Thank-you very much.
Dan
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 6:06 PM
To: Dan Farrell; Nitzan Tzelniker
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dynamic-db for prefix-list filter on ex3200,
{
input blocktest;
}
address 192.168.78.1/24;
}
}
}
}
vlans {
noc24-test {
vlan-id 33;
interface {
ge-0/0/3.0;
}
l3-interface vlan.33;
}
}
Dan Farrell
Applied
and it's
associated churn. I'd hate to have to migrate to MX because EX can't/won't do
it.
Cheers!
Dan
From: Nitzan Tzelniker [mailto:nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:19 PM
To: Dan Farrell <da...@appliedi.net>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] d
that seem to touch protocols you're
having issues with, you should review this link and use it-
https://www.juniper.net/alerts/viewalert.jsp?actionBtn=SearchtxtAlertNumber=PSN-2010-06-820viewMode=view
If you are interested in the details of my specific case I'll be happy to
share them.
Dan Farrell
I see the same thing on fresh configs - once I define something on one
of those interfaces, it shows up.
Dan Farrell
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fouant sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
I think stating to a voluntary list that you need an 'urgent response' is out
of place. People here like sharing issues, helping others, and expanding their
knowledge and community. This is not a volunteer firefighter team, however.
Aside from that, you aren't providing the usuals, mainly the
Message-
From: Laurent HENRY [mailto:laurent.he...@ehess.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:23 AM
To: Dan Farrell
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?
Thank you !
No weird bugs encountered ?
Le Monday 21 Ju4ne 2010 23:25:13
We experienced phantom routing and arp issues as well in the 9 series, but
10.0s1.1 has been very stable.
-Original Message-
From: Cyrill Malevanov [mailto:c...@n-home.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:18 AM
To: Dan Farrell
Cc: Laurent HENRY; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re
We leverage the EX3200 and 4200's extensively in our network, for edge, core,
and access.
As far as edge (ISP connectivity) we use EX3200's in pairs- each EX3200 has a
separate peer session to each upstream provider, providing redundancy
(high-availability) without merging the two units as one
# set snmp community XPTO clients 10.31.0.236
Dan
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gabriel Farias
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:16 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
You might also want to try from your server-
# snmpwwalk -c XPTO 10.251.42.230 system
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Dan Farrell
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:39 PM
To: 'Gabriel Farias'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net;
juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Logical
And I doubt the Solarwinds app is pushing that kind of icmp traffic to a single
host for monitoring. Now, if something else was already hitting it up...
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper
syslog entries?
Personally, on my EX's, I'm running JUNOS 10.0S1.1 because it's the recommended
release- I looked over the differences in 10.1 and 10.0 and couldn't find
anything changed/improved that's relevant to my network. I'd recommend the same
for yours.
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
I'm sorry but I'm on the 'downloads' tab on the junoscriptorium page and don't
see any scripts (or anything). What clue am I woefully missing here?
Thanks,
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
) that use them.
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:45:07PM -0700, Hoogen wrote:
I think flash isn't going to be considered... It has a finite
erase/write cycles.. yeah but 8200 could have had more storage..
Erm... what do you think it uses
Just taking a stab...
... if they are SSG/J boxes, what about loading JUNOS onto them, which is not
flow-based?
We had the opportunity to do this with a pair of SSG 520M's. It entailed
getting a separate flash card from Juniper with the JUNOS image that physically
replaced the Netscreen
We use 10.0S1.1 in a heavy production environment (750+ RVI's across 21
downstream switches in a two-stack VC chassis setup) with no issues. knocking
on wood
10.1.R.18 is nice, but had nothing we needed in our environment to upgrade to.
I would compare 10.0.R2 release notes (what 10.0S1.1
Works for me.
dan
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:04 AM
To: 'Juniper-Nsp'
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper.net website problems?
Hi folks - am I the only
purposes.
As far as your Jumbo Frames, you might want to check the MTU settings on the
connecting devices to these switches as well.
Dan Farrell
da...@appliedi.netmailto:da...@appliedi.net
From: Paul Waller [mailto:waller...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:42 PM
To: Dan
need the route-reflector functionality.
Am I correct or ?
Dan Farrell wrote:
If I'm not mistaken I got an EX3200-24T for around $3k (give or take) and I
have BGP peering on it.
Dan Farrell
da...@appliedi.net
-Original Message-
From: TCIS List Acct [mailto:lista
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Dan Farrell; TCIS List Acct
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX series needs a special license for BGP?
