Ewald Wasscher, 2001-04-21 16:38 +0200
>Eric Wolzak wrote:
>
>>okay time for CVS :)
>
>Hmm, and hwo are we going te set this up? Currently there are lots of
>binaries in my eigerstein2beta tree for which I don't have (yet) the
>source code. Should there be seperate source and binaries trees? It
Eric Wolzak wrote:
> okay time for CVS :)
Hmm, and hwo are we going te set this up? Currently there are lots of
binaries in my eigerstein2beta tree for which I don't have (yet) the
source code. Should there be seperate source and binaries trees? It
would be really nice to do a "cvs co" and t
Eric Wolzak wrote:
> > > Greetings to all of you.
> > > Ook ewald de groeten :)
> >
> > Greetings to all, and to Eric:
> >
> > Gruesse aus Holland (hmm, where did you read that before :-)
> in my schoolbooks ;) ,I am dutch but live in Germany since 1984.
>
> Ewald
> > P.S. Eric; I live only 5
> I think that should be the first goal. It would of course be very
> interesting to create a truly linux 2.4 based distribution, but it will
> hardly be eigerstein I think (though rather cool)
The special part of eigerstein is in effect the script to setup the
firewall. This is based on ipchai
Eric Wolzak wrote:
> Hello Ewald, Charles
>
> Is anyone working on this already? If not I will have a start this
> weekend, or perhaps when I return from work tonight. If you prefer
> someone else's work please tell me so; it will save me some superfluous
> work.
> yep, sor
Hello Ewald, Charles
> > >> Is anyone working on this already? If not I will have a start this
> > >> weekend, or perhaps when I return from work tonight. If you prefer
> > >> someone else's work please tell me so; it will save me some superfluous
> > >> work.
> > >
yep, sort of.
I am implementin
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Any particular version(s) of Oxygen I need to be working with, or should I
> just grab the latest?
There are in essence, two versions at this time: the original glibc
2.0.7 version, and the new 2.1.3 version in development. Both use the
same /bin/sh.
The glibc 2.0
> >> Is anyone working on this already? If not I will have a start this
> >> weekend, or perhaps when I return from work tonight. If you prefer
> >> someone else's work please tell me so; it will save me some superfluous
> >> work.
> >
> >
> > I haven't seen any progress reports, or been asked any
David Douthitt wrote:
> Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>> David Douthitt wrote:
>>
>>> I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
>>> realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
>>> problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
>>> Eri
Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
> David Douthitt wrote:
>
> > I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
> > realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
> > problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
> > Erik Andersen (seems to me) I
David Douthitt wrote:
> I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
> realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
> problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
> Erik Andersen (seems to me) I managed to recompile ash and now it
>
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
>> realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
>> problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
>> Erik Andersen (seems to me) I managed to recompile ash an
> I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
> realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
> problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
> Erik Andersen (seems to me) I managed to recompile ash and now it
> works.
>
> What I prop
I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
Erik Andersen (seems to me) I managed to recompile ash and now it
works.
What I propose is to upd
I thought I'd ask about this
I've been thinking about Eigerstein, and its binaries. Would it be a
good idea to update all the binaries in the base system?
I was thinking of something like this, done on an Oxygen system:
# mkdir /tmp/work
# cd /tmp/work
# mount /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt/fd0
# apkg
15 matches
Mail list logo
