Greetings,
Hi,
I've been experiencing problems with HTB where the whole machine locks
up. This usually happens when the whole qdisc is being removed and
occasionally when a leaf is being removed.
You may be interested in reading these two:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9318
gypsy wrote:
gypsy wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1 ceil
1 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb prio 1 rate
7000 ceil 7000 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc
gypsy wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1 ceil
1 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb prio 1 rate
7000 ceil 7000 burst 100 quantum 1600
tc
On 9/18/07, hhoxha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi every body
I have a linux server with Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz , and 2 Gigabit
of RAM , kernel version 2.6.22.6 , and 2 Intel 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet
controllers
In simple situation i would like to limit bandwidth for 2 customers
On 16 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose we have simple router with upstream interface connected
to internet (eth0) and downstream interface connected to lan (eth1).
Lan uses private addressing so there is NAT rule used for traffic
leaving eth0.
You can redirect lan-internet traffic
On 15 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a small problem. I have my debian server setup in my home.
I have setup htb that is working perfectly.
The only problem I have is to control the traffic server - internet
I have a daemon (bittorrent) and I would like to limit its
Any idea how to control that traffic (serv - net)
Its the same problems with apt etc etc When I use it, it uses the
entire amount of bandwidth...
You can shape download to server on ingress using IFB:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php?title=IFB
IMQ could also be helpfull, but IFB is included
On 15 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can shape download to server on ingress using IFB:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php?title=IFB
But AFAIK at the moment practically only if there is no NAT involved (or
if you do not want to classify de-nated traffic).
Any news regarding this
Is quantum not perhaps a bit high? Try setting it lower, and see what
happens?
-justin
On 2007-08-29 08:06, Martin Björnsson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs
Martin Björnsson pisze:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me
results I
expect. I've created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0)
1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1)
1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 1 (prio 2)
1:40
Yes, exactly. So my 1:20 class (prio 1) should get to send more than the 1:30
class. But
it doesn't, they both get about the same throughput.
Nobody else having problems with the prio parameter?
Martin
bartekR wrote:
Martin Björnsson pisze:
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with HTB and the prio
Hello Martin,
I used to have this kind of problem before. Not sure if I resolved it
with the help of folks on this mailing list, but I never tested.
What you can try is to remove the prio parameter from the classes and
leave the prio only for the filters.
Let us know if that helps.
Cheers,
Hi Andy :)
* Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
DervishD wrote:
I've thought that the culprit may be cpufreq. I have cpufreq scaling
activated, and cpufreq reduces the clock speed from 1800MHz to 1000MHz
when the processor is idle. This is more or less the same amount that I
lose
DervishD wrote:
I'll start a new thread here for this and will report to LKML too.
OK you should probably report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than LKML.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
Hi Andy :)
* Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
DervishD wrote:
I'll start a new thread here for this and will report to LKML too.
OK you should probably report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than LKML.
I was considering it, but then I thought that maybe this problem was
known
DervishD wrote:
Hi all :)
I've been using a tc setup for almost two years, but at some point
(probably when I switched to kernel 2.6.x, but I'm not sure) it has
started making something very weird.
For a certain class, the rate is 125000bit and the ceil is
27bit, but the
Marco C. Coelho wrote:
I've got a linux (2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.centos.plus) router doing pppoe
termination and HTB rate limiting.
the number of connections has grown quite a bit in the last few months,
and I'm now getting a:
HTB tree is too deep
message on the monitor.
where is the setting
Edouard Thuleau wrote:
Hi all,
I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for
an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link.
I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with
differents flows.
It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50%
Ranko Zivojnovic wrote:
Greetings,
I've been experiencing problems with HTB where the whole machine locks
up. This usually happens when the whole qdisc is being removed and
occasionally when a leaf is being removed.
Common is that it always happens when some sort of removal is in
progress.
Marco Aurelio ha scritto:
What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger
than the parent's?
