1.
I am using VS2008 + Git extensions - Visual Studio and Shell Explorer
Extensions for Git
version 1.79 made by Henk Westhuis ( henk_westh...@hotmail.com )
The only problem I had was simillar to yuors. It is easily rectified
by *not* using PuTTy.
I switched to OpenSSH. I am pretty sure Tortoise
@Scott : I have never met any poor soul , who pays my fees and who
is in the same time not stuck in the MS-land. Game over.
On Dec 1, 5:18 pm, Scott Sauyet scott.sau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually even better would be jquery.proj.
I started cleaning the code and I think it's already in a good enough shape
now for some code reviews/remarks/ideas, etc.
All tests pass under webkit browsers, Opera Firefox (only latest versions
tested). IE8 has two failing tests (3 but the third doesn't fail if the 2
previous ones aren't ran) I
I'm still a little confused as to why the XHR (with transport)
plugin doesn't give us what we need in terms of being able to provide
an alternate XHR-like transport that $.ajax will use?
I found it to be quite graceful and succinct for what I was doing with
flXHR and the jQuery.flXHR plugin.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:12 AM, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
@Scott : I have never met any poor soul , who pays my fees and who
is in the same time not stuck in the MS-land. Game over.
Sorry, I'm working this week with C++ for the first time in more than
five years and with Visual Studio for
I confirm that jQuery.isObjectLiteral(document.createElement(div)) returns
true under IE8.
2009/12/2 Julian Aubourg aubourg.jul...@gmail.com
I started cleaning the code and I think it's already in a good enough shape
now for some code reviews/remarks/ideas, etc.
All tests pass under webkit
In case anyone is interested, I just stumbled on this product from
google...
http://code.google.com/closure/
With a web interface and REST API
http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home
And a Firebug extension...
http://code.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/inspector.html
--
You received this
Yep - we've investigated the compiler as a solution for jQuery.
Unfortunately the best part (the advanced optimization settings)
require some significant changes to the code base in order to work
correctly - and even then it's not entirely clear that it'll provide a
benefit over the basic
Sounds like someone needs to listen to the Official jQuery Podcast ;-)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:57 AM, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep - we've investigated the compiler as a solution for jQuery.
Unfortunately the best part (the advanced optimization settings)
require some significant
I confirm that jQuery.isObjectLiteral(document.createElement(div)) returns
true under IE8.
I was actually just exploring issues with isObjectLiteral and extend
as you wrote this email. I'll check in to that today and hopefully
post a solution.
--John
--
You received this message because you
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Julian Aubourg aubourg.jul...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, the code has been comitted at http://github.com/jaubourg/jquery
Just started looking at this, and it makes a great deal of sense to
me. As to the extension API, would this be simpler?:
Alternatively try :
http://aspnet.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=34488#DownloadId=87862
It *seems* really good ...
--DBJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to
@Scott (sorry others for privatising this thread) I advise you to look
again in msbuild. It is actually deprecated, but still supported. The
usual inital knee jerk reaction is just to dump it, it is xml etc ..
but it is really simple and really works. I guess this is why it is
deprecated ;o)
I
To clarify:
I use VisualStudio and its web site (from file system) project kind,
for editing jquery project.
To build it I have jquery.proj which I execute with open with
msbuild.exe
For git I have Visual Studio GIT Extensions installed.
On Dec 2, 3:06 pm, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
1.
I
Hi Julian,
re the deep copy bug you experienced. I presume you are referring to
$.extend(deep...) ?
FWIW I hit this when a document object is among the options passed
into a plugin that uses extend deep to merge the options with it's
defaults. For some reason it worked fine when I passed
No, you're actually right... I just realized I made an awful signature with
two functions in a row and I'm puzzled John didn't notice it yet... quick
quick, to refactor it :P
The main problem I have with optionsFilter and the way it works is that I
still need a main function to select the correct
Yep, like I said earlier
jQuery.isObjectLiteral(document.createElement(div)) returns true in IE8
(dunno for earlier versions) but John seems to be working on it. Can't
believe how difficult to get right these type controlling codes can be.
Seems like magic to me sometimes.
2009/12/3 George
Yep, like I said earlier
jQuery.isObjectLiteral(document.createElement(div)) returns true in IE8
(dunno for earlier versions) but John seems to be working on it. Can't
believe how difficult to get right these type controlling codes can be.
Seems like magic to me sometimes.
I actually landed
Unfortunately this type of change will break plugins such as
jquery.ui.tabs but judging by other changes you've been discussing, it
seems that there will be many breaking changes.
I'm doing my best so that it doesn't break anything, hence my current focus
on unit testing right now.
--
You
And here I ask the git newb question? How do I sync my branch with your
latest changes?
2009/12/3 John Resig jere...@gmail.com
Yep, like I said earlier
jQuery.isObjectLiteral(document.createElement(div)) returns true in IE8
(dunno for earlier versions) but John seems to be working on it.
I have multiple country state dropdowns on my form and would like to
change the options of state dropdown when the value in corresponding
country dropdown is changed. (all my country elements have class
'country' state elements have 'state' class)
$('select.country').change(function() {
var
The jQuery-en group is a better fit for this question. This group is
for the discussion of the development of jQuery itself.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
This article looks like it could be helpful:
http://devlicio.us/blogs/sergio_pereira/archive/2009/05/06/git-ssh-pu...
Thanks everyone for your help. For me at least, it turned out the
solution was to switch from the PuTTY client recommended in that
article to the one in the git bash
Nevermind I found the way ;)
So, 100% tests passing in IE8, latest safari, latest chrome, latest Opera
and latest Firefox.
Still searching for a decent solution to the pluggable aspect of transports.
2009/12/3 Julian Aubourg aubourg.jul...@gmail.com
And here I ask the git newb question? How
isObjectLiteral is a really poor name for that function. It makes no sense
at all. An object *literal* is text. It's not an object until it's parsed,
and then it's not an object literal any more, it's just an Object.
Case in point: jQuery.isObjectLiteral({}) and jQuery.isObjectLiteral(new
Object)
Well, we don't want isObject (or isJavaScriptObject or
isNativeObject) since that'll allow things like 'new String'. We
explicitly want the case where people are using {} or new Object in
their code, adding on some properties, and passing it around. It sound
like you're worried about some sort of
isPlainObject?
Anyway, progress again on the transport front. Transport definition reduced
to 2 functions (the response headers are now passed to the complete callback
which is simpler and more elegant). Also, the new architecture didn't
prevent the infamous memory leak when using
Since I remembered this :
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev/browse_thread/thread/5e63ab0adf17aabc?pli=1
I implemented a common poller for all xhr based requests. So, no matter how
many concurrent requests you have, there will only be *1* timer used.
See top of the file:
I have been listening to the jQuery podcasts (official and yayquery)
and I am really excited about all the potential stuff that is to come
in January. Of those many things I am extremely interested in the new
developments regarding a mobile version of jQuery. As far as I
understand, a mobile
29 matches
Mail list logo
