Re: [jug-discussion] If you started a web project on the JVM today...

2009-05-01 Thread Richard Hightower
's what Javascript is for. :) > > (Just imagine. Groovy compiling to Java compiling to Javascript. VM > optimization nightmare!) > > Nick > > On May 1, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > >> I agree with Nick. >> >> GAEJ/Grails/GWT >&g

Re: [jug-discussion] If you started a web project on the JVM today...

2009-05-01 Thread Richard Hightower
I agree with Nick. GAEJ/Grails/GWT I'd want GWT on the frontend and GAEJ/Grails on the backend. I would use JPA/JDO talking to GAEJ datastore on the backend which I could port to another datastore if I needed. This is very nascent and I have not deployed an real world app yet. But if I was work

Re: [jug-discussion] Jython - alive (again)

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Hightower
I am around. I live in Fremont now. Was living in LA. ;) On 4/21/09 4:25 PM, "Thomas Hicks" wrote: > At 04:18 PM 4/21/2009, you wrote: >> http://www.jython.org/Project/ >> > I thought I'd toss out there that the Jython project was revived on March 9, > 2009 with the beta release of Jython cove

Re: [jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Ic... I fell into your trap. At least I took Kit with me On 12/10/08 10:26 AM, "Chad Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Richard Hightower > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just not such a big fan of the Java is dead

Re: [jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Hightower
I don't disagree that non-Java is not off topic. I'd don't mind seeing stuff about Ruby. Just not such a big fan of the Java is dead stuff. On 12/10/08 9:36 AM, "Chad Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Richard Hightower >

Re: [jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Yes. Chad. That is very cool. Jython does the same for Python libs. It is pretty cool. On 12/10/08 9:37 AM, "Chad Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Richard Hightower > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> JRuby is cool. If I wer

Re: [jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Hightower
fense of Ruby, not a > protagonist position) was that I believed Ruby devers were (in > general) happier than Java devers. Thanks for proving my point. > > Kit > > On Dec 9, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > >> >> Ha. I am no troll. This is a Java li

Re: [jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Hightower
JRuby is cool. If I were going to use Ruby, it would most likely be Jruby. On 12/9/08 8:16 PM, "Chad Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Richard Hightower > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For now I will stick to Java and Groov

Re: [jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-10 Thread Richard Hightower
preference mostly do to my hatred of Ruby. I also prefer Jython to Jruby mostly because I do not like the Ruby syntax because I thought it was weak compare to Python when I was as excited to Python as you now seem to be about Ruby. Python has also seen some strong growth more so than Ruby not

[jug-discussion] Java is dead... Here we go again....

2008-12-09 Thread Richard Hightower
o. Ruby will be a never was. Java will one day be a former heavy weight champion of the world. > Open > sourcing Sun's version of the JVM and platform has done nothing for > ensuring its longevity. Only said with a slight grin. > > > > On Dec 9, 2008, at 7:17 P

Re: [jug-discussion] JRuby vs. Groovy (was: Any News on the Holiday Party?)

2008-12-09 Thread Richard Hightower
RE: Java is dead, long live the JVM. JRuby FTW in the enterprise. >From May 08 to Sept 08 Java job demand grew 3 times higher (in raw numbers) than the total Ruby market. But let's not mere facts get in the way of your "Java is dead" argument. Java continues to dwarf Ruby. And, Ruby does not see

Re: [jug-discussion] Since Chad Mentioned Guice

2008-12-09 Thread Richard Hightower
This is funny. I recently wrote this: http://java.dzone.com/articles/dependency-injection-an-introd I read your article (after promising myself that I would only skim it). Seems cool though... I like the hero references... I cover the @Autowire and the @Required and the @Attribute in my artic

Re: [jug-discussion] OT -- SaveXP.com

2008-05-09 Thread Richard Hightower
Mac has Java 6 for about a month now (preview was available for much longer). It took a long time to switch from 1.5 to 1.6 because they had to switch from Carbon to CoCoa. This was a monumental task. The next release should come out a lot quicker (or so I heard on Java Posse podcast which

Re: [jug-discussion] OT -- SaveXP.com

2008-05-09 Thread Richard Hightower
Vista is the best thing that ever happened to me. It SUCKED so bad that after six months of hell I finally switched to a Mac. I turned my old vista machine into Ubuntu and it is my backup dev environment. I love my Mac. I can run Windows XP in a VM. All is good. On May 9, 2008, at 9

