Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 31-Dec-2017 23:17:12 +0100 schrieb tim...@bitstream.net: On Dec 31, 2017, at 5:30 AM, bb wrote: > > I think you cannot install different versions of frescobaldi or parallel > from different sources. You might simply remove the repository version, try > again and see

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

gt; I think you cannot install different versions of frescobaldi or parallel > from different sources. You might simply remove the repository version, try > again and see what happens. > > > > Concerning the description on http://www.frescobaldi.org/download.html > > there

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

On Dec 31, 2017, at 5:30 AM, bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net> wrote: > > I think you cannot install different versions of frescobaldi or parallel from > different sources. You might simply remove the repository version, try again > and see what happens. > > Concerning

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

t at that > time on Linux? > > Thank you for > https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Running-Frescobaldi-3-From-Source-Git-(Linux) > that makes something more comfortable if it works. > > $  uname -a > Linux bb-MS-7713 4.10.0-42-generic #46~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 4 > 15:5

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

r versions had not been available for pre-18 mint at that time on Linux? Thank you for https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Running-Frescobaldi-3-From-Source-Git-(Linux) that makes something more comfortable if it works. $  uname -a Linux bb-MS-7713 4.10.0-42-generic #46~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mo

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 31.12.2017 um 12:30 schrieb bb: I think you cannot install different versions of frescobaldi or parallel from different sources. You might simply remove the repository version, try again and see what happens. As I wrote I *can* and *did* install the versions from the package manager

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

I think you cannot install different versions of frescobaldi or parallel from different sources. You might simply remove the repository version, try again and see what happens. Concerning the description on http://www.frescobaldi.org/download.html there are some errors for frescobaldi 3.0.0

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

(definitely not related to all of this, but just for sake of completeness) * sudo apt install frescobaldi This gave me a *working* installation of Frescobaldi, including LilyPond 2.18.2 and both the PDF and the SVG viewer working properly After making the frescobaldi and python-ly Git

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Hello Urs and all, Following your excellent instructions on the dependenicies, always difficult to work out, especially when detail is missing, I am immediately presented with the same old core dump on startup, as per usual. I am using Ubuntu 17.10, kernel 4.13.0-21-generic (not that the kernel

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

I for some reason thought I was using 2.whatever frescobaldi on Ubuntu 17.10 but it is in fact 3.0. I remember it crashing iniitially but after throwing the error into google there was some reasonably simple fix, but going through the terminal history hasn't revealed what it was.  Shane Sent

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

23. Dezember 2017 03:30, "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de (mailto:%22Simon%20Albrecht%22%20<simon.albre...@mail.de>)> schrieb: Hello everybody, just to let you know: After gathering from the recent thread that the situation with frescobaldi dependencies an

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Hi Simon, > Then – how to actually install that? You download the file and then you do dpkg -i ~/Downloads/python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb using the path where you downloaded the file. This way you use the file with the older poppler-qt version which still worked (at least on my

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

the old version 0.9.3-1. That does not work! Get it from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ly/0.9.5 [1] Thanks, that's a step forward. At least Frescobaldi now launches successfully. Next: When I start opening some menus, very quickly this appears: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-pac

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

>Get it from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ly/0.9.5 Thanks, >that's a step forward. At least Frescobaldi now launches successfully. >Next: When I start opening some menus, very quickly this appears: >File >"/usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/frescobaldi-3.0.0-py3.5.egg/f

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 24-Dec-2017 11:07:32 +0100 schrieb b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net: Have you installed python3-ly 09.5? The distro repository offers the old version 0.9.3-1. That does not work! Get it from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ly/0.9.5 Thanks, that's a step forward. At least Frescobaldi

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

-poppler-qt5 On my linux version (UBUNTU_CODENAME=xenial, that is a version 18.x) I could install frescobaldi 3.0.0. As I repeatedly pointed out in different postings I never could install version 3.0.0 on older ubuntu versions. (And I tryed hard!). Let's check: Had somebody from the list

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 23-Dec-2017 15:49:11 +0100 schrieb noeck.marb...@gmx.de: Out of curiosity: Did anyone writing here at least try the fix that I posted here twice which worked for me? I.e. installing python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb? Maybe I didn't - it would hardly be surprising if I had

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Am 23.12.2017 um 15:48 schrieb Noeck > Out of curiosity: Did anyone writing here at least try the fix that I > posted here twice which worked for me? > > I.e. installing python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb? > > > Joram > > ___ > lilypond-user

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Out of curiosity: Did anyone writing here at least try the fix that I posted here twice which worked for me? I.e. installing python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb? Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

