UPDATE: I have found where the changes to resolv.conf are coming from.
Dhclient.conf and data coming from my ISP DHCP server.
I have managed to overide this behaviour with 'prepend' and 'supersede'
and end up with a resolv.conf looking like this:
search nimc1.on.cogeco.ca
nameserver 192.168.1.25
Hi, John. Sounds like you're getting close. More inline...
On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 20:39:21 EDT John Mullan wrote:
> I have made all the required changes. I even changed the network.conf.
> The variable you mention seems to be CONFIG_DNS=NO
>
> Resolv.conf still gets overwritten with 'nameserve
Sounds like I started something!! Just to add fuel to the fire (or more
hopefully, slow it down), I do know that since 'mullan.dns2go.com' is a
smaller 'chunk' of names to resolve that it is possible to have the
server understand that DNS2GO.COM domain gets resolved out-of-house but
MULLAN.DNS2GO
Jonathan Berglund wrote:
>
> I'm running Dachstein, and I was wondering if there were an packages to
> throttle bandwidth. The reason I ask is that at my work we rent out
> space to some other people, and they share our T1. Problem is they are
> hogging bandwidth and even if institute some rule
I'm running Dachstein, and I was wondering if there were an packages to
throttle bandwidth. The reason I ask is that at my work we rent out
space to some other people, and they share our T1. Problem is they are
hogging bandwidth and even if institute some rule or policy, I still
want to make sure
Boy, this seems to be the thread that never ends. :) I have to
politely disagree on several of your statements, Erich. tinydns
and dnscache config files for a working setup are included below
as well.
Re-quoted slightly for readability...
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:51:02PM +0200, Erich Titl w
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 05:03
> 07.06.2002:
> >To recap: The plan is to force internal network to resolve
> >MULLAN.DNS2GO.COM to 192.168.1.128. External requests of course will
> >already find their way to 192.168.1.128 via the
> Thanks Charles, worked like a charm. However, I don't see *how* it works.
> This notation suggest to me that all internal traffic is going over eth1,
> but I know it's not because I have them physically separated on different
> switches.
>
> INTERN_IF="eth1"
> INTERN_NET="192.168.1.0/24 192.168
Thanks Charles, worked like a charm. However, I don't see *how* it
works. This notation suggest to me that all internal traffic is going
over eth1, but I know it's not because I have them physically separated
on different switches.
INTERN_IF="eth1"
INTERN_NET="192.168.1.0/24 192.168.212.0/24"
IN
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 05:03
07.06.2002:
>To recap: The plan is to force internal network to resolve
>MULLAN.DNS2GO.COM to 192.168.1.128. External requests of course will
>already find their way to 192.168.1.128 via the INTERN_SERVERS in
>network.conf
You are trying to ma
> I'm doing something a little different this time. I have 1 routable IP
and
> 2 private networks which I want to masquerade from behind the firewall,
but
> keep separate from each other. The eth1 network works great, masquerades
> like it's supposed to, NAT's like it's supposed to. However, my
Hi,
I'm doing something a little different this time. I have 1 routable IP and
2 private networks which I want to masquerade from behind the firewall, but
keep separate from each other. The eth1 network works great, masquerades
like it's supposed to, NAT's like it's supposed to. However, my et
Le Vendredi 7 Juin 2002 15:12, George Luft a écrit :
> Following the instructions in
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343
> B/ The masq file (entry 7). With a dial-up modem setup it should look like:
>
> (...)
> #INTERFACE SUBNET
> ppp0eth
Is there a suggested standard way to set up static routes with Oxygen?
I'm looking for something similar to /etc/sysconf/static-routes
If not, how does Bering or Dachstein do this?
Thanks in advance.
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprin
I assume you use pap for pppoe : ?
if so then you don't need provider, isp login script
> Here are my PPP/PPPoE scripts. Are the settings valid for a dynamically
> assigned aDSL connection?
>
> Provider file:
>
> # ISP pppd options file
> # What follows is OK for Compuserve
> #
> noauth
> d
I appreciate the reply Tom!
You have just caught me digging through your Shorewall site in search of hints on this
very topic. I have also just downloaded the Shorewall 1.3.1 lrp and was about to send
a message to the LEAF list to see if anyone had tried using this version with the most
I am running Bering and connecting to it via SSH using puTTY as my
client--from the outside. Everything works fine but in my syslog, exactly
every minute, I get a packet dropped and logged on port 20041 from my client
IP. I've poked around on the web and found some vague references to SSH, so
I'
Here are my PPP/PPPoE scripts. Are the settings valid for a dynamically
assigned aDSL connection?
Provider file:
# ISP pppd options file
# What follows is OK for Compuserve
#
noauth
debug # log transaction to /var/log/messages
/dev/ttyS0 # (ttyS0=com1, ttyS1=com2, ...)
