Michelle,
The beauty of Legacy is that everyone can enter data based upon their own
individual preferences and style. Personally, I never delete a source, even
when the information contained in the source has proven to be wrong. Instead, I
add the source to a properly titled Disproven event i.e
Following generally accepted genealogical standards for researching our
ancestors leaves plenty of room for all of us to customize our research to
reflect our individual preferences. I agree that there could be more options
for customizing the Family Group Sheet, however, of the Family Group She
Richard,
I am not a LDS member but I think the B=Baptism, E=End, S=Sealed/Spouse,
P=Sealed/Parents, C=Children ordinances. I am not that familiar with them, so I
can't explain their meaning.
Charles
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 8:25 PM
Thank you everyone for your input, both pro and con, as well as the suggested
use of the User ID field as an alternative. I think I have a better
understanding now of what to do, what not to do, and the potential problems
that could result if one is not careful.
Charles
-Original Message--
Hi Jennifer,
Thanks for the additional discussion of this system. Since you have re-numbered
many of your MRINs, have you experienced any problems with Phantom RINs, or
Phantom MRINs, or any other type of problems?
I have read the Help Files and Legacy User's Manual that explains how to do
thi
Hi Wendy,
Actually, I stated my question incorrectly, it is the MRINs that I am
considering renumbering not the RINs. My apologies to the LUG for hijacking
Elizabeth's thread, that certainly was not my intention. I have changed the
subject line to reflect this new thread.
My reason for renumbe
I have been following this thread with interest. Someone please correct me if I
am wrong, however, am I to understand that renumbering RINs can cause confusion
and is not necessarily a good thing to do.
I was considering renumbering some RINs, until this thread came up. Now I am
not sure whethe
I too have been following this thread for a while. If memory serves me
correctly, the Legacy Training CD's support what Cynthia stated below. The
plethora of information available to us such as family group sheets on LDS,
Ancestry, etc. should be viewed as nothing more than "Clues or Leads" as t
I have been following the list all day and it appears that some are having
problems with the Legacy 7.5 upgrade while others are not. The question I
have been trying to answer is, should I upgrade now or wait a few days?
I am currently using Legacy Deluxe 7.4.0.45 on a Win XP Desktop.
Charles
Kathy,
The Standard Finder at http://labs.familysearch.org/ listed the following
results: Rochlitz, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany with ISO CODE DE-SN, and 51.05N,
12.8E
It listed many more alternatives, apparently Rochlitz, Germany covers a rather
large area.
Hope this helps,
Charles
From: Kath
Thank you Jenny,
I did as you suggested and found additional information about the particular
IGI film, however, I did experience a potential problem that some may wish to
be aware of.
Instead of searching on a name, I clicked on the IGI Records to search, and
entered the Batch Number and Shee
Legacy's SoureWriter Template for the International Genealogical Index (IGI)
provides fields for the following information;
FHL Film Number:
Item No.:
Title of Film:
Batch Number:
Reference Number:
The FamilySearch IGI provides the following Source Information;
Batch Number:
Sheet:
Source Call N
Thank you Steve,
Yes, a large university library is nearby. I will check it out.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: steven perkins [mailto:scperk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Help from across the pond
Ch
I would suggest that correctly
it would be "Cratfield, Hundred of Blaything, Suffolk, England".
Hope that helps, have a good Christmas, I close down tomorrow as I am off to
Spain - out of the snow!
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Charles Apple
Sen
I have traced one of my ancestral lines to Cratfield, Suffolk, England
during the early 1500's. While researching Cratfield, I found a variety of
location entries, therefore, I am specifically looking for information as to
how the people of England correctly identify this location. The following
ar
Howland,
I used FGS (without quotes) as the search string and received 33 hits after
November 21, 2009 and 118 hits before November 21, 2009.
Charles
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-arc
Ron,
Thank you. Your explanation really does help.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 5:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy terminology
Charles,
That is absolutely correct
Ron,
Please correct me if I am wrong. As I understand from your post, the
limitations of the location fields in Legacy, are self imposed by the user
relative to the way he or she perceives location entry, and is not a short
coming of Legacy itself. Is my understanding correct or way off base?
Just a thought. Many of us have ancestors that originated from many different
countries i.e., England, Germany, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. Instead of
different Legacy programs specific to a particular country i.e., Legacy UK,
Legacy Canada etc. Why not include these options in Legacy Prefer
Ken,
I switched from TMG also, if I had it to do over again I would not try to clean
up my files in TMG, it is much easier to clean them up in Legacy. Additionally,
you don't know what errors or inconsistencies Legacy will find until after the
import. Here are the basic steps I would follow.
