Not this neither :
jQuery UI 1.7.2
says ui.core.js
2009/10/23 Maxime FAYE
> OK i'll check this and i'll keep you posted :)
>
> 2009/10/23 Richard D. Worth
>
> How bout an old version of jQuery UI then? If you're using jQuery v1.3.2
>> make sure you're not using a jQuery UI version older than 1.
OK i'll check this and i'll keep you posted :)
2009/10/23 Richard D. Worth
> How bout an old version of jQuery UI then? If you're using jQuery v1.3.2
> make sure you're not using a jQuery UI version older than 1.7
>
> - Richard
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Maxime FAYE wrote:
>
>> Nope
How bout an old version of jQuery UI then? If you're using jQuery v1.3.2
make sure you're not using a jQuery UI version older than 1.7
- Richard
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Maxime FAYE wrote:
> Nope :
>
> jQuery JavaScript Library v1.3.2 that's what the jQuery.js file says :)
>
>
> 2009/1
Nope :
jQuery JavaScript Library v1.3.2 that's what the jQuery.js file says :)
2009/10/22 Ariel Flesler
> Could be that you're using an old version of jQuery (prior to 1.3.x?)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Maxime FAYE wrote:
>
>> Sorry no...
>>
>> But i can give you the code that is ge
Could be that you're using an old version of jQuery (prior to 1.3.x?)
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Maxime FAYE wrote:
> Sorry no...
>
> But i can give you the code that is generting the error :
> var sDialogId = "divPleaseActionDialog";
> var sDialog = "";
> var oButtons = {};
>
Sorry no...
But i can give you the code that is generting the error :
var sDialogId = "divPleaseActionDialog";
var sDialog = "";
var oButtons = {};
oButtons[aTranslations["ok"]] = function(){
$j('#' + sDialogId).dialog('destroy');
};
sDialog += '' + "\n";
sDialog +=
Can you provide a link to the page where you see this error?
--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com
On Oct 22, 1:32 pm, Maskime wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having the following error when opening a dialog
>
> $.Event is not a function js/jquery/ui.core.js Line 345
>
> I don't really underst
utton.
>
> Am I misunderstanding?
>
> Rick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
>
> Behalf Of Mr Speaker
> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 10:07 PM
> To: jQuery (English)
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: event coordinati
om] On
Behalf Of Mr Speaker
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 10:07 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: event coordination problem
I pasted your code into a new HTML doc and it ran as expected: if you
put the focus in the textbox (#id1) then click the button (#id2) both
events get fired (
I pasted your code into a new HTML doc and it ran as expected: if you
put the focus in the textbox (#id1) then click the button (#id2) both
events get fired (blur event fires first, click event fires second).
Is there anything else in your page? Are you getting any JS errors?
On Sep 13, 4:27 am,
Not sure how this helps, and in fact I'm pretty much already doing
that. The problem is that if the focus is in the field, when the
button is clicked I get the blur event only and not the click event on
the button.
If you try the code in the OP, you'll see this happening. Remember to
click into t
How about setting the field to "invalid" to start with and
force the user to blur the field for a validation routine
to declare it valid.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of jhm
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:04
sorry .up() is prototype... should be .parent() instead.
On Aug 30, 1:20 pm, Josh Powell wrote:
> kali - here is a way to accomplish the same thing in less code, and
> lets you call the images anything you want instead of having to use
> numbers. This is untested so there may be some slight
kali - here is a way to accomplish the same thing in less code, and
lets you call the images anything you want instead of having to use
numbers. This is untested so there may be some slight errors, but the
logic should be sound:
$(function() {
var imageArray = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'];
Even simpler:
$('img.thumb').click(function () {
$(this).toggleClass('dim');
});
actually got solution in another forum (http://www.manning-sandbox.com/
thread.jspa?threadID=34108&tstart=0)
works like a charm!! :) namely:
$('#image' + i).bind('mouseover', i, function(event) {
$('#image' + event.data).addClass('dim');
});
as to other problem (var elem1 =
Good points by Josh. However this selector example...
