Re: [j-nsp] Best Place to Buy Used Juniper

I have always had great luck working with Hula Networks. Scott -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Colton Conor Date: Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 1:10 PM To: Juniper List

Re: [j-nsp] Practice lab environments, any suggestions?

Which of the certification tracks are you going for? Because eventually, each will be different! Two options to start out the way I see itŠ. Grabbing a few SRX¹s or even old J-series off EBay are good. JUNOS is JUNOS at the beginning levels. Eventually things separate though. An MX would be

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP/JNCIE new Tracks

Anyone who has confirmed knowledge is under an NDA and not supposed to say anything. When Juniper puts the information out to the public, then we can talk the details. :) Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS

. With a refresh, I believe you will be forced to go for A, then S. Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER s...@emanon.com Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard and be Eeeevl

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP-SP latest dumps

nderstand things. My two cents for the day.  (or 3.5 in case the register failed)  ;)   Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER

Re: [j-nsp] any guidance on JNCIP-M

I believe the Sybex books are still available on Juniper's web site as PDFs. That would be excellent study material to start with! Lab up everything in them and play around/change things, and you'll gain lots of insight for the lab! Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP-SP latest dumps

care less about OSPF LSAs. Learn it. It's a multiple choice exam, so statistically, even a monkey has a chance of passing. In theory, that should be higher if you understand things. My two cents for the day. (or 3.5 in case the register failed) ;) *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (RS/ISP-Dial

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 JunOS recommendations

I will assume that you mean ethernet headers instead of TCP headers ;) You should be fine with 9014 though as only the header is counted. The FCS shouldn't be counted in the total length at all. Scott Jonathan Call wrote: I don't know if this will help because it has to deal with gigabit

Re: [j-nsp] AS-path

Oops. just realized wrong syntax, assumed this was for a different list. ;) So disregard my last reply! Anyway, in this answer, you have one THOUSAND in paren instead of 100. Scott Judah Scott wrote: Without testing It seems like: set as-path 100not1000orig .* 100 .* (!1000)$ should

Re: [j-nsp] 13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests

. *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER s...@emanon.com Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard and be Eeeevl.. Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:14

Re: [j-nsp] 13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests

Tests* *Scott Morris * to: Richard A Steenbergen 06/29/09 05:13 PM Sent by:*juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net* Cc: Juniper Puck *Please respond to swm* I feel a need to jump

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP-M Preparation

Make sure to check out the current list of topics on the web site to be sure But for most things (especially at JNCIP level) the basic technologies aren't really much different today than with much older versions of software anyway! No vendor tests on latest and greatest (statistically

Re: [j-nsp] PtP link over FR

On your Cisco router, when you look at show frame map what do you see as the encapsulation? Is it CISCO or IETF? Juniper routers (like most other vendors) does not do CISCO frame encapsulation, so if you change to IETF on the Cisco side you should be fine. Note, this is different than Cisco

Re: [j-nsp] PtP link over FR

Tinka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:25 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Farhan Jaffer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PtP link over FR On Thursday 17 July 2008 19:13:50 Scott Morris wrote: Juniper routers (like most other vendors

Re: [j-nsp] PtP link over FR

There is no ARP in frame-relay. More specifically, on a P2P subinterface, there's no mapping either. The assumption is that if it's not MY address it must be yours. So as long as you believe the other side is within the defined subnet, then you're good. If you have 10.1.1.1/24 on one side, and

Re: [j-nsp] PtP link over FR

Fair enough. I simply read the scenario involving two routers sharing a frame-relay p2p link. :) Scott -Original Message- From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:27 AM To: Scott Morris Cc: 'Farhan Jaffer'; 'Juniper Puck'; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services

An AS-PIC (or ASM) will terminate tunnels as well, but you don't need to have it. The tunnel pic (or built in one) serves that function as well. The Tunnel Services PIC leverages a comprehensive set of tunneling technologies to deliver revenue generating IP/MPLS services over any IP

Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:57 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Dermot Williams'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Tunnel Services -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Morris Sent: Tuesday

Re: [j-nsp] Odd BGP Issue

, 2008 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Lee Hetherington'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Odd BGP Issue Or maybe they wouldn't be upset if you were providing a reliable link between two previously un-peered AS's. On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Scott Morris wrote: HA! You

Re: [j-nsp] New JUNOS Enterprise routing book... [9:5520]

-Original Message- From: Scott Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April 2008 21:16 To: Firth,MJC,Michael,DMJ R; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [j-nsp] New JUNOS Enterprise routing book... [9:5520] I'm not sure there's really that big of a hole. The blueprint for the exam

Re: [j-nsp] How to load a lot of prefixes

Find a friend with a full BGP feed and set up an ebgp multihop peer to them? Just make sure to filter updates out (and hopefully he/she is filtering in from you) to cover those oops moments. :) HTH, Scott PS. Otherwise, there's a lot of Cut/Paste involved and Ctrl-H for Search/Replace.

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP on juniper M series

RSVP is for transporting interfaces. So just your core facing ones. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ibariouen Khalid Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:49 AM To: Juniper-NSP Mailing list Subject: [j-nsp] RSVP on juniper M

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS support for RFC 4193 : Unique Local IPv6 UnicastAddresses

There shouldn't be any problem in the support for it as it is just an address type. I haven't tested this, but don't see any problem with it. https://noc.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ula/ The pseudo-random ID is generated from your MAC address that you input, again, being a pseudo (and presumably)

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 questions

And unless you are on only certain particular devices (e.g. L3 switches) then the end device won't necessarily have any relevant clue what VLAN it's on. I have never seen/heard of an RFC for it either and would certainly wonder WHY?. :) Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [j-nsp] Cisco to Juniper Question

What about a /31? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Florian Weimer Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:17 AM To: Eric Van Tol Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Cisco to Juniper Question * Eric Van Tol: I ask this of

Re: [j-nsp] frame-relay J6350 to Cisco 2611

On the Cisco side, you can establish IETF in many ways. encapsulation frame-relay ietf will set a baseline for all PVCs. frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x yyy ietf or frame-relay interface-dlci yyy ietf will set encapsulation on a per pvc basis. But yes, you'll need to make the change for that

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Exam Guideline

At this point in time, there aren't any particular prep materials or practice questions... If you have seen any CCIE-based practice labs, you'll have some idea (conceptually, the details are obviously significantly different) of a lab. It's a scenario/configuration-based exam. The Sybex books

Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE

/07, Scott Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a very strange question, and very strange scenario... but I'm also getting some very strange errors, so I'm hoping that someone here may have seen this before and can give me some hint of whatever I'm apparantly not thinking of! I have

Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE

crazy! Scott -Original Message- From: Kevin Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP over GRE On May 4, 2007, at 7:57 AM, Scott Morris wrote: Protocols { bgp { group

[j-nsp] BGP over GRE

This is a very strange question, and very strange scenario... but I'm also getting some very strange errors, so I'm hoping that someone here may have seen this before and can give me some hint of whatever I'm apparantly not thinking of! I have a GRE tunnel from a J2300 to a Cisco router. The