Shouldn't the paths be relative to /etc/openvpn? Did you try copying
the keys there and adjusting the relative paths? Might not be a bug at
all.
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:01 +1100, Mark Berndt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just upgraded to v6.02 and had some time to play with the openvpn
> server,
Am Sonntag, 11. Mai 2014, 21:10:20 schrieb Otto Halák - TeleLarm:
> Dear users,
> Running 5.0.2 and 5.0.3 (i486) on two WRAP boards and noticed on both,
> that OpenVPN does not want to automatically start after boot.
> I could try
> AUTOSTART="all"
> or
> AUTOSTART="client"
> with no success.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Sampson [mailto:do...@dawnsign.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 06:02 PM
> To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [leaf-user] OpenVPN running in DMZ using Bering uClibc
> 3.1
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm experimenting with a dd-wrt type wireless access
Hey Robert,
Not sure what your configuration is but what I've done for a client is
just copy /etc/openvpn to /etc/openvpn2 and /etc/init.d/openvpn
to /etc/init.d/openvpn2. You need to make a few changes in the various
files for the new locations but then you have 2 independently controlled
openvp
give a look in /etc/default/openvpn for "AUTOSTART" variabile
graziano
Il 01/10/2010 12.30, bob ha scritto:
> Hello leaf list,
> I have LEAF running on a WRAP box using shorewall& openvpn.
> We need to be able to serve udp& tcp openvpn for proxying reasons.
> The 'standard' openvpn can be con
Hi Robert,
take a look into /etc/init.d/openvpn :
CONFIG_DIR=/etc/openvpn
..
AUTOSTART="all"
..
..
if test -z "$AUTOSTART" -o "x$AUTOSTART" = "xall" ; then
# all VPNs shall be started automatically
for CONFIG in `cd $CONFIG_DIR; ls *.conf 2> /dev/null`; do
NAME=${CONFIG%%.co
Jim
Jim Ford wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Jim
Jim Ford schrieb:
I use a Ubuntu Linux machine where I work (at a school). At home I
use an XP machine (because of Photoshop!) behind a Bering Leaf uClibc
box.
I'd like to access my home machine from work and from what I can
deduce, Openvpn seems
Jim
Jim Ford schrieb:
I use a Ubuntu Linux machine where I work (at a school). At home I use
an XP machine (because of Photoshop!) behind a Bering Leaf uClibc box.
I'd like to access my home machine from work and from what I can deduce,
Openvpn seems the way to go.
I'm initially working on
e DNS server
for the whole VPN'd network, but I want to stay away from changes that
break either LAN when the VPN connection is down. For now I can just
comment out a line in /etc/hosts on both LEAF boxen each time I change
locations. :-)
Thanks!
--Eric
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:51
Hi Eric,
I did something similar on Bering-uClibc 3.0.1 a while back, albeit
using OpenSwan (ipsec.lrp) rather than OpenVPN. One of my WAN addresses
was effectively static though - I don't know how you'll get on if *both*
addresses are dynamic. Maybe if you use a dynamic DNS service you can
define
>
> Why would I install openvpn on Bering box? Is this nessesary
> in order to get to work above setup?
>
No, the setup you described would work if the necessary ports were forwarded
through the firewall to your server. Further, if you use the bridging mode
of openvpn, you could have access to an
Bob, Erich,
> Bob
>
>
> Bob von Knobloch wrote:
>
>> Dear LEAF list,
>>
>>
>> having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?). I am
>> using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
>> client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version. When I do this (delete
>> f
Hi Erich, Bob,
>Bob
>
>Bob von Knobloch wrote:
>> Dear LEAF list,
>>
>> having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?).
>> I am using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
>> client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version.
>> When I do this (delete from
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
> Dear LEAF list,
>
> having upgraded from 2.3 to 3.0 Beta 2, I notice small quirk(?).
> I am using the OpenVPN package from the ISO image and want to remove the
> client config file, as I did on the 2.3 version.
> When I do this (delete from /etc/openvpn/ and save co
Hello Bodo,
>
>> If you make a list of (simple) tools/scripts which would be valuable
>> in such a package I will make a package out of it.
>
> Hello Eric,
>
>
> I don't use OpenVPN and I don't create certificates.
