Alain Michaud wrote:
Ok, then what about that score:
hello world1 %
GTK 98 %
GTK2 90 %
Win32 99 %
QT10 %
Right now Laz/linux comes with GTK by default. I supose that we will do
a transition to GTK2 (or QT) at some point. Are we? When
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
wrapping it?
It's a problem of postgres. A transaction 'block' is started with the
sql-command 'begin', from that comand on, all queries are executed
But you can do multiple queries in a block I
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Alain Michaud wrote:
Ok, then what about that score:
hello world1 %
GTK 98 %
GTK2 90 %
Win32 99 %
QT10 %
Yes, forgot to say in the other mail, but these numbers are about right;
although I think gtk2 is not that far
Micha Nelissen schreef:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Alain Michaud wrote:
Ok, then what about that score:
hello world1 %
GTK 98 %
GTK2 90 %
Win32 99 %
QT10 %
Yes, forgot to say in the other mail, but these numbers are about right;
although I
- Original Message -
From: Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Cc: Sainty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Growing memory and MySQL
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Sainty wrote:
Hello all,
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
wrapping it?
It's a problem of postgres. A transaction 'block' is started with the
sql-command 'begin', from that comand
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
wrapping it?
It's a problem of postgres. A transaction 'block' is started with the
sql-command 'begin', from that comand on, all queries are executed
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But you can do multiple queries in a block I suppose ? Multiple
update, and one select, or so ?
Obviously, this is the whole idea of transactions ? :)
Then I don't see why multiple concurrent transactions are useful ? The
user can only do one thing at a time
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But you can do multiple queries in a block I suppose ? Multiple update,
and one select, or so ?
Obviously, this is the whole idea of transactions ? :)
Then I don't see why multiple concurrent transactions are useful ?
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Then I don't see why multiple concurrent transactions are useful ? The
user can only do one thing at a time anyway, right? :-)
Didn't you implement threads ? ;-)
Not if you make e.g. some reports in the background, using threads.
Hmm I didn't expect multiple
This patch fixes some bugs,button captions are working now,tstatictext is
also working!
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
mypatch.patch
Description: Binary data
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:37:36 +0330, roozbeh gholizadeh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch fixes some bugs,button captions are working now,tstatictext is
also working!
well saw other peaple pasted patch in text message so here it is again
Index: wincecallback.inc
roozbeh gholizadeh wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:37:36 +0330, roozbeh gholizadeh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch fixes some bugs,button captions are working now,tstatictext is
also working!
well saw other peaple pasted patch in text message so here it is again
As attachment is
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:27 -0700, johnf wrote:
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:42, Marc Santhoff wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2006, 21:29 +0200 schrieb Joost van der Sluis:
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:43 -0400, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
2006/4/18, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 09:22 +0200, Micha Nelissen wrote:
But you can do multiple queries in a block I suppose ? Multiple
update,
and one select, or so ?
Yes, you can even do multiple selects. But what you can't do is rollback
only a part of the block. (well.. there are safepoints, but not
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:22 +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
wrapping it?
It's a problem of postgres. A transaction 'block' is started with the
sql-command 'begin',
On 4/19/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
wrapping it?
It's a problem of postgres. A transaction
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
wrapping it?
It's a
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 13:22 +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a problem with PostrgreSQL itself or the component in lazarus
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 13:36 +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several other databases have support for more then one transaction. This
means that if you want to execute a query, you have to tell in which
transaction the query should be
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, pseudo-code, see Michaels mail for the real commands.
Yep, I've seen them. Interesting. It's good to know about them .
Indeed, it's not visible. Therefore: the same user can see that record
in one place, and at the same time
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 04:57, Adrian Maier wrote:
On 4/19/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, pseudo-code, see Michaels mail for the real commands.
Yep, I've seen them. Interesting. It's good to know about them .
Indeed, it's not visible. Therefore: the same user
Hello,
I'm porting an old Delphi application to Lazarus. This application, needs
to embeed a PDF viewer in its interface.
I did it with an OCX provided by Adobe, that I imported to Delphi's component
palette. Delphi allowes me to iclude an OCX as a normal Delphi's component.
Is there any way to
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
[...] With PostgreSQL it blows when I try to go up
records in a grid instead of going down. Probably has more to do with
I was going up from a newly inserted record.
Yes, it was probably a bug in TBufDataset, which is used for all
transaction.commit
John
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 09:23, Jon Foster wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
[...] With PostgreSQL it blows when I try to go up
records in a grid instead of going down. Probably has more to do with
I was going up from a newly inserted record.
Yes, it was probably a
Lazarus dont support OCX´s as components since they are not cross platform.
the best way is you use an external pdf2html converter and show this with
turboipro or something else.
2nd way is you load your ocx with windows ole api prvided by freepascal (i
hope)
Vincent Snijders a écrit :
Luc Vigato wrote:
Hello,
I have problem after building lazarus rev 9144, I can't start
lazarus. I compile with interface GTK2. Before i have had the same
problem with GTK interface.
Has anyone an idea in how i can help you with this ?
I assume you are using fpc
Am Mittwoch, den 19.04.2006, 16:35 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I'm porting an old Delphi application to Lazarus. This application, needs
to embeed a PDF viewer in its interface.
I did it with an OCX provided by Adobe, that I imported to Delphi's component
palette. Delphi
Luc wrote:
Vincent Snijders a écrit :
Luc Vigato wrote:
Hello,
I have problem after building lazarus rev 9144, I can't start
lazarus. I compile with interface GTK2. Before i have had the same
problem with GTK interface.
Has anyone an idea in how i can help you with this ?
I assume
Just thought I would shared the views in this message - well done guys :)
A.J.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Rorden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 19, 2006 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: Idea for a Lazarus project
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A.J.-
Just to say that the conversion of my
30 matches
Mail list logo