HTB will assign to the leaf the rate regardeless of the value of the
parent's rate.
The parent's rate is used only to compute how much bandwith must be
allocated to the leaf's
Pablo Fernandes Yahoo wrote:
I would like to have the customer using 150kbit stable in a download. But at
the begining of the conection, i would like to have a 200kbit burst.
Depends what you mean - burst is an amount of data not a bitrate. If you
want them (using your setup) to have 25k of
Michael Fincham wrote:
Hey everyone,
For some reason my htb configuration isn't allowing any class to burst
up to its ceiling ever, even when the link is only being utilised by one
class that class only ever gets its assigned rate and exactly that
assigned rate...
The hierarchy I have is 1: at
It looks as though I may have had the hierarchy wrong... I had a class
with a qdisc as a child then all my classes as children of the qdisc...
now borrowing allowed as they're all root qdiscs.
-Michael
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 08:53 -0700, Flechsenhaar, Jon J wrote:
I would need to see your
On Thursday 26 April 2007 19:34, terraja-based wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi!
Hola!
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:01:02 +0200, Radu Oprisan wrote
Bc.Slavomir Danas wrote:
I'm trying to access shared folders (samba) on ip 10.4.10.10 from
my
laptop with ip 172.16.0.2.
Everything works as expected when downloading or uploading (correctly
shaped and policed at 1Mbit). But when I
Bc.Slavomir Danas wrote:
I'm trying to access shared folders (samba) on ip 10.4.10.10 from my
laptop with ip 172.16.0.2.
Everything works as expected when downloading or uploading (correctly
shaped and policed at 1Mbit). But when I try to download and upload at
the same time, my speed drops
How the guide say I expect to see on router (with command tc -s qdisc ls dev
eth0) that unclassified traffic, like ssh, get rounded to 20: but it doesn't
happen.
- Traffic just doesn't get rounded to a class. If you want traffic going to a
class you need to specify a filter. Did you by
On Jan 20, 2007, at 12:05 AM, Simone84bo wrote:
Hi to all
I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on
router:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3mbit burst 15k
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1
You should propably try:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20
and not 30 cause your default class is 20 no?
On 1/20/07, Simone84bo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all
I am studying HTB on LARTC how to. I realize a simple configuration on
router:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle
Hi Alan,
can anyone teach me what software to use to build a own web based GUI HTB
software in Fedoracore ( Linux based) ? Thanks
That really is a very open question to be asking. There are so many
different programming languages that can work with a web server 2 that
spring to mind are
You might want to look into
MasterShaper. It's
a full tc/ip bandwidth shaper. The author of it is Unki. He's done
the GUI in php, and uses some perl scripts to run the actual scripts on
the system. He's currently working on a newer version, and I
think it's supposed to support multiple wans.
plugthebox.net /dev/null wrote:
Hello,
hi
This process
kills my machine for 3-4 minutes until dumping all htb/sqf/iptables into
files and running these files (remember that i almost have 1200 IPs, and
each IP has 6 HTB+SFQ line with 2 iptables)
both iptables and tc have a batch mode, and both
own [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Thossapron Apinyapanha [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: lartc lartc lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:56:02 PMSubject: Re: [LARTC] HTB has 2 bucket?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Greetinsg Thossapron,: in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket - ke
PROTECTED]To: Thossapron Apinyapanha [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: lartc lartc lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:56:02 PMSubject: Re: [LARTC] HTB has 2 bucket?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Greetinsg Thossapron,: in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket - ke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetinsg Thossapron,
: in HTB use 2 bucket for manage 2 rate??? first bucket - keep
: token for sending with rate second bucket - keep ctoken for
: sending with ceil rate Is it true?? may be i'm misunderstand
: about token/bucket thoery
Yes,
Flechsenhaar, Jon J wrote:
I don't know if you answer basic HTB questions but I'l try anyway. I'm
implementing AF and EF with a root rate of 500 kbps (kilo bits per
second). I am using DSMARK to classify packets. I'm implementing this
on two different hardware sets PPC and x86 with the same
*~ r a K u ~ * wrote:
I have a lot question about tc-command because now i'm doing research to compare
performance between HTB and HFSC
so i'm doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My
question is
*In HTB tc command question*
1. I'm use opensource (Mastershaper) for
Namitha Rao wrote:
Hi
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004977.html
I have the same problem to discuss as in the above link. I want to allocate
say X MBit per individual connection regardless of the number of
connection
. KIndly could anyonen suggest me how to proceed.
