Re: GOP2-3: GLISS (update 1)

On 31 juil. 2012, at 14:03, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> >> Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM >> >>> \version "2.16.0" >>> \score { > ... >>> \midi {} >>> } >> >> Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layou

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On 4 juil. 2012, at 21:58, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:36 PM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: >> >>> No idea when i'll have time to finish Tie Report, but as tie shapes >>> are screwed in general, i wouldn't care much about this

Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?

On 5 juil. 2012, at 08:14, Joe Neeman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:37 AM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > On 4 juil. 2012, at 20:10, Marc Hohl wrote: > > > Am 04.07.2012 13:29, schrieb David Kastrup: > >> Marc Hohl writes: > >> > >

Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?

On 4 juil. 2012, at 20:10, Marc Hohl wrote: > Am 04.07.2012 13:29, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Marc Hohl writes: >> >>> Hello list, >>> >>> the topic is somewhat over my head, but perhaps someone with more >>> insight can answer this question? >> I think that gcc likely can, don't know about g++,

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On 4 juil. 2012, at 15:17, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: >> Thanks Janek! Very valuable stuff. > > :) > >>> (sorry, too big for an attachment - 200 kB) >>> In short: >>> - sta

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On 3 juil. 2012, at 10:18, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Hi all, > > my favorite patch returned! Yay! > I did some testing and the results are here: > http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/file/n5705594/patchset37-results.tar.gz Thanks Janek! Very valuable stuff. > (sorry, too big for an attac

Re: make bin got dumb because of "Fix description in lily/include/smobs.hh"

On 3 juil. 2012, at 19:46, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 03/07/2012 19:23, Janek Warchoł disait : >> Hi, >> >> until recently, 'make bin' was a very smart tool: it recompiled only >> necessary .cc files, not everything. That was lifesaving: instead of >> having to wait for 5 minutes, i got

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On 2 juil. 2012, at 01:03, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > I like the direction in which this goes, making things closer, because > it is easier for users to add padding when needed than to persuade > LilyPond to space things more closely. > > I did a quick test on some music.

Re: building master / fixed all Critical?

On 2 juil. 2012, at 01:26, Keith OHara wrote: > Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > >> Could we get a clear note about which commit(s) were reverted and >> are presumably in limbo? If the remaining commits fixed 2604 and >> 2524 (which at a first glance appear to be resolved), then co

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On 1 juil. 2012, at 17:08, David Kastrup wrote: > mts...@gmail.com writes: > >> It's back... >> >> The only thing that doesn't the work the way I'd expect it is >> Skyline::padded. It seems to not be adding the padding correctly (Joe - >> any ideas)? This causes tighter than desired spacing in

Re: More build oddities

On 30 juin 2012, at 23:48, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > Hey all, > > Running the regtests on a patch set, make check fails: > > Dissecting... > Writing snippets... > Processing... > Processing > /home/mikesol/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-testdb/snippet-names--1465161827.ly > command failed: /

Re: screech-and-boink.ly

On 30 juin 2012, at 10:30, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes: > >> Hey all, >> >> I'm getting the following when compiling a local branch based off of master: >> >> LILYPOND_VERSION=2.15.41 /usr/bin/python >> /home/mikesol/lilypond-git/scripts/lilypond-book.py -I >> /home/m

Re: Meeting 2nd half of August!

On 29 juin 2012, at 16:59, David Kastrup wrote: > > Assuming from the contents that this was intended as a public response > (the foreigners bit does not make sense otherwise). > > Werner LEMBERG writes: > > Pity. If you say you booked your flights already for the sake of > visiting y

Re: Meeting 2nd half of August! (was: GOP2: 0 - why are we losing developers? (discuss responses))

On 26 juin 2012, at 18:26, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > >> Mailing list arguments are a trickier issue. It’s clearly a big >> problem, but this isn’t something we can fix by waving a change of >> policy. I’ll schedule a time to discuss it. We need to do >> something about thi

Re: Meeting 2nd half of August! (was: GOP2: 0 - why are we losing developers? (discuss responses))

On 26 juin 2012, at 18:26, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > >> Mailing list arguments are a trickier issue. It’s clearly a big >> problem, but this isn’t something we can fix by waving a change of >> policy. I’ll schedule a time to discuss it. We need to do >> something about th

Re: Stable release.