> (I use IPsec and the admin generates certs for me.)
> That's why I don't know whic
Am 15.08.2006 21:39:39 schrieb(en) Eric Spakman:
> If you make a list of (simple) tools/scripts which would be valuable
> in such a package I will make a package out of it.
Hello Eric,
I don't use OpenVPN and I don't create certificates.
(I use IPsec and the admin generates certs for me.)
That's
Hi Kp,
>>
>>
>> I suggest to create a separate "openvpn CA" package that contains the
>> revocation script and maybe other tools for key/certificate management.
>
> The natural place for a revoke script would be easyrsa.lrp.
> This package contains the key generation scripts and already requires
>
On 8/12/06, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to do a simple OpenVPN between a couple of systems, and I'm
> having trouble. The tunnel comes up fine according to the OpenVPN logs on
> both sides, but they can't ping. Tcpdump -i tun0 on the server while the
> client pings
Hi;
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 21:30 schrieb Bodo Meissner:
> Am 14.08.2006 23:15:19 schrieb(en) Eric Spakman:
> > If we add the script to openvpn.lrp the package would also require the
> > openssl.lrp package. I will think about a solution.
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> I suggest to create a separate "op
Hello Bodo,
>
> I suggest to create a separate "openvpn CA" package that contains the
> revocation script and maybe other tools for key/certificate management.
>
If you make a list of (simple) tools/scripts which would be valuable in
such a package I will make a package out of it.
> I think the re
Am 14.08.2006 23:15:19 schrieb(en) Eric Spakman:
> If we add the script to openvpn.lrp the package would also require the
> openssl.lrp package. I will think about a solution.
>
Hello Eric,
I suggest to create a separate "openvpn CA" package that contains the
revocation script and maybe other
Hi Bob,
Sorry for responding so late.
If we add the script to openvpn.lrp the package would also require the
openssl.lrp package. I will think about a solution.
Regards,
Eric
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> Just to confirm, the script works fine without modification, the Server
> config needs "crl-verify keys/
Hi Eric,
Just to confirm, the script works fine without modification, the Server
config needs "crl-verify keys/crl.pem" adding to be able to use the CRL
generated by "full-revoke ".
On testing, the leaf box shows that a revoked certificate has been tried
in daemon.log. Sadly the Windows Openvpn
Hi Bob,
Correct, but you can just copy the script from the openvpn source to the
Bering-uClibc system and make it executable.
Regards,
Eric
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> Thanks for answering, but the revoke script is neither in the openvpnz
> nor the openssl lrp package. I have both installed on my LEAF box.
Hi Eric,
Thanks for answering, but the revoke script is neither in the openvpnz
nor the openssl lrp package. I have both installed on my LEAF box.
Regards,
Bob
Eric Spakman schrieb:
> Hi Bob,
>
> The revoke-full script is a very simple shell script which only uses
> openssl (you need the openss
Hi Bob,
The revoke-full script is a very simple shell script which only uses
openssl (you need the openssl.lrp package, probably the reason why the
script isn't added by default), so I don't see any reason why it shouldn't
work. I think you just can use it "as is" on Bering-uClibc.
Regards,
Eric
Hello Bob,
I can only answer a part of your question about bridging.
Bridging can be setup by loading the bridge.o module and editing
/etc/network/interfaces, something like:
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 192.168.1.254
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 192.168.1.255
et
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] OpenVPN with compression, transfer stalls
After FTP stops, can you still use the tunnel with
other programs (ping) or is it totally closed?
/Lars
--- Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> >Anyone using compression that can c
After FTP stops, can you still use the tunnel with
other programs (ping) or is it totally closed?
/Lars
--- Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> >Anyone using compression that can confirm that it
> works?
>
> I'm using compression between two 2.2.2 boxes and
> now t
Thanks for answering, Erich!
--- Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> Lars
>
> Lars wrote:
> > V2.2.3 uClibc kernel 2.4.26
> > openvpnz 2.0.5 Rev 1
> >
> > I connect from a Windows system to the Leaf box
> with
> > OpenVPN. Without compression everything works as
> > expected. With compressio
Lars wrote:
> Hmm, I see that the liblzo package is quite old,
> version 1.08-2. A newer version is available on the
> lzo homepage (2.02). Anyone with experience from a
> more recent version of lzo?