I have
f00ty wrote:
Hi all !
I'm building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip
quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem,
and i think i'm doing something wrong, but i can't find what. Please
excuse my terrible english, i'm french.
From what i've read, tc is
El Thursday 14 September 2006 05:55, Namitha Rao escribió:
Hi
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004977.html
I have the same problem to discuss as in the above link. I want to allocate
say X MBit per individual connection regardless of the number of
connection . KIndly could
d3xcrIpt wrote:
Help me ...
I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn't work, I already
reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS
enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from
HTB source package, well this is my set :
eth0 is my
Good afternoon,your configuration seems correct to
me. Could you send us the output of tc -s -d class show dev eth0
during your probes?What kernel and tc versions are you
using?Regards,Eric Janz Departamento de SistemasGrupo Barceló ViajesC\ 16 de Julio, 7507009 Polígono Son CastellóPalma de
7:40 AM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb traffic
shaping problem
Good afternoon,
your
configuration seems correct to me. Could you send us the output of tc -s
-d class show dev eth0 during your probes?
What
kernel and tc versions are you using?
Regards,
Eric
Janz
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 02:27, Adorean Alexandru Raul wrote:
I have a router with about 300 clients connecting to it. It has htb with
a class per client.
I wnat to create a script to prioritise www trafic and ssh trafic over
p2p trafic
this is a sample of what i have now:
/sbin/tc
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:28:12PM +0200, Stefano Mainardi wrote:
The goal is to divide the traffic for classes of workstations, at example in
three classes, let say A, B and C.
Sounds simple enough...
If B don't make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the
rest at B
Why
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Larry Brigman wrote:
On 5/14/06, Jesper Dangaard Brouer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Muthukumar S wrote:
cut
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
cut
The kernel timer resolution does have an impact on
Muthukumar S wrote:
Iperf has a demonstrated behavior that when running more than one copy
at the
same time on the same box (client side); that the timing of each will
start to effect
the other copies. This is a function of how Iperf does it's timing
(spin loops).
What traffic generators
On 5/14/06, Jesper Dangaard Brouer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Muthukumar S wrote:
cut
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
cut
The kernel timer resolution does have an impact on the precision of HTB
(the delay jitter).
I
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Muthukumar S wrote:
cut
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
cut
The kernel timer resolution does have an impact on the precision of HTB
(the delay jitter).
I have done some detailed studies in my master thesis. Which
I'll try using 450 K and setting a higher ceil to see how it works.
Also I was wondering what limits (if any) the kernel timer resolution
imposes on HTB.
Thanks!
Muthu
On 5/11/06, Jody Shumaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/10/06, Muthukumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First up, thanks for the
Iperf has a demonstrated behavior that when running more than one copy at the
same time on the same box (client side); that the timing of each will
start to effect
the other copies. This is a function of how Iperf does it's timing
(spin loops).
What traffic generators would you recommend? What
On 5/12/06, Muthukumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Iperf has a demonstrated behavior that when running more than one copy at the
same time on the same box (client side); that the timing of each will
start to effect
the other copies. This is a function of how Iperf does it's timing
(spin
On Friday 12 May 2006 12:35, Muthukumar S wrote:
Iperf has a demonstrated behavior that when running more than one copy at
the same time on the same box (client side); that the timing of each will
start to effect
the other copies. This is a function of how Iperf does it's timing
(spin
Forwarding this to the list just so its in the archives.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Larry Brigman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 11, 2006 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB at 100+ Mbits/sec
To: Muthukumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/10/06, Muthukumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 5/10/06, Muthukumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First up, thanks for the response Jody. I appreciate your taking the
time to answer.
