Shouldn't the paths be relative to /etc/openvpn? Did you try copying
the keys there and adjusting the relative paths? Might not be a bug at
all.
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:01 +1100, Mark Berndt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just upgraded to v6.02 and had some time to play with the openvpn
> server,
Hello all,
I just upgraded to v6.02 and had some time to play with the openvpn server,
which did not work out of the box when I migrated from 5 to 6.
the problem was the paths are no longer relative to a base so in the
server.conf:
ca keys/ca.crt
cert keys/Server.crt
key keys/Server.key #
Hi,
has anyone tryed openvpn-auth-pam plugin on openVpn server in order to
authenticate openVpn client with userid/password?
thanks
dm
--
Am Sonntag, 11. Mai 2014, 21:10:20 schrieb Otto Halák - TeleLarm:
Dear users,
Running 5.0.2 and 5.0.3 (i486) on two WRAP boards and noticed on both,
that OpenVPN does not want to automatically start after boot.
I could try
AUTOSTART=all
or
AUTOSTART=client
with no success.
I always have
Hello,
I'm experimenting with a dd-wrt type wireless access point in a DMZ
setting using a three NIC router. I do not want to expose the WAP to the
Internet- thus it sits in the DMZ. The network is as follows;
INTERNET
|
-Original Message-
From: Doug Sampson [mailto:do...@dawnsign.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 06:02 PM
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [leaf-user] OpenVPN running in DMZ using Bering uClibc
3.1
Hello,
I'm experimenting with a dd-wrt type wireless access point
Hello leaf list,
I have LEAF running on a WRAP box using shorewall openvpn.
We need to be able to serve udp tcp openvpn for proxying reasons.
The 'standard' openvpn can be configured usin 2 '.opvn' config files.
How does this work on the LEAF package?
The config file is called server.conf, I
Hi Robert,
take a look into /etc/init.d/openvpn :
CONFIG_DIR=/etc/openvpn
..
AUTOSTART=all
..
..
if test -z $AUTOSTART -o x$AUTOSTART = xall ; then
# all VPNs shall be started automatically
for CONFIG in `cd $CONFIG_DIR; ls *.conf 2 /dev/null`; do
NAME=${CONFIG%%.conf}
give a look in /etc/default/openvpn for AUTOSTART variabile
graziano
Il 01/10/2010 12.30, bob ha scritto:
Hello leaf list,
I have LEAF running on a WRAP box using shorewall openvpn.
We need to be able to serve udp tcp openvpn for proxying reasons.
The 'standard' openvpn can be configured
Hey Robert,
Not sure what your configuration is but what I've done for a client is
just copy /etc/openvpn to /etc/openvpn2 and /etc/init.d/openvpn
to /etc/init.d/openvpn2. You need to make a few changes in the various
files for the new locations but then you have 2 independently controlled
Hello!
openvpn in 3.1.1beta3 is compiled without support of storing password in
file.
unfortunately, I need this feature.
may be somebody already have openvpnz.lrp with auth-user-pass enabled?
--
Register Now for
Jim
Jim Ford wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Jim
Jim Ford schrieb:
I use a Ubuntu Linux machine where I work (at a school). At home I
use an XP machine (because of Photoshop!) behind a Bering Leaf uClibc
box.
I'd like to access my home machine from work and from what I can
deduce, Openvpn seems
I use a Ubuntu Linux machine where I work (at a school). At home I use
an XP machine (because of Photoshop!) behind a Bering Leaf uClibc box.
I'd like to access my home machine from work and from what I can deduce,
Openvpn seems the way to go.
I'm initially working on my Leaf box and am
Jim
Jim Ford schrieb:
I use a Ubuntu Linux machine where I work (at a school). At home I use
an XP machine (because of Photoshop!) behind a Bering Leaf uClibc box.
I'd like to access my home machine from work and from what I can deduce,
Openvpn seems the way to go.
I'm initially working on
changes that
break either LAN when the VPN connection is down. For now I can just
comment out a line in /etc/hosts on both LEAF boxen each time I change
locations. :-)
Thanks!