$('img[class="thumb"]).mouseover
...can be written simpler as
$("img.thumb").mouseover
It's faster in most browsers to select-by-class than to iterate
elements and 'read attributes'. jQuery may process both syntaxes the
same (?), but us
for (i = 1; i < 5; i++) {
$('#thumb' + i).bind('mouseover',function(event) {
$(this).addClass('dim');
});
}
The 'i' you've called here is a global variable, in a for loop always
put a var in front of it to have local scope (to the function, not
block)
for (var i = 1; i < 5;
Something I forgot to mention in my previous reply... To make sure it's
clear what code is actually being run in the browser, never rely on looking
at your JSP source to understand it. That's what threw you off here. The
browser never sees your JSP source, only the HTML/JS/CSS/whatever files that
You can't call jQuery from JSP code, only from JavaScript.
Your JSP code *generates* JavaScript code, which is what actually calls
jQuery.
In your JSP code, the loop is run in JSP, and it generates a separate block
of JavaScript code each time through the loop. Here is the actual JavaScript
code
yes I know they are two different things, I do know both JSP and
JavaScript, so I do know the difference; I would like to know why what
works in JSP doesn't work in JavaScript.. again:
this works in JSP:
<% for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++) { %>
$('#image<%=i%>').bind('mouseover',function(event) {
I have difficulties understanding what you're trying to achieve.
As someone mentioned, Java is to Javascript as Ham is to Hamster.
They're two different beasts.
For the 'elem+1' situation, you can do:
this['elem'+1] = '...';
to dynamically create variables. But usually you don't have to resor
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:00 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Event Not Triggering On External JS Files
@Meroe: That was kind of pseudo-code so I checked anyway and there's
no spaces in the actual code.
@James: No, it doesn't work if I put the jQuery script tag i
@Meroe: That was kind of pseudo-code so I checked anyway and there's
no spaces in the actual code.
@James: No, it doesn't work if I put the jQuery script tag in the
head.
I was wondering if it had something to do with preventing XSS? There
is an ajax call to the button.js's domain (which coul
Does it work if you put your jquery library at the top? (In the
)
On Aug 25, 12:31 pm, Greg wrote:
> I built a small JavaScript file that does some HTML and CSS
> manipulation when you hover over any tag with a certain class. It
> works great when running on the same server, but if I try to use
http://mydomain.com/js/
button.js">
Check your source, but I see an extra space after / and before button.js
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:31 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject:
i was interested in using the value of a text input immediately after the
browser has finished handling a keyboard event.
On 8/21/09 10:14 AM, "ak732" wrote:
>
> Not sure that there's a more deterministic approach - if so, it's
> beyond my limited Javascript knowledge.
>
> Specifically what
2009/8/20 Tom Worster :
>
> is there a way to set up a page so that a event handler function is bound to
> a DOM object and event but it runs _after_ the browser's default action is
> complete?
>
No; the DOM Events specifications explicitly state that the event
handling process occurs before the
Not sure that there's a more deterministic approach - if so, it's
beyond my limited Javascript knowledge.
Specifically what are you trying to accomplish by wiring an event
handler to fire after the default action?
On Aug 20, 10:39 pm, Tom Worster wrote:
> thanks.
>
> i thought of using a timeou
thanks.
i thought of using a timeout and it could probably be made to work fairly
well. but i'd be left with the worry that some user's crummy old browser and
computer that's too busy doing other things might need a longer delay than i
set.
we can insert event handlers at the beginning of the ev
This is crude, but might work for you...
$("#someId").click()(function() {
set_timeout(function() {
// stuff to be done 2ms from now
}, 2);
});
You might have to play with the set_timeout delay a bit, 2ms might be
too short.
On Aug 20, 3:47 pm, Tom Worster wrote:
> is there a way to se
Oh, yeah!
Thank you very much, Carlos.
I am new to javascript and jquery and this post saved my day,
really :)
So ,I hope that Felix can also fix his problem with your post.
Greetings from Germany
if you load content with ajax you should send code funcionality later load
the content, example.