On Friday 19 February 2010 10:52:22 pm Dan Farrell wrote:
TBH, I have no clue about the licensing ramifications, only that for
the price I paid, I was given the ability
If you didn't need full routes you could go with the EX series for pretty cheap.
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen
Sent: Thursday
Are there any hard limits that anyone knows of? We use the 3200's and 4200's,
and on the 4200's we're literally putting on hundreds of rvi's (eventually a
couple thousand).
Thanks,
Dan Farrell
Director of Network Operations
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
That leaves out the specific CPU and TEMP counters though, right? I think that
cacti link had those included.
Dan Farrell
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
keegan.hol...@sungard.com
Sent: Monday
Believe it or not, 10.0.r2 is working like a charm for us so far. So far.
Dan Farrell
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Malte von dem Hagen
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 3:57 PM
To: Paul Waller
Cc
,
Dan Farrell
Director of Network Operations
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
(not for our
operations).
Anyway, if you have run into this and found a workaround in the switch itself,
any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan Farrell
Director of Network Operations
Applied Innovations Corp.
da...@appliedi.net
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus
finally had room
to populate within the 5000 prefix limit.
Just thought I'd drop this nugget here in case anyone runs into the same issue.
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Farrell
This is how I do it... if this is not a recommended method, please let me know
(PLEASE!) I currently configure around 90 L3 interfaces in this manner right
now.
interfaces {
ge-0/0/20 {
description physical port;
unit 0 {
family ethernet-switching {
Cacti has plugins written by the community- one of them is known as 'thold' or
'threshold'. When installed in the cacti application, it can be set to monitor
and alert when a low or high threshold on a counter is met. This can be done on
anything cacti is monitoring (CPU, interface throughput,
, or vlans a
particular filter is applied on. The best I can come up with is-
show configuration | display set | match filter | match vlan
Is there way I'm missing that can give me the same (or somewhat similar)
information?
Thanks,
Dan Farrell
Director of Network Operations
Applied Innovations
To: Dan Farrell; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: EX series VLAN filter verification
Does show interfaces filters help?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Farrell
Sent: Tuesday
I'm not sure that this is always a good idea, anyway.
Let's say you reach a point where you want to prune your interface
membership... you just want, let's say, to remove one interface from the
range.
Would that action of deleting the line and re-submitting it without the
interface you want
It seems as though you are criticizing someone by doing exactly what you accuse
them of.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Calkins
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:45 PM
To: Richard A
Thanks for the information... I will let you know how it goes (though it seems
you already know hehehe, since this was your baby.)
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:04 PM
To: Dan Farrell
Cc
times
Feb 5 19:11:13 nap-r2-edge-2 last message repeated 17 times
Feb 5 19:11:43 nap-r2-edge-2 rpd[82464]: RPD_RT_PREFIX_LIMIT_BELOW: Number of
prefixes (3999) in table inet.0 is now less than the configured maximum (4000)
Thanks,
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp
I wonder if that's because they're not trying to make an 'everything'
package on their first stab in the marketplace.
It sounds like they submitted a decent first attempt at the switching
space and will wait to see what shakes out, and what people will say (as
per your suggestion) what works and
Actually he can speak for us on this one, too. I asked my cohort here
what devices we had in our datacenters that would need POE... you know
what I heard?
... cricket...
I told a vendor rep recently that there is no way we would ever buy POE
switches for our hosting work... and now he's smiling
As a newcomer to JUNOS I'm stumbling a little on the policy
configurations (in particular for prepending.) This really seems to
spell it out better than the Juniper reference.
One question- The 'then accept;' statement after term 2 ... is it
necessary? If so, what is it doing that wouldn't happen
one bring the FIC 'online'? I checked the documentation, and
googled, and came up empty.
Thanks for any insight,
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
-
show chassis fpc pic-status 1
Which should show the PIC online. And when I then do a show interfaces
terse the ge-1/3/0 interface now appears.
Thanks again guys!
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Farrell
Sent: Monday
You're not incorrect that they can be ordered with that much RAM,
however... any sales rep that didn't put you onto the new RE-850-1536-BB
(the 850Mhz CPU with 1536 MB RAM) for the same price as the old 400 mhz
RE isn't doing his/her job.
I say this because we just got our new M7i with those
Hi,
Can you explain how you were able to actually set your GE interface to
100Mbps? Is it only specific GE interfaces that allow 100Mbps settings?
I ask because we just got an M7i, and it is not possible to duplicate
the configuration you have below with our own ge-0/0/0.
Thanks,
danno
43 matches
Mail list logo