--Eric
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:51:53 +0100
From: David M Brooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] OpenVPN
I'm trying to join two home networks, each behind a LEAF
(Bering-uClibc 3.1-beta1) box, into a single network using OpenVPN.
Both networks have dynamic IP addresses on their outward (WAN via DSL)
interfaces. What I'm hoping to do is make it appear that all hosts on
both are available on both,
This might sound stupid but I have never used openvpn. If I want to use
openvpn I can install server on my home machine and client on my laptop
on the road than open UDP port in shorewall and use openvpn to connect
(I hope). Why would I install openvpn on Bering box? Is this nessesary
in
Why would I install openvpn on Bering box? Is this nessesary
in order to get to work above setup?
No, the setup you described would work if the necessary ports were forwarded
through the firewall to your server. Further, if you use the bridging mode
of openvpn, you could have access to any
Bob, Erich,
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Dear LEAF list,
having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?). I am
using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version. When I do this (delete
from /etc/openvpn/
Dear LEAF list,
having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?).
I am using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version.
When I do this (delete from /etc/openvpn/ and save config), I am
rewarded with a fresh
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Dear LEAF list,
having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?).
I am using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version.
When I do this (delete from /etc/openvpn/ and save
Hi Erich, Bob,
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Dear LEAF list,
having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?).
I am using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version.
When I do this (delete from /etc/openvpn/
Hi;
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 21:30 schrieb Bodo Meissner:
Am 14.08.2006 23:15:19 schrieb(en) Eric Spakman:
If we add the script to openvpn.lrp the package would also require the
openssl.lrp package. I will think about a solution.
Hello Eric,
I suggest to create a separate openvpn CA
On 8/12/06, Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do a simple OpenVPN between a couple of systems, and I'm
having trouble. The tunnel comes up fine according to the OpenVPN logs on
both sides, but they can't ping. Tcpdump -i tun0 on the server while the
client pings shows
Hi Kp,
I suggest to create a separate openvpn CA package that contains the
revocation script and maybe other tools for key/certificate management.
The natural place for a revoke script would be easyrsa.lrp.
This package contains the key generation scripts and already requires
openssl.lrp.
Am 15.08.2006 21:39:39 schrieb(en) Eric Spakman:
If you make a list of (simple) tools/scripts which would be valuable
in such a package I will make a package out of it.
Hello Eric,
I don't use OpenVPN and I don't create certificates.
(I use IPsec and the admin generates certs for me.)
That's
Hello Bodo,
If you make a list of (simple) tools/scripts which would be valuable
in such a package I will make a package out of it.
Hello Eric,
I don't use OpenVPN and I don't create certificates.
(I use IPsec and the admin generates certs for me.)
That's why I don't know which tools are
Hi Bob,
Sorry for responding so late.
If we add the script to openvpn.lrp the package would also require the
openssl.lrp package. I will think about a solution.
Regards,
Eric
Hi Eric,
Just to confirm, the script works fine without modification, the Server
config needs crl-verify
Hi Eric,
Just to confirm, the script works fine without modification, the Server
config needs crl-verify keys/crl.pem adding to be able to use the CRL
generated by full-revoke client.
On testing, the leaf box shows that a revoked certificate has been tried
in daemon.log. Sadly the Windows
Hi,
I'm trying to do a simple OpenVPN between a couple of systems, and I'm
having trouble. The tunnel comes up fine according to the OpenVPN logs on
both sides, but they can't ping. Tcpdump -i tun0 on the server while the
client pings shows everything working fine, but tcpdump -i tun0 on the
Dear LEAF list,
I am using Bering uClibc 2.3 with OpenVPN. Everything works reaaly well
- thanks !
I am trying to revoke a certificate (only to test the CRL mechanism). On
the OpenVPN Howto a script is used revoke-full that is part of the
easyRSA software. This does not seem to exist in the
Hi Bob,
The revoke-full script is a very simple shell script which only uses
openssl (you need the openssl.lrp package, probably the reason why the
script isn't added by default), so I don't see any reason why it shouldn't
work. I think you just can use it as is on Bering-uClibc.