$("#container").load('url',{},function(){
/*here you put codes for fires clicks or something*/
$(".addanswer").click(function()
/* code here */
});
});
or use plugin like live or listen
Ok, I answer myself as I founded the answer, in case it can help
someone:
instead of $(".addanswer").click(function(event){});, put:
$(".addanswer").live("click", function(){...});
On 14 août, 10:46, Felix wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a page with a form, that represent questions and the
> corresp
You might want to pull the variable declaration out of the anonymous
function so that it can be used later (outside the function):
var str = "";
$("#theSelectsID").change(function () {
str = $(this).val();
});
// later
alert(str);
--
Hector
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, James wrote:
>
Just simplify it like:
$("#theSelectsID").change(function () {
var str = $(this).val();
//or -- var str = this.value;
});
On Jun 30, 11:51 pm, "developm...@sdinternet.co.uk"
wrote:
> If you have a single dropdown list with the id of 'theSelectsID' the
> below code should store the selected item
If you have a single dropdown list with the id of 'theSelectsID' the
below code should store the selected item into the variable 'str'.
Hope that helps
$("#theSelectsID").change(function () {
var str = "";
str = $("#theSelectsID").val();
});
you might be able to use
$('select').change(function(){
// do stuff
});
On Jun 30, 7:22 pm, theozmanbo wrote:
> How can I trigger a jquery event for when a user changes the option that is
> selected in a select statement? I need to update a variable with the new
> selected item when this happens
It couldn't possibly work because the javascript isn't there. Add the
code to cadastroCliente.php.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Frank wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm with a doubt in jquery, I am using the function load () to call
> another page, but after I loaded this page, I can not use the id
heres aplugin called JQuery logging
http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-logging
here is a link to JQuery console
http://code.google.com/p/jquery-console/
try this.
add a hyperlink with the class mylink
give it a click event like so
$("a.mylink").click(function() {
alert("random");
});
now rem
current domElement
2009/6/6 runrunforest
>
>if(o.btnGo)
>$.each(o.btnGo, function(i, val) {
>$(val).click(function() {
>return go(o.circular ? o.visible+i : i);
>});
>});
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder whats the second p
Most likely because the button element doesn't recognize the keypress event.
Not every element have the same events.
Swap out button for input and try it again, it should work just fine.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of
On May 18, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
Events are not automatically bound to new elements added to the dom.
However if you are using jquery 1.3+ you can do this to achieve
dynamic
binding:
$("tr").live("dblclick",function(event) {
// etc.
True, but the OP was referring to row
Events are not automatically bound to new elements added to the dom.
However if you are using jquery 1.3+ you can do this to achieve dynamic
binding:
$("tr").live("dblclick",function(event) {
// etc.
-- Josh
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegro
On May 18, 2009, at 2:04 PM, naresh wrote:
Hi I have a query(JQuery) here. can you plz help me in fixing the
issue with this code.
That is when I click on of first table that should get removed
from first table and added to second table. It is happening fine and
good. But when I double clic
Any future elements added to the DOM will not automatically inherit
events that are set on the page.
Try using the live() function to set your dblclick:
$("tr").live("dblclick", function(event) {...});
More info on it here: http://docs.jquery.com/Events/live#typefn
On May 18, 8:04 am, naresh w
Thank you - a switch to live solved the problem quite easily. I'm
still wondering about the slowness.
On Mar 26, 2:37 pm, Karl Swedberg wrote:
> don't know why it's so much slower in Firefox, but if you're dealing
> with that many elements, you ought to consider using event delegation
> ins
don't know why it's so much slower in Firefox, but if you're dealing
with that many elements, you ought to consider using event delegation
instead. You can use the .live() method ...
$('td').live('click', function() {
// do stuff
});
... or roll your own
http://learningjquery.com/2008/0
http://docs.jquery.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Why_do_my_events_stop_working_after_an_AJAX_request.3F
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:21 PM, method8 wrote:
>
> Each time I add new HTML to a div, either by .html('') or by .load...
