to do its work?
Thanks in advance.
--
Jim Brownfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Radical System Solutions, Inc.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
help,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jim Brownfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Netboot doesn't pick up jars from the
${JBossHome}/lib directory
Hi
.
Thanks in advance!
Jim
--
Jim Brownfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Radical System Solutions, Inc.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C
file, and I had to modify Larry's wrapper to fix some other
Informix problems (I couldn't get the SQLH_TYPE and SQLH_FILE parameters to
work). But it is logging in and accessing the database.
I didn't know about Larry's DB-locks problem, though. Now I'm worried! :(
--
Jim Brownfield
[EMAIL
You do it in your application/applet. This problem is really independent of
JBoss. I had the same problem 6 weeks ago or so (I'm using 2.2.1). I
solved it a little differently by creating a PermissionsCollection with
AllPermission in it and setting the system policy to a new anonymous class
I saw that in the Monson-Haefel book also, and I didn't interpret it that
way, but I agree that you are probably right. I originally read this as
meaning the inner transaction was independent in the sense that it could be
rolled back independently within the context of the outer transaction.
This is probably not relavent, but I thought I'd throw it in.
I had a similar problem, and it turned out to be that somehow my MBean ended
up being put into jboss-auto.jcml twice without me knowing it. What was
happening was two of my MBeans were trying to start at the same time, and
the second
(which normally would be
ok for non-jdbc accesses). When I hard-coded the port NUMBER entry in
sqlhosts, JBoss got through the configuration.
grumble grumblestupid Informix jdbc driver/grumble grumble :)
--
Jim Brownfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Radical System Solutions, Inc
Here's an example that works for me. YMMV. I've tried to remove all
application specific code, but still leave relavent timer MBean code. I
reset the timer on each timer call. You can probably set the timer up to
send periodically. The timerInterval is in seconds in this example (default
10
.
However, since this message is printed for every published message, I'm
concerned that I am doing something stupid that is causing excess resource
utilization.
Is this a problem, or can I just turn off debug-level output to the logs?
Thank you in advance for your time!
Jim
--
Jim Brownfield
be Handing out a server session
in English. There appears to have been a slight translation problem when
the message was added. You can safely ignore the message.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:35 PM
Subject
I believe this is dependent upon the underlying database implementation.
For instance, in Informix, if you have an autoincrement (called SERIAL type
in Informix), you could make the function call DBINFO( 'sqlca.sqlerrd1' )
to get the last value of a serial type that was created by the database
script which reads it from a file
and kills it.
R.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brownfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] problems launching JBoss2.2.x from a user
shell
Since ^C
I don't think this will
work unless you are willing to lock the entire table before you execute
this. Otherwise, you will have a race condition for the unique
key.
Jim
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vinay
MenonSent:
Turning off the JIT has allowed JBoss to run at least an extra hour (and
that's without playing with the system time). The SCO Openserver JVM must
have a big surprise bug in their JIT implementation /big surprise.
Turning off the JIT will slow down JBoss, but that's probably not a problem
for
Hi Juan,
try nohup ./JBoss2.2.1/bin/run.sh
This should keep the terminal group from axing your JBoss subprocess when
the terminal exits.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Arraiza
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:03 AM
To:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] What happens at 6 hours and 35 minutes?
You might also try sucking down as much memory outside the process as
possible to see if that is an issue as well.
--- Jim Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ohhh, thanks, that might work!
Jim
for the best?
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] problems launching JBoss2.2.x from a user shell
Hi Juan,
try nohup ./JBoss2.2.1/bin/run.sh
This should keep
that
might lead me to find what's happening. I am using the latest jboss/tomcat
binary distribution launched with run_with_tomcat.sh.
Anybody have any ideas?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Brownfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Radical System Solutions, Inc.
___
JBoss-user
Thanks for the suggestion, but it's not 6:35A.M, it's 6 hours and 35 minutes
running time, and it doesn't matter when I start JBoss, but you can set your
clock by when the JVM will fail after you've started it. I'm sure there's a
JVM problem with SCO's implementation, but unfortunately, there's
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Toby Allsopp
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] What happens at 6 hours and 35 minutes?
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:42:43PM -0700, Jim Brownfield wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, but it's not 6:35A.M
thye _exact_
same amount of time?
Overall yours is a pretty nasty problem, as you'll have to
wait 6 hours to see whether it makes a difference |-(
Good luck.
R.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brownfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:52
To: [EMAIL
22 matches
Mail list logo
