Rasmussen
Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2008 2:56 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
Dave and I met about this yesterday and have some ideas.
First of all, one of our great challenges when developing the SourceWriter was
to
Geoff:
That sounds like a great solution to me - especially if you have an
option to export to TNG. Thanks for your efforts!
Gene
==
At 11:56 AM 8/15/2008, you wrote:
Dave and I met about this yesterday and have some ideas.
First of all, one of our great challenges when developing
OTECTED]
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com <http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/>
> ===
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail Nestor
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:41 AM
> To: Legacy User Group
> Subject: [LegacyUG] V7 Sou
ussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny M
Benson
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 10:52 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty forma
Geoff Rasmussen wrote
With this option selected, when the GEDCOM is uploaded to the site of
choice, the entire citation will read as it is displayed in the
Footnote/Endnote Citation of the output preview.
Would it be possible to have something similar within Legacy so that one
can type in a c
cy defaults and others.
>
> If this makes sense to any of you, would this solution be adequate?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geoff Rasmussen
> Millennia Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
> ===
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
==
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail Nestor
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:41 AM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
Do you happen to find yourself in the following three catego
/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Family Tree import
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:00:39 -0500
>
> Ron,
>
> If someone sends me a CD with their
Eileen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:26 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom
output
K
Legacy User Group guidelines
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 6:00:32 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
Your point about there being no one answer to sourcing is absolutely true,
and therein lies the problem. There
their own thing.
>
> Kirsten
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of ronald
> ferguson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:20 PM
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty f
mplates are a great
tool to help us muddle through--and independent souls can continue to do
their own thing.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:20 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.c
UserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
>
> I think Legacy's gedcom format is not the problem. It's just that a
> gedcom file strips away all the formatting that Legacy uses to create
> the nice EE-style citations. One exampl
Ron:
Thanks for the encouraging report.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:26 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in
p://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
> For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
> _________
>
>
>
>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:17:56 -0700
>
&g
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gail Nestor
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:41 AM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources: Nifty formatting lost in gedcom output
Do you happen to find yourself in the following three categories?
1) You use Legacy v7 sourcewriter and have converted
Do you happen to find yourself in the following three categories?
1) You use Legacy v7 sourcewriter and have converted some/all of your
sources
2) You publish to the web using TNG
3) You strongly desire to have these sources formatted according to Evidence
Explained
If so, please note that the ge
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of glove
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:07 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup
Subject: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources
I posted this 5 days ago and not yet seen it yet!
Maybe it is just because I set up my sources in a particular way
I posted this 5 days ago and not yet seen it yet!
Maybe it is just because I set up my sources in a particular way but under
SourceWriter there is no option to strip HTML from the text/comments in the
source detail although it does exist in the master source definition text
tab. Would this be a pr
Not really. I just highlight all the text and toggle the B, U, and I
buttons. Or do you mean some other kind of html?
--
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jlog.html
glove wrote:
Maybe it is just because I set up my sources in a particular way but
Yes.
I'm using a workaround at the moment by copying and pasting the formatted text
first into Notepad.
Evert van Dijken
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] V7 Sources
> Date: Mon, 9
Maybe it is just because I set up my sources in a particular way but under
SourceWriter there is no option to strip HTML from the text/comments in the
source detail although it does exist in the master source definition text
tab. Would this be a problem for anyone else?
Graham Love
Legacy User
23 matches
Mail list logo
