Hi,
I'm using DCD-1.02 and has been working great.
So far I've been using DMZ=PRIVATE to do port forwarding.
I put them in DMZ_SERVER0 to DMZ_SERVER4 switch, and they're working fine.
.
.
.
DMZ_SERVER4="tcp 64.110.181.168 110 192.168.15.202 110"
Now I have new servers, I put them in DMZ_SERVE
Hi
At 09:33 06.06.2002, you wrote:
>Message: 9
>From: "John Mullan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Lee Kimber'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file
>Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:54:53 -0400
>
>
>At 08:38 PM 6/5/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >I use DNS2
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:09:38 PDT Ray Olszewski wrote:
> Jeff's response is the right one here -- the router (or some other host on
> the LAN) needs to run a DNS server that resolves FQNs of hosts on the LAN
> to their private addresses and forwards all other requests to a "real"
> nameserver.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:34:13PM +0700, GREGOR wrote:
>
> How do I solve this problem? Are the switches limited for only 5 DMZ?
I have nine entries like that, which work as intended, so no there's no
limit. (Not at 5 anyway ;)
But you have three external IPs... Are you certain that works?
I
Jon Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> resulting QUERY_STRING, and echo back to a new page. This all works
> pretty much as I want it, even if my sed scripts *are* a bit clunky...
>
> Next step will be to have that data written to a file instead of just
> out to a page. Now, since this whole t
Hi all,
has anyone had any succes using this wireless nic or does anyone know of a
pretty cheap
wireless pci adapter that works with bering?
Thanks in advance
Kim
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conferenc
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:46:01AM -0700, Greg Morgan wrote:
>
> Take it one step at a time. I'd make a backup of the files you will be
> modifying. Experiment with what you want to do as root, then worry
> about the uid thing. It is not like you're going to have to send hours
> reinstalling a
On Thursday 06 June 2002 02:09, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> At 12:07 AM 6/6/02 -0500, guitarlynn wrote:
> >By chance have any of you attempted to declare "files" before "dns"
> >in /etc/nsswitch.conf???
> >
> >By doing this, any host/network listed in nsswitch.conf should
> > resolve according to the o
Okay,
i've come to the conclusion that bering (at least in my config)
can't reboot my machine. That said, what would be the best way
of achieving the same effect as a reboot? ie. how would I flush
everything and rerun all the startup scripts?
I need to do this, as pump is incapable of holding my
On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:25, J wrote:
> Okay,
>
> i've come to the conclusion that bering (at least in my config)
> can't reboot my machine. That said, what would be the best way
> of achieving the same effect as a reboot? ie. how would I flush
> everything and rerun all the startup scripts?
C
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, J wrote:
The fact that you are unable to reboot indicates that you have a problem.
This could be a hardware problem or a configuration issue.
Reloading the init scripts is not likely to fix your problem, so heading
in that direction is not advised.
Try the generic lrp ima
I inadvertently used the .lrp extension yesterday, as in
# lrpkg -i sshd.lrp
instead of
# lrpkg -i sshd
and to my later surprise, it worked. (... perhaps because I was working
from an msdos filesystem?)
Unfortunately, when I later went to backup sshd, the backup screen showed
it as "sshd
Hi Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 18:13
06.06.2002:
>Message: 11
>Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 08:47:27 -0700
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file
>
>At 09:45 AM 6/6/02 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
>[...]
> >>At 08:38 PM 6
One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address
Translation?
Is it different from NAR (Network Address Retention)?
Okay, just wanting to learn. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Nachman Yaakov Ziskind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday
I'd like to combine NAT with PAT in Dachstein 1.0.2; e.g. to have private
addresses on 10.1.1 to PAT to a single public IP number, except for 10.1.1.[1-
5], which should each NAT to a (separate and distinct) public IP address.
I've looked through the FAQ's, the sample network.conf/ipfilter.conf
Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:36:46PM -0500):
| One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address
| Translation?
NAT = Network Address Translation (one to one).
PAT = Port Address Translation (one to many).
| Is it different from NAR (Network Address Ret
Say, how come I can't zero out the ipchains counters?