RE: [jug-discussion] storing blobs on file system or in db

2005-03-29 Thread Richard Hightower
mentioned below, but it was arrived at not chosen per se. I am not sure if starting from scratch we would have stored any files in the DB. Thus, below was not a suggestion, it was an idea. -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9

RE: [jug-discussion] storing blobs on file system or in db

2005-03-29 Thread Richard Hightower
We started using a shared file system so we could easily invalidate the file cache, but this came later. -Original Message- From: Randolph Kahle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 3:28 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] storing blobs

RE: [jug-discussion] storing blobs on file system or in db

2005-03-29 Thread Richard Hightower
We did both. We stored the file in the DB. Then when the file is retrieved from the db, we write the file to the filesystem. The app would check for the file on the file system first if not found it gets it from the db and then writes it to the file system for next time. This has the advantage of w

[jug-discussion] Spring Hibernate JSF HELP!

2005-03-17 Thread Richard Hightower
We now have more work than we can do. I have several consulting positions open. You need a background in Spring, Hibernate and JSF. I'll accept a background in Spring and Hibernate. This will require travel. This particular work requires a lot of J2EE web development experience. -- r i c k

RE: [jug-discussion] Meeting tonight at 6:30

2005-03-08 Thread Richard Hightower
I am in San Diego CA, but I will be there in spirit. :o) -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 3:20 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: [jug-discussion] Meeting tonight at 6:30 Just wanted to remind everyone that we hav

RE: [jug-discussion] More wasted time...laughing

2005-02-21 Thread Richard Hightower
I always thought he was funny. Even when he attacks me. You have to have a sense of humor. Hani is creative and outspoken... qualities I admire. I admit fully to being on the side of evil in Hani-land. I've done some C# development. It is very close to working with Java. I decided to stay the Jav

RE: [jug-discussion] IoC and object encapsulation

2005-02-11 Thread Richard Hightower
Warner, Hmmm... I saw the same thing. IoC has always been a fundamental concept of OO. -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:56 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] IoC and object encapsulati

[jug-discussion] FW: Reminder - 2005 JavaOne(SM) Conference Call for Papers

2005-01-13 Thread Richard Hightower
Last chance to submit your JavaOne papers. I am thinking about submitting a paper so far I have resisted the urge! I spoke at JavaOne in 2003. It was a good experience. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 4:44 PM To: [E

[jug-discussion] Tucson JUG / Phoenix JUG report

2005-01-13 Thread Richard Hightower
I went to the Phoenix JUG last night. I spoke on Spring (Spring has Sprung) (snip) I was told that this was the biggest turn out in a while for the Phoenix JUG. I credit the turnout to the subject not the speaker. (snip) Read more http://www.jroller.com/page/RickHigh/20050113#phoenix_jug_is

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded

2005-01-13 Thread Richard Hightower
:o) === jest -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:04 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded On Jan 12, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > It will be in

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded

2005-01-12 Thread Richard Hightower
It will be in the book. :o) -Original Message- From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 5:05 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded When are you going to Open source your ExpressionPropertyCo

[jug-discussion] AOP overhead

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
This is just with bare bones JVM setting running inside of Eclipse. I am calling a simple method that I decorate with AOP. The overhead for AOP seems to be about 0.00048 milliseconds on my box or 0.0048 seconds. If I use dynamic AOP support the overhead jumps all the way to 0.00059 millisecon

RE: [jug-discussion] Simplicity

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
here and meeting with some of my old buds, so I will have to pass. Michael Oliver CTO Alarius Systems LLC 3325 N. Nellis Blvd, #1 Las Vegas, NV 89115 Phone:(702)643-7425 Fax:(520)844-1036 *Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [jug-discussion] Simplicity

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:45 AM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: [jug-discussion] Simplicity On Jan 10, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > > I first learned

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded On Jan 10, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > As always, I am in violent agreement with you. :o) Erik and I have > been in violent agreement since 2001. > I love ya man: http://www.lucenebook.com/search?query=hightower+les

RE: [jug-discussion] Simplicity

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Yes. I agree. -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:45 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: [jug-discussion] Simplicity On Jan 10, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > > I first learned about IoC fr

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:46 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded RE: It lives on in the various ways it has spun off: http://avalon.apache.org/closed.html So its underpinnings are

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
I am having too much fun. I gotta get back to work!) -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:22 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded On Jan 10, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Richard

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:22 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is confounded On Jan 10, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > Regarding Erik's opinions: As far as Spring vs. HiveMind, Pico > container, Avalon, etc. >