Regards,
Eric
Hi Eric,
Thanks for answering, but the revoke script is neither in the openvpnz
nor the openssl lrp package. I have both installed on my LEAF box.
Regards,
Bob
Eric Spakman schrieb:
Hi Bob,
The revoke-full script is a very simple shell script which only uses
openssl (you need the
Hi Bob,
Correct, but you can just copy the script from the openvpn source to the
Bering-uClibc system and make it executable.
Regards,
Eric
Hi Eric,
Thanks for answering, but the revoke script is neither in the openvpnz
nor the openssl lrp package. I have both installed on my LEAF box.
Dear List,
I am currently using LEAF-Bering uClibc 2.3 on a WRAP platform with 3
NICs. One NIC is for ADSL-PPPOE, the second for internal networks and
the third for a WLAN access point. To protect the WLAN, I use OpenVPN to
connect clients with Windows XP.
Because of problems with MS share
Hello Bob,
I can only answer a part of your question about bridging.
Bridging can be setup by loading the bridge.o module and editing
/etc/network/interfaces, something like:
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 192.168.1.254
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
: RE: [leaf-user] OpenVPN with compression, transfer stalls
After FTP stops, can you still use the tunnel with
other programs (ping) or is it totally closed?
/Lars
--- Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Anyone using compression that can confirm that it
works?
I'm
V2.2.3 uClibc kernel 2.4.26
openvpnz 2.0.5 Rev 1
I connect from a Windows system to the Leaf box with
OpenVPN. Without compression everything works as
expected. With compression turned on applications that
transferes large amount of data stops responding after
a while (for example checking a
Hmm, I see that the liblzo package is quite old,
version 1.08-2. A newer version is available on the
lzo homepage (2.02). Anyone with experience from a
more recent version of lzo?
/Lars
--- Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Datum: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:31:44 +0100 (CET)
Från: Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone using compression that can confirm that it
works?
I'm using compression between two 2.2.2 boxes and now that you mention it I
have FTP transfers die when using the VPN from time to time... They just
quit, no error in the ftp client. I have not investigated it yet.
- Bob Coffman
Lars
Lars wrote:
V2.2.3 uClibc kernel 2.4.26
openvpnz 2.0.5 Rev 1
I connect from a Windows system to the Leaf box with
OpenVPN. Without compression everything works as
expected. With compression turned on applications that
transferes large amount of data stops responding after
a while
Lars wrote:
Hmm, I see that the liblzo package is quite old,
version 1.08-2. A newer version is available on the
lzo homepage (2.02). Anyone with experience from a
more recent version of lzo?
My OpenVPN executable is statically linked against lzo-1.08
runs fine...
btw. it's 2.0.2
cheers
Thanks for answering, Erich!
--- Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Lars
Lars wrote:
V2.2.3 uClibc kernel 2.4.26
openvpnz 2.0.5 Rev 1
I connect from a Windows system to the Leaf box
with
OpenVPN. Without compression everything works as
expected. With compression turned on
After FTP stops, can you still use the tunnel with
other programs (ping) or is it totally closed?
/Lars
--- Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Anyone using compression that can confirm that it
works?
I'm using compression between two 2.2.2 boxes and
now that you
Dear List,
I have now succeeded in installing an OpenVPNZ on my WRAP LEAF Box.
Everything works very well. This sort of surprised me, I am used to
working with professional IKE/IPSEC VPNs and OpenVPN seems at least as good.
For information, one small problem remains that is LEAF orientated: The
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Dear List,
I have now succeeded in installing an OpenVPNZ on my WRAP LEAF Box.
Everything works very well. This sort of surprised me, I am used to
working with professional IKE/IPSEC VPNs and OpenVPN seems at least as
good.
For information, one small problem
]
To: LEAF Request leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: [leaf-user] Openvpn - Bering uClibc 2.3
Dear List,
I have now succeeded in installing an OpenVPNZ on my WRAP LEAF Box.