115200
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Richard Amerman wrote:
> I have been combing the list archive for info and it seems clear the
> configuring at least Dachstein or other than Bering with two active
> external interfaces is indeed a daunting task. Getting the two
> interfaces to work looks fairly easy, it is t
Eric,
Thanks for the swift response. SHOREWALL is fine, and lets everything I want in
and out. It's not that the PPPoE connection goes down and comes back up again,
I appreciate that is what my ISP does, it's just that the PPP connection
accasionally goes down and stays down, requiring a reboo
I have been combing the list archive for info and it seems clear the configuring at
least Dachstein or other than Bering with two active external interfaces is indeed a
daunting task. Getting the two interfaces to work looks fairly easy, it is then all
about the firewall.
A fairly in
You most definitely want a 2.14.18 or later kernel with netfilter.
The iptables tool for configuring netfilter can do, probably,
anything you want.
You can start with Dachstein or Bering and roll your own kernel,
though Bering is probably fine as is.
If you are a serious experimenter, I would
Hello Adam
comments inline
I don't know what your povider is , but most provider do a disconnect after a certain
amount of time, or after a certain period of non activity.
The problem about the reconnecting could have several causes.
You can best increase the debug level in the pppd option scr
Boris,
On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 09:28:43 PDT Ray wrote:
> 1. How does CPU utilization change with this change in load? If you have
> "top" available, it calculates and reports the numbers I have in mind; if
> not, you'll need to get the raw data from /proc/stat and do the arithmetic
> yourself.
Hello Georg
> Are these (Bering) modules necessary for pppoe?
>
> ppp_async.o
AFAIK no
> ppp_deflate.o
could be useful by decompressing
AFAIK no
> ppp_mppe.o
>
> They don't show up in lsmod.
Correct
They are not loaded in the standard setup .
> That's nearly 70KB. Ka-ching!
uncompressed that
Possible? Yeah sure, I suppose it is "possible". But you'd do better to
give us a more systematic profile of what the router is doing if you want
good opinions.
The "load average" numbers that various apps report are sort of odd things.
They don't represent a true system "load", at least not t
Hej All!
Since several Weeks I got the following problem, that doesn't seem to be
normal.
I use a dachstein 1.02.1 with glibc 2.1.3 on CD and the hardware is a IBM
PC 330 (P-166) with 64 MBytes RAM ant two Realtek 8139 NICs. The system is
stable and doing everything I want, but:
After the (re)
> Another question for the list: can Linux cum Dachstein
> a) alias the eth0
> (external) interface to multiple ip numbers (in SCO unix we use 'ifconfig
> alias'
Yes
> b) pass along somehow (to ipchains or whatever) which ip number the
> packet arrived with?
Of course...this is pretty much *AL
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, George Luft wrote:
> Tom, I'm with you on all of the points below, except the dial-up. These
> instructions are specific to pppoe. There's a separate dial-up page, and
> these appear to have been copied and pasted from there and should be
> updated.
>
Ok -- the documentati
Hi everyone!
I am looking for a maintained up to date samba package for a bering box,
which I would like to share a partition with a win2k computer, but did
not find anything in the main package archives
(bering/oxygen/dachstein).
Is something like that available or will I have to start on my ow
Tom, I'm with you on all of the points below, except the dial-up. These
instructions are specific to pppoe. There's a separate dial-up page, and
these appear to have been copied and pasted from there and should be
updated.
Thanks for all of your work on Shorewall!
George
PS. I have since pri
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, George Luft wrote:
> Following the instructions in
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343
>
> I added the net/ppp0/- line to the Interfaces file and commented out the
> eth0 line. Should I have left eth0 in?
No.
> Do I need the dhcp, routefilter,
> a
| > In NAT, the router essentially changes the source IP number to some other
| > (presumably better :-) one, and makes no other changes. So, your network
| > address is hidden, but you still need one public IP address for every host
| > on your network.
| > In PAT, the router changes the port
Following the instructions in
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343
I added the net/ppp0/- line to the Interfaces file and commented out the
eth0 line. Should I have left eth0 in? Do I need the dhcp, routefilter,
and norfc1918 options added to the ppp0 line?
#ZONE INTER
Ray Olszewski wrote (on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:38:09PM -0700):
| One low-tech solution that should work, BTW, is to add the hostname/IP
| address pair to the hosts file on each workatation (/etc/hosts for Linux
| workstations; I don't know the WinXX analog, though I do know there is
| one).
Gentlemen,
My BERING box seems to be having some connection problems. I'm on aDSL using
PPP & PPPoE to connect. My connection will stay up for a period of time, up to
a couple of days, then reconnect, last a few hours and then fail. It then
requires a reboot to reconnect. Here's a logfile entr
Oops. Bloody. Forgot to mention that I had that module
installed, as well:
# lsmod
Module PagesUsed by
ip_masq_h3236868 0 (unused)
ip_masq_mfw 3076 0 (unused)
ip_masq_portfw 2296 12
ip_masq_autofw 2356 0 (unused)
ip_masq_user
37 matches
Mail list logo
