Hi Antonio,
yes, interface ge-0/0/0 is only configure for ospf3 and interface fe-0/1/0
is configued for dual-stack.
Here, I have listed the required configuation as you have asked.
scenario
Cisco-rtr -- ge-0/0/0 (M10i) fe-0/1/0 -
Cisco-rtr
Ramesh,
Do you see cisco neighbor in show ipv6 neighbors?
Thanks,
Nilesh
On 4/4/10 11:32 PM, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Antonio,
yes, interface ge-0/0/0 is only configure for ospf3 and interface fe-0/1/0
is configued for dual-stack.
Here, I have listed the required
Nilesh,
Give me few minute I will get back to you.
ramesh
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Nilesh Khambal nkham...@juniper.netwrote:
Ramesh,
Do you see cisco neighbor in show ipv6 neighbors?
Thanks,
Nilesh
On 4/4/10 11:32 PM, Ramesh Karki rameshka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Antonio,
Hi Nilesh,
Herewith, I have attached the output file. please go through the file.
thank you,
Ramesh
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Nilesh Khambal nkham...@juniper.netwrote:
Ramesh,
Do you see cisco neighbor in show ipv6 neighbors?
Thanks,
Nilesh
On 4/4/10 11:32 PM, Ramesh Karki
Hi Ramesh,
Are the “Policed Discards”, “L3 Incompletes” and DA Rejects increasing all the
time? Can you disable all Cisco proprietary protocols such as CDP and
keepalives on Cisco port? Clear the interface stats ib fe-0/1/0 and then
monitor if these counters are still incrementing.
...
Stefan,
Any suggestions to correct this imbalance?
Thanks,
Gabriel Farias
2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias gabrielfaria...@gmail.com
Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration:
*Interfaces*:
show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0
description *BA* G2/47 - SW001;
gigether-options {
Hi!
Another story about ex-series and counters: packets that is
dropped due to lack of buffer space is not reported neither
in Output errors nor as ifOutDiscards:
s...@us-sjc-csw01 show interfaces ge-0/0/3 extensive
Physical interface: ge-0/0/3, Enabled, Physical link is Up
[...]
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:41:25PM +0400, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
That's from EX-3200 running 9.3R4.4, the same error still present in 9.3S7.2.
Does anybody knows if it fixed in more recent JunOS ?
9.6R3 shows the same behavior on this EX-4200:
rvandegr...@switch show interfaces ge-0/0/0
Stefan,
This configuration has no effect, because the connection (PE x CE) uses EBGP
routing within the VRF dados.
What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces of
RT110, you have any other suggestions?
Thanks
Gabriel Farias
2010/4/5 mail-list mohan.nand...@gmail.com
Hello,
eBGP shouldn't come into play here. Your physical interfaces are bundled as 1
logical interface (ae0). Load balancing over L3 LAG interfaces works the same
as ECMP links. You have to configure this:
Hi,
I configured the router the suggested parameters in URL:
{master}[edit]
RT110# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance
term 1 {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
}
}
RT110# show routing-options
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}
RT110# show
11 matches
Mail list logo