My OpenVPN executable is statically linked against lzo-1.08
runs fine...
btw. it's 2.0.2
cheers
Lars
Lars wrote:
> V2.2.3 uClibc kernel 2.4.26
> openvpnz 2.0.5 Rev 1
>
> I connect from a Windows system to the Leaf box with
> OpenVPN. Without compression everything works as
> expected. With compression turned on applications that
> transferes large amount of data stops responding after
> a w
>Anyone using compression that can confirm that it
works?
I'm using compression between two 2.2.2 boxes and now that you mention it I
have FTP transfers die when using the VPN from time to time... They just
quit, no error in the ftp client. I have not investigated it yet.
- Bob Coffman
-
I use ntpdate and specify a NTP server in its config. This will correct the
time right after your box is up. Make sure you allow your box to connect to
that server. If you have an internal NTP server, it would be good.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob von Knobloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bob
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
> Dear List,
> I have now succeeded in installing an OpenVPNZ on my WRAP LEAF Box.
> Everything works very well. This sort of surprised me, I am used to
> working with professional IKE/IPSEC VPNs and OpenVPN seems at least as
> good.
> For information, one small problem
Hi Bob,
> Does anyone know what this error message from OpenVPN in (daemon.log)
> might actually mean?
>
> Wed Jan 18 22:30:07 2006 TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address
> [undef]:1194: Address already in use
>
> I have not specified a specific address and certainly have nothing
> running
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Does anyone know what this error message from OpenVPN in (daemon.log)
might actually mean?
Wed Jan 18 22:30:07 2006 TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address
[undef]:1194: Address already in use
I have not specified a specific address and certainly have nothing
ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darcy (Home) wrote:
| Good day All,
|
| I am trying to figure out how to route over ipsec to one site then over
| openvpn to another site as well as a few general questions re OpenVPN.
|
| 1. I have 8 sites to deal with. All sites will connec
Tens of installations using bering uclibc
Ciao
Gianni
Hi,
I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully
installed/tested openvpn with bering.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fil
Sylvain
Sylvain Pelletier wrote:
Hi,
I would like to get the feedback of people who have succesfully
installed/tested openvpn with bering.
I am running it on multiple systems without a hitch using Bering glibc
cheers
Erich
---
This SF.n
Am 01.07.2005 um 17:56 schrieb Stephen More:
According to:
http://openvpn.net/archive/openvpn-users/2004-10/msg00418.html
the openvpn system allows a user/password to be configured.
I did not see any mention of passwords on:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bucu-openvpn.html
Is there any
Michael
Michael D Schleif wrote:
Please, somebody comment on changes required to upgrade an existing v1.x
openvpn installation to this new version?
I have read about the enhancements, &c.; but, I am wondering whether or
not an existing configuration will simply work in v2.0 ???
AFAIK, no.
2.0 ha
Please, somebody comment on changes required to upgrade an existing v1.x
openvpn installation to this new version?
I have read about the enhancements, &c.; but, I am wondering whether or
not an existing configuration will simply work in v2.0 ???
What do you think?
* On 2005:04:28:16:47:31-0500
Is this a drop-in replacement for existing implementations?
If not, howto find what requires change?
Thank you.
* "K.-P. Kirchdörfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:04:27:18:54:31+0200] scribed:
> Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 12:41 schrieb Pascal OFFREDO:
> > OpenVpn 2.0 final has been released
> >
>
Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 12:41 schrieb Pascal OFFREDO:
> OpenVpn 2.0 final has been released
>
> Has anyone built a leaf package with this release ?
For LEAF Bering-uClibc see
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=3&MMN_position=3:
Pascal OFFREDO wrote:
OpenVpn 2.0 final has been released
Has anyone built a leaf package with this release ?
Yes, for Bering 1.x
regards
Erich
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
irchdörfer
Sent: dinsdag 1 februari 2005 20:58
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] OpenVPN
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2005 10:55 schrieb Stefaan Van Dooren:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Bering uClibc 2.1 and I was wondering if anyone has allready
> made a openvpn 2 pack
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
I would interested in an openvpn2.x lrp for libc...
