Hi dear list !
I have just downloaded packages and patches for the svn-10289.
I ran md5sum and got a failure for
lfs-bootscripts-20130515.tar.bz2
What am I supposed to do ?
Thanks in advance.
--
Ph. Delavalade
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Hi all;
Philippe, I would try to Re-Load the file Or load it in another format, If it
is available, try .gz..
THANK YOU Marty
-- Original Message --
From: Philippe Delavalade philippe.delaval...@orange.fr
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [lfs-support] problem
Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi dear list !
I have just downloaded packages and patches for the svn-10289.
I ran md5sum and got a failure for
lfs-bootscripts-20130515.tar.bz2
What am I supposed to do ?
The md5sum for the bootscripts in the svn version changes every day due
to the
Le samedi 01 juin à 23:29, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Philippe Delavalade wrote:
Hi dear list !
I have just downloaded packages and patches for the svn-10289.
I ran md5sum and got a failure for
lfs-bootscripts-20130515.tar.bz2
What am I supposed to do ?
The md5sum for the
Apologies for sending to the wrong list.
# cat /etc/lfs-release
SVN-20130512
64bit, built with jhalfs
I am worried about this:
Either as normal user or as root:
env LANG=C xzless
/home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-2013.05.15-17h21m20s.log.xz
error message:
/usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test:
On May 15, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Fernando wrote:
xzless
/home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-2013.05.15-17h21m20s.log.xz
/usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer
expression expected
Line 49 is also an error when a filename isn't given.
Works fine here.
Hello,
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 -0300, Fernando wrote:
error message:
/usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer
expression expected
(used env in order to get English message, but it appears in my locale
LANG too.)
Line 49 of xzless is:
if test $(less
El Wed, 15 May 2013 17:47:58 -0300
Fernando fam...@yahoo.com.br escribió:
Apologies for sending to the wrong list.
# cat /etc/lfs-release
SVN-20130512
64bit, built with jhalfs
I am worried about this:
Either as normal user or as root:
env LANG=C xzless
Em 15-05-2013 17:54, Michael E. Maher escreveu:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 -0300, Fernando wrote:
error message:
/usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer
expression expected
(used env in order to get English message, but it appears in my locale
LANG too.)
On May 15, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote:
Seems the `less' of busybox, the output of `less -V' is:
less 451 (POSIX regular expressions)
[..]
So.. the integer cannot be compared.
This is a jhalfs build of LFS. Thus no busybox.
| Yes. Use better alternatives like zutils[1] or
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 18:11 -0300, Fernando wrote:
Em 15-05-2013 17:54, Michael E. Maher escreveu:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 -0300, Fernando wrote:
error message:
/usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer
expression expected
(used env in order to get
El Wed, 15 May 2013 16:12:15 -0500
William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.org escribió:
On May 15, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote:
Seems the `less' of busybox, the output of `less -V' is:
less 451 (POSIX regular expressions)
[..]
So.. the integer cannot be compared.
This
Em 15-05-2013 18:37, Matias A. Fonzo escreveu:
El Wed, 15 May 2013 16:12:15 -0500
William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.org escribió:
On May 15, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote:
Seems the `less' of busybox, the output of `less -V' is:
less 451 (POSIX regular expressions)
[..]
Michael E. Maher wrote:
The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular
expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test ...
-ge 429; then'.
This seems like a bug in either:
less -V giving too much information for xz
- or -
xzless
Em 15-05-2013 20:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Michael E. Maher wrote:
The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular
expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test ...
-ge 429; then'.
This seems like a bug in either:
less -V giving too much
Just to say that this known, at least since 17 Nov 2012 17:15:02 UTC.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693537
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information
Fernando wrote:
Em 15-05-2013 20:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Michael E. Maher wrote:
The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular
expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test ...
-ge 429; then'.