Everything works very well. This sort of surprised me, I am used to
working
I am trying to get openvpn working on my WRAP box, but am hitting
problems during installation. I am using Bering uClibc 2.3 and sourcing
all packages from the current ISO.
I am using Kapeka's 'How-To' as an installation guide but am not sure
how up-to-date it is.
Progress:
All packages
Thank you Gianni, the text was not clear that this should be run first.
My next stumbling block (referring to the HOW-TO) is in 7.5.1.
An entry like:
route 192.168.25.0 255.255.255.0 vpn_gateway
or similar must be made, but where is this to be made (there is no
example in
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Thank you Gianni, the text was not clear that this should be run first.
My next stumbling block (referring to the HOW-TO) is in 7.5.1.
An entry like:
route 192.168.25.0 255.255.255.0 vpn_gateway
or similar must be made, but where is this to be made (there is no
Erich Titl schrieb:
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Thank you Gianni, the text was not clear that this should be run first.
My next stumbling block (referring to the HOW-TO) is in 7.5.1.
An entry like:
route 192.168.25.0 255.255.255.0 vpn_gateway
or similar must be made, but where is this to be
Does anyone know what this error message from OpenVPN in (daemon.log)
might actually mean?
Wed Jan 18 22:30:07 2006 TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address
[undef]:1194: Address already in use
I have not specified a specific address and certainly have nothing
running on port 1194.
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Erich Titl schrieb:
...
Of course I was there but I must disagree, I find the documentation not
so good.
OK, I built a number of openvpn connections for my wrap boxes. I must
admit, I am still using a derivative of Bering glibc and I compiled the
openvpn package
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Does anyone know what this error message from OpenVPN in (daemon.log)
might actually mean?
Wed Jan 18 22:30:07 2006 TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address
[undef]:1194: Address already in use
I have not specified a specific address and certainly have nothing
Good day All,
I am trying to figure out how to route over ipsec to one site then over
openvpn to another site as well as a few general questions re OpenVPN.
1. I have 8 sites to deal with. All sites will connect to Site #2 but
I also need to get to Site #1 from Site #3 via Site # 2. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darcy (Home) wrote:
| Good day All,
|
| I am trying to figure out how to route over ipsec to one site then over
| openvpn to another site as well as a few general questions re OpenVPN.
|
| 1. I have 8 sites to deal with. All sites will
Hi,
I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully
installed/tested openvpn with bering.
Thanks
Sylvain
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new
Sylvain
Sylvain Pelletier wrote:
Hi,
I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully
installed/tested openvpn with bering.
I am running it on multiple systems without a hitch using Bering glibc
cheers
Erich
---
This
Tens of installations using bering uclibc
Ciao
Gianni
Hi,
I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully
installed/tested openvpn with bering.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
Hi,
I try to set up a vpn with the lastest version of openssl (2.0.5)under
Bering-uClibc 2.3.
I try to connect a xp client to the bering gateway, the tls handshake
is succesfully achived.
From the client's log:
[tremblay.chep.priv] Peer Connection Initiated with 82.124.204.58:1194
My client
Am 01.07.2005 um 17:56 schrieb Stephen More:
According to:
http://openvpn.net/archive/openvpn-users/2004-10/msg00418.html
the openvpn system allows a user/password to be configured.
I did not see any mention of passwords on:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bucu-openvpn.html
Is there
According to: http://openvpn.net/archive/openvpn-users/2004-10/msg00418.html
the openvpn system allows a user/password to be configured.
I did not see any mention of passwords on:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bucu-openvpn.html
Is there any LEAF package that allows one to maintain a list
Michael
Michael D Schleif wrote:
Please, somebody comment on changes required to upgrade an existing v1.x
openvpn installation to this new version?
I have read about the enhancements, c.; but, I am wondering whether or
not an existing configuration will simply work in v2.0 ???
AFAIK, no.
2.0
Please, somebody comment on changes required to upgrade an existing v1.x
openvpn installation to this new version?
I have read about the enhancements, c.; but, I am wondering whether or
not an existing configuration will simply work in v2.0 ???
