Envoyé par : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : jboss-user
cc :
Objet : RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
> That is my point exactly - showcase Jboss, build as much
> using the standard j2ee approach, integrate interesting libs
> as needed, and make something professional. Thi
> That is my point exactly - showcase Jboss, build as much
> using the standard j2ee approach, integrate interesting libs
> as needed, and make something professional. This may mean
> trying to find someone who is a graphic artist to put
> together a nice look for the examples. Anyone can writ
So, two tracks: demo the tech capabilities of Jboss with
demos, and make it sharp for the business folks that need convincing.
Thoughts?
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Conner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:51 AM
> To: '[EMAIL P
Sorry to start this again, I've been away.
> 1. to showcase Jboss (yes, they could run on other servers,
> but focus on JB as the 1st server)
> 2. provide a set of components that could be used as-is or
> customized for your application
> 3. provide some example Uis either using a rich or thi
--- Pete Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
This sounds like a good idea except for one
> immediate problem:
> integration.
>
> Any components would have to be developed as a suite
> (including the data
> model) as it is not usually possible to integrate
> Order A with Product B
Exact but, if
This sounds like a good idea except for one immediate problem:
integration.
Any components would have to be developed as a suite (including the data
model) as it is not usually possible to integrate Order A with Product B
if they are not compatible. Of course you could use the facade design
patt
;
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:45 AM
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
>
>
> > Here, I'm talking of JBoss only (at least for
> now).
>
> Why would you want to do that? It misses one of the
>
I've followed this thread quietly until now, but this caught my attention:
- Original Message -
From: "wonder sonic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:45 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
&
-
From: "Jon Haugsand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
> * wonder sonic
> > This just what I talked about, to centralize the
> > development of such c
From: wonder sonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
>
>
> Well done, a lot of very good ideas!
>
> --- Curt Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
> écrit :
> Well, I've had a quick look and saw the Entity engine,
> not entities ready to use.
>From memory-
The entity engine is for managing data definitions, not entities
as in EJBs. I think they have a generic entity (DTO) and define
the contents/tables using XML.
> Well, I think: "no one than
-jar.xml, and in many projects
> they
> >>>>could probably be
> >>>>implemented by free components
> >>>>(org.jboss.user.LocalUserBean).
> >>>>
> >>>>I think it is a great idea, is anyone
> volunteering
> >&
--- Kevin Conner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a écrit : > > This just what I talked about, to
centralize the
> > development of such components, I mean *FREE*
> > components working without spending one hour to
> > configure it... sort of Plug and Play components
> ;)
>
> I was talking about *FREE* compo
gt;>>>for hosting
>>>>www.ejbs4jboss.org?
>>>>
>>>>- Or does the JBoss group wish to add a component
>>>>submittal page at
>>>>www.jboss.org?
>>>>
>>>>As an alternative, we could use an existing (EJB)
>>
> This just what I talked about, to centralize the
> development of such components, I mean *FREE*
> components working without spending one hour to
> configure it... sort of Plug and Play components ;)
I was talking about *FREE* components.
> For Open For Business, it's not the same, here I'm
>
It is an excellent idea.
There are already a plenty of OSS EJBs available out there.
It would be better if we just prepare a comprehensive list of all freely
available EJBs for respective domains and host the list somewhere. For those
EJBs (source) which do not have a place to host on the web w
-1- Never tell to reconfigure from the outside the
components. Such components must provide ALL needed.
If not one can extend such a component with minimal
effort (I think of CMP components...)
-2- Did you ever work with let's say Delphi. It
provides components with properties. These properties
ca
* wonder sonic
> This just what I talked about, to centralize the
> development of such components, I mean *FREE*
> components working without spending one hour to
> configure it... sort of Plug and Play components ;)
Is this possible? Is it even a good idea?
I agree in the sense that any free
Does anyone have any experience with that forum? - Looks interesting.
R.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gus Power
Sent: 27. september 2002 13:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
A
--- Kevin Conner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a écrit : > > As an alternative, we could use an
existing (EJB)
> component sharing
> > forum - any suggestions?
>
> There are a number of them out there, why start
> another?
This just what I talked about, to centralize the
development of such components, I
A good idea!
And for my contribution to the possible domains, how about the OSS/J
initiative?
(http://java.sun.com/products/oss/)
Gus.
-Original Message-
From: wonder sonic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 09:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Comp
* rahul ganjoo
> not sure if it will increase the usage of jboss
> developers on any app server can use these EJB components.
I think it will. First, it increases the awareness of Open Source.
Second, it will be best tested on JBoss. Third, when businesses are
looking for solutions to probl
> As an alternative, we could use an existing (EJB) component sharing
> forum - any suggestions?
There are a number of them out there, why start another?
Two that spring to mind are ofbiz (Open For Business) and Open Symphony.
I've never used either of them so I don't know what their quality is
does the JBoss group wish to add a component
> > submittal page at
> > www.jboss.org?
> >
> > As an alternative, we could use an existing (EJB)
> > component sharing
> > forum - any suggestions?
> >
> >
> > Randahl
> >
> > -Origi
--
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Saroj Kumar
> Sent: 27. september 2002 10:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
>
> Hi Wonder Sonic,
>
> Yeah, this seems to be a good idea.
>
&g
* wonder sonic
> Hi Saroj,
>
> 1 & 2)
> In fact the kind of components can be sorted by
> domain:
> - network:
> - SSL Connection management component
> - Chat component
> - Forum component
> - Multicast component (JXTA...)
> - accounting:
> - Order component
> - invoice
Saroj Kumar
Sent: 27. september 2002 10:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library
Hi Wonder Sonic,
Yeah, this seems to be a good idea.
Certainly it can be done.
Let us discuss it in depth.
Q-
1) What kind of components are u thinking about?
2) Which domain t
Hi Saroj,
1 & 2)
In fact the kind of components can be sorted by
domain:
- network:
- SSL Connection management component
- Chat component
- Forum component
- Multicast component (JXTA...)
- accounting:
- Order component
- invoice component
- login/security:
- User co
Hi Wonder Sonic,
Yeah, this seems to be a good idea.
Certainly it can be done.
Let us discuss it in depth.
Q-
1) What kind of components are u thinking about?
2) Which domain they work in?
-Saroj
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of wonde
29 matches
Mail list logo