This seems like a bug in either:
less -V
Here is the result of my grep of my config file.
config-3.8.1:CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
config-3.8.1:CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y
config-3.8.1:CONFIG_TMPFS=y
config-3.8.1:CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL=y
config-3.8.1:CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y
Quoting Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com:
On 03/30/2013 03:03 PM,
On 03/30/2013 08:03 PM, bcl...@brianclarkprojects.com wrote:
Hello,
I am getting a message that says I should not be getting this message.
When the computer goes to mount dev and other directories. It is
giving an error of unknown file system devtmpfs. I have tried
multiple kernel
On 03/30/2013 03:03 PM, bcl...@brianclarkprojects.com wrote:
Hello,
I am getting a message that says I should not be getting this message.
When the computer goes to mount dev and other directories. It is
giving an error of unknown file system devtmpfs. I have tried
multiple kernel
On lfs 6.8 on chapter 5.7 whet i run make i have an error :
if test -r /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new; then mv -f
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h; \
else echo 2 'This configuration not matched in ../abi-tags'; exit
On 03/21/2013 05:44 PM, Mihal wrote:
On lfs 6.8 on chapter 5.7 whet i run make i have an error :
if test -r /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new; then mv -f
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h; \
else echo 2 'This
On 03/21/2013 12:44 PM, Mihal wrote:
On lfs 6.8 on chapter 5.7 whet i run make i have an error :
if test -r /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new; then mv -f
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h.new
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-tag.h; \
else echo 2 'This
Hey,
I've got a problem with locales on my in-progress installation of LFS.
I'm at the end of the 6), and the problem is, i can't seem to get utf8
to work. I installed all the locales by running make
localedata/install-locales at step 6.9.1), and everything seems to have
been generated just fine.
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:06:02AM +0100, Clément Hertling (Wxcafé) wrote:
Hey,
I've got a problem with locales on my in-progress installation of LFS.
I'm at the end of the 6), and the problem is, i can't seem to get utf8
to work. I installed all the locales by running make
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 03:31:54AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 02:06:02AM +0100, Clément Hertling (Wxcafé) wrote:
This is what i get :
[root@nuada-airgetlam]/ # locale -a | grep en_US
en_US
en_US.iso88591
en_US.utf8
[root@nuada-airgetlam]/ # export
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Rubin Saifi rubinsa...@live.com wrote:
here is the error that i am getting
--
checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... yes
checking for MPFR... no
on this list are a few timezones behind me...
perhaps better ideas are on their way.
Nicholas McCurdy
mindwarpstud...@aim.com
-Original Message-
From: Rubin Saifi rubinsa...@live.com
To: lfs-support lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 12:15 pm
Subject: [lfs-support
Downloaded version of glibc-2.16.0 from www.gnu.org while not modified
according to MD5 sum wont compile correctly as after make install locale
and localedef would not create individual locales.
What i found is that both above programs require version 2.15 when
actual version installed is 2.16.
Michael zachar wrote:
Downloaded version of glibc-2.16.0 from www.gnu.org while not modified
according to MD5 sum wont compile correctly as after make install locale
and localedef would not create individual locales.
What i found is that both above programs require version 2.15 when
actual
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012, at 8:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Michael zachar wrote:
Downloaded version of glibc-2.16.0 from www.gnu.org while not modified
according to MD5 sum wont compile correctly as after make install locale
and localedef would not create individual locales.
What i found is
Michael zachar wrote:
This is where it fail to create them saing that file or directory does
not exist
Then I run command localedef by itself and message is that cannot run
cannot find version 2.15.
I'm not sure what you did, but you should get:
$ localedef -V
localedef (GNU libc) 2.16
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012, at 9:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Michael zachar wrote:
This is where it fail to create them saing that file or directory does
not exist
Then I run command localedef by itself and message is that cannot run
cannot find version 2.15.
I'm not sure what you did, but
Hi there!
I tried once again to get me a LFS-system.
Intel i3, 8GB RAM, SSD 60GB + HD 2TB
So 64 bit comes natural.
I tried several approaches to compile gcc regarding to chapter 6.17,
first with user package management... then as root, too.
