On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:20:13 +0300, Marko Mäkelä
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18:27PM +0200, Stephan Knauss wrote:
>> I still think the symbols and the names do not fit. My suggestion is to
>> patch it to look like this:
>>
>> 7head_to_head("-><-"),
>> 8tail_to_tail("<-->"
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18:27PM +0200, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> I still think the symbols and the names do not fit. My suggestion is to
> patch it to look like this:
>
> 7 head_to_head("-><-"),
> 8 tail_to_tail("<-->"),
> 9 head_to_tail("->->"),
> 10tail_to_head(
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>> Or is there a deeper meaning? Please enlighten me. It's like this for
>> already three months. Could such an obvious bug hide that long?
>
> Why not :-) Would you feel artist enough to draw four little images
> instead of these texts?
So it is no bug? I would be happy with
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
> I planned to have these signs replaced by icons when I checked in the
> stuff first time. But I forgot about it. I think a proper mini icon will
> tell you more than 1000 words.
While I agree that a good icon is really important for a GUI, I just
don't agree that it comp
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Stephan Knauss wrote:
Or is there a deeper meaning? Please enlighten me. It's like this for
already three months. Could such an obvious bug hide that long?
Why not :-) Would you feel artist enough to draw fou
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Stephan Knauss wrote:
>
>> Or is there a deeper meaning? Please enlighten me. It's like this for
>> already three months. Could such an obvious bug hide that long?
>
> Why not :-) Would you feel artist enough to draw four little images
> instead of th
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> Or is there a deeper meaning? Please enlighten me. It's like this for
> already three months. Could such an obvious bug hide that long?
Why not :-) Would you feel artist enough to draw four little images
instead of these texts?
Ciao
--
http://www.ds
Hi,
I was a bit confused how to read the linked column in the relation
editor. So I thought having a look at the source would help to clarify
things a bit.
It got me even more confused ;)
4 public enum WayConnectionType {
7 head_to_head("-><-"),
8 tail_to_tail("->->")