What do you think?
* On 2005:04:28:16:47:31-0500
Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 12:41 schrieb Pascal OFFREDO:
OpenVpn 2.0 final has been released
Has anyone built a leaf package with this release ?
For LEAF Bering-uClibc see
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemasterPAGE_user_op=view_pagePAGE_id=3MMN_position=3:
(one
Pascal OFFREDO wrote:
OpenVpn 2.0 final has been released
Has anyone built a leaf package with this release ?
Yes, for Bering 1.x
regards
Erich
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT
Sent: dinsdag 1 februari 2005 20:58
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] OpenVPN
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2005 10:55 schrieb Stefaan Van Dooren:
Hi,
I'm using Bering uClibc 2.1 and I was wondering if anyone has allready
made a openvpn 2 package for it (only can find
Hi,
I'm using Bering uClibc 2.1 and I was wondering if anyone has allready made
a openvpn 2 package for it (only can find a version 1.6 on the site). I know
version 2 is still beta, but I need some of the new features..
Stefaan
---
This
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2005 10:55 schrieb Stefaan Van Dooren:
Hi,
I'm using Bering uClibc 2.1 and I was wondering if anyone has
allready made a openvpn 2 package for it (only can find a version
1.6 on the site). I know version 2 is still beta, but I need some
of the new features..
2.0-rc1
I would interested in an openvpn2.x lrp for libc...
Preferably with ip route and lzo compiled in.
Anyone know where one can be found?
If not can anyone tell me how to go about building it?
I have several 2.4 kernels available to me.
TIA,
Rick.
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
I would interested in an openvpn2.x lrp for libc...
Preferably with ip route and lzo compiled in.
You can try here
http://leaf.think.ch/styx/pre/bin/openvpn-2.0_rc6/
It is not packaged, early pre whatever
Just copy it to your existing openvpn location, possibly
]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
OK, I deleted the route directive on the wireless laptop and everything
works fine. I can ping each end of the tunnel from the other, etc.
Apparently the route directive is completely unnecessary in my
situation
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
I am not sure the laptop needs a route to 192.168.10.0.
In fact, although the tunnel between homefw and officefw is working --
I can ping either end of the tunnel IPs (10.1.10.1,2) from the other --
I can't get access to the individual subnets.
Although there is no route to
.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 6:05 PM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
I am not sure the laptop needs a route to 192.168.10.0.
In fact
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:16 AM
To: Tibbs, Richard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard
Dear list.
I have the following arrangement, running two instances of openvpn on
home fw I want to protect my WLAN in back of the home fw and that
works fine. I can see Peer connection initiated with 192.168.1.3:5000
in daemon.log on homefw.
However nothing is initiated with officefw, nor
no dropped
UDPs of port 5000, or 50001.
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:09 PM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
Dear list.
I have the following arrangement
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
Erich,
The float directive in the bering openvpn.conf allows the WinXP
wireless nic to get a variable IP. Since I am rebooting quite often,
and LEAFs have no memory of the ip to mac address, so it would come up
192.168.1.3 or .4.
OK, but still you are tunnelling
Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 6:08 PM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
Erich,
The float directive in the bering openvpn.conf allows the WinXP
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
the pt-to-pt tunnel needed to know how to get to the other.
Not the endpoints, your local end point is a device which is linked to
an address and knows the other end of the tunnel. The local and remote
directives apparently take care of the routing issues.
! (et Jean-Pierre aussi)
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:59 AM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems executing up-script
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
Dear list: I experimented a bit making
Dear list -- apologies in advance, I am not familiar with unix scripts.
Using using openvpn 1.6 on a Bering 1.2 firewall (non-uclibc) I have
tried several different script lines to add the route. These are:
#!/bin/sh -e
ip route add 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 nexthop $5
#!/bin/sh -e
ip route add $1
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tibbs,
Richard
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 6:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems executing up-script
Dear list -- apologies in advance, I am not familiar with unix scripts.