I fear there might be some problems with the
Ralf Bauerfeind wrote:
Hi there!
I tried once again to get me a LFS-system.
Intel i3, 8GB RAM, SSD 60GB + HD 2TB
So 64 bit comes natural.
I tried several approaches to compile gcc regarding to chapter 6.17,
first with user package management... then as root, too.
I fear there might be
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:08:16PM +0100, Ralf Bauerfeind wrote:
I tried several approaches to compile gcc regarding to chapter 6.17,
first with user package management... then as root, too.
I fear there might be some problems with the compiled-as-user programs
prior to gcc which leaves
I finished 6.6 Creating Essential Files and Symlinks. All seems good.
But when I get to chapter 6.7 I have no idea what to do - there's no
makefile around, and none under the / directory, so far as I can tell. It
seems to me that there're some instructions missing or that I've skipped,
but I
On 04/07/12 20:52, Toby Ferguson wrote:
I finished 6.6 Creating Essential Files and Symlinks. All seems good.
But when I get to chapter 6.7 I have no idea what to do - there's no
makefile around, and none under the / directory, so far as I can tell.
It seems to me that there're some
Ah - I thought I'd installed everything - so you're saying I have to do the
'unpack/cd/install/rm' cycle, but as the root user in the chroot'd
environment? OK - I can do that I guess.
Thanks.
Toby
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, spiky martynvid...@aol.com wrote:
On 04/07/12 20:52, Toby
On 04/07/12 21:15, Toby Ferguson wrote:
Ah - I thought I'd installed everything - so you're saying I have to
do the 'unpack/cd/install/rm' cycle, but as the root user in the
chroot'd environment? OK - I can do that I guess.
Thanks.
Toby
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, spiky
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:18 PM, spiky martynvid...@aol.com wrote:
On 04/07/12 21:15, Toby Ferguson wrote:
Ah - I thought I'd installed everything - so you're saying I have to do
the 'unpack/cd/install/rm' cycle, but as the root user in the chroot'd
environment? OK - I can do that I guess.
Toby Ferguson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:18 PM, spiky martynvid...@aol.com wrote:
Also can you not top post it,s prefered to post at the end so ppl can
follow
OK - thanks for the speedy reply - I guess you mean I should post down
here? ...
Yes, but you need to trim away non-relevant
Hi. I started compiling LFS 6.8 and i got stuck while compiling the
gcc-4.5.2 in pass 1 itself. The error reads as:
checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc...
/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/
-B/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
FYI -- I had to go back to step 6.7. I redid the API headers, and the the
other steps to glibc, and glibc installed fine.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Charles Wood wood.charle...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, I did copy and paste, the second time I ran those commands. I just
moved on to the next
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:54:08 +0100
Kshitij Jain kjain181...@gmail.com wrote:
After Configuring the Gruband restarting the system my system
grub
menu shows and kernel boots. After few seconds it stops loading
Kshitij Jain wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:54:08 +0100
Kshitij Jain kjain181...@gmail.com wrote:
After Configuring the Gruband restarting the system my system
grub
menu shows and kernel boots. After few
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Kshitij Jain wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:54:08 +0100
Kshitij Jain kjain181...@gmail.com wrote:
After Configuring the Gruband restarting
Installing glibc-2.14.1
I am a student and am doing Linux From Scratch as a class project. I am
working on section 6.9, installing glibc-2.14.1. I have made sure I am
entering all the commands correctly. When I perform make install it runs
for quite awhile but gives an error at the end. Here is a
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 01:38:22 +0100
Charles Wood wood.charle...@gmail.com wrote:
Installing glibc-2.14.1
I am a student and am doing Linux From Scratch as a class project. I am
working on section 6.9, installing glibc-2.14.1. I have made sure I am
entering all the commands correctly. When I
Yes, I did copy and paste, the second time I ran those commands. I just
moved on to the next section, for lack of any other ideas, hoping that the
errors I got didn't really mean any harm. All the tests that were run on
the tool chain readjustment section ran just fine. Do you think I am good,
or
On 04-04-2012 12:46, Kshitij Jain wrote:
After Configuring the Gruband restarting the system my system grub
menu shows and kernel boots. After few seconds it stops loading on
following snapshot shows the booting
...
