For some reason the ends of two paragraphs were chopped off the message I sent
yesterday (on the old list): you didn't miss much, but if anyone was curious the
missing snippets were:
'Hideous' you are welcome to interpret as a matter of personal artistic taste ;-)
and
but mostly the problem
Thank you for being more specific. I agree with you that these could be
more consistent, mostly by removing colors or by making the coloring
more consistent. I suspect they got this way by harvesting them from
completed VIs. Personally I think they are a good start, and with a few
rounds of
LabVIEW and/or CVI instrument drivers.
Let me know if you have any questions and I'd be happy to assist.
Jason Hobbs
Hi,
I am gearing up to build an instrument driver for one of our newest
instruments per NI's LabVIEW Plug and Play model. I just downloaded the
driver templates from
Is it just me
or is this the most hideous, haphazard ragbag since the invention of the
Windows toolbar? I counted *at least twelve* different styles of xy graph
in
this collection of supposedly 'consistent' symbols.
While it is always good to get feedback, it is even better to get
Greg McKaskle [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
While it is always good to get feedback, it is even better to get
feedback that you understand.
I apologise if my comment was provocative - it is only an opinion, but it wouldn't be
the first time someone on info-labview has had one, and I'm glad to
drivers. If only other
manufacturers would follow your lead!
As a late adopter still on LV5, I hadn't seen the 'icon art glossary'
(http://www.ni.com/devzone/idnet/library/icon_art_glossary.htm) until I saw the link
from the driver templates page on the NI site today. Is it just me
Scott Remington [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am gearing up to build an instrument driver for one of
our newest instruments per NI's LabVIEW Plug and Play
model. I just downloaded the driver templates from their
website but found out they were written in version 7.
In my LV5 installation
