Folks,
the TeX-Gyre project (financially supported mainly by the German TeX
Users' Group, DANTE) is developing replacements for the set of common
URW fonts. The project isn't finished yet, but already now the glyph
repertoire has almost doubled, compared to the set of glyphs currently
in
I forward this to lilypond-devel, which is more appropriate for discussions
about this experimental feature.
As far as I know, this experimental feature was introduced in 2004, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-05/msg00160.html
but hasn't been maintained since then and it
Graham Percival wrote:
IMO the nice way to do this would be to add a conservative-option
to convert-ly. When conservative is on, convert-ly tries to stay as
close as possible to the old syntax (i.e. keeping times), when
conservative is off, it tries to use as many of the new constructs as
it
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:36:20 -
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too oppose this as a mandatory change, and the
creation of an alias. \times does exactly what
the word 'times' implies and not what 'tuplet'
would imply. The change would lead to still greater
confusion, with new
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:49:08 +0100
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Well, this is always the problem with open-source: it takes to
time implement new features, and then it takes time to maintain
them. (that said, this could probably be done in such a way that
Bryan Stanbridge wote on 27 January 2008 21:38
John Mandereau wrote:
There has already been a *huge* thread on the
-user list about this, and
the conclusion was that the only realistic
change we could do was
renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else;
the point of my remark in
Op maandag 28 januari 2008, schreef Trevor Daniels:
I too oppose this as a mandatory change, and the
creation of an alias. \times does exactly what
the word 'times' implies and not what 'tuplet'
would imply. The change would lead to still greater
confusion, with new users writing the
From the user's point of view I am really happy with a change to this
situation.
I would be really fine with tuplet, but also factor seems to me (also
German speaker :-)
a good solution.
In my opinion the best for now would be a alias with changes in the
documention --
change all mention of
Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2008 23:19 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
For issue 297, I can change the formatting to end exactly on the last
note; would that solve the problem? Juergen?
I would be very happy if only this could be solved!
However, there is one additional problem with ligature
brackets:
The only question to me is: how can be made use of these unicode
features?
I don't know. :-) Han-Wen probably can answer this -- if it's not
possible to use features right now, maybe it can be implemented some
time.
Do the metrics make additional affords? Are they somehow hard coded
into
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
Folks,
the TeX-Gyre project (financially supported mainly by the German TeX
Users' Group, DANTE) is developing replacements for the set of common
URW fonts. The project isn't finished yet, but already now the glyph
repertoire has almost doubled, compared to the set
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008 à 19:37 +0100, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
The only question to me is: how can be made use of these unicode
features?
I don't know. :-) Han-Wen probably can answer this -- if it's not
possible to use features right now, maybe it can be implemented some
time.
I
On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:16 PM, John Mandereau wrote:
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008 à 19:37 +0100, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
The only question to me is: how can be made use of these unicode
features?
I don't know. :-) Han-Wen probably can answer this -- if it's not
possible to use features right
The only question to me is: how can be made use of these unicode
features?
I don't know. :-) Han-Wen probably can answer this -- if it's not
possible to use features right now, maybe it can be implemented
some time.
You can insert any UTF-8 character and LilyPond will render it
14 matches
Mail list logo