> it looks great but it seems that the newly added html's event do not
I only used parents() and selected the P as that is what I understood
spaceage wanted.
spaceage wrote:
Actually, this works nicely (I think because of the use of this vs.
event.target?):
$('div.clickable_element').click(function() { $(this).toggleClass
("selected"); });
On Feb 20, 8:28 am,
Actually, this works nicely (I think because of the use of this vs.
event.target?):
$('div.clickable_element').click(function() { $(this).toggleClass
("selected"); });
On Feb 20, 8:28 am, Frederik Ring wrote:
> I think it should be also working just this way:
>
> $('#mydiv').css('cursor','poin
I think it should be also working just this way:
$('#mydiv').css('cursor','pointer').click(function(){
$(this).addClass('selected');
});
No need to select all the contents "manually".
On Feb 20, 5:16 pm, spaceage wrote:
> OK, so you have to independently assign a handler to all descendant
> el
OK, so you have to independently assign a handler to all descendant
elements in the ? Is there no better way via the parent div?
On Feb 20, 8:07 am, Liam Potter wrote:
> $(document).ready(function () {
> $("div.clickable_element p").click( function () {
> $(this).parents("div.clickab
$(document).ready(function () {
$("div.clickable_element p").click( function () {
$(this).parents("div.clickable_element").toggleClass("selected");
});
});
spaceage wrote:
A question re: event handling/propagation: I have a surrounding
and I want any click within the (including a
Could you check out this example I created and let me know if that was
your intended effect? I'm still not entirely certain I'm grasping
everything you're trying to do. Basically, you have an initial list.
You want the image in each one to fade in/out when the link is
hovered. You then want to be
Hi Shane,
thanks for the reply!
What you recommend seems to be rebinding the functionality to the
latest appended list-item. Which of course would work just fine, but
the question is, how can I do this with event delegation (which
watches for new elements within the ul)?
And it's also the hover
The way the post initially reads, it seems that when you're appending
the ul with an li, the anchor within it does not have the click
function bound to it. Is that correct? If so, when you add the li you
would need to bind the click function to the newly created anchor.
Something like this should
indeed it is
On Jan 19, 3:53 am, Krommenaas wrote:
> is this also true of document.ready?
>
> On Jan 14, 9:24 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
>
> > In the old-fashioned you couldn't have more than one event handler:
>
> > window.onload = function(){ .. }
>
> > but using jQuery's bind('load', function
is this also true of document.ready?
On Jan 14, 9:24 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
> In the old-fashioned you couldn't have more than one event handler:
>
> window.onload = function(){ .. }
>
> but using jQuery's bind('load', function(){}) you're using the new
> standards-based event system, via ad
Closest is not part of delegation. Closest is a way to traverse the
dom tree to find an elements parent that matches the selector used. I
think the reason this is helpful in event delegation is because some
browsers may not register the click if it occurs inside of a child
element of the li. Fo
In the old-fashioned you couldn't have more than one event handler:
window.onload = function(){ .. }
but using jQuery's bind('load', function(){}) you're using the new
standards-based event system, via addEventListener (attachEvent on
IE), in which 'onload' is not a property of the window object
strange, but I should have checked. thanks!
"However, I assume if I do this in two different .js files, the second
one will
replace the first one"
and your assumption is not correct
< javascript1.js ->
$(window).load(function() {
alert("Alert in One");
});
<-->
< javascript2.js ->
$(wi
alert(event.type)
See
http://docs.jquery.com/Events_(Guide)#event.type
for more info.
- Richard
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:46 PM, bob wrote:
>
>var handler = function(e){
>
>//How do I know what event triggered this function?
>//this does not work:
>
Hi Michael ,
sorry it's my fault i made a stupid mistake somewhere else ( i dare
not tell you what it was, I think i'd better get some sleep :) ). The
code as such worked, so i would assume the wrap() does not unbind the
events.
Thanks again!
alexandre
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Michael
Without testing it, off the top of my head I think it may be the .wrap()
that is doing you in. That has to remove the element from the DOM and
re-insert it, and I think that loses the event binding.