1
Thank you Ron, that worked.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:15 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Marriage order in Chronology View
Charles,
The order of spouses is as that set
Multiple marriages of some people are listed out of order in the Chronology
View. For Example someone's 1st wife may be listed as the 2nd wife and the
2nd wife as the 1st wife, etc. I have searched the help files, the Legacy
Family Tree manual, and the Legacy Archives for an solution to correcting
"I have relatives where one brother used the named PARET and the other PARROTT.
Likewise EWERT, EVERT, and EVERETT amongst 6 brothers."
Count your blessings, I have found over 30 ancestors that spelled "Apple"
differently, but I have learned something, I hope, from this thread in using
Legacy's
As someone mentioned in an earlier post, the LUG is a Global Network made up of
many different cultures, and that, in and of itself, makes us all richer as we
learn from each other. What may be perceived as polite and mannerly in one
culture, may actually be rude and offensive an in another.
Re
Well said Kim, however, as a relatively new Legacy User, I for one (maybe I
am the only one) do appreciate those with more experience than I pointing
out my transgressions of List Rule's. After all, they are Millennia's rules
and it really doesn't matter whether I agree with them or not.
Whether b
Thanks Ron,
For keeping us straight. I went back and re-read the etiquette pages, and I
stand corrected.
Charles
>I think it is in the etiquette pages (I haven't looked for a while), but in
>any event, like the "No HTML" stipulation, it is repeatedly ignored.
>
>Ron Ferguson
Legacy User Gro
ist in respect to
"Legacy Family Tree" programme and it's use not all these off track matters
and discussions.
--------
From: "Charles Apple"
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 5:21 AM
To:
Subject: [LegacyUG] Spamming vs Help
> Although t
Although there are various definitions of what constitutes SPAM, and people can
further broaden that definition if they wish, however, a commonality of just
about all definitions is "Unsolicited Bulk Messages" as in the following
definition from WikiPedia; "Spam is the use of electronic messagin
Please, do not stereotype the Legacy User Group, as a whole, based upon a few
loud, boisterous, and arrogant individuals who appear to hold to the perception
that the "civilized world" revolves around their particular definitions.
Unfortunately, they are part of this world and we must accept the
I also use AniMap and it has proven to be an invaluable tool on many occasions
in determining the correct location name during a given year.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Tim Rosenlof [mailto:spa...@xmission.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Scott, I am no expert by any means, however, my thoughts on this is as follows;
1) Original Source: United States, Selective Service System. World War I
Selective Service System Draft Registration Cards, 1917-1918.
2) 1st Derivative: National Archives and Records Administration microfilm.
M1509,
This is probably Off Topic, however, I just wanted to let the Legacy Users
Group know that I tried the Retouch company that Geoff mentioned in his
article on photo restoration, and their results far exceeded my expectations
at a price that is far below any of their competitors.
Charles
Legacy
Syble,
I am inclined to agree with Heather, and the other users, that the User "ID
field" is determined by "YOU" the user as you feel appropriate for your
particular requirements.
Charles
From: Syble Glasscock [mailto:syble_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 6:47 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup
Jenny,
Filing hard copies is really a personal preference and any system that suites
your needs is OK, as long as there is no duplication of records as you have
pointed out.
Personally, after trying many different systems I found that filing by MRIN
best suited my particular needs. If you want
My apologies Martin, I misspelled your name.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles Apple [mailto:apple1...@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 3:45 PM
To: 'LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com'
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Missing RINs
Marty,
The RIN is a "Record
Marty,
The RIN is a "Record Identification Number" that is unique for each individual
in your family file. The MRIN is a "Marriage Record Identification Number" also
unique to each marriage.
They are used to quickly locate, or jump to, specific individuals or marriages.
Some use them as an ind
Rich,
IMO this may be of interest to some in the LUG, since the Legacy Detailed
Search tab uses the AND / OR functions of Boolean logic. Perhaps others will
have a different opinion.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May
Joy,
I will also have to agree with Joy and Jenny in that you don't need to create a
sentence in the override tab.
