[leaf-user] Added host to DMZ; host sees anything; no one sees host (ping)

... which pretty much describes my problem, dear all: This maybe a typical newbie question, but I still find myself to be chewing on it. All I did to add a new host to the Demilitarized Zone in an otherwise stable and running Bering-Leaf configuartion was to update the NAT package with just one li

[leaf-user] Bering on a Compaq2266

I'd like to move my Bering 1.2 to this little box. Unfortunately as far as I can get is: Loading Linux ... [Sorry, no I didn't count exactly how many periods.] Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue. This cute little puppy has a Cyrix MII, and a SiS-5598 chipset

[leaf-user] Very OT: maximum ftp transfer rate for two 10/100Mbps P2P end points

Hi everyone, Does any one have any idea regarding the said title? I'm just trying out the latest rtl8139too driver code from realtek on my LEAF-based machines. I'm using my own 2.4.x kernel and I noticed that the stock RTL driver codes are not performing satisfactorily with my on-board RTL8100C c

[leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs

Hi everyone, Just a bit concerned. Look here: http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp However, we have this to keep our hopes up: http://www.pubpat.org/Microsoft_517_Reexam.htm Any ideas for LEAF floppies (at least) in case M$ gets their patent claim? This is going to be a real headache fo

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 06:41 schrieb Tim Wegner: > I noticed that the just released Bering-uClibc 2.1.1 uses Shorewall > updated to version 1.4.10e. When I recently migrated my three > interface router from Bering to Bering-uClibc I went straight to > Shorewall 2.0.1. I had no problems at all

Re: [leaf-user] Bering on a Compaq2266

At 00:30 28.04.2004 -0700, you wrote: >I'd like to move my Bering 1.2 to this little box. Unfortunately as far >as I can get is: >Loading Linux ... [Sorry, no I didn't count exactly how many >periods.] >Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue. > >This cute little

RE: [leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs

Hi Giovani, > -Original Message- > From: Giovanni Franza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:39 PM > To: Vic Berdin > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs > > > Vic Berdin ha scritto: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Just a bit concerned. Look here: >>

Re: [leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs

Vic Berdin ha scritto: > Hi Giovani, > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Giovanni Franza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:39 PM >>To: Vic Berdin >>Subject: Re: [leaf-user] LEAF use of M$ technology: FAT fs >> >> >>Vic Berdin ha scritto: >> >>>Hi everyone, >>> >>>

Re: [leaf-user] Dachstein as border_router? (public ip addresses etc)

Craig Johnson wrote: The only documentation I can point you to for the border_router option is the shell-script source that builds the firewall rules. So when you use the border_router option, what is the setting for IPFILTER_SWITCH in network.conf? I beleive it should be set to "router". Look

[leaf-user] WinScp3 and dropbear

Hello Everyone, Started my upgrade (sidegrade?) from Bering 1.2 to uClibc 2.0. I started to setup dropbear but am having a problem connecting using WinScp3. I can connect using Putty and pscp but not with WinScp3. When I launch it says connecting, authenticating, starting the session and then time

RE: [leaf-user] Bering on a Compaq2266

>I'd like to move my Bering 1.2 to this little box. Unfortunately as far >as I can get is: >Loading Linux ... [Sorry, no I didn't count exactly how many >periods.] >Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue. > One thing to try is take a 1.44MB floppy, run syslinux

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 06:41 schrieb Tim Wegner: I noticed that the just released Bering-uClibc 2.1.1 uses Shorewall updated to version 1.4.10e. When I recently migrated my three interface router from Bering to Bering-uClibc I went straight to Shorewall 2.0.1. I had

Re: [leaf-user] Added host to DMZ; host sees anything; no one sees host (ping)

waeos wrote: ... which pretty much describes my problem, dear all: This maybe a typical newbie question, but I still find myself to be chewing on it. All I did to add a new host to the Demilitarized Zone in an otherwise stable and running Bering-Leaf configuartion was to update the NAT package wit

Re: [leaf-user] Very OT: maximum ftp transfer rate for two 10/100Mbps P2P end points

At 04:18 PM 4/28/2004 +0800, Vic Berdin wrote: Hi everyone, Does any one have any idea regarding the said title? I'm just trying out the latest rtl8139too driver code from realtek on my LEAF-based machines. I'm using my own 2.4.x kernel and I noticed that the stock RTL driver codes are not perform

[leaf-user] Re: leaf-user digest, Vol 1 #2256 - 14 msgs

>From: "waeos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [leaf-user] Added host to DMZ; host sees anything; no one >sees host (ping) > >#EXTERNAL INTERFACEINTERNAL ALL INTERFACESLOCAL > >212.202.143.196etho 10.22.22.196 Yes Shouldn't that be "eth0"? zero, not oh.