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
sick, being so sensitive, so I just wondered if you got a flu shot. Michael Oliver CTO Alarius Systems LLC 3325 N. Nellis Blvd, #1 Las Vegas, NV 89115 Phone:(702)643-7425 Fax:(520)844-1036 *Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Okay sounds good to me. -Original Message- From: Robert Zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:48 AM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring Richard

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:29 AM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring I apologize for

RE: [jug-discussion] Speaking at the Phoenix JUG on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Whew! I thought I went insane. Thomas asked me to present.   If someone else was scheduled, I am happy to just attend.   I will be speaking in Phoenix, the next day if anyone want to see the presentation and does not mind driving two hours.     From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
pring Richard Hightower wrote: >Robert, > >I don't make that call. I am happy to come and watch an NIO discussion. >We can discuss Spring over some beers. >I don't want to supersede anyone. My feeling will not be hurt if I am >canceled. I apologize for the schedulin

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
I apologize for being a little rough. -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:54 AM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring Is any one able to do an audio/video/notes cache of the presentation for us/me? (Not be in Tucson is a real drag sometimes ;) On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Robert Zeigler wrote: > Richard Hightower wrote: > > >Tuesday should be a lively discussion. I am s

RE: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:07 AM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring Richard Hightower wrote: >Tuesday should be a lively discussion. I am sharpening

RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Comments below -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:19 AM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring Could you elaborate more one item number 3? Come to the jug on

[jug-discussion] Spring FUD is unfounded.... RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-10 Thread Richard Hightower
Tuesday should be a lively discussion. I am sharpening my tongue. :o) I respect Randy, but I find Randy's fears unfounded, and his question indicate a lack of knowing what Spring is and what it is not. Spring does not replace J2EE. There is more risk to sticking with existing J2EE technology sta

RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-09 Thread Richard Hightower
ithout EJB" book generally suggest building a system with an array of disjointed OSS tools- all using parochial formats and APIs. Sounds like a huge liability to me. sincerely, Josh Zeidner --- Richard Hightower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "If you have not looked into

RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-09 Thread Richard Hightower
Darn. The thought of Warner being my mother has really disturbed me. I think it is his goatee. -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:04 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured

RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-09 Thread Richard Hightower
Darn. The thought of Warner being my mother has really disturbed. I think it is goatee. -Original Message- From: Ollie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 4:57 PM To: Jug Discuss Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring Thanks mom -Original

RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-09 Thread Richard Hightower
roduct. The "J2EE without EJB" book generally suggest building a system with an array of disjointed OSS tools- all using parochial formats and APIs. Sounds like a huge liability to me. sincerely, Josh Zeidner --- Richard Hightower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "If

RE: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-09 Thread Richard Hightower
] Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 5:39 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring On Jan 8, 2005, at 6:52 PM, Richard Hightower wrote: > "If you have not looked into Spring yet, it is time." That's Rick > Hightowe

[jug-discussion] JDJ: Featured article on Spring

2005-01-08 Thread Richard Hightower
"If you have not looked into Spring yet, it is time." That's Rick Hightower's New Year's advice. "As Rod Johnson once put it: Spring puts the OO back in J2EE development," he continues. What makes Spring different than the other frameworks and containers, Hightower explains, is that Spring goes bey

[jug-discussion] Speaking at the Phoenix JUG on Spring

2005-01-07 Thread Richard Hightower
They asked me yesterday. It was short notice, but I have a presentation that I have used before for a workshop. The presentation covers Spring templates, Springs IOC (including property editors), Spring transactions, interfacing with Hibernate via Spring. It should be fun. (I plan on attending the

RE: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-29 Thread Richard Hightower
PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs Richard Hightower wrote: >I agree with Erik. I don't have time to read your long email let alone >implement a full-text search engine. I can't think of a single client >that would rathe

RE: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-29 Thread Richard Hightower
[jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs Richard Hightower wrote: >I agree with Erik. I don't have time to read your long email let alone >implement a full-text search engine. I can't think of a single client >that would rather have me beat my laptop with a rock, then rent a

RE: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-29 Thread Richard Hightower
Re: "It seems easier to re-invent a full-text search engine? I'd be way impressed if you could beat Lucene!" I agree with Erik. I don't have time to read your long email let alone implement a full-text search engine. I can't think of a single client that would rather have me beat my laptop with a

RE: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-29 Thread Richard Hightower
Beware of any email that begin with the words "Not to be Trite...". You can feel a big wall of Trite flame coming around the corner. :) -Original Message- From: Tim Colson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 4:15 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: RE:

