RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still

2007-01-05 Thread Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
, January 04, 2007 9:52 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still You can use Legacy to find next sequential File ID when you are prefacing the number with a code. Click the binoculars at the end of the File ID field

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still

2007-01-04 Thread Cathy
You can use Legacy to find next sequential File ID when you are prefacing the number with a code. Click the binoculars at the end of the File ID field. Highlight the code + greatest number in the list Click Select +1 Cathy At 12:34 PM 5/01/2007, you wrote: Jean True, the Legacy feature that

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still

2007-01-04 Thread Bob Janice
Of jean van horn Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:43 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still Gary, I tried using a letter in front of the number for my adoptive family database so that when I'm gone that

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still

2007-01-04 Thread Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
ht on. Gary Near St Louis MO USA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jean van horn Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:43 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still

2007-01-04 Thread jean van horn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jean van horn Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:30 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more "...I use the file it as I got it system which files source

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-03 Thread malkajef
Thanks. Makes sense and simple enough. Jeff - Original Message - From: "M. Brenzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:29 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files I do something similarly and my system was the topi

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-03 Thread M. Brenzel
sequence in which it is filed. Mary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of malkajef Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 10:16 PM To: LegacyUserGroup Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files Thank you. That makes sense. Question

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more still

2007-01-03 Thread Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson-Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara-
nt: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:30 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more "...I use the file it as I got it system which files sources once but is referenced by all that use it." "When I find a censu

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more

2007-01-03 Thread jean van horn
LegacyUserGroup" Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:55 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more Frankly I will not endeavor to defend the standard ahnentafel nor the library cross referencing systems that have survived virtually all options for many de

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more

2007-01-03 Thread Sue Eggett
I'm up way past my bedtime, so I hope this makes sense: I agree with Loran. I use the Dollarhide adaptation. I know that it's a nuisance to go back and change numbering of several descendants when children are out of order or when a new child is found . But having this unique number for each indi

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more

2007-01-02 Thread Loran Braught
Frankly I will not endeavor to defend the standard ahnentafel nor the library cross referencing systems that have survived virtually all options for many decades. I am not a professional genealogist, but I have noticed that the more we try to merge family lines into one file the more difficult

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread malkajef
: Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:09 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files Hi Jeff, It's not Clooz you need (in my opinion) but the method of organising paper documents before you enter them into Clooz. When you enter stuff in Clooz, everything has an ID code/numbe

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread Cary
acyUG] One tested method of organizing files Back on the topic of organizing files-- I heartily agree with those who view making multiple copies of material wasteful, time-consuming, space-consuming, and prone to errors. For what it's worth I am defining "material" here as any

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread Heather Stovold
One other problem with this method - ahentafal numbers, with child numbers afterwards, and spouse numbers if needed(which I used for a while) - the numbers can get very messed up if you find out that you missed a child or had them in the wrong order, or the same with spouses *** Give th

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread Cathy
Hi Jeff, It's not Clooz you need (in my opinion) but the method of organising paper documents before you enter them into Clooz. When you enter stuff in Clooz, everything has an ID code/number. You have to assign that to the pieces of paper. The suggestion is to divide your paper into types -

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread malkajef
See embedded comments: You are quite right - we need to make sure our research papers are organised in some fashion - a great message for the New Year. You'll find several methods listed in the Legacy News. Personally, I can't cope with any method that requires copying or cross-referencing. I

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson-Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara-
Back on the topic of organizing files-- I heartily agree with those who view making multiple copies of material wasteful, time-consuming, space-consuming, and prone to errors. For what it's worth I am defining "material" here as any hard copy item be it photograph, letter, newspaper, recorded tap

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread Bob
Cathy wrote: Personally, I can't cope with any method that requires copying or cross-referencing. I found I simply put such papers in a pile to "file later" and later never came. I file by document type as advocated by the maker of Clooz - Elizabeth ? - it's the only useful thing I got from C

RE: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread C.G. Ouimet
Perhaps I'm missing something but, in my view, there is one major flaw with this system. The Ahnentafel numbering system has meaning and when hardcoded into the UserID that meaning becomes irrelevant when doing pedigrees for someone other than the person for which the numbers were generated for in

Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files

2007-01-02 Thread Cathy
Hi Loran, Are you wondering whether this reached the list? It came forwarded a few days ago and now direct preceded by an empty message from you with the same title - and while I was writing this - another one. You are quite right - we need to make sure our research papers are organised in s