[leaf-user] ipsec.lrp, Super FreeS/WAN, X.509 and Wildcards - New Build Needed?

My posts seem to keep getting rejected by the list server. Hopefully this one will work. I have run into a huge problem with ipsec.lrp which is preventing an enterprise-wide deployment of Bering 1.2 with ipsec. I believe the problem would also exist with the uClibc distro as well, although I ha

Re: [leaf-user] Re: leaf-user digest, Vol 1 #2256 - 14 msgs

At 18:16 28.04.2004, Paul G Rogers wrote: ... I'll give it a try. I also need to check my Tom's RootBoot diskette and see what size it is. HP/Compaq tells me I have to go to one of their service centers for anything like swapping the CPU with a classic Pentium, they won't tell me what the missing

Re: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp, Super FreeS/WAN, X.509 and Wildcards - New Build Needed?

Hi At 21:07 28.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote: My posts seem to keep getting rejected by the list server. Hopefully this one will work. I have run into a huge problem with ipsec.lrp which is preventing an enterprise-wide deployment of Bering 1.2 with ipsec. I believe the problem would also exist with

Re: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp, Super FreeS/WAN, X.509 and Wildcards - New Build Needed?

Thanks for the reply Eric. Consider this a push :). Why did you opt to go with OpenSwan rather than Super FreeS/WAN? Does OpenSwan contain all the patches that Super FreeS/WAN does (http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-2.05/doc/web.html#patch)? On 28 Apr 2004 at 23:44, you wrote: > I ran into

Re: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp, Super FreeS/WAN, X.509 and Wildcards - New Build Needed?

Sorry to reply to my own post, but I think I partially answered my question by looking at http://www.openswan.org/docs/feature_comparison.php. The only things that I need that aren't answered by this comparison are: 1.does OpenSwan support hardware crypto acceleration? I know there is a patch f

Re: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp, Super FreeS/WAN, X.509 and Wildcards - New Build Needed?

Hi At 23:49 28.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote: Thanks for the reply Eric. Consider this a push :). Why did you opt to go with OpenSwan rather than Super FreeS/WAN? Does OpenSwan contain all the patches that Super FreeS/WAN does (http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-2.05/doc/web.html#patch)? Super Fre

Re: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp, Super FreeS/WAN, X.509 and Wildcards - New Build Needed?

At 00:04 29.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote: Sorry to reply to my own post, but I think I partially answered my question by looking at http://www.openswan.org/docs/feature_comparison.php. The only things that I need that aren't answered by this comparison are: 1.does OpenSwan support hardware crypto a

RE: [leaf-user] WinScp3 and dropbear

AL, you need to tell WinScp3 what shell to use. In Environment/SCP under Shell click the Enter radio button and enter /bin/sh in the edit box. That will fix that. You may get some other errors about Groups when you try to connect but just click ok and it should be fine. Mine is! HTH -Orig

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

KP asked (referring to the 2.X version of shorewall in my Bering- uClibc setup): > Sounds good; how big is shorwall.lrp? My configured three interface Shorewall 2.x version is 83563 bytes . That is 15000 or so bytes bigger than my 1.4X version. As I said the upgrade was painless. My Bering thre

RE: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

G'day folks. I am having some difficulty getting a pptp VPN running on my LEAF box. I seem to be able to connect locally but not remotely. I can see my remote connection request coming in to my router (I've turned logging on) but the connection is not made. Do I need to install conntrack modules

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

David Pitts wrote: G'day folks. I am having some difficulty getting a pptp VPN running on my LEAF box. I seem to be able to connect locally but not remotely. I can see my remote connection request coming in to my router (I've turned logging on) but the connection is not made. Do I need to instal

RE: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

I apologise unreservedly for that but I certainly didn't mean to do it and I usually start a new thread with a new subject. -Original Message- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 12:27 PM To: David Pitts Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user]

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall version with Bering

David Pitts wrote: I apologise unreservedly for that but I certainly didn't mean to do it and I usually start a new thread with a new subject. And I apologize for being so grumpy -- time to go to bed -Tom -- Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \

[leaf-user] Handling whatever input from serial com port

Dear All Is there any clue/docs/url about handling whatever input received through serial-com-port (tty ?) I need to monitor the usage of PBX. It'll be great if there is example on using BASH to monitor tty. Sincerely -bino- --- This SF.Net