Thanks Dave. Upstream router suddenly decided against RIP.
John Rodley
To do RIP, you need the routed daemon. From a security standpoint,
using routed is not a good idea. In theory, you should not
have to use
routed, even if the upstream router does: just put in statically
whatever
Hi John,
Sounds like your upstream router's brain came online again! :-)
Regards,
Hilton
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
John Rodley
Sent: Saturday, 30 June 2001 12:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-user] RIP?
Dale Long, 2001-06-29 09:58 +0930
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Do you still need me to complete the scanning task, or is the web
based scanner enough for each user/leader to do?
Yes. I think they will provide a good reference for users to compare
there setup with. Also, scans
causes a 486 computer to bog down and not be able to handle the DSL
connection with speeds over 500k.
How have you been monitoring the CPU usage? With top or something else?
I have been running your pppoe-image now for a couple of weeks, my connection
is rated 1.5M/512k, but I have been
with top
I will send you a top.lrp package if you wish to test your CPU usage..my
tests are subjective untill I get more data
Kenneth Hadley
PC / Network Specialist
McCormick Selph Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Mika Kouhia
Meanwhile, did you check http://lrp.c0wz.com ?
Rick has a mini-HOWTO on ppp servers.
The howto was written with 2.9.4, and works with 2.9.8 also. As it is
pretty package specific, as long as you can get a ppp(d).lrp and a
mgetty.lrp and the required modules, you should be fine.
Yes, I would like to get the top.lrp package. I have not yet had the time
to build up development machine for LRP, so I cannot compile the package
myself.
I am using ISA nic-cards on the 486-machine, (and not even good ones,
cheap ne2000 clones), but I think I was not clear enough on my post;
at
This is a bit OT, but it's an outstanding
map that you will certainly enjoy, if you
haven't seen it yet.
Best,
Matthew
http://www.atai.org/softwarewar.gif
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] We are confused about usage of:
INTERN_SERVERS
Format is given:
protocol_extern-ip_extern-port_intern-ip_intern-port
Suppose that we want 192.168.0.250 ping-able by the world -- how ought
this be var be constructed?
INTERN_SERVERS creates port-forwarding rules. I don't think you
I am new to the list, and have a question I am sure must be in an archive
or FAQ. Without going into too much detail, I want to poke a hole in my LRP
firewall so that I can ssh directly through the firewall into an internal
server.
I'm still using an LRP version that uses ipfwadm. I'd be happy
I've got a question concerning DSL service via PPPoA, yes oA for PPP
over
ATM, which is what is what my ISP uses.
Ok, the way it was explained to me is that my DSL modem, Zyxel Prestige
642MA will have an ethernet port for my connection, it will have a set
IP of
192.168.1.1 on that ethernet
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Jeff Pierce wrote:
I've got a question concerning DSL service via PPPoA, yes oA for PPP
over
ATM, which is what is what my ISP uses.
Ok, the way it was explained to me is that my DSL modem, Zyxel Prestige
642MA will have an ethernet port for my connection, it will
12 matches
Mail list logo