So in essence what this means is that I will not be able to use the
maximum that the link allows if I'm shaping traffic? Please correct me
if I got this wrong -
On Monday April 17 2006 18:56, Cahyo Purnomo wrote:
Dear All,
I wanna to implement of bandwith shapingin my office using HTB, any
body suggest about the case ?
Below the acl ip range i want to limit :
1. staf (10.0.0.1 - 3) -- limit to 10kbyte/s
2. lab (10.0.0.4 - 6) -- limit to 5kbyte/s
El Wednesday 26 April 2006 13:00, Luke McConnell escribió:
Hi,
I'm trying to get HTB working correctly on Centos4 (RHEL-based) with
kernel 2.6.9-34.EL. I have two gigabit network interfaces bridged
together and I have created the following:
tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1: htb default 1
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
One more thing I just thought - sfq sets its quantum from the dev mtu.
Riiight. I should have tried without the sfq earlier. Without it this
works as expected without explicit mtu setting for the htb class. And no
giants.
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
# tc
Andy Furniss wrote:
Looking again at your stats -
Sent 189796883 bytes 20626 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 3484Kbit 45pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 20627 borrowed: 0 giants: 30926
tokens: -9768 ctokens: -9768
The giants count is higher than the packet count so now I
Andy Furniss wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Looking again at your stats -
Sent 189796883 bytes 20626 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 3484Kbit 45pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 20627 borrowed: 0 giants: 30926
tokens: -9768 ctokens: -9768
The giants count is higher than the
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:40 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 03:03 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Setting mtu 16500 for the class fixed it. But I wonder where did these
giants come from in the first place? The
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 21:32 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Well, as much as google tells me TSO has been in the kernel and enabled
since 2.5.33 and e1000 was the first driver to support it. The FC4
2.6.16 kernel doesn't have any tso related patches as can be
seen here
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 03:03 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Setting mtu 16500 for the class fixed it. But I wonder where did these
giants come from in the first place? The mtu of the interface is and was
1500. Or so ifconfig and ip link tell me. Or this
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:40 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 03:03 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Setting mtu 16500 for the class fixed it. But I wonder where did these
giants come from in the first place? The mtu of the interface
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
I think you need to ask fedora or intel driver maintainer about this.
AIUI tso is not in vanilla kernels and the patches are quite invasive.
Well, as much as google tells me TSO has been in the kernel and enabled
since 2.5.33 and e1000 was the first driver to support it.
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Hi
Here is something that worked with with 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp and stopped
working when I upgraded to 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4smp.
These are fedora kernels and the network controller is an Intel Gbit
(e1000) running a 100 Mbps Full Duplex.
Don't know how or if this matters but the
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 00:13 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Hi
Here is something that worked with with 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp and stopped
working when I upgraded to 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4smp.
These are fedora kernels and the network controller is an Intel Gbit
(e1000) running
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Setting mtu 16500 for the class fixed it. But I wonder where did these
giants come from in the first place? The mtu of the interface is and was
1500. Or so ifconfig and ip link tell me. Or this is some other mtu we
are talking about...
Hmm I didn't expect that - maybe
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 03:03 +0100, Andy Furniss wrote:
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Setting mtu 16500 for the class fixed it. But I wonder where did these
giants come from in the first place? The mtu of the interface is and was
1500. Or so ifconfig and ip link tell me. Or this is some other mtu
b) Is there a way to get a precise rate and pps for the last 10 seconds?
(issue of rate taking 3-4 mins to get to zero as opposed to instantly)
Run the command, record the number of bytes and packets sent. (tc -s
class show dev ppp0)
Wait exactly 10 seconds (sleep 10)
Run the command again,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:56:44PM +0100, Fabio wrote:
Is this a configuration problem?
