On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
[speaking of Portage, a version of the BSD ports tree for Linux]
That would rock, speaking as one who's been bitten by many an
rpm-related problem... Does picoBSD have anything like that? Could be a
good place to raid.
I
Everyone,
Who would like to evaluate this package?
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-06-13 17:16 -0700
Patches item #432947, was updated on 2001-06-13 17:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=313751aid=432947group_id
=13751
Category: None
Group: None
Status:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
Mike Sensney wrote:
At 12:26 PM 06/14/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote
Windows users who don't know Linux/ipchains should just skip installing a
LEAF firewall since it will add no protection? Well, that will simplify
things a lot for the new
Also, I'm generally interested in 'really thin' servers. The first will
probably be a BIND server, which I'd also like to see install straight
from
the CD.
Charles Steinkuehler
Hi Charles !
What are the reasons which make you choose Bind over tinydns if you are
looking for a really
Take a look at Cisco I'd say. I never have to compile IOS from source, but
they're pretty responsible in reporting security issues.
Provided you'll pay for the fixes.
They do NOT offer nothing for free... but they never said that either...
___
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
Take a look at Cisco I'd say. I never have to compile IOS from source, but
they're pretty responsible in reporting security issues.
Provided you'll pay for the fixes.
They do NOT offer nothing for free... but they never said that either...
True.
David Douthitt wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Hey! What's with this VI stuff...it's emacs all the way! just kidding
;-)
I love Emacs too - that's the problem. I got spoiled using real Emacs
on a HP Apollo for a while - never left Emacs, even though X was
available.
I forgot
Pim van Riezen wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
For me personally, my aim is not to build black box appliances that need
no maintenance, but rather to build network appliances that don't carry
Unix baggage unless if there's no alternatives.
That's if you consider UNIX
[Pim had written:]
Think about it, a 500MB IDE harddrive to install FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Debian
Linux or whatever else on costs close to nothing. If I wanted a Unix
machine to do that task, I'd go and build one and wouldn't bother with
things like LRP. As a 'consumer', I go for LRP because
I've started work on a setup.lrp, which will use dialog (which
requires libm and ncurses) to provide a simple setup script for
experts and novices alike. It is also flexible enough to be used for
new environments and new configurations such as seawall or the
EigerStein scripts.
It works a bit
Jack Coates, 2001-06-15 08:34 -0700
you're on Exchange 5.5 too. I did some quick searching but couldn't find
any good reason for the problem. Will keep looking.
Jack,
Could this be related to the following support request I just opened?
ML user messages not delivered
Mike Sensney wrote:
A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its administrator
that updates are needed.
This is a great idea, and one I like. However, there are several
things that would be needed before something like this could be truly
useful:
* A centralized package
A new user comes along (with or without UNIX/network tech), boots with
two disks (yes two), and then goes through this initial setup step by
step, with a boot disk to be configured in hand. Once this is all
done, then the disk is backed up to another, the configuration saved,
and the user
Mike Sensney, 2001-06-15 08:35 -0700
At 06:31 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote
David Douthitt, 2001-06-15 07:45 -0500
Mike Sensney wrote:
Still, a point well taken. It probably would be wise to institute an
advisory list for package updates and security issues.
A very good idea -
David:
This, now, is a great idea. Go fer it.
Suggestion:
A new user comes along (with or without UNIX/network tech), boots with
two disks (yes two), and then goes through this initial setup step by
step, with a boot disk to be configured in hand. Once this is all
done, then
I'll do some looking next week through technet. It may be a setting
specific to exchange. It happens on lists ONCE in a while. Certainly not
every message. And yes, I am using Exchange5.5 and Outlook2000 at home for
now. Experiance with it pays my rent.
It's not just from you that it
A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its
administrator that updates are needed.
-
I don't necessarily agree with this. Part of the appeal of a base config'd
system for me is that even if it is hacked, there arn't many tools to use.
Gee. And I was just thinking of simple notification, then letting the admin
do the work. :-)
At 10:54 AM 06/15/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote
Mike Sensney wrote:
A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its administrator
that updates are needed.
This is a great idea,
At 09:53 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote
Mike Sensney, 2001-06-15 08:35 -0700
At 06:31 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote
David Douthitt, 2001-06-15 07:45 -0500
Mike Sensney wrote:
Still, a point well taken. It probably would be wise to institute an
advisory list for package updates
These are great senarios. Add them to your Oxygen usage page. :)
But, we also have people who need to 'get something up now!', have more than
3 systems and don't want to pay for the per user sygate license and have
read on the dangers of unprotected Windows ICS or use a newer more expensive
At 11:13 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Steven Peck wrote
A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its
administrator that updates are needed.
-
I don't necessarily agree with this. Part of the appeal of a base config'd
system for me is that even if
Steven Peck wrote:
What are the posibilities of doing a custom pre configured build of Oxygen
ala Eigerstein series? I haven't had the time to look at Oxygen at all, so
I don't know if the single disk with preloaded modules and a firewall are
posible, much less space for
Hi,
I wanted to have a try to the Dachstein pre-release
( 2001/05/27 ) butI didn't found any trace of pppoe support
Does someone work on this ??
Have a nice WE
Etienne Charlier
23 matches
Mail list logo