RE: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-29 Thread Richard Hightower
I keep hitting my thumb with the Rock. I guess that is better than severing my limb with the pneumatic hammer. Congrats on the book Erik. Lucene seems really cool. I hope to work with it on a future project. My limbs seem to grow back. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

[jug-discussion] Eclipse Plugin/SWT experts

2004-12-23 Thread Richard Hightower
Are there any Eclipse plugin/SWT experts in town? -- r i c kh i g h t o w e r -- Senior Mentor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.arc-mind.com -- p: 520-290-6855 -- m: 520-661-6753 -- f: 520-290-4179 -- 15378 e colossal cave rd -- Tucson, AZ 85641 New Publications: Warner Onstine & Rick High

[jug-discussion] JavaOne CALL FOR PAPERS, was RE: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-23 Thread Richard Hightower
Hey Erik et al. I am glad to hear your Lucene in Action book is going to the printers. I will order a copy ASAP. BTW JavaOne 2005 is doing a call for papers. I was thinking about signing up. You should think about it too. (The year I got accepted, I submitted 5 presentations, and they choose one

RE: [jug-discussion] Sometimes I wish I had a blog....[off topic]

2004-11-15 Thread Richard Hightower
Perhaps we can have a constitutional amendments banning marrying lower life forms. (Of course my wife would be forced to leave me [Rick=Lower Life form].) -Original Message- From: Jon Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [jug-discussion] Jython, Groovy and other limp wristed languages RE: [jug-discussion] thoughts on new presos

2004-11-01 Thread Richard Hightower
:) -Original Message- From: Drew Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Jython, Groovy and other limp wristed languages RE: [jug-discussion] thoughts on new presos Richard Hightower wrote: >H

RE: [jug-discussion] Jython, Groovy and other limp wristed languages RE: [jug-discussion] thoughts on new presos

2004-10-31 Thread Richard Hightower
limp wristed languages RE: [jug-discussion] thoughts on new presos Richard Hightower wrote: >I agree. Like it or not Groovy looks like it will be a factor. >(Poor Drew hates it with a passion.) > > > Actually I don't hate it at all. I actually quite like the concep

[jug-discussion] Jython, Groovy and other limp wristed languages RE: [jug-discussion] thoughts on new presos

2004-10-31 Thread Richard Hightower
I agree. Like it or not Groovy looks like it will be a factor. (Poor Drew hates it with a passion.) BTW I heard earlier that Jython was dead on this list. I agree with that assesment if you made it about a year ago. I think there is some new life in Jython Mostly breed by the new Eclipse p

RE: [jug-discussion] Tapestry Presentation, follow-up

2004-09-15 Thread Richard Hightower
Cool beans. Thx. -Original Message- From: Robert Zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 9:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jug-discussion] Tapestry Presentation, follow-up FYI: For those interested in learning more about tapestry... Warner has begun

RE: [jug-discussion] Meeting Tues Sep 14

2004-09-15 Thread Richard Hightower
Warning: Drew is the Tapestry stud. I have not fully taken the Tapestry plunge yet. I have been doing JSF (JavaServer Faces) for a while. I dig JSF. I hear Tapestry is better. JSF is a lot *more* productive than Struts. Tapestry is on my list of things to master. -Original Message- Fr

RE: [jug-discussion] OGNL presentation on Tuesday

2004-03-08 Thread Richard Hightower
I am a weekend Tucsonan. -Original Message- From: Drew Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OGNL presentation on Tuesday Richard Hightower wrote: >I wish I could be there. >I really want to

RE: [jug-discussion] OGNL presentation on Tuesday

2004-03-08 Thread Richard Hightower
I wish I could be there. I really want to learn more about Ognl. I will be out of town. Can you post the slides on the website? -Original Message- From: Drew Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 4:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jug-discussion] OGNL prese

RE: [jug-discussion] Webapp frameworks

2004-03-05 Thread Richard Hightower
AppFuse is similar to Turbine, but it is Struts/Spring based, plus it has a lot of additional Struts centric project (like display tag, Erik's label tag that integrates with Validator framework, and such). I used AppFuse on my last two projects with great success. If you decide on Struts, try AppFu

[jug-discussion] JBoss, Spring, JMX.... Oh MY!

