On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Lynn Avants wrote:
> On Sunday 02 February 2003 05:07 am, you wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have the following problem:
> >
> > I am trying to build talk/talkd for my LEAF firewall, however they don't
> > work on my firewall. When I dynamically link them, I get a segmentation
Putty, TTP and WinSCP.
Of course, it turns out bloody sshd needs 1/2 Mb, so now I need to find
another floppy drive to put that on first grrr...
Thanks people,
Jim.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IB
Hi,
Well, I put that tiny 50k SOCKS5.LRP package on and copied a config file
from this mailing list. The config file was from somebody's Dachstein
setup, but using the same subnet as me. Does anybody know of a HOWTO for
socks5.lrp?
I added
ACCEPT loc fw tcp 1080
ACCEPT loc fw udp 1080
And I ca
This is the dumbest of questions but its beginning to frustrate me.
Does the ash shell support escape sequences for coloured text?
The documentation I've found is limited although reliable but skips that
bit, and the normal bash techniques don't work! The man pages while reliable
are a little Spa
greetings
is there any sensible way of setting a limit on bandwith per ip address
in bering
as i understand tc.lrp can set a bandwith, but since i usemasq it would
set one limit on the external interface.
I need 1 different limit per internal ip address
mvh
Ronny Aasen
-
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:12:37 +0100 Jaap Eldering wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Lynn Avants wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 02 February 2003 05:07 am, you wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have the following problem:
> > >
> > > I am trying to build talk/talkd for my LEAF firewall, however they don't
>
Adrian Wooster wrote:
This is the dumbest of questions but its beginning to frustrate me.
Does the ash shell support escape sequences for coloured text?
The documentation I've found is limited although reliable but skips that
bit, and the normal bash techniques don't work! The man pages while re
Thanks for everybody's help. I'll try your suggestions.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
---
Hi all,
We have been invited to place a system for firewalling and QoS in a local
"Campus Party". We expect to have 500 users and 20MB conexion.
For this scenario we plan to use an embedded system with the following
spects:
1) VIA EDED 533 Fanless system
2) 256 or 512 MB RAM
3) 3x
You don't say what this router is going to do.
Do you want 500 users to have simultaneous Internet access? With Nat? DCHP?
With two cards, 2 Lans?
On a single T1?
Are you going to chain together 50 to 100 hubs?
A Via 533 is not going to service 100MBS total bandwith.
And this sounds like downtown
Thanks to Steve the weblet is now running. I had 10.10.10.0/255.255.255.0
added in the hosts.allow files, but didn't realize I also had to add
10.10.10./255.255.255.0 as well.
(a) port forward traffic to port 25 on the LEAF router to the
10.10.10.x mail server
(b) have the ISP r
My log file from Dachstein is getting packed with messages like this:
Feb 4 17:29:52 Nimrod kernel: Packet log: input REJECT eth1 PROTO=17
10.10.10.2:4813 10.0.0.14:161 L=84 S=0x00 I=58236 F=0x T=128 (#39)
Feb 4 17:29:52 Nimrod kernel: Packet log: input REJECT eth1 PROTO=17
10.10.10.2:4814 1
At 01:44 PM 2/4/03 -0800, Chris Low wrote:
Thanks to Steve the weblet is now running. I had 10.10.10.0/255.255.255.0
added in the hosts.allow files, but didn't realize I also had to add
10.10.10./255.255.255.0 as well.
(a) port forward traffic to port 25 on the LEAF router to the
10.10
Hi all. What's the simplest way to go about this? I'd like to cut the tether to my
notebook. Is
it as simple as hooking up the router off the hub on my internal network and letting
it create a
separate subnet? Thanks.
=
-
Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
This is a good place for a ta
If your overall LAN setup is simple enough, this will work. Since this
approach "double NATs" all the traffic (first by the LEAF router; second
by the ISP someplace), there is always some risk that something you
implement will run into a rare problem. Worry most about things that you
are port
I'm running Bering-uClibc 1.1 and having some minor problems. First of
all, I do have a request. Does anyone have a packaged udhcp.lrp for
this distribution? I'm only aware of Lynn Avants' for LEAF in general
and for specifically for Dachstein located in these places
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/c
I have completed my high-availability package for .lrp systems,
"kpalived.lrp", based on Alexandre Cassen's excellent open-source software.
Due to limitations in keepalived's code AFAIK it wouldn't compile on glibc
2.0.x. This version was compiled on gcc 2.2.x system. My LRP system is
Bering uCli
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 06:15 pm, Chris Low wrote:
> My log file from Dachstein is getting packed with messages like this:
>
> Feb 4 17:29:52 Nimrod kernel: Packet log: input REJECT eth1 PROTO=17
> 10.10.10.2:4813 10.0.0.14:161 L=84 S=0x00 I=58236 F=0x T=128 (#39)
This is a machine broadca
At 04:15 PM 2/4/03 -0800, Chris Low wrote:
My log file from Dachstein is getting packed with messages like this:
Feb 4 17:29:52 Nimrod kernel: Packet log: input REJECT eth1 PROTO=17
10.10.10.2:4813 10.0.0.14:161 L=84 S=0x00 I=58236 F=0x T=128 (#39)
Feb 4 17:29:52 Nimrod kernel: Packet log: i
That was it! I'll post the new .local files and an iso in a day or two.
Thanks to everyone for their help. Todd, thanks for the .local files,
even the ones with the cr/lf's in there ;-)
Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sean E.
Covel
(Re-rounting back to the list)
--- Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several ways to "go about this", depending on undetailed
> characteristics of "this" and what "the [wireless] router" actually is.
pn] Thanks for the reply, Ray. Yes, by "this" I mean a linksys wireless rout
(Re-rounting back to the list)
--- Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several ways to "go about this", depending on undetailed
> characteristics of "this" and what "the [wireless] router" actually is.
pn] Thanks for the reply, Ray. Yes, by "this" I mean a linksys wireless rout
At 07:53 PM 2/4/03 -0800, Peter Nosko wrote:
[...]
pn] Thanks for the reply, Ray. Yes, by "this" I mean a linksys wireless
router.
[...]
pn] I thought I might be able to make use of one too. It can be
configured for an external
dynamic IP assignment, and since I'm using a DHCP server behind m
Greetings,
I have tried both conf.modules and modules.conf on
Bering RC3. It does not seem to be working ! Any hint
?
I just want to bring up my wireless pcmcia orinoco as
eth0 and my tulip pci ethernet as eth1. Is there an
alternative way to do it in Bering ? Note that Bering
RC3 automatically a
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 21:38, wing newton wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have tried both conf.modules and modules.conf on
> Bering RC3. It does not seem to be working ! Any hint
> ?
>
> I just want to bring up my wireless pcmcia orinoco as
> eth0 and my tulip pci ethernet as eth1. Is there an
> alterna
25 matches
Mail list logo