Is there any problem in mounting the partition or with the
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:28:09AM +0530, ankit vishwakarma wrote:
after having changed the symlink from dash to bash and again starting the
process the error in glibc still persists please provide help
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
../misc/syslog.c: In
after having changed the symlink from dash to bash and again starting the
process the error in glibc still persists please provide help
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
../misc/syslog.c: In function '__vsyslog_chk':
../misc/syslog.c:144:9: warning: variable
Lázaro Morales wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0301@gmail.**
com ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:13:11 +0100
ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com wrote:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Fix this. You can't do LFS with
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:29:04 +0100
Lázaro Morales laz...@frioclima.com.cu wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com
escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
On 3/30/2012 8:02 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:29:04 +0100
Lázaro Moraleslaz...@frioclima.com.cu wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarmaankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com
escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
presently i am doing with chapter 5.7 glibc installation i have applied the
patches restarted the budil many a times but the following error occurs
consistently please help.
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
../misc/syslog.c: In function '__vsyslog_chk':
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:10:52 +0100
ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com wrote:
presently i am doing with chapter 5.7 glibc installation i have applied the
patches restarted the budil many a times but the following error occurs
consistently please help.
In file included from
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.21.53.20110810
bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.1
/usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison.yacc
bzip2, Version
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com
escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu)
Lázaro Morales wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com
escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
En 29/03/2012 15:43:23, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com escribió:
No, it's not.
Sorry, you have right.
Lázaro
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
please provide me help on the following error i started all the
process from the beginning still the error persists.
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
../misc/syslog.c: In function '__vsyslog_chk':
../misc/syslog.c:144:9: warning: variable 'prioff' set but not used
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM, ankit vishwakarma
ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com wrote:
please provide me help on the following error i started all the
process from the beginning still the error persists.
In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
../misc/syslog.c:
I am following the LFS 7.0 book
I am having a problem with LFS-BOOK-7.0-NOCHUNKS.html#ch-system-util-linux:
root:/sources/util-linux-2.20/build# PKG_CONFIG=/tools/bin/true
LDFLAGS=-lblkid \
../configure --prefix=/usr --with-root-prefix= \
--enable-elf-shlibs --disable-libblkid
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:39:08PM +0100, Martin Knappe wrote:
I am following the LFS 7.0 book
I am having a problem with LFS-BOOK-7.0-NOCHUNKS.html#ch-system-util-linux:
root:/sources/util-linux-2.20/build# PKG_CONFIG=/tools/bin/true
LDFLAGS=-lblkid \
../configure --prefix=/usr
On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:07:47AM -0800, Qrux wrote:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/binutils-build/bfd'
make[2]: *** [info-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/binutils-build/bfd'
make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:15:39AM -0800, Qrux wrote:
It isn't acceptable. I've never seen anything like this. The
report of 'Error 1' without an actual error message makes me wonder
if you caught stdout in a file but didn't catch stderr ?
No--this was straight cut-and-paste from
On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
Fix this. Glibc does not like mawk. Use gawk.
Also, can you please stop top posting and trim your replies to the
relevant content?
Building binutils (pass 3?):
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/binutils.html
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:07:47AM -0800, Qrux wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
Fix this. Glibc does not like mawk. Use gawk.
Also, can you please stop top posting and trim your replies to the
relevant content?
Building binutils (pass 3?):
Hi Group,
I get following error when I try to install the binutils. I am new to lfs
and may be this one may be a silly question to ask:) . Please help me on
this
make[3]: Entering directory
`/mnt/lfs/Sources/binutils-build/libiberty/testsuite'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install'.
make[3]:
There is no error. Just messages that there is nothing to be installed. I
am not sure but testsuit shouldn't be install in system it is just to check
the correct installation and dependencies to run that software
correctly.Also you have to look the compilation options while building the
same.
