ddparker wrote:
NEVER BACKUP PACKAGES WITH DESTINATION DEVICE (hda1) MOUNTED!
This will corrupt the CF disk.
Yikes. I had a problem with corruption only once, using DriveImage
under DOS. For several months, while testing Leaf, my CF would be
mounted 80% of the time. I've never experienced
Erich Titl wrote:
NEVER BACKUP PACKAGES WITH DESTINATION DEVICE (hda1) MOUNTED!
This
will corrupt the CF disk.
It is not really _that_ bad. The only package which is attempted is
root.lrp
and, of course, a backup of all packages (which includes root). Then
it is not
only hda1
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi Arne,
|
| Indeed and we don't know which mount directory an user creates.
| I just mount my CF under /mnt (which also seems obvious to me) and
| never had a problem.
|
| Certainly true,
Darcy
ddparker wrote:
Hi All,
I still consider myself to be a newbie to leaf and Linux in general
and found myself corrupting files on a CF Disk.
I had to learn the hard way so I thought I would share my woes. I have
been working with Troy Aden (Thanks Troy) getting beta 4 to work on CF
Seems to me that the backup command for the root .lrp package should
include instructions to tar to not traverse filesystems?
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA *
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:08 -0700, Paul Traina wrote:
Seems to me that the backup command for the root .lrp package should
include instructions to tar to not traverse filesystems?
unfortunatly it seems that busybox tar is not aware of this option (-l).
--arne
--
Arne Bernin [EMAIL
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 06:16:32PM +0200, Arne Bernin wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:08 -0700, Paul Traina wrote:
Seems to me that the backup command for the root .lrp package should
include instructions to tar to not traverse filesystems?
unfortunatly it seems that busybox tar is not
Jaap Eldering wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 06:16:32PM +0200, Arne Bernin wrote:
...
Isn't this already handled by the root.exclude.list? In it e.g. /mnt
/mnt? /nfs are listed, so if you'd mount another filesystem there
(which seems the obvious choice to me), then you won't have problems
Hello Jaap, Erich,
Isn't this already handled by the root.exclude.list? In it e.g. /mnt
/mnt? /nfs are listed, so if you'd mount another filesystem there
(which seems the obvious choice to me), then you won't have problems
backing up root.lrp while your floppy/CF card is mounted.
It is,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jaap, Erich,
..
Indeed and we don't know which mount directory an user creates.
I just mount my CF under /mnt (which also seems obvious to me) and never
had a problem.
Certainly true, still I believe it is good this had some exposure,
because I believe
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 22:41 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Eric, Erich and Jaap!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jaap, Erich,
..
Indeed and we don't know which mount directory an user creates.
I just mount my CF under /mnt (which also seems obvious to me) and never
had a problem.
Hi Arne,
Indeed and we don't know which mount directory an user creates.
I just mount my CF under /mnt (which also seems obvious to me) and
never had a problem.
Certainly true, still I believe it is good this had some exposure,
because I believe some users were not aware of this. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi Arne,
|
| Indeed and we don't know which mount directory an user creates.
| I just mount my CF under /mnt (which also seems obvious to me) and
| never had a problem.
|
| Certainly true, still I believe it is good this
Hi All,
I still consider myself to be a newbie to leaf and Linux in general
and found myself corrupting files on a CF Disk.
I had to learn the hard way so I thought I would share my woes. I have
been working with Troy Aden (Thanks Troy) getting beta 4 to work on CF
as described by Peter
14 matches
Mail list logo