On 25 juin 2012, at 22:45, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> There is just one patch I put in the repo (Werner's slur/tie fix) >> that is causing cyclic dependencies in some of his scores. > > Maybe it's caused just by using an unoptimized build (which I always > do)? I couldn't see any problems in th

Re: Stable release.

On 25 juin 2012, at 20:46, Keith OHara wrote: > David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > >> It is a reasonably safe bet that we won't have a stable release 2.16 in >> the next two months given our current release policies and policy change >> policies and their past effects on release candidates. > >

Re: Issue 2624 in lilypond: Patch: Bumps Mike to Frog meister

On 25 juin 2012, at 18:44, David Kastrup wrote: > lilyp...@googlecode.com writes: > >> Updates: >> Status: Fixed >> Labels: Fixed_2_15_41 >> >> Comment #5 on issue 2624 by >> mts...@gmail.com: Patch: Bumps Mike to >> Frog meister >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=26

Re: My responses to developers' responses

On 25 juin 2012, at 15:48, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: > To: "Devel Dev" > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 2:23 PM > Subject: My responses to developers' responses > > >> Hey all, >> >> Thank you very much, Colin, for organizing these responses. >> >> I think GOP2-0 i

My responses to developers' responses

Hey all, Thank you very much, Colin, for organizing these responses. I think GOP2-0 is very important, and as such I'd like to send responses to certain excerpts from other people's emails. DevC > There's a similar problem with trying to recruit new contributors. > Person 41 says "hey guys, it

Re: LSR updates and translations

On 20 juin 2012, at 12:29, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila" > To: "Phil Holmes" > >> Good, I like it in principle, but how will be changes being tracked >> using SHA IDs? >> >> Currently, translations have a SHA ID which is that of the snippet it >> is a

Re: cleanup: infinity, get property (issue 6310043)

On 15 juin 2012, at 22:10, d...@gnu.org wrote: > Ok, I am currently somewhat fuzzy. A grob has individual properties, > and it has interfaces. Interfaces also carry properties. When a grob > is created, its properties are initialized from the context and then > live on independently. > > I thi

Re: Sets TabVoice Stem height to ##f (issue 6303065)

On 15 juin 2012, at 09:33, d...@gnu.org wrote: > On 2012/06/12 13:22:10, dak wrote: >> On 2012/06/12 12:54:40, MikeSol wrote: >> > On 2012/06/12 12:49:45, dak wrote: >> > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6303065/diff/10003/lily/grob.cc >> > > File lily/grob.cc (right): >> > > >> > > > http://coder

Re: avoid slur-tie collision? (issue #582)

On 11 juin 2012, at 17:20, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Naive question: We have a lot of code to avoid collisions between > various grobs. What about slurs and ties? Look at issue #582 for > samples. > > >Werner > Fixed with commit ad0e41c6cd25db2643d1a3e25242d284d6f65e69. Cheers, MS __

Re: assistants for GOP and GLISS

Count me in! Cheers, MS On 30 mai 2012, at 14:39, Graham Percival wrote: > It would be useful if there were a few people interested in > helping prepare discussions for GOP and GLISS. This would involve > a number of 1-3 hour research+writing tasks. > > Typical examples of this work are: > - "

Re: Extent of automatic beams?

On 25 mai 2012, at 19:19, David Kastrup wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently rewriting footnote documentation, and I got the somewhat > embarrassing screenshot > > > It would appear that the dimensions of the Beam grob are located at the > note where LilyPond _decides_ where to end the beam, not

Re: Server at Paris VIII

On 14 mai 2012, at 18:28, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> For me, it is faster to write a lot of kludgy code, see what it >> breaks, and then write good code [1] rather than trying to write good >> code from the get-go. So cheap r

Re: Server at Paris VIII

On 14 mai 2012, at 18:00, James wrote: > Hello, > > On 14 May 2012 14:56, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> >> On 14 mai 2012, at 15:40, Graham Percival wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:25:29PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >>>> Hi Graham,