Preferably with ip route and lzo compiled in.
You can try here
http://leaf.think.ch/styx/pre/bin/openvpn-2.0_rc6/
It is not packaged, early pre whatever
Just copy it to your existing openvpn location, possibly
/u
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2005 10:55 schrieb Stefaan Van Dooren:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Bering uClibc 2.1 and I was wondering if anyone has
> allready made a openvpn 2 package for it (only can find a version
> 1.6 on the site). I know version 2 is still beta, but I need some
> of the new features..
2.0
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 6:05 PM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
>I am not sure the laptop needs a route to 192.168.10.0.
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
I am not sure the laptop needs a route to 192.168.10.0.
In fact, although the tunnel between homefw and officefw is "working" --
I can ping either end of the tunnel IPs (10.1.10.1,2) from the other --
I can't get access to the individual subnets.
Although there is no route t
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
>OK, I deleted the route directive on the wireless laptop and everything
>works fine. I can ping each end of the tunnel from the other, etc.
>Apparently the route directive is completely unn
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
OK, I deleted the route directive on the wireless laptop and everything
works fine. I can ping each end of the tunnel from the other, etc.
Apparently the route directive is completely unnecessary in my situation
on either end.
Great it works for you, I have one quest
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
Erich,
The "float" directive in the bering openvpn.conf allows the WinXP
wireless nic to get a variable IP. Since I am rebooting quite often,
and LEAFs have no memory of the ip to mac address, so it would come up
192.168.1.3 or .4.
OK, but still you are tunnelling thr
's show no dropped
UDPs of port 5000, or 50001.
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:09 PM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
>Dear list.
>
te 10
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:16 AM
To: Tibbs, Richard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Ri
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
the pt-to-pt tunnel needed to know how to get to the other.
Not the endpoints, your local end point is a device which is linked to
an address and knows the other end of the tunnel. The local and remote
directives apparently take care of the routing issues.
Apparentl
tween home &
office.
HTH
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 6:08 PM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems -- again..
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
>Erich,
>The "float
anks Erich! (et Jean-Pierre aussi)
Rick.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:59 AM
To: Tibbs, Richard
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Openvpn problems executing up-script
Rick
Tibbs, Richard wrote:
>Dear list: I experimented a b
Dear list: I experimented a bit making the script
#!/bin/sh -e
/sbin/ip route add $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6
But same outcome "... shell failed with error status 1."
I checked the -e parameter and it is stops the script immediately if any
command fails.
Higher up in daemon.log openvpn calls the script th
Hi Scott,
Scott Merrill wrote:
I've just recently set up an OpenVPN 2.0 server. It's actually pretty
straightforward, if you're at least somewhat familiar with the old 1.x
operation.
I have no doubt - the config-file is not the problem (especially since
the sample configs provided should almost
On Friday 22 October 2004 13:43, Martin Hejl wrote:
> > In that case, you can contact Martin Hejl and see if he can port the 2.0
> > to LEAF. We are looking forward to it too.
>
> Well, a package is available at
>
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/hejl/
>
> the reason that I haven'
In that case, you can contact Martin Hejl and see if he can port the 2.0 to
LEAF. We are looking forward to it too.
Well, a package is available at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/leaf/devel/hejl/
the reason that I haven't "officially" published it until now is that
there's no up to date doc
, October 22, 2004 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] OpenVpn
> I forgot to explain that I have a firewall between my
> clients and my leaf box. This firewall is a Border
> Router, not on my responsability. I can only ask for
> the opening of some ports. So, all clients must
> conn
theoleyre fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I try to set up VPN with a leaf box.
I want to create VPN tunnels between the router and
several clients (Linux, WinXP, Win2K...). Some clients
have a NATed connection, with private addresses, which
cause some troubles with Ipsec.
OpenVPN is interesting: a single udp po
I forgot to explain that I have a firewall between my
clients and my leaf box. This firewall is a Border
Router, not on my responsability. I can only ask for
the opening of some ports. So, all clients must
connect to the leaf box via a single udp port.
Client --- Internet --- Firewall --- LeafBox
I think you will be much better off with OpenVPN regarding NATed clients.