Also, when I set tc rules I get: quantum of class is big. Consider r2q
change
Well, that message can be avoided by configuring quantum properly
(not always possible if difference between rates is
Diego Andrés Asenjo Gonzalez wrote:
Hi again!
$IPT -A FORWARD -t mangle -p udp -s 172.16.0.185/32 -i eth1 --sport
1:10100 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 0x44
This should be -o eth1 or you should be shaping it on eth0 or if it's
for the shaping box you need to do some sort of
Diego Andrés Asenjo Gonzalez ha scritto:
Sorry, a typo :p. You pointed clearly the -o eth1 in the previous
message. Really, is the first time that I use -i or -o in the rule. One
point is that the box is a bridge between a LAN and a router, eth0 is in
the LAN and eth1 in the router. So, I
El Thursday 02 March 2006 12:59, Andy Furniss escribió:
Diego Andrés Asenjo Gonzalez wrote:
Hi again!
$IPT -A FORWARD -t mangle -p udp -s 172.16.0.185/32 -i eth1 --sport
1:10100 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 0x44
This should be -o eth1 or you should be shaping it on eth0 or
Hello!
Thanks to all for your responses.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to use physdev on a bridge (-m physdev --physdev-out eth1).
Yes, you are right. Taken from ebtables FAQ:
* Can I use ebtables with iptables? Yes, it's possible to use ebtables
together with iptables, there are
Diego Andrés Asenjo Gonzalez wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm using an edge bridge box with two ethernet cards to shape traffic in
a WAN link. I'm running Debian 3.1 stable with kernel 2.6.8 and iproute
from packages. I recompiled the kernel with the following built-in options:
[*] 802.1d Ethernet
Hi and thanks for replying!
As I select everything I don't know if this is enough - also I think
you need to select classify in netfilter the section.
I also select almost everything in the netfilter section, including MARK
and CLASSIFY. I simplified the script mantaining the most
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:48:18PM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
than bulk. Also remember when setting rates that htb will see ip packets
as ip length + 14 when used on ethX
Could you elaborate on this a bit?
I suppose you also meant this in an earlier message when you mentioned
that the overhead
Diego Andrés Asenjo Gonzalez wrote:
Hi and thanks for replying!
As I select everything I don't know if this is enough - also I think
you need to select classify in netfilter the section.
I also select almost everything in the netfilter section, including MARK
and CLASSIFY. I simplified
Andreas Hasenack wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:48:18PM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
than bulk. Also remember when setting rates that htb will see ip packets
as ip length + 14 when used on ethX
Could you elaborate on this a bit?
I suppose you also meant this in an earlier message when you
Hi again!
$IPT -A FORWARD -t mangle -p udp -s 172.16.0.185/32 -i eth1 --sport
1:10100 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 0x44
This should be -o eth1 or you should be shaping it on eth0 or if it's
for the shaping box you need to do some sort of ingress shaping/policing.
Sorry, a typo
El Friday 24 February 2006 06:36, Andreas Klauer escribió:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:42:16PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote:
with vde_switch daemon listening in a tuntap device.
I suppose that htb is device independet, i hope it does not matter.
I don't have any experience with vde_switch and
Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 14:45 schrieb Markus Schulz:
tc -s -d class show dev ppp0
class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b cburst 1739b/8 mpu 0b overhead 14b level 7
Sent 1485575598 bytes 3140554 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
ok, i've understand now. Differenz comes from gross versus net data
rates due to overhead of ATM-SAR and pppoe-overhead. All statistic
values are netto values.
Yes - you can get patches to do egress overheads for dsl - if you know
your exact type and are prepared to rebuild kernel or the
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:42:16PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote:
That's becouse the _real_ scenario will look like this:
root-parent_all_hosts-client_host_1-prio
-dfl
[...]
-client_host_N-prio
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:08:27PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote:
root-parent_all_host(256,256)-client_host_1(X,X)-host_1_prio(X*0.9,X)
-host_1_dfl(X*0.1,X)
What's the purpose of the 256kbit class? In the setup you posted,
the 200/230kbit child
El Thursday 23 February 2006 19:38, Andreas Klauer escribió:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:08:27PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote:
root-parent_all_host(256,256)-client_host_1(X,X)-host_1_prio(X*0.9,X)
-host_1_dfl(X*0.1,X)
What's the purpose of the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:21:36PM +0100, Boris Gereg wrote:
thanks Andreas, I reconfigured HTB to get your suggested hierarhy:
One thing I forgot in my graph: Make sure that the rates always add up,
i.e. the sum of the child class rates should equal the parent class rate.
It's unlikely to be
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 05:00:12AM +0100, Boris Gereg wrote:
I did what you suggested and the results are as expected!
You can see this picture to verify: http://elusion.sk/visual_inet_7.png
At 4:25 I started HTTP download. P2P class immediately droped down to
it's RATE, WWW class got it's
Hello,
thanks Andreas, I reconfigured HTB to get your suggested hierarhy:
AK 1: HTB Qdisc
AK |
AK \--- 1:2 HTB root class (10Kbit:10kbit)
AK |
AK \--- 1:2000 HTB leaf class (5Kbit:10Kbit) #local
AK |
AK \--- 1:3000 HTB parent class (2048Kbit:2048Kbit)
AK
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:59:33PM +0100, Boris Gereg wrote:
I made a screen to help explain my problem. Please, see this picture:
http://elusion.sk/visual_inet_hory.png
Nice graph. I assume this is on downstream, and you rely on HTB to drop
packets for you. You may have read this in the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:49:59AM +0100, Boris Gereg wrote:
(first of all, please, how to reply to some article in LARTC via mail
to post it into right thread?)
Using 'reply all', or 'reply list' if your mail software offers it.
If all else fails, just hit 'reply' and add the mailing list to
Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 14:45 schrieb Markus Schulz:
tc -s -d class show dev ppp0
class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b cburst 1739b/8 mpu 0b overhead 14b level 7
Sent 1485575598 bytes 3140554 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
rate 480008bit
They would do different things, the prio only has to do with all other classes that share the same parent. The prio isn't preserved as it goes up/down the tree. Depending on what you want to accomplish, you really should probably be doing it on all levels, not one or the other.
- JodyOn 2/5/06,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:35:36PM +0200, Anton Glinkov wrote:
Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per class
basis? A simple example:
class 1:10 parent 1:
class 1:130 parent 1:10 prio 3
class 1:170 parent 1:10 prio 7
class 1:171 parent 1:170 prio 1
class
Dnia wtorek, 10 stycznia 2006 00:57, Andy Furniss napisał(a):
# main rate limitation for whole connection (802.11a radio link)
tc class add dev eth2.24 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 15000kbit ceil
15000kbit burst 10kbit
Burst too small - it's realated to HZ and also should be at least
Oliver Hookins wrote:
burst 19k will limit you unless your HZ=1000
Our HZ is 512.
I don't know if it makes any difference, but I would have chosen 500 so
that it was 2ms. The default now is 250 and with 19k burst that fits the
speed you get really well - with 512 it would be around
Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
Here is current setup:
tc qdisc del root dev eth2.24 2/dev/null
tc qdisc add root dev eth2.24 handle 1: htb default 1
# main rate limitation for whole connection (802.11a radio link)
tc class add dev eth2.24 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 15000kbit ceil
15000kbit
Denis Ovsienko wrote:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 24k
Does the following help?
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 1
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 81mbit burst 24k
Oliver Hookins wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to perform some (what I consider) basic traffic shaping on
our network utilising HTB. I have mostly reused the example on the
lartc.org site:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit
1 - 100 of 694 matches
Mail list logo