For greater flexibility, I created an event and named it Military. The sentence
structure is [EventName]: [Desc], [Date], [Place].[Sources] [Notes]. I must
admit that like Connie,
Charles Apple wrote
>Robert, I don't know if this is what you are looking for, but, after
>showing the Marriage List, click on the help button in the lower right
>corner. It states that one can tag or untag all marriages by clicking
>on the column heading for the tag that you want t
Robert, I don't know if this is what you are looking for, but, after showing
the Marriage List, click on the help button in the lower right corner. It
states that one can tag or untag all marriages by clicking on the column
heading for the tag that you want to use, i.e., tags 1, 2, 3, etc.
Hope
Sherry,
Point well taken. My apologies to Support, Millennia, and the LUG.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:12 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Power outage now errors and othe
Scott,
When shopping for a UPS, there are a couple of things you need to look for.
1. Make sure that the UPS filters the electrical input and stabilizes it at a
steady level. Electrical dips and spikes (brown outs and surges) can cause the
same problems that a power outage can cause. This will
Scott, database programs (of any kind) kind do some very strange things when
not properly closed, or exited from their normal routines. The only remedy that
I am aware of is frequent good backups. Perhaps others on the list may have
more specific information relative to the Access database used
Thank you CE Wood. You are quite correct that this hijacked thread has nothing
to do with Legacy and is not on topic. Thank you again.
Charles E. Apple
-Original Message-
From: CE Wood [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 12:29 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subje
ta Lynn McKale wrote:
> Charles,
> I was just drafting a similar response. However, you have expressed
> my thoughts perhaps better than I could. Thank you.
> Rita in South Carolina
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Apple [mailto:apple1...@embarqmail.com]
> S
Come on people lighten up. Although, I agree with many of your comments, as a
former teacher I can certainly empathize with the writer. The only dumb
question is the one that “someone does not ask.” Occasionally, us new comers to
Legacy appreciate the expert guidance and opinions of those that a
Jim,
To my knowledge, the Source Writer Conversion Tool, has never been released. I
will agree with Ron Ferguson that it should be removed from the help files to
eliminate confusion, however, I will even go a step further and say (In my
opinion) there are just too many variables for a Source Wr
Mine is working perfectly, and very fast, although, I only have 7000 people in
my database, not nearly as many as some of you.
Charles E. Apple
Tennessee
-Original Message-
From: John S. Adams [mailto:oldbr...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:23 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@Legacy
If I may interject a thought into this thread. I tend to agree that my "local
library" is of little use to someone else in another state wishing to locate
one of my sources. Whenever possible I use WorldCat as my repository located at
http://www.oclc.org/worldcat . This way others can locate the
I just found the answer to my earlier question regarding Quick Bookmarks
slots 1, 2, and 3. They can be removed by holding down the CTRL+ Right Click
the name and it will disappear. The answer was in help, I overlooked it
somehow, probably because I wasn't using the correct terminology of Quick
Boo
After removing or clearing existing bookmarks, the individual names of those
who were bookmarked still appear in their respective bookmark slots on
Family View, i.e. slot 1, slot 2, slot 3. I have read help, archives, and
still no answer. Am I missing something, or is this a possible bug? I am
usin
.
Original Message-
-Original Message-
From: Charles Apple [mailto:apple1...@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 7:12 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Printing Family Group Sheet with Chonology Report
option
Unfortunately, this
ily Group Sheet with Chonology Report
option
Charles Apple wrote
>Is there a way to print a Family Group Sheet with Research Notes, and a
>Chronology Report attached without repeating the Research Notes again?
Check the Option to include Research Notes on the FGS and uncheck it on the
Chronology R
When pringting a Family Group Sheet with Chronology Report option checked,
the Research Notes print twice once on the FGS and again on the Chronology
Report. When unchecking the option for Research Notes in the Chronology
Options, it does not display the Research Notes in the Chronology Report,
how
I will second that request. It is a wonderful suggestion.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: David at il Destino [mailto:da...@ildestino.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 11:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy and Clooz
This is question for Legacy users who
I have not been able to find an answer in the archives, help file, or the
manual, so I am bringing it to the LUG. I apologize if this has been
discussed before.
When defining Event Sentences, or customizing those already available, will
those newly defined or customized Event definitions be overwr
Excuse my ignorance, but, what is a dit name?