Re: Server at Paris VIII

On 14 mai 2012, at 15:40, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:25:29PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >> Hi Graham, >> Il giorno dom, 13/05/2012 alle 19.24 +0200, Graham Percival ha scritto: >>> Agreed. I think the most we'd use it for would be LSR. I don't >>> think we should give

Re: Plan for discussions

On 14 mai 2012, at 11:22, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 14/05/12 09:56, David Kastrup wrote: >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/source/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music> > > Yes, but that wasn't the use-case I had in mind. The sort of thing I was > thinking of wa

Re: Plan for discussions

On 14 mai 2012, at 08:04, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file >> system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format >> that stores loads of data

Re: Plan for discussions

On 14 mai 2012, at 07:37, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >> On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote: >>> LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this >>> question can be split into two separate ones: >>> - wh

Re: Server at Paris VIII

On 13 mai 2012, at 12:41, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: > To: "LilyPond-Devel list" > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:08 AM > Subject: Server at Paris VIII > > >> Hey all, >> >> Just got off the phone with John M about setting up a server at Paris VIII. >> He'll be g

Server at Paris VIII

Hey all, Just got off the phone with John M about setting up a server at Paris VIII. He'll be going as the LilyPond rep on Wednesday to chat with the people there (Valentin's teaching piano and I'm in rehearsal all day, otherwise we'd all go...music gets in the way of LilyPond yet again!). Jo

Re: LoMus 2012

On 12 mai 2012, at 15:55, David Kastrup wrote: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Well, I was going to send news of it around, but as of now, there is >>> nothing to be seen yet: http://concours.afim-asso.org/home.php>. >>> Hope they get their act together eventually,

Re: LoMus 2012

On 12 mai 2012, at 14:53, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Make a ponding of the award, and point to the contest site (if any) for >> the details. Like the awarded sum. I'd find it weird to flash numbers >> on our main website. > > I think this q

Re: LoMus 2012

On 12 mai 2012, at 14:38, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: >> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be five >> weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to

Re: LoMus 2012

On 12 mai 2012, at 13:00, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be >> five weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on >> something o

Re: LoMus 2012

On 12 mai 2012, at 12:37, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes: > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>From: Thierry Coduys >> >>Subject: LoMus 2012 >> >>Date: 12 mai 2012 12:15:03 HAEC >> >>To: m...@mikesolomon.org >> >> >> >>Dear Mike, >> >>The jur

Re: Plan for discussions

On 11 mai 2012, at 19:44, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Janek Warchoł writes: >>> What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in Dusseldorf (west

Re: Allows lyrics to slide under TimeSignature when OctaveEight present. (issue 6201068)

On 11 mai 2012, at 09:09, d...@gnu.org wrote: > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6201068/diff/1/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc > File lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6201068/diff/1/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc#newcode56 > lily/pure-from-n

Re: Ponding croaks

On 7 mai 2012, at 10:05, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> On 7 mai 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> >>Perhaps we should include croaks in the pondings (somewhat akin to >>Bleats http

Re: Ponding croaks

On 7 mai 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup wrote: > > Perhaps we should include croaks in the pondings (somewhat akin to > Bleats http://www.sluggy.com/comics/archives/daily/111003>): > interesting LilyPond oneliners, not necessarily restrained to 12 > characters, and their output. This seems a bit

Re: Spanish pondings

On 4 mai 2012, at 14:29, Francisco Vila wrote: > Hi all, > > 734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work. > 278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work. > > in translation branch makes the new web block in the main page to > appear in Spanish, but it touches some files which a plain transla

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 4 mai 2012, at 01:23, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > > > On 4 May 2012 01:08, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > >> On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> 2460 is more or less impossible. >>

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > 2460 is more or less impossible. > > Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals, but a "white-out" is a > rather simple idea, isn't it? >

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 3 mai 2012, at 14:00, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: >> He plans to tackle 2451, 2452, and 2453 first via a parsing of pango strings >> to find word prefixes and suffixes and do alignment from where these lie. > > Quick question: will languages that do not use Latin characters be > considered? For e

Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

Hey all, Janek and I talked at length about GSoC and I wanted to give people a little update about the game plan. He plans to tackle 2451, 2452, and 2453 first via a parsing of pango strings to find word prefixes and suffixes and do alignment from where these lie. 2454 will require spacing stu

make doc and make all

Hey all, I'm for the first time doing semi-complicated doc work w/ the website thing and discovering a bit about the build system in the process. I learned today that `make doc' does not automatically `make all' if there are files that have been touched. Would it be a good idea to roll a make

Re: LoMuS

On 28 avr. 2012, at 10:13, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote: >> >>> So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick >>> ans

Re: LoMuS

On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> >> On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >>>>

Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)

On 27 avr. 2012, at 23:55, Keith OHara wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:01:04 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > >> On 27 avr. 2012, at 19:58, Keith OHara wrote: >>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote: >>>> >>>> Call pure

Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)

On 27 avr. 2012, at 21:01, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > > Your right that, in the code above, the function gleaned from (cdr pure) gets > passed (list (car args) start end (cdr args)). I'm not exactly sure what > that signifies, but that's what's going on. When

Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)

On 27 avr. 2012, at 19:58, Keith OHara wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:02:51 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > >> On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:45, Keith OHara wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote: >>> >>>> lily/beam.cc

Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)

On 26 avr. 2012, at 11:43, James wrote: > Mike, > > On 26 April 2012 08:51, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 26 April 2012 07:55, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >>>

Re: Better pure height approximations for beamed rests. (issue 4860043)

On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:45, Keith OHara wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote: > >> lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM >> prev_offset, >> >> You're right - this is an error. Do you want me to fix it or are you >> working on a patch into which the f

Re: Add announcements to the upper right corner of the website (issue 6068045)

On 27 avr. 2012, at 10:55, David Kastrup wrote: > gra...@percival-music.ca writes: > >> LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me. >> >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi >> File Documentation/web.texi (right): >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/60

Re: LoMuS

On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:33, Trevor Daniels wrote: > Werner LEMBERG wrote Friday, April 27, 2012 6:29 AM >>> I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from >>> Valentin about: >>> http://concours.afim-asso.org/ >> Aah, very nice! Yes, participating in this contest would be a goo

Re: Website build crashing

On 27 avr. 2012, at 07:08, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > Hey all, > > My website build crashes with: > > mikesol@mikesol-laptop:~/lilypond-git$ sudo make > LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=/home/mikesol/lilypond-extra website > make --no-builtin-rules config_make=./config.make \ &g

Re: LoMuS

On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply >> to other software competitions in the future. > > *sigh*

LoMuS

Hey all, I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from Valentin about: http://concours.afim-asso.org/ I've been reticent about applying because the development community is rather diffuse and there isn't any good way to accept the prize money if we win. However, after hav

Website build crashing

Hey all, My website build crashes with: mikesol@mikesol-laptop:~/lilypond-git$ sudo make LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=/home/mikesol/lilypond-extra website make --no-builtin-rules config_make=./config.make \ top-src-dir=/home/mikesol/lilypond-git \ -f /home/mikesol/lilyp

Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)

On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote: > Hello, > > On 26 April 2012 07:55, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> >> On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote: >> >>> >>> Well, right now we have nobody running the automated tests to >>&g

Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)

On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote: > > Well, right now we have nobody running the automated tests to > check that new patches are ok. So there will be no patches > accepted to lilypond. > I have a meeting in mid-May w/ the University of Paris VIII. They're donating a computer

Re: announcing things like Mike's tour in News column?

On 25 avr. 2012, at 12:08, Graham Percival wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> On 25 avr. 2012, at 11:53, Graham Percival wrote: >>> >>> If you really really want to have fluff pieces on the main >>> lilypond w

Re: announcing things like Mike's tour in News column?

