lol
~Don
On Oct 11, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Richard Van Wasshnova rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I knew that NARA is an acronym for the National Archives and Records
Administration.
I'm also waiting for answer to Don's question. What does the NARA
mneumonic mean?
I know a mneumonic for the
This is just showing up in my email box. The NARA acronym means National
Archives and Records Administration.
Marie
Marie Varrelman Melchiori, CG, CGL
Melchiori Research Services, L.L.C.
---
CG, Certified Genealogist and CGL,
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
Please excuse the newbie question. What does the NARA mneumonic mean?
Thanks,
~DonH
On Oct 9, 2012, at 8:35 AM, mvmc...@aol.com wrote:
The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet] is:
(GIL 17) Citing Records in the National
10, 2012 9:26 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
Please excuse the newbie question. What does the NARA mneumonic mean?
Thanks,
~DonH
snip
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
National Archives and Records Administration
Don Hendershot wrote:
Please excuse the newbie question. What does the NARA mneumonic mean?
Thanks,
~DonH
On Oct 9, 2012, at 8:35 AM, mvmc...@aol.com mailto:mvmc...@aol.com wrote:
The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet] is:
(GIL
templates can you
Michele
-Original Message-
From: Richard Van Wasshnova [mailto:rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:05 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
Michele,
So you are using a non
Marie,
You wrote: I use the NARA recommended source template.
Can you send us a link to the NARA-recommended source template you mention??
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
[mailto:rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:05 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
Michele,
So you are using a non-Legacy template of your own design for some
sources?
Wouldn't you prefer to be able to save your
The current NARA GIL [General Information Leaflet] is:
(GIL 17) _Citing Records in the National Archives of the United States_
(http://www.archives.gov/publications/general-info-leaflets/17-citing-records.p
df) , [rev. 2010], 12 pp.
On 08/10/2012 13:42, Suzanne Scheraga wrote:
I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in
Source Writer to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone
give me the pros and cons of each format (in simple language)?
The great benefits of using SourceWriter are that
I too would like to know why people are bailing out of SW. The only problem I
have been able to see in all of the discussions is that gedcom does not handle
it properly. Are there other reasons?
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: Suzanne Scheraga [mailto:sjscher...@yahoo.com]
Sent:
There are some sources that I prefer to format using Elizabeth Shown Mills'
first book, Evidence! Citation and Analysis. I like my citations to include
everything a person needs to find the source but nothing more so that the
citations are easier to read. In ESM first book some of the
: Bobby Johnson
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:37 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
I too would like to know why people are bailing out of SW. The only problem
I have been able to see in all of the discussions is that gedcom does
On 08/10/2012 15:11, Michele Lewis wrote:
I have to have all my citations following the same format. I do have
a style sheet where I record all of the different sources that I use
so that I do cite things consistently but it is hard to remember how
I manipulated the blanks in SW to get it
: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
On 08/10/2012 13:42, Suzanne Scheraga wrote:
I have been following the thread of changing sources entered in Source
Writer to Basic format but I'm totally confused. Could someone give me
the pros and cons of each format (in simple language)?
The great
Bobby,
None that I am aware of.
As many will know, I am averse to standardisation, but I like, and use SW
because it saves me time and effort, not to mention that I no longer have to
think about the construction of a Source - a god send for those of us who are
lazy (or efficient - take your
. I will
continue to use SW and live with the results.
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 4:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
Bobby,
None
Thanks, Ron, for your insightful comments. I consider you efficient! You
have reinforced my decision to continue using SW.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
Bobby,
None that I am aware of.
As many will know, I am averse to standardisation, but I
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Basic Source Format vs Source Writer
Michele,
So you are using a non-Legacy template of your own design for some
sources? Wouldn't you prefer to be able to save your custom template in Legacy
so
you wouldn't need to consult your external template
19 matches
Mail list logo
