As the first link says, the patches for the Mountain (Materhorn/Eiger)
releases, including Eigerstein, are included in the kernel tarball.
For LRP 2.9.8 using the old 2.0 kernel:
ftp://ftp.linuxrouter.org/linux-router/dists/2.9.8/kernel/2.0.36pre15-1-
patches.tar.gz
For LRP 2.9.8 using the 2.2.1
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Lan Barnes wrote:
> I am new to the list, and have a question I am sure must be in an archive
> or FAQ. Without going into too much detail, I want to poke a hole in my LRP
> firewall so that I can ssh directly through the firewall into an internal
> server.
>
> I'm still us
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Jeff Pierce wrote:
> I've got a question concerning DSL service via PPPoA, yes oA for PPP
> over
> ATM, which is what is what my ISP uses.
>
> Ok, the way it was explained to me is that my DSL modem, Zyxel Prestige
> 642MA will have an ethernet port for my connection, it wi
I've got a question concerning DSL service via PPPoA, yes oA for PPP
over
ATM, which is what is what my ISP uses.
Ok, the way it was explained to me is that my DSL modem, Zyxel Prestige
642MA will have an ethernet port for my connection, it will have a set
IP of
192.168.1.1 on that ethernet port
I am new to the list, and have a question I am sure must be in an archive
or FAQ. Without going into too much detail, I want to poke a hole in my LRP
firewall so that I can ssh directly through the firewall into an internal
server.
I'm still using an LRP version that uses ipfwadm. I'd be happy t
> OK, I'd forgotten this request this afternoon; but, completed this
> remotely a few moments ago. I copied /cdrom/etc.lrp to /floppy and
> rebooted -- which logged the overflow errors.
>
> So, clearly, there is something unusual about /cdrom/etc.lrp . . .
>
> > Also, please provide more details
> [2] We are confused about usage of:
>
> INTERN_SERVERS
>
> Format is given:
>
>
>
> Suppose that we want 192.168.0.250 ping-able by the world -- how ought
> this be var be constructed?
INTERN_SERVERS creates port-forwarding rules. I don't think you can
port-forward ICMP packets, so your e
This is a bit OT, but it's an outstanding
map that you will certainly enjoy, if you
haven't seen it yet.
Best,
Matthew
http://www.atai.org/softwarewar.gif
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-u
Yes, I would like to get the top.lrp package. I have not yet had the time
to build up development machine for LRP, so I cannot compile the package
myself.
I am using ISA nic-cards on the 486-machine, (and not even good ones,
cheap ne2000 clones), but I think I was not clear enough on my post;
at
> Meanwhile, did you check http://lrp.c0wz.com ?
>
> Rick has a mini-HOWTO on ppp servers.
The howto was written with 2.9.4, and works with 2.9.8 also. As it is
pretty package specific, as long as you can get a ppp(d).lrp and a
mgetty.lrp and the required modules, you should be fine.
with top
I will send you a top.lrp package if you wish to test your CPU usage..my
tests are subjective untill I get more data
Kenneth Hadley
PC / Network Specialist
McCormick Selph Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Mika Kouhia" <[EM
Does your PC have PCI bus and you are using PCI nics?
If not then your ISA bus can be the actual bottleneck...
If you can try to use a Pentium with PCI network card and check back
the speeds.
-Original Message-
From: Mika Kouhia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:0
>causes a 486 computer to bog down and not be able to handle the DSL
>connection with speeds over 500k.
How have you been monitoring the CPU usage? With top or something else?
I have been running your pppoe-image now for a couple of weeks, my connection
is rated 1.5M/512k, but I have been
Dale Long, 2001-06-29 09:58 +0930
>On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > >Do you still need me to complete the scanning task, or is the web
> > >based scanner enough for each user/leader to do?
>
> > Yes. I think they will provide a good reference for users to compare
> > there setup with. Al
Hi John,
Sounds like your upstream router's brain came online again! :-)
Regards,
Hilton
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> John Rodley
> Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2001 12:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] R
Thanks Dave. Upstream router suddenly decided against RIP.
John Rodley
>
> To do RIP, you need the routed daemon. From a security standpoint,
> using routed is not a good idea. In theory, you should not
> have to use
> routed, even if the upstream router does: just put in statically
> whate
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-06-28 16:23 -0700
>On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-06-27 23:00 -0700
> > >Someone recently mentioned that this was characteristic of a binary
> > >download gone bad, as Windows Netscape is likely to do with a poorly
> > >configured serve
John Rodley wrote:
>
> Got my Oxygen LRP system working great. Now I can tell my wife we have a
> gold mine of potential routers rather than a closet full of boat anchors.
> Thanks all.
>
> My upstream router wants me to do RIP. I poked around in the various
> documentation troves and couldn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have been noticing an unusual number of probes to these ports recently.
> I am guessing the 515 target is a solaris printer service overflow bug
> mentioned on www.securityfocus.com last week, but I am not sure what is
> attracting so many to the 111 (sunrpc) port.
>No, I want to be able to dial into my LRP box and access the net through
its
>ADSL connection. I have this set-up already but just not on an LRP box.
>There are pppd.lrp and mgetty.lrp packages available, just not for
>EigerStein. I might try them anyway.
Erik, the ppp that you are using as a d
20 matches
Mail list logo