On 25 avr. 2012, at 11:53, Graham Percival wrote: > > If you really really want to have fluff pieces on the main > lilypond website, I could imagine us using the top right-hand > corner (Mike's "wasted space") for twitter-like announcements of > concerts and editions. Or maybe even using the enti

Re: GSoC

> Francisco Vila writes: > >> 2012/4/23 Carl Sorensen : >>> Dear Jan, >>> >>> Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer >>> of Code! >> >> Contratulations! > I concur and I'm excited to mentor it! As ya'll know, I'll be doing my own summer-of-lily cleaning up

Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

On Apr 17, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > Ok, > > Could we sum up the discussion? > As I understand: for (UP_and_DOWN(d)) >{ >} > > is ok, right? I will wait for two OKs and then make changes and produce and > upload a patch. > > Łukasz > LGTM. Before you tackle this,

Re: State of the pond

On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > We have a new release candidate, slower development, highlights on > development problems, and a vacation. > > > SLOWER DEVELOPMENT > > Development has slowed to a trickle. I'm not certain if this is > just because it's late spring (i.e. bu

Re: announcing things like Mike's tour in News column? (was: 30 day webathon...)

On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > What about a news item about Enseble 101's tour? It seems reasonable > to me; a short notice without "advertisement content" (i.e. without > that Kickstarter part i guess) shouldn't be offensive, and it could > link to appropriate productions e

Re: Footnote documentation error

On Apr 20, 2012, at 7:40 AM, James wrote: > Hello, > > On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne wrote: >> The documentation at >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for >> both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must >> come *before* the

Re: 30 day webathon for kickstarter support (issue 6068045)

On Apr 19, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> mts...@gmail.com writes: >> >>> We have a sweet plug in the project video for GNU LilyPond and I was >>> wondering if I could strike up a partnership with LilyPond to put a link

Re: 30 day webathon for kickstarter support (issue 6068045)

On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:40 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > mts...@gmail.com writes: > >> Reviewers: , >> >> Message: >> Hey all, >> >> My ensemble is launching a Kickstarter project in a day or two to >> support our tour in France and Ireland. >> >> We have a sweet plug in the project video for GNU L

no critical issues!

Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can build it, Graham, if you're over hours. Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: GSoC rendering improvements

On Apr 4, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Corey F wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd be interested in working on either of two projects suggested for Google > Summer of Code, most likely "Improve beaming" but perhaps instead "Improve > slurs and ties". > > Though LilyPond isn't currently my notation tool of choice,

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail whenrunning the whole lsr

On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > > We need to check what the script is doing and how it responds to failing > snippets like this. I'm not in a position to do this right now, but let's > not forget it's there. I've put it on the tracker as > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/i

Re: Failed compiling a single lsr-snippet, which does not fail when running the whole lsr

On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi, > > Seba just informed me that the "Contemporary vibrato" snippet is not > compiling. > Contemporary vibrato is a total hack (it was one of the 1st things I wrote in LilyPond). It's a miracle that it ever compiled in the first place. I

Re: my GSoC application - please review! (also, who will be my mentor?)

On Apr 2, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: >> It's just the opposite - the use of technical details shows a lack of >> clarity of understanding, as it attaches importance to things that may >

Re: my GSoC application - please review! (also, who will be my mentor?)

On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Do you think i've chosen a good order of attach in my plan? > My problem is that i will have significantly more time in the second > half of the project. However, i've read that it's better to start > with the most important (on thus often most d

Re: my GSoC application - please review! (also, who will be my mentor?)

On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > > Also, since this is a new project not mentioned on our GSoC page, i > need to know who will mentor me - Mike? :) Doable, although if I mentor you you may wind up breaking more things than you fix! Below is a diff with some corrections. It's

Re: a Lyric Report (-> my GSoC project)

Agreed - this is fantastic work. I wish there were more reports of this quality. It'd make it easier to fix stuff. I have a pretty good sense of how difficult each issue will be to fix - lemme know if you need an order of attack once you get cracking on these problems. Cheers, MS On Mar 30, 2

Re: Creates pure conversion for Flag::calc_y_offset (issue 5934050)

On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:25 AM, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote: > Mike, I don't understand how the commit message and title relate to this > change, probably due to some misunderstanding on my part. How does this > create a pure conversion for Flag::calc_y_offset? > Trevor > Sorry...forgot to

Parsed object should be dead

I'm getting a lot of: programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*) continuing, cross fingers from current master. Is anyone else having this problem? Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-devel mail

Re: Fixes heights and pure heights of stems. (issue 4898044)