Using using openvpn 1.6 on a Bering 1.2 firewall (non-uclibc) I have
Hi,
I try to set up VPN with a leaf box.
I want to create VPN tunnels between the router and
several clients (Linux, WinXP, Win2K...). Some clients
have a NATed connection, with private addresses, which
cause some troubles with Ipsec.
OpenVPN is interesting: a single udp port is required
for the
Subject: [leaf-user] OpenVpn
Hi,
I try to set up VPN with a leaf box.
I want to create VPN tunnels between the router and
several clients (Linux, WinXP, Win2K...). Some clients
have a NATed connection, with private addresses, which
cause some troubles with Ipsec.
OpenVPN is interesting
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:14 AM
Subject: [leaf-user] OpenVpn
Hi,
I try to set up VPN with a leaf box.
I want to create VPN tunnels between the router
and
several clients (Linux, WinXP, Win2K...). Some
clients
have a NATed connection, with private addresses
theoleyre fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I try to set up VPN with a leaf box.
I want to create VPN tunnels between the router and
several clients (Linux, WinXP, Win2K...). Some clients
have a NATed connection, with private addresses, which
cause some troubles with Ipsec.
OpenVPN is interesting: a single udp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:14 AM
Subject: [leaf-user] OpenVpn
Hi,
I try to set up VPN with a leaf box.
I want to create VPN tunnels between the router
and
several clients (Linux, WinXP, Win2K...). Some
clients
have a NATed
In that case, you can contact Martin Hejl and see if he can port the 2.0 to
LEAF. We are looking forward to it too.
Well, a package is available at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/hejl/
the reason that I haven't officially published it until now is that
there's no up to date
On Friday 22 October 2004 13:43, Martin Hejl wrote:
In that case, you can contact Martin Hejl and see if he can port the 2.0
to LEAF. We are looking forward to it too.
Well, a package is available at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/hejl/
the reason that I haven't
Hi Scott,
Scott Merrill wrote:
I've just recently set up an OpenVPN 2.0 server. It's actually pretty
straightforward, if you're at least somewhat familiar with the old 1.x
operation.
I have no doubt - the config-file is not the problem (especially since
the sample configs provided should
Has anyone had success with openVPN on Dachstein?
thanks,
Miguel DeAvila
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
hey poh wrote:
I wanted to setup a leaf vpn router with openvpn. I had also set up a
window2k openvpn computer.When I try to connect these two the following
msg shown in the console:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
003b
*pde =
Oops :
CPU :
I wanted to setup a leaf vpn router with openvpn. I had also set up a
window2k openvpn computer.When I try to connect these two the following msg
shown in the console:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 003b
*pde =
Oops :
CPU : 0
EIP :
chiew yock sang wrote:
From: Martin Hejl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In routerA, when i try to ping 192.168.99.2, the following commands
shows:
Virtual device tun0 asks to queue packet!
ping: sendto: Network is down
Hm, I've never seen that error - but I must say, I'm not quite sure how
commands actually
From: Martin Hejl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In routerA, when i try to ping 192.168.99.2, the following commands shows:
Virtual device tun0 asks to queue packet!
ping: sendto: Network is down
Hm, I've never seen that error - but I must say, I'm not quite sure how
commands actually pop up - do you mean
From: Martin Hejl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] openvpn help
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:41:12 +0200
chiew yock sang wrote:
/etc/shorewall/tunnels (routerA)
#type zonegatewaygateway zone
openvpn: net 192.168.99.2
chiew yock sang wrote:
when i do ps aux, in the command line shows, /usr/sbin/openvpn --daemon
--writepid /var/run/openvpn (the rest can't be seen).
This means that openvpn is already running, so any attempt to start
another instance (which is using the same config) will fail.
when i do
when i do netstat, it shows,
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (tcp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (udp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (raw)' on this system
Well netstat -an should produce more relevant results.
When i do netstat -an, the following shows:
From: Martin Hejl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when i do netstat, it shows,
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (tcp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (udp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (raw)' on this system
Well netstat -an should produce more relevant results.
When i do
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