Charles
_
From: Lee Martin [mailto:equinephi...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 9:31 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG]
How does one record dit names? I have French and Canadian-French ancestry
plus Quebec chu
Angelique,
I can sympathize with your frustration, however, since 1996 I have used or
tried many Genealogy programs (with the exception of PAF) and all of them,
bar none, have their Pro's, Con's, Disappointment's, and frustrations,
however, I can honestly say that I have not, yet, found a better
Marianne:
Your message came through just fine. I suspoect the LUG is just experiencing
a quiet moment.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Marianne Szabo [mailto:msz...@mindspring.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 3:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Group very
1:20 PM, Charles Apple wrote:
> I have been trying for days, in vain, to reorder someone with multiple
> marriages, or partnerships. Help, how is this done. Three of the
> marriages I have proven, however, one marriage is unproven and
> probably never occurred, so it would have been a
licking on it.
>
>Click the up or down button in the lower right corner of the window to
>move the line up or down in the list.
>
>
>
>Sorting Automatically
>
>To sort the Spouse List by the marriage date, click Sort. All
>marriages with no marriage date are sorted to the top
layed
in date order.
Bert
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Apple"
To:
Sent: Friday 26 March 2010 18:20
Subject: [LegacyUG] Numerical order of multiple marriages and partnerships
I have been trying for days, in vain, to reorder someone with multiple
marriages, or par
I have been trying for days, in vain, to reorder someone with multiple
marriages, or partnerships. Help, how is this done. Three of the marriages I
have proven, however, one marriage is unproven and probably never occurred,
so it would have been a partnership. The order displaying in Legacy, on the
Jennifer, thank you for a description of the different categories on
FamilySearch. I was aware of the different categories, but not aware of the
distinct differences between them that you pointed out. I did not know that
some were indeed sourced very accurately, therefore, I had a tendency to
view
with LDS records are that they aren't verified or
sourced. Any LDS member can put information up that is just based on family
talk. Nevertheless it is a good place to start and a source if you have
nothing else.
Happy searching
Kathy
-Original Message-
From: Charles Apple [mailto:a
Graham,
I am not an LDS member, therefore, I cannot speak for those that are,
however, I have found FamilySearch.org to be an excellent resource. I have
found clues that, after further research and verification, actually helped
to break through some brick walls. FamilySearch Labs also has some
int
Thanks Ron, for the correct UK location format. Since I have traced my lines
back to Germany, England, Ireland, and Scotland this is very useful
information to me. I do have some quite old records from parish's in England
where the location is rather confusing. When I start focusing on those
partic
Thank you Jenny. I didn't think there should be difference simply because I
think that all Deeds, Bills of Sale, etc., are simply different instruments
that convey title from one party to another, regardless of the Land or
Property being conveyed. However, since I am not a lawyer, I thought I had
b
Thanks to all users that replied to my question concerning Divorce and
SourceWriter.
Jenny, following your example, and after a little experimenting I found that
Court Records>loose Papers>Basic Format works well for Divorce certificates
received from State Vital Statistics, and that Court Records
I am trying to cite a variety of deeds of conveyance, assumptions, etc. Some
being land, others being homes or chattel. Is there any distinction between
Land Records vs Property records, when it comes to developing a Master
Source and its subsequent citations?
Charles
__ Information from
I have read the archives relative to citing a Divorce in the SourceWriter.
Although, I found a lot of helpful information I could not find a reasonbly
consistent answer to my question. So I apologize to the group in advance for
asking a question that has already been discussed.
I know that there i
Mine has not changed from the original number issued.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Dee Whiting [mailto:deema...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:27 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.4 Assigns New Customer Number
Mine has not changed...
D
Nick,
I only do this type of analysis when an obvious piece of data is conflicting
with other data previously attained. Only then do I go through the steps
that you outline below. The analysis is all done on paper, maintained in a
file for that specific research problem. According to Elizabeth Sho
Jennifer and Dale, no you are not the only ones that are experiencing this
"squished pop up box phenomenon." I am experiencing it also, however, it
seems to be an intermitant problem. I have not been able to identify any
regular sequence of steps that will cause it to occur. Sometimes you see it,
a
acyUG] Newspaper Announcements
Charles - here's one way you can locate the newspaper when you don't know
where it came from: http://tinyurl.com/q8vjkg.
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
ge...@legacyfamilytree.com
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
-Original Message-
From
I have many obituary clippings from various newspapers that were sent by
relatives, many of them deceased now, however, they give no newspaper name,
or any other relavent information about the newspaper. How can I cite the
newspaper as the source when I don't even know the name of the newspaper?
P
rom: Jenny M Benson [mailto:ge...@cedarbank.me.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:32 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Fraktur or Artifact?