2004-02-26 Thread Richard Hightower
import javax.management.ObjectName; import javax.naming.Context; import javax.naming.InitialContext; import org.apache.commons.logging.Log; import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory; /** * @author Richard Hightower * ArcMind Inc. http://www.arc-mind.com */ public class UserManagerJBossSpecific extends UserMan

[jug-discussion] Has anyone used Spring yet?

2004-02-23 Thread Richard Hightower
I have been using Spring on my last two projects. It is the coolest thing ever! Has anyone tried it? I just used it to declaratively demarcate transaction support for my HibernateDAO with Spring's AOP extensions. WOW! Spring is killer. Spring makes TDD in J2EE so much more doable. You got to che

[jug-discussion] Problems with JBoss Security.... Any JBoss gurus out there?

2004-02-20 Thread Richard Hightower
I am having a problem with roles. A user called tomcat is in a role called admin, but should not be. I can login okay with the tomcat user but, the tomcat user can do everything an admin can do, which is not what I want. I then tried to programmatically see if tomcat user is an admin and he was. (A

RE: [jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list

2004-01-18 Thread Richard Hightower
True enough. I am at least 50% to 60% Tucsonan. :) -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 6:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list On Jan 18, 2004, at 7:36 PM, Richard

RE: [jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list

2004-01-18 Thread Richard Hightower
listYea whoever that is, it sounds more like a salesman than a CTOOn Sat, 2004-01-17 at 07:47, Erik Hatcher wrote: On Jan 17, 2004, at 12:55 AM, Richard Hightower wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to this list. I have been a member in the past, but that was > several email addresses ago.

RE: [jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list

2004-01-18 Thread Richard Hightower
Hey Don't you live in Virginia? :) -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 7:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list On Jan 17, 2004, at 12:55 AM, Richard Hightower

RE: [jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list

2004-01-18 Thread Richard Hightower
, Richard Hightower wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to this list. I have been a member in the past, but that was > several email addresses ago. Who the heck is this poser?! Who let him on this list? Geez! :)) > I use to work at eBlox with Andy B., Paul V., Warner O., Nick L., Drew

[jug-discussion] Hello, I am sort of new to the list

2004-01-16 Thread Richard Hightower
Hello, I am new to this list. I have been a member in the past, but that was several email addresses ago. I use to work at eBlox with Andy B., Paul V., Warner O., Nick L., Drew D., Erik H., Randy K., etc. a while back. I now work at ArcMind. "ArcMind provides systems integration, consulting and

Re: [jug-discussion] January Presentation

2003-01-08 Thread Richard Hightower
To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Hightower CTO | LearningPatterns, Inc. Global Java Education, Mentoring, Courseware & Consulting Services +520-290-6855 direct 55 Broad Street , 18th Floor | New

Re: [jug-discussion] Software Quality Assurance Conference - Call for Speakers

2002-11-24 Thread Richard Hightower
ode > > > > - To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Hightower CTO | LearningPatterns, Inc. Global Java Education, Mentoring, Courseware & C

RE: [jug-discussion] portable.net released

2002-11-24 Thread Richard Hightower
er >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [jug-discussion] Questioning XP

2002-11-22 Thread Richard Hightower
; For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Hightower CTO | LearningPatterns, Inc. Global Java Education, Mentoring, Courseware & Consulting Services +520-290-6855 direct 55 Broad Street , 18th Floor | New York NY 10004 w w w . l e a r n i n g p a t t e r n s . c o m w w w

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
to your previously >> scheduled program. >> >> -warner >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ---

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
i agree. resin's is good. the question was not better, but good. all > True but even then weblogic had a much better community and > documentation base. > 6 of one... > > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Hightower [mailto:rhightower@;learningpatterns.com]

[jug-discussion] +1 for the OR tools preso sans EJB CMP CMR Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
heduled program. >> >> -warner >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
#x27;t have >> designed, and was just plain designed by a raving lunatic...but now >> can't be changed?) >> 4) Does it adapt well to changes in schema? >> 5) Does it have cacheing built in? >> 6) How query-intensive is it? (i.e. how many queries does it take to >> restore a listed of objects that have nested objects) >> >> Lo

Re: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
r presentation. > -tom > > > > > --------- To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Hightower CTO | LearningPatterns, Inc. Global Java Education, Men

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
ave cacheing built in? > 6) How query-intensive is it? (i.e. how many queries does it take to > restore a listed of objects that have nested objects) > > Looking forward to this! > Tim > > > - To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

Re: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-13 Thread Richard Hightower
ing feature-comparison > Advantages and Disadvantages to each. > > -warner > > > - To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Hightower CTO | LearningPatterns, Inc.