On
Hi Sandip,
I followed the book.. During the compilation i didnt get any errors.. Then
during the installation I got the above warning and system
got out of the installation mode soon after the errors.
Do we have different options in compilation ?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:13 PM, sandip sitapara
On Jan 10, 2012 9:48 AM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sandip,
I followed the book.. During the compilation i didnt get any errors..
Then during the installation I got the above warning and system
got out of the installation mode soon after the errors.
Do we have different options
Hi Firerat
Book says the required disk space should be 350 MB. But my binutils-build
is only 508K
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/mnt/lfs/Sources$ ls -lh binutils-build/
total 508K
that means , I am missing something no btw I used ubuntu to create my
lfs partition.. is there any thing to do with that ?
you are checking your build directory size. You did after build or before
build? And the size mentioned in book is space required in your system to
install the same.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Firerat
Book says the required disk space should be
On Jan 10, 2012 10:22 AM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Firerat
Book says the required disk space should be 350 MB. But my binutils-build
is only 508K
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/mnt/lfs/Sources$ ls -lh binutils-build/
total 508K
that means , I am missing something no btw I used
Hi Firerat,
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/$ make -j1
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
I also tried in following way
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/$ export MAKEFLAGS='-j 1'
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/$ make -j1
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
But earlier, Since My
Hi Sandip,
I checked my tools folder too... Its empty
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, sandip sitapara s13884...@gmail.comwrote:
you are checking your build directory size. You did after build or before
build? And the size mentioned in book is space required in your system to
install the
that is why you got this make: *** No targets specified and no makefile
found. Stop.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sandip,
I checked my tools folder too... Its empty
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, sandip sitapara s13884...@gmail.comwrote:
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/$ du -hcs /mnt/lfs/Sources/binutils-build/
87M /mnt/lfs/Sources/binutils-build/
87M total
It is 87M. Thanks for the info. But my tools folder
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/$ du -hcs /mnt/lfs/tools/
4.0K /mnt/lfs/tools/
4.0K total
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Firerat
Create new directory and untar the binutils source and try to build it as
suggested by Firerat.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:21 PM, sandip sitapara s13884...@gmail.comwrote:
that is why you got this make: *** No targets specified and no makefile
found. Stop.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:16 PM,
yes, du is the command to check the disk usage.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Firerat fire...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012 10:37 AM, sandip sitapara s13884...@gmail.com wrote:
you are checking your build directory size. You did after build or
before build? And the size
yes, you are right. Point to be noted that you have to untar the source
then run configure from
binutils-build to generate the makefiles. Also source directory and
binutils-build are in same directory from the below mentioned command
../binutils-x.y.z/configure \
--target=$LFS_TGT
Hi Firerat,
I did that in following way.
I went to the binutis-2.21 folder first (after unziping ) and then offered
the commands in the book. I think the commands in the book simply get out
of the binutils folder and create binutil-build under source directory..
Correct me If I am wrong.
On
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Firerat,
I did that in following way.
I went to the binutis-2.21 folder first (after unziping ) and then offered
the commands in the book. I think the commands in the book simply get out of
the binutils folder
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
This time I got loads of no . I think I should slow little bit down and
do the whole process again..
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:~$ cd /mnt/lfs/Sources/binutils-2.21.1
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/mnt/lfs/Sources/binutils-2.21.1$
Thank You all for the support . :)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Eleanore Boyd cara...@cox.net wrote:
On 1/10/2012 5:27 AM, Uthayanan wrote:
This time I got loads of no . I think I should slow little bit down and
do the whole process again..
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:~$ cd
Hi,
I'm using LFS-book-7.0 and have reached the udev rules initialisation
step for network interfaces:
for NIC in /sys/class/net/* ; do
INTERFACE=${NIC##*/} udevadm test --action=add $NIC
done
This step fails to create the 70-persistent-net.rules file. I have two
network interfaces on the
90 matches
Mail list logo