Charles Apple wrote
>I have a very ornate marriage certificate of an ancestor, and I am
>trying to determine whether t
I have a very ornate marriage certificate of an ancestor, and I am trying to
determine whether this is a Fraktur or Artifact. I know that originally,
Fraktur's were elaborate hand painted certificates with some being
illuminated, however, as time passed many of these were done in mass
production on
Thanks Jenny, in my haste I didn't think to look there first.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Jenny M Benson [mailto:ge...@cedarbank.me.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:04 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Book, Multi Authored
Charles Apple wro
I would like to make a Master Source using the SourceWriter for Books,
Authored, Basic Format, however, this particular book has three authors. The
only template that I could find was for two authors.
Has anyone experienced this before? And how would you recommend I go about
it?
Charles
___
Ron,
Please, don't hold back and avoid these discussions on sourcing with the
SourceWriter. As a relatively new user of Legacy, I learn from each of these
discussions, what the pro's and con's are of the Basic Source system and the
SourceWriter system, and when it is better to use vs the other.
T
I just clicked on your link in the message below, and went to the Legacy
Family Tree home page without any problems.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: CE Wood [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 4:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Serve
gacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Genalogy reports - SourceWriter
Charles Apple wrote
>My understanding is that the "supplied by" or "supplied date" is for
>the puposes of showing the Provenance of a particular record.
Oh yes, I have no problem with that at all. The
Jenny,
My understanding is that the "supplied by" or "supplied date" is for the
puposes of showing the Provenance of a particular record. If you are the
"Supplier" then it would probably be "Privately Held," I think.
I am rather new at Legacy and learning, so you may want to get responses
from ot
Walts' question and some of the responses have left me puzzled and
questioning the SourceWriter System.
I am using the Legacy Deluxe Edition version 7.0.0.109. Under the Options >
Customize > Sources Tab, I have selected the "SourceWriter System" as the
default. Whenever, I want create a new Sourc
Michele,
I am relatively new to Legacy also. From one newbie to another, Bruce Jones
suggestion is well worth considering. I purchased both volumes of the
training videos from Legacy, and they are exceptionally good. I still keep
them close by, to review when I have questions.
Welcome to the Grou
Hello and Welcome everyone,
As a Newbie to Legacy and the LUG I welcome all comments from everyone on
the LUG, whether mild mannered or harsh. I have learned, and am learning
from each and everyone of you. Even the 2 percent that have been labeled
incredibly rude, have something important to contr
Well said, Mike. IMHO, if Millennia tried to implement the variety of needs,
and requests of thousands of users, the program would eventually become so
convoluted and cumbersome that nobody would be able to use it.
We were all "Newbies" at one point, as we learned and made mistakes someone
on the
Sherry is correct. For those that cannot find it, here is the link that
states "there is no digest mode." It is located on the screen where new
Users Subscribe to the LUG, not in the etiquette guidelines.
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Charles
-Original Message-
From: El
Cathy,
I hesitated for a long time before purchasing Adobe Acrobat Professional due
to it being rather pricey, however, since I made the purchase I have not
regretting it one second. I haven't tried the Family Group Sheet editing
that you are talking about, however, I know tht Acrobat Professional
Remove the "space" between "/public/ optin.aspx" in the link provided. I
should work then.
Charles
_
From: Peter Bottrell [mailto:pjbottr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 10:14 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Re: Verify your subscription to LegacyUs
Thank you Heather, that's sounds like a very good solution. That way I can
maintain documentation on both names.
Charles
From: Heather Stovold [mailto:hstov...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 1:39 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [
I have three separate reports (all well documented) on an Individual. All
three records agree with the exception of the Maiden Surname of the wife
(Given names agree). I would like to be able to record both wives with
different Surnames for future verification. NOTE: This is not a Second
Marriage.
Quote from Jenny Benson, "the beauty of Legacy is that we can all use is
just how we choose and that means RINs for me and no RINs for you that's
fine and no one's going to say either of us is wrong."
That is precisely the reason that I switched to Legacy from another
genealogical program. Legacy
I am a registered user of the Ancestry World Database web site, so yes I use
their information frequently. However, so much of the information posted by
users is without any documentation what so ever. So I use it for the
information and leads that it provides, which is quite good for that. After
g
Welcome Angelique,
Your points are well taken, however, prior to converting from another
Genealogy Program, I purchased the full versions of both Legacy Deluxe and
FTM 2010, and evaluated both for quite some time using the same identical
data set with several thousand individuals.
Bottom line, I
101 - 196 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
