I still think it's a Java caching problem on your machine.
Try downloading RC17. That runs fine for me.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Rolf Huehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Hmm. This could be a mix of signed applet versions. Try using
> >
> > jmolInitialize(".","Jmo
Great! Thanks very much -- that's very useful.
-Tom
(google is amazing!)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Angel Herraez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just found this (well, not me, Google of course):
>
> Clearing Java cache on Linux, Mac, Windows:
> http://www.uwplatt.edu/oit/howto/java-cach
same problem
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Rolf Huehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to
> break
> > it would be great.
> >
>
> The following commands that used to work at least until 11.5.35 give an
> er
yeah, I know what that is thanks.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Rolf Huehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to
> break
> > it would be great.
> >
>
> The following commands that used to work at least u
Using 11.6.RC17 I get this error:
eval ERROR: el argumento no es válido
line 1 command 64 of file null:
{ selected } . >> y << = 0
The offending script is
select 2.0; spacefill off; wireframe 0.04; color [xFF00FF];
{selected}.y = 0;
It worked in 11.5.41 at least
(I seem to re
Rolf Huehne wrote:
> Robert Hanson wrote:
>> Hmm. This could be a mix of signed applet versions. Try using
>>
>> jmolInitialize(".","JmolAppletSigned.jar")
>>
>> so that it is definitely picking up just the one JAR file.
>>
>> I'll try
>>
>> jmolInitialize(".","JmolAppletSigned0.jar")
>>
>> and see
Robert Hanson wrote:
> Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to break
> it would be great.
>
The following commands that used to work at least until 11.5.35 give an
error message in 11.6.RC17:
bound_box = getProperty("boundboxInfo", "vector");
vector_x = bound_
Robert Hanson wrote:
> Hmm. This could be a mix of signed applet versions. Try using
>
> jmolInitialize(".","JmolAppletSigned.jar")
>
> so that it is definitely picking up just the one JAR file.
>
> I'll try
>
> jmolInitialize(".","JmolAppletSigned0.jar")
>
> and see if I forgot to include som
Hmm. This could be a mix of signed applet versions. Try using
jmolInitialize(".","JmolAppletSigned.jar")
so that it is definitely picking up just the one JAR file.
I'll try
jmolInitialize(".","JmolAppletSigned0.jar")
and see if I forgot to include something in one of the Jar files. Could be
--
Robert Hanson wrote:
> Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to break
> it would be great.
>
> One bug I know about seems to be that the applet stalls if a file load error
> occurs. I'm onto that one.
>
I tried to use the signed applet but when I try to load a file
I've added some information about clearing Java cache and other Java-
related stuff into the Wiki: main page > Running Jmol > Solving Java
Problems
Also linked from Running Jmol Application and Running Jmol Applet
Any confirmation or correction of that info from the Mac or Linux
users will be we
Just found this (well, not me, Google of course):
Clearing Java cache on Linux, Mac, Windows:
http://www.uwplatt.edu/oit/howto/java-cache.html
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
It's the Java cache.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Stout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good explanation, but unfortunately I had the same
> problem on both WinXP and linux & I also cleared the FF cache on both
> platforms (in addition to re-starting FF and also re-sta
That sounds like a good explanation, but unfortunately I had the same
problem on both WinXP and linux & I also cleared the FF cache on both
platforms (in addition to re-starting FF and also re-starting the computer
(WinXP). I may go back and try it again, but like I said, I'm happily
using the
also, you can add parameters like that as though they were callbacks:
jmolInitialize("./", "JmolApplet.jar")
jmolSetCallback("draggable", true)
jmolApplet(400)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Angel Herraez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: draggable applet
>
> Here is a partial copy of my previo
Re: draggable applet
Here is a partial copy of my previous post (4 Sep.)
--- Forwarded message follows ---
[...]
I've tested it and it works. The applet detaches (Firefox 3 and
Chrome) and stays as a borderless window with a tiny close button
(that returns it to the browser), no way to
El 24 Sep 2008 a las 17:35, Thomas Stout escribió:
> Oh, I restarted everything - including the computer and re-downloaded
My experience with Firefox (Win) is that on some occasions it caches
the applet and insists on using the cached copy even after restart
and even if a new applet version is
El 24 Sep 2008 a las 16:06, Robert Hanson escribió:
> OH, OK, I'm glad that worked. I had heard about that and was
> wondering about it. Is that what then allows one to drag the applet
> out of the window and onto the desktop?
As I understand, the "draggable" is a feature of applets in the new
this:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=107955&package_id=116499&release_id=591572
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:40:50 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated
so do we conclude that the firefox3/Ma
Oh, I restarted everything - including the computer and re-downloaded all of
the gzipped, the zip-ped and the full-source included versions! Not a big
deal to me since I've switched over to the signed applet in order to provide
local file loading and image saving...
-Tom
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at
//sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=107955&package_id=116499&release_id=591572
>
> --
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:40:50 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing
I installed this:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=107955&package_id=116499&release_id=591572
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:40:50 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated
so do we conclude
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:21:06 +0200
> > Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated
> >
> > Rob, you must take with caution that diagnostics. Browsercheck is rather
> old* and its report
> > is based
firefox3 without any problem.
-Rob
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:21:06 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated
>
> Rob, you must take with caution that diagnostics. Browsercheck is rather old*
>
Rob, you must take with caution that diagnostics. Browsercheck is rather old*
and its report
is based on the browser identity (userAgent), not by testing the features.
Do you mean that Firefox 2 was working correctly and Firefox 3 fails, on the
same MacOS?
If so, it's probably not that reason t
true
navigator.javaEnabled()
false
--
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:44:51 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated
Rob,
This message is from some version of browsercheck, I th
Rob,
This message is from some version of browsercheck, I think.
When you go here:
http://jmol.sourceforge.net/browsercheck/
do you get that same message?
I suspect the problem is that somebody's HTML needs updating.
Does Jmol work fine for you in general, anyway?
Bob
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008
Tom, could be your browser didn't get fully closed. You have to make sure
all browser windows are closed and then restart the browser to use a newer
version of the applet. Just putting it in a directory and navigating to a
page won't do it. The release files are fine.
Bob
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at
I'll check into that.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Stout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> One oddity that I've just noticed: I downloaded 11.6.RC16 (several times in
> the last 24 hours) and find that if I run the stand alone or load the signed
> applet, they report version 11.6.RC16. H
One oddity that I've just noticed: I downloaded 11.6.RC16 (several times in
the last 24 hours) and find that if I run the stand alone or load the signed
applet, they report version 11.6.RC16. However, if I run the un-signed
Applet, it is still reporting version 11.6.RC14 -- is this known and/or
in
for what it's worth: I have never seen that using FF 3 on WinXP or linux
... I don't have a modern Mac, so have not been running Jmol there...
-Tom
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:03 AM, rob yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --
>
>
> Final testing appreciated for J
Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to break it
would be great.
Has anyone had problems with Jmol applet when using firefox 3? I sometimes
(strangely not always) get the following error:
Your web browser is not fully compatible with Jmol
browser: mozilla
(That's the SIGNED applet...)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Robert Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One bug I know about seems to be that the applet stalls if a file load
> error occurs. I'm onto that one.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
-
Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to break
it would be great.
One bug I know about seems to be that the applet stalls if a file load error
occurs. I'm onto that one.
Bob
--
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stol
34 matches
Mail list logo