You can have road-warriors with 1.6 but you have to use different port for
each warrior.
- Original Message -
From: "theoleyre fabrice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 9:14
hey poh wrote:
I wanted to setup a leaf vpn router with openvpn. I had also set up a
window2k openvpn computer.When I try to connect these two the following
msg shown in the console:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
003b
*pde =
Oops :
CPU : 0
chiew yock sang wrote:
From: Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In routerA, when i try to ping 192.168.99.2, the following commands
shows:
Virtual device tun0 asks to queue packet!
ping: sendto: Network is down
Hm, I've never seen that error - but I must say, I'm not quite sure how
commands actually
From: Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In routerA, when i try to ping 192.168.99.2, the following commands shows:
Virtual device tun0 asks to queue packet!
ping: sendto: Network is down
Hm, I've never seen that error - but I must say, I'm not quite sure how
commands actually "pop up" - do you mean
chiew yock sang wrote:
When i do netstat -an, the following shows:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local AddressForeign AddressState
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:800.0.0.0:*
Listen
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:10230.0.0.0:*
Listen
netstat:
From: Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
when i do netstat, it shows,
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (tcp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (udp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (raw)' on this system
Well "netstat -an" should produce more relevant results.
When i
when i do netstat, it shows,
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (tcp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (udp)' on this system
netstat: no support for 'AF INET6 (raw)' on this system
Well "netstat -an" should produce more relevant results.
When i do netstat -an, the following shows
chiew yock sang wrote:
when i do ps aux, in the command line shows, /usr/sbin/openvpn --daemon
--writepid /var/run/openvpn (the rest can't be seen).
This means that openvpn is already running, so any attempt to start
another instance (which is using the same config) will fail.
when i do nets
From: Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] openvpn help
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:41:12 +0200
chiew yock sang wrote:
/etc/shorewall/tunnels (routerA)
#type zonegatewaygateway zone
openvpn: net 192.168.99.2
t
ALParada wrote:
Are tun and tap devices associated with any one interface?
Not that I know of - for all I know, they _are_ interfaces themselves.
I forgot to ask: Is a "route add" command the best/only way to handle this
situation?
I'd say, the the easiest solution to set up is to use the "route"
chiew yock sang wrote:
/etc/shorewall/tunnels (routerA)
#type zonegatewaygateway zone
openvpn: net 192.168.99.2
this is either a typo, or a problem - the error message you quoted later
suggests openvpn runs on port 5000 - but in /etc/shorewall/tunnels you
I forgot to ask: Is a "route add" command the best/only way to handle this
situation?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "ALParada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 6:30 PM
Subject: [leaf-user] OpenVPN and routing
>
> Setting up OpenVPN on uClibc
I'm only posting a reply to the LEAF list since that is where I prefer
Leaf Shorewall support to be handled. I also dislike getting involved in
mail threads that are cross-posted on several lists.
AdStar wrote:
I'm trying to setup a VPN (openvpn version 1.5.0) connection from my home
(ADSL, sta
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 00:59, Informática. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> I´m trying to connect several offices, and I decided to use Bering uClib
>
> because it seems to be the most up to date branch.
>
>
>
>
> After several problems with network drivers it´s starting to work, but
>
> now I ha
Hello,
I use openvpn since 1 year with bering ( glibc) to connect 2 subnets through
adsl ( pppoe) lines
It's a wonderfull product. ( the easiest one to configure if both ends of
the tunnel are connected with changing extrnal addresses). I only used
static keys so far.
I'm working on building a .lr
Le Jeudi 27 Mars 2003 21:46, Scott Merrill a écrit :
> I've seen some posts (here and on the Shorewall list) about OpenVPN, so I
> thought I'd take a look. I like what I see, and I'd like to try to
> implement it on LEAF/Bering.
>
> Getting OpenVPN compiled for Bering is problematic, though. I fo
On Thursday 27 March 2003 02:46 pm, Scott Merrill wrote:
> Getting OpenVPN compiled for Bering is problematic, though. I followed the
> Bering UML instructions for creating a virtual slink environment for
> compiling userland programs, but the compilation of OpenVPN produced a
> binary that did no
83 matches
Mail list logo