# ipchains -nvL
Chain input (policy ACCEPT: 15420 packets, 3599705 bytes):
Chain forward (policy ACCEPT: 178 packets, 13155 bytes):
Chain output (policy ACCEPT: 8343 packets, 3177138 bytes):
# ipchains --zero
# ipchains -nvL
Chain input (pol
Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500):
| What do you mean, I still don't understand.
|
| > | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address
| > | Translation?
| >
| > NAT = Network Address Translation (one to one).
| > PAT = Port Address Transla
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> Say, how come I can't zero out the ipchains counters?
You can... some of them.
> # ipchains -nvL
> Chain input (policy ACCEPT: 15420 packets, 3599705 bytes):
> Chain forward (policy ACCEPT: 178 packets, 13155 bytes):
> Chain output (policy ACC
Hello Folks,
Uncertain which mailing list is the correct and active one, so I'm
posting to both. I'm trying to get voice over IP working between two
boxes; each is behind a basic EigerStein LRP box, both configured as
firewalls. Almost all ports on both boxes are closed. One of the
boxes
OK Brad. I've put tinydns on. I left the tinydns option for internal
IP at 127.0.0.1
Is this the proper loopback interface address?
-Original Message-
From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:42 AM
To: John Mullan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500):
> | What do you mean, I still don't understand.
> |
> | > | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address
> | > | Translation?
> | >
> | > NAT = Network
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 20:40:25 EDT you wrote:
> OK Brad. I've put tinydns on. I left the tinydns option for internal
> IP at 127.0.0.1
>
> Is this the proper loopback interface address?
Yes, it is:
$ cat /etc/tinydns-private/env/IP
127.0.0.1
--Brad
_
I'm trying to get something working at work, and I need to
be able to allow tftp and ultimately an x-server.
first I assume that I can add a a few lines into the
network.conf similar to the following
EXTERN_UDP_PORTS="ip.ad.dr.es/32_tftp"
EXTERN_PROTO0="69 ip.ad.dr.es/32"
I would presumably als
On Thursday 06 June 2002 18:12, James K. Wiggs wrote:
> running OpenH323 and GnomeMeeting 0.85;
> the other is an NT 4.0 box running NetMeeting 3.01. I've configured
Load the "ip_masq_h323" module in /etc/modules.
This is a helper module to get it to work right.
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarl
Thanks for you help so far Brad..
I'm sure I'm missing something, but no luck. I had tried to set it up
so that dnscache watches 192.168.1.254 and looks to tinydns. Not sure
if that is what is supposed to happen or if I even got it that way in
any of my attempted combinations.
If it helps,
On Thursday 06 June 2002 21:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> EXTERN_UDP_PORTS="ip.ad.dr.es/32_tftp"
> EXTERN_PROTO0="69 ip.ad.dr.es/32"
>
> I would presumably also need a line for the x-server, but I
> don't know of-hand what it is.. at any rate... does
> something like this work?
the stated "tftp
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 15:35, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> Omar D. Samuels wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500):
> | What do you mean, I still don't understand.
> |
> | > | One learns something new everyday... does PAT stand for Private Address
> | > | Translation?
> | >
> | > NAT =
John Mullan wrote:
>
> Thanks for you help so far Brad..
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something, but no luck. I had tried to set it up
> so that dnscache watches 192.168.1.254 and looks to tinydns. Not sure
> if that is what is supposed to happen or if I even got it that way in
> any of my at
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 23:01:43 EDT you wrote:
> Thanks for you help so far Brad..
Glad to help.
> I'm sure I'm missing something, but no luck. I had tried to set it up
> so that dnscache watches 192.168.1.254 and looks to tinydns. Not sure
> if that is what is supposed to happen or if I e
Fcc: +sent
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Using HOSTS file
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jun 2002 22:40:16 CDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 22:40:16 CDT mds wrote:
> John Mullan wrote:
> >
> > To recap: The plan is to force internal network to resolve
> >
Michael, I think you have confused the issue for John. There is nothing
magic about the last two pieces of a domain name; a DNS server can assert
it is authoritative for a domain name that has 3 or 4 or 5 pieces.
(Examples are fairly common in TLDs that end in country codes; for example,
here
Good day,
I am trying to get 2 leased-line modems to connect using multilink. I am
unsure which file does what and hope that someone has some guidance for me,
please.
TIA
Glyn
__
"The information contained in this email is intended solely for the
use
33 matches
Mail list logo