Also, I take it that $dsanchors refers to a UL, is that right? Then you're
temporarily inserting t
Interesting I have figured out the reason why your example didn't work(and
now does). It doesn't work when you have elements in the array which don't
need animation/are in the same state initially as the final animation state.
So I now have an active class indicating it's state and the selector I
Strange. In my tests the last element's callback was always called
last. jQuery's animations are time-based, that means both animations
should end at the same time, with a small offset for the last element
at most.
Anyway, you already have a solution. I had first rewritten yours
before trying the
Thats cool thanks Brian and Ricardo for your time.
Ricardo that did look really good but it doesn't work for me.
jQuery("div.mainLiner div.panel").not(':last')
.slideUp(750, function(){
console.log("not last");
}).end()
.filter(':last')
.slideUp(750, function(){
console.log("last");
//callback
}
You're right, that will run the callback once for each element. This
is a bit hacky but is the shortest way I could think of:
function closeMainPanels(){
jQuery("div.mainLiner div.panel").not(':last').slideUp(750).end()
.filter(':last').slideUp(750, function(){
//callback
They are all sliding up at the same time, but I was under the impression
that your code would call the callback function once for each div.panel that
was found. Am I mistaken?
(would be really awesome if it does only call once)
And if I'm not, I reiterate that I only want the callback function cal
If they are all sliding up at the same time, isn't it simpler to use
function closeMainPanels(){
jQuery("div.mainLiner div.panel").slideUp(750, function(){ /
*...callback...*/ });
}
On Jan 1, 5:53 pm, "Cam Spiers" wrote:
> function closeMainPanels(callback){
> var panels = jQuery('div.m
function closeMainPanels(callback){
var panels = jQuery('div.mainLiner div.panel');
var done = [];
var length = panels.length;
panels.each(function(){
var panel = jQuery(this);
panel.slideUp(750, function(){
if (done.push(panel) == length){
Thanks for your response.
Yes I have used that before, but I need to know how to add a callback
function which is called after a set of animations are completed.
If I have an array of dom elements which all need the same animation applied
to them,
how can I tell when all the animations are comple
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Cam Spiers wrote:
> Hey,
>
> function closeMainPanels(){
> jQuery("div.mainLiner div.panel").each(function(){
> jQuery(this).slideUp(750);
> });
> }
>
> How can I tell when all panels have finished animation?
>
> As I need to call another function
Yea, use clone(true) to copy the events.
If you are using jQuery 1.3 beta you can try to use
$(selector).live('event', function(){
});
live is like bind just that new nodes added to DOM will inherit the
event.
Well, this is a trick call event delegation.
On Dec 29, 2:40 pm, Ricardo Tomasi
Didn't look at the source, but have you tried $(element).clone(true) ?
That sets 'deep copying' and should copy all the event handlers with
it.
On Dec 29, 11:33 am, "nikla...@googlemail.com"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know wether it is the right place for this question but I am
> going to ask i
Yes, there is. There is a technique called event delegation which
consists of exactly that.
the Delegate plugin does it:
http://www.danwebb.net/2008/2/8/event-delegation-made-easy-in-jquery
as does LiveQuery in its own way: http://brandonaaron.net/docs/livequery/
google 'event delegation' and y
Yes I do. It's just a bunch of check boxes to filter and order a
result. It is not updating the form, too. Nothing disastrous about
this.
Keep cool,
Jan
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:42 PM, MorningZ wrote:
>
> This original code you posted
>
>
> $(document).ready(function(){
>$form = $('#fi
This original code you posted
$(document).ready(function(){
$form = $('#filter-form');
$form.ajaxForm({
//dataType: 'json',
success: function(){
alert("peng");
},
target: "#layout-child-output
I think that ajaxForm already adds a submit handler to the form you are
adding it to...
So i think this is doubling up.