On Mar 27, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > It seems that the /begin/ positions, the positions of the stem-ends attached > to the note heads, should be calculated the old way whether the beam > placement has been determined or not, so I'm inclined to remove if() above, > removing the need

Re: vertical spacing - skyline integrals

On Mar 22, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> Looks right: The area between horizontal skylines should influence the spacing. However, I think we need a parameter to adjust the amount of influence. >>> >>> I'm not

Re: Axis group interface ignores column rank for pure-from-neighbor-interface (issue 5843063)

On Mar 20, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Keith OHara wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:51:04 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > >> On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:36 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: >> >>> do you still need this change ? >> >> It looks like I do, &

Re: Axis group interface ignores column rank for pure-from-neighbor-interface (issue 5843063)

On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:36 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/5001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode330 > lily/axis-group-interface.cc:330: || > Pure_from_neighbor_interface::has_interface (me)) > Now that the engraver is working correctly, do you still n

Re: Turns off TupletBracket collision avoidance if Script avoids slur (issue 5821051)

On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:27 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On Mar 15, 2012, at 12:03 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote: > >> On 2012/03/14 20:35:34, MikeSol wrote: >>> Meh...not my best work, but it is a first step towards fixing this >> problem. >> >> To me it

Re: Turns off TupletBracket collision avoidance if Script avoids slur (issue 5821051)

On Mar 15, 2012, at 12:03 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote: > On 2012/03/14 20:35:34, MikeSol wrote: >> Meh...not my best work, but it is a first step towards fixing this > problem. > > To me it looks more like an attempt to hide the problem's symptoms. It > does not appear to have any relation with line-

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

Hey all, An update on this patch. After having correctly skylined dynamics, I'm realizing that serifed fonts and italicized fonts are posing a problem for snug vertical alignment. Joe and I have been back and forth about a solution and he has graciously accepted to tag-team the problem with me

Re: Issue 2376: Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results (issue 5755058)

On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:48 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote: > Given the level and amount of code you write, it might be worth > investing the time rereading the garbage collection chapter of the Guile > manual. > You're right that I know nothing about guile's garbage collection...it'd help to know this. I

Re: Allows seconds to merge (issue 5729057)

On Mar 4, 2012, at 8:37 PM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > Mike I begin to suspect that you employ an army of monkeys on keyboards. > This code works by accident. > I obviously don't pay them enough :) I just took a stab at it to see if I could get it done quickly: David has a few solid criticis

Re: Doc: simplify example for unpure-pure containers (issue 5623044)

On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:38 PM, plros...@gmail.com wrote: > To be honest, there are many things I don't understand. In fact, I > reduced the example to understand it better. > > Why is horizontal spacing affected even though the purity affects the > Y-axis only? Because horizontal spacing is based

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:28 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > As for compilation times with patchset 32, SATB choral files compile > two times longer than master, and instrumentals 1.0-1.5 times longer > than master. > Mike, i am very sorry but i have to pause my involvement in this issue > a bit. I'm very

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Well, perhaps there is another method. I just want to point out that > it is a waste to represent the extent of the letter 'n' with 10 boxes, > and we should be able to do better. > I agree that it's excessive. To me, "do better" means ma

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Janek Warchoł wrote Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:01 AM > >> The bad news is that for scores containing a lot of lyrics (like my >> SATB pieces) compilation times are now 3-4 times longer than wiith >> master. For instrumental scores the situ

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > 2012/3/1 Janek Warchoł : > >> From what i see, the skylines are now more precise than they need to >> be - every glyph has a skyline of 10 or so boxes, even if it's a >> single letter! (see attached) >> I think the proper solution would be to

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> >> Well, it is again an issue of "incest tabu" where the details of the >> combining skylines make best sense for combining _heterogenous_ >> elements: for arranging text with text, you don't want to have things >> get too closely or even i

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mar 1, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Hey Mike, > > I did a quick check of newest patchset (30) and the results look > great! There are some flaws, but i'd say they're not your patch's > fault. Rather, it seems that the new super-precise skylines unveil > imperfections in vertical

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Feb 29, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Joe Neeman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > Hey all, > > I've put up a new version that doesn't issue warnings. > > Any change of getting an updated git branch, too? Done. A lot of the t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >