Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-30 Thread DCU
Agreed - the last part is probably not essential, though a useful check if things don't work. My guess is that the problem lies with the 1st part, i.e. ensuring that Java on the visitor's computer is configured to permit it to use the visited Jmol website. > On 30 Jul 2014, at 06:34, Robert Ha

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Robert Hanson
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Albert Pratt wrote: > When version 65 was downloaded and installed it didn't work with Jmol. > However, following advice, I configured Java (Start>Java>Configure > Java>Security>Edit Site List) by including the URLs of relevant Jmol sites > (the http:// prefix a

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Albert Pratt
Eric, Robert, The procedure I used worked for both the "unsigned Jmol applet" and "signed Jmol applet" options on the test page. Albert On 30 July 2014 00:22, Eric Martz wrote: > Angel: you could simply put a link in the Jmol wiki to > http://proteopedia.org/w/Installing_and_enabling_Java#

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Eric Martz
Angel: you could simply put a link in the Jmol wiki to http://proteopedia.org/w/Installing_and_enabling_Java#Windows where solutions to the Java update 65 problem are given. Once the bug in the Java installer is fixed in a new update, I will remove that yellow block. Reminder to everyone: the

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Albert Pratt
Recently I needed to install Java 7, version 65 (with Windows 7, Home Premium) and took the opportunity to do a complete uninstall of earlier Java versions (e-mails below) using Fix 1 in Protopedia

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Angel Herráez
I can put those descriptions in the wiki, but I am not sure the situation is clear. On 28 Jul 2014 at 10:52, Robert Hanson wrote: > It would be good if someone would get this into the Jmol wiki. -- Infragistics Profess

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Robert Hanson
I've done that now -- it is on the "Installing Jmol" template. On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > It would be good if someone would get this into the Jmol wiki. > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Eric Martz > wrote: > >> Dear Pshemak, >> >> Thanks so much -- your sug

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-29 Thread Robert Hanson
Has this been reported to Oracle? That's critical. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Pshemak Maslak wrote: > I can confirm that observations. All my (remaining) Jmol (Java) > instances show as "gray" squares. There are no error messages in the Java > console (in fact, loading of the page with

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-28 Thread Robert Hanson
It would be good if someone would get this into the Jmol wiki. On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Eric Martz wrote: > Dear Pshemak, > > Thanks so much -- your suggestion enabled Java 7 update 65 to work > with Jmol on my Windows 7 system. > > 1. I used Control Panel, Programs, Uninstall to unins

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-26 Thread Eric Martz
Dear Pshemak, Thanks so much -- your suggestion enabled Java 7 update 65 to work with Jmol on my Windows 7 system. 1. I used Control Panel, Programs, Uninstall to uninstall the non-working Java 7 update 65. 2. Using the free Windows search program Agent Ransack (truly excellent, blows away Wi

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-25 Thread Pshemak Maslak
I had similar problems (I reported them some time ago). They were limited to one Windows machine (Win 7, Firefox, Chrome, IE) of 3 tried (Win 7 and Win 8). My problem was with the update procedure. It was insufficient to uninstall the old version, I had to delete (after uninstalling) all Java

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-25 Thread Eric Martz
In Windows 7, my tests indicate that Java 7 update 65 does not work with the current Jmol_S, or recent 14.0.17 Jmol_S. However, update 60 does work. Do others confirm this? Previous emails indicate that Java 7 update 65 runs Jmol applet in Windows 8 (Angel H), and that Java 8 runs Jmol applet

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues

2014-07-17 Thread Robert Hanson
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Pshemak Maslak wrote: > Does ___JmolVersion="14.2.3_2014.07.12" works with Java 7.65? Where > can this version be downloaded? > The latest is currently at SourceForge. See https://sourceforge.net/projects/jmol/files/ Hoping to get a bug-fix update in this we

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues

2014-07-17 Thread Angel Herráez
I have just updated from Java 7.0_60 to 7.0_65 and the page > > The test page: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm loads the Jmol_S applet just fine in Firefox 30, Win8.1 --after accepting the "signed applet by Integrated Graphics" dialog I suggest that you thoroughly clean your java

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues

2014-07-17 Thread Rzepa, Henry S
On 17 Jul 2014, at 16:54, Pshemak Maslak wrote: > Jmol (v14.1.16) is not agreeing with Java 7.65 update (both Windows and > OS X, several browsers). > > The test page: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm > "JSmol/Java" link works with Java 7.51, it does not load with Java 7.65 >

[Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues

2014-07-17 Thread Pshemak Maslak
Jmol (v14.1.16) is not agreeing with Java 7.65 update (both Windows and OS X, several browsers). The test page: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm "JSmol/Java" link works with Java 7.51, it does not load with Java 7.65 (no error messages, see below). Does ___JmolVersion="14.2.3_2

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-16 Thread Rolf Huehne
On 07/16/2014 08:19 AM, Rzepa, Henry S wrote: > There are still a few functions of Jmol that simply run too slowly in JSmol > for Java-Jmol to be phased out just yet (generating .jvxl surfaces from > large cube files for example) but I suspect that day is going to have to > come. It might

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-16 Thread Angel Herráez
David, your site runs well in my system (Firefox 29 Win, Java 1.7.0_60) after accepting a couple of warnings. You must update the Jmol version you are using in the page. Jmol 14 has properly signed applet that will give less warnings and blocking in new Javas.

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-15 Thread Rzepa, Henry S
On 16 Jul 2014, at 04:45, Pshemak Maslak wrote: > I can confirm that observations. All my (remaining) Jmol (Java) instances > show as "gray" squares. There are no error messages in the Java console (in > fact, loading of the page with the app does not trigger opening of the > console even if

Re: [Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-15 Thread Pshemak Maslak
I can confirm that observations. All my (remaining) Jmol (Java) instances show as "gray" squares. There are no error messages in the Java console (in fact, loading of the page with the app does not trigger opening of the console even if it is set up to open). Other java applets on the same sit

[Jmol-users] Java Update 65 Causing Issues?

2014-07-15 Thread David Hibbitts
After updating Java today, I've been unable to run jmol on my webpage: http://atlas.che.virginia.edu/mm/dim.php?user=ddh9r&jobid=82043&struct=Dimer_Mode.res or any others that i've tried, including: http://jmol.sourceforge.net/demo/atoms/ Java itself, however, seems to work as expected on http