$('input', $form).change(function(){
$form.submit();
});
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Jan Limpens wrote:
>
> And this does work:
>
> $(documen
And this does work:
$(document).ready(function(){
$form = $('#filter-form');
$('input', $form).change(function(){
$form.ajaxSubmit({
dataType: 'json',
success: function(){},
target: "#layout-ch
Must be some bug in ajaxForm, I guess.
if I change
$('input', $form).change(function(){
$form.submit();
});
to
$('input', $form).change(function(){
alert('peng');
});
it fires once only, otherwise I get the exponential behavior. My guess
No, unfortunately... but I may be able to put something up...
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Eric Hobo Garside wrote:
>
> Do you have a live environment where this is hosted, or at least the
> code for the page to test it locally? Looks like it should be working
> fine, at face value.
>
> On D
Do you have a live environment where this is hosted, or at least the
code for the page to test it locally? Looks like it should be working
fine, at face value.
On Dec 16, 11:55 am, "Jan Limpens" wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have this piece of innocent looking code:
>
>
> $(document).ready(function()
I don't quite follow your description, but in any case, you can
disable the focusing by setting focusInvalid: false.
Jörn
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Arthur Ccube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using jquery.validation.js plugin. It works fine in firefox.
>
> However, in IE, I have proble
Yep, that was me just staring for too long at one chunk of code.
Thanks to the kind users who pointed out my very silly
extraneous .change() at the end.
I hope this saves someone else from a similarly overlooking something
so relatively obvious.
-c
On Dec 1, 2:46 pm, chickenofeathers <[EMAIL
Mike, any help on this?
On Nov 4, 4:02 am, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am confused when it comes to triggering an ajax event. I would like
> > to trigger a ajaxStart event, so I use:
>
> > $.event.trigger("ajaxStart");
>
> > But now, what will that trigger? What piece of code?
Look for a handler of the supplied type.
> > > > var handler = ;
>
> > > > if (handler)
> > > > {
> > > > handler.apply(parent,[evt]);
> > > > break;
> > > > }
>
t; // Look for a handler of the supplied type.
> > > var handler = ;
>
> > > if (handler)
> > > {
> > > handler.apply(parent,[evt]);
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
...;
>
> > if (handler)
> > {
> > handler.apply(parent,[evt]);
> > break;
> > }
> > else
> > el = el.parentNode;
> > }
>
> > });
>
> > };
> > -Original
}
>
> });
>
> };
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> Behalf Of ricardobeat
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:44 PM
> To: jQuery (English)
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: event delegation - great, but ho
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ricardobeat
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:44 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: event delegation - great, but how does one trigger the
handlers through code?
You're right, it doesn't work.
Maybe NW Eve
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> Behalf Of ricardobeat
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:43 AM
> To: jQuery (English)
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: event delegation - great, but how does one trigger the
> handlers through code?
>
> Can't you just $('tbody td:eq(x)')
Behalf Of ricardobeat
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:43 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: event delegation - great, but how does one trigger the
handlers through code?
Can't you just $('tbody td:eq(x)').click() ? The event should
propagate as normal and reach the tbody.
Can't you just $('tbody td:eq(x)').click() ? The event should
propagate as normal and reach the tbody. I guess.
On Nov 22, 1:11 am, Leeoniya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During event delegation, handlers are registered higher in the DOM
> tree and then filtered when the event is triggered. This i
thats what i was looking for, thanks!
On Nov 21, 10:25 pm, "Jeffrey Kretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've used a pattern like this:
>
> var table = $('table.class')
> .bind('click',selectCell);
>
> function selectCell(e)
> {
> var cell = e.target;
> do_something();
>
> }
>
> var cell
I've used a pattern like this:
var table = $('table.class')
.bind('click',selectCell);
function selectCell(e)
{
var cell = e.target;
do_something();
}
var cell = table.find('td.eq(8)');
selectCell.apply(table[0],[{target:cell[0]}]);
JK
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googl
I have no link but used that approach for plazes.com. The only pitfall
I came across is that some plugin's (in my case the datepicker)
internally use the ready event, which can cause some troubles.
Apart from that, perceived page loading/rendering was much much
faster, especially since I put Goo
Can't you give the elements the same class and bind the class with the
click event?
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
