Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-12 Thread MVMcgrs
This is just showing up in my email box. The NARA acronym means National Archives and Records Administration. Marie Marie Varrelman Melchiori, CG, CGL Melchiori Research Services, L.L.C. --- CG, Certified Genealogist and CGL, Certi

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-12 Thread Don Hendershot
lol ~Don On Oct 11, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Richard Van Wasshnova wrote: > I knew that NARA is an acronym for the National Archives and Records > Administration. > I'm also waiting for answer to Don's question. "What does the NARA > mneumonic mean?" > > I know a mneumonic for the resistor color cod

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-10 Thread Ron Bernier
National Archives and Records Administration Don Hendershot wrote: > Please excuse the newbie question. What does the NARA mneumonic mean? > > Thanks, > ~DonH > > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 8:35 AM, mvmc...@aol.com wrote: > >> The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet]

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-10 Thread Don Hendershot
:donald.henders...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:26 AM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Cc: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer > > Please excuse the newbie question. What does the NARA mneum

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-10 Thread Michele Lewis
@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer Please excuse the newbie question. What does the NARA mneumonic mean? Thanks, ~DonH On Oct 9, 2012, at 8:35 AM, mvmc...@aol.com wrote: The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet] is: (GIL 17) Citing Records in the National

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-09 Thread MVMcgrs
The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet] is: (GIL 17) _Citing Records in the National Archives of the United States_ (http://www.archives.gov/publications/general-info-leaflets/17-citing-records.p df) , [rev. 2010], 12 pp. _http://www.archives.gov/publications/general-info-leaflets/in

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-09 Thread MVMcgrs
> Michele > > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Van Wasshnova [mailto:rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:05 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer > > Michele,

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-09 Thread Pat Hickin
Marie, You wrote:" I use the NARA recommended source template." Can you send us a link to the NARA-recommended source template you mention?? Pat Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacy

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Richard Van Wasshnova
r...@gmail.com writes: > > U, yes? You can't save custom templates can you > > Michele > > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Van Wasshnova [mailto:rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:05 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@Legacy

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread MVMcgrs
Group@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer Michele, So you are using a non-Legacy template of your own design for some sources? Wouldn't you prefer to be able to save your custom template in Legacy so you wouldn't need to consult your ex

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Bruce Jones
e are bailing out of SW. The only > problem I have been able to see in all of the discussions is that gedcom > does not handle it properly. Are there other reasons? > >Bobby > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Suzanne Scheraga [mailto:sjscher...@yahoo.com]

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Bobby Johnson
sults. I will continue to use SW and live with the results. Bobby -Original Message- From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 4:31 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer Bobby, None

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
nday, October 08, 2012 8:42 AM >To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >Subject: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer > >I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in Source Writer >to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone give me�the pros�and >cons

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Michele Lewis
U, yes? You can't save custom templates can you Michele -Original Message- From: Richard Van Wasshnova [mailto:rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:05 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source W

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Richard Van Wasshnova
Michele, So you are using a non-Legacy template of your own design for some sources? Wouldn't you prefer to be able to save your custom template in Legacy so you wouldn't need to consult your external template. Perhaps a suggestion to Legacy? -- Richard Van Wasshnova On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:11

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Alan Pereira
t: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer On 08/10/2012 13:42, Suzanne Scheraga wrote: > I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in Source > Writer to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone give me > the pros and cons of each format (in sim

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 08/10/2012 15:11, Michele Lewis wrote: > I have to have all my citations following the same format. I do have > a style sheet where I record all of the different sources that I use > so that I do cite things consistently but it is hard to remember how > I manipulated the blanks in SW to get it

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread R G Strong-genes
rom: Bobby Johnson Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:37 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer I too would like to know why people are bailing out of SW. The only problem I have been able to see in all of the discussions is that gedcom d

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Michele Lewis
s.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in Source Writer to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone give me the pros and cons of each format (in simple language)? Thanks, Suzanne Legacy

RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Bobby Johnson
, October 08, 2012 8:42 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in Source Writer to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone give me�the pros�and cons of each f

Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer

2012-10-08 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 08/10/2012 13:42, Suzanne Scheraga wrote: > I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in > Source Writer to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone > give me the pros and cons of each format (in simple language)? The great benefits of using SourceWriter are that