RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread S Mohan
t while reading linuxrc thanks to Brad's inline documentation in the hack. Mohan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brad Fritz Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Pr

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread John Mullan
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:26 PM To: John Mullan Cc: 'Brad Fritz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version John (and/or Brad), I've been te

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread gart
I'll have to setup everything to try and do it again. Unfortunately, the system I have doesn't have a floppy so I have to do the Hard-Drive shuffle to get everything setup. I'm thinking this weekend I should have some time to plug away at this. --Pat On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Brad Fritz wrote: >

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread Brad Fritz
Pat, On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 20:26:11 EST Pat wrote: > John (and/or Brad), > I've been teetering on getting this working myself. Can you suggest (or > document) variances from the UserGuide? I recently updated the DoC UG chapter for Bering 1.0-stable. The HTML version is at http://leaf.sour

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread John Mullan
again Brad. John -Original Message- From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:37 PM To: John Mullan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:18:47 EST John Mullan wro

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread gart
what the purpose > is. > > John > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brad Fritz > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 8:15 PM > To: John Mullan > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Problem: B

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread Brad Fritz
On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:18:47 EST John Mullan wrote: > OK Brad, some fantastic success. I now get the expected fdisk results. > However, previously I also got the expected /proc/mtd results, but now I > get 'permission denied'. Just to verify, do you get that message when you "cat /proc/mtd"? >

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread John Mullan
Brad Fritz Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 8:15 PM To: John Mullan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:20:51 EST John Mullan wrote: > Hi Brad. > > When I run 'fdisk /dev/nftla' it gives m

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-03 Thread John Mullan
Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-02 Thread Brad Fritz
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:34:37 EST you wrote: > OK. Now we are getting somewhere. > > First, my major is 100, not 93. That is left over from when I used > Dachstein. I didn't think it would make a big difference, but then I > don't know a lot about the inner workings of things. Yep, that will

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-02 Thread John Mullan
ject: Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:20:51 EST John Mullan wrote: > Hi Brad. > > When I run 'fdisk /dev/nftla' it gives me 'unable to open /dev/nftla' The output of 'ls -l /dev/nftla*' sho

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-02 Thread Brad Fritz
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:20:51 EST John Mullan wrote: > Hi Brad. > > When I run 'fdisk /dev/nftla' it gives me 'unable to open /dev/nftla' The output of 'ls -l /dev/nftla*' should look like this: brw-rw 1 root root 93, 0 Dec 2 16:51 /dev/nftla brw-rw 1 root root 93,

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-02 Thread John Mullan
Brad: Further to your other suggestions: >Did you use Bill's fdisk or linux fdisk? What were the results? >Better yet, what is the output of the linux "fdisk -l /dev/nftla" >command? This fdisk command returns a blank line. >My guess is a partition or filesystem problem with the DoC. Le

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-02 Thread John Mullan
t cannot find the packages and hangs. But then, it still technically has FAT on it. Any other hints? John -Original Message- From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 12:46 AM To: John Mullan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Problem

Re: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-01 Thread Brad Fritz
John, On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:19:01 EST John Mullan wrote: > Well, I've spent the weekend changing from my Dachstein DHCP system on > DoC to Bering PPPoe (changed ISPs) latest "stable" version I believe > based on 2.4.18 kernal. > > It didn't take too long to implement the PPPoE feature using th

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-01 Thread John Mullan
I'm kinda stuck on the meaning of "device not configured". -Original Message- From: S Mohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:45 PM To: 'John Mullan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "

RE: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-01 Thread S Mohan
, December 02, 2002 5:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version Well, I've spent the weekend changing from my Dachstein DHCP system on DoC to Bering PPPoe (changed ISPs) latest "stable" version I believe based on 2.4.18 ke

[leaf-user] Problem: Bering DOC in latest "stable" version

2002-12-01 Thread John Mullan
Well, I've spent the weekend changing from my Dachstein DHCP system on DoC to Bering PPPoe (changed ISPs) latest "stable" version I believe based on 2.4.18 kernal. It didn't take too long to implement the PPPoE feature using the Install/User guides. But the DoC part has me baffled. Currently,