As I remarked, I could not install frescobaldi 3.0 on ubuntu version 17 (as I remember that is true for 16 as well). I had success with ubuntu 18.2 brands (and higher). I sent some mails to frescobaldi and the lilypond list. i.e see lilypond list from 09.12.2017 10:21. As I can reconstruct out

Re: Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

As I mailed frequently to frescobaldi and to the lilypond mail list it was/is definitely impossible for me to get frescobaldi 3.0 to work with any ubuntu 17 version and any linux brand based on ubuntu 17! I tried to install frescobaldi 3.0 multiple times on that version(s), especially following

Next round on frescobaldi dependencies

Hello everybody, just to let you know: After gathering from the recent thread that the situation with frescobaldi dependencies and conflicting versions of python would be easier to handle with Ubuntu 17, I tried getting it to work on a pristine 17.10 live system - unsucessfully, with another

Re: Frescobaldi 3 build on Ubuntu 17.10

d even less exchange than the Frescobaldi Google > group. So I suggest to actually discuss it on the lilypond-user list as it > isn't *that* off-topic IMO. > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Frescobaldi 3 build on Ubuntu 17.10

Do you know https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues Regards Am 10.12.2017 um 11:09 schrieb Urs Liska: > > > > Am 10.12.2017 um 02:45 schrieb Andrew Bernard: >> Hi All, >> >> Attempting to get to the bottom of the Frescobaldi dependency >> merry-go-round

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

Concerning LTS ubuntu 17.04 (Zesty Zapus) and 17.10 (Artful Aardvark) do not offer LTS and never had! As I used it , I had no problems but never got frescobaldi 3.0.0 running. It did not work on "16" either! Obviously "17" is a version "in between" the LTS release

Re: Frescobaldi 3 build on Ubuntu 17.10

Am 10.12.2017 um 02:45 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi All, Attempting to get to the bottom of the Frescobaldi dependency merry-go-round, Thank you for that! I end up - having carefully checked everything - with the old crash after the splash screen core dump. :-( Altogether miserable. I

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

Hi Simon, Well, 16.04 is a long term support (LTS) release which companies seem to like. But there is nothing wrong therefore with 17.10. I find it to be really stable and trouble free, and superior in may ways - else why would they release it?. Still cant get Frescobaldi 3 running on it, but I

Frescobaldi 3 build on Ubuntu 17.10

Hi All, Attempting to get to the bottom of the Frescobaldi dependency merry-go-round, I end up - having carefully checked everything - with the old crash after the splash screen core dump. Altogether miserable. I remember trying to debug the source code for this a while ago and came to grief

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 09:11:58 (-0500), Ben wrote: > On 12/9/2017 9:03 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > > >>However, weren't you one of those who "enjoyed" the fun of a > >>major version update? ;-) > > > >Yes, I was. But I think I know how to avoid that ‘fun’ in future: > >having a separate home

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

On 12/9/2017 9:03 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: However, weren't you one of those who "enjoyed" the fun of a major version update? ;-) Yes, I was. But I think I know how to avoid that ‘fun’ in future: having a separate home partition now, I’d just overwrite the old version and install the new

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

On 09.12.2017 09:22, Urs Liska wrote: Until now I’ve stuck to my resolve to not open that can of potential problems coming with less stable Ubuntu versions. How much of a risk is there? In general or specifically for LilyPond? Frescobaldi has the discussed issue,*compiling* LilyPond is pretty

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > Hi Vincenzo, > > I haven’t been able to get any version of Frescobaldi working under Ubuntu > 16.04, sadly. I made several attempts at fixing it, and there’s some > information here: <https://

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

What does "installed blindly" mean? ubuntu studio? The actual version is 17.10, eventaully based in ubuntu 17.10. I used that as well and tried hard to get frescobaldi 3.0.0 installed, but never succeeded. That is true for other ubuntu blends based on versions older than 1

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

I am just jumping into that thread and have not read the rest of the conversation. I did not get to run frescobaldi 3.0.0 on my Linux mate 17.04, python-ly did not work which version ever i tried. I installed Linux mint 18.2 Sonja 64 bit a couple of weeks ago and gave frescobaldi 3.0.0

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

> Until now I’ve stuck to my resolve to not open that can of potential > problems coming with less stable Ubuntu versions. How much of a risk is > there? Hi Simon, I had small issues (like this Frescobaldi one, not working switch user, some missing icons for non-gnome applications) wi

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

d >in >>> later releases? Just an idea for testing. If you're not wanting to >leave >>> your older-but-stable OS, I totally understand. >> With 17.04 I had to install an older python3-poppler-qt5 as described >> above to solve the issue. But with 17.10 Frescobald

Re: Frescobaldi 3.0 CRASHES

. With 17.04 I had to install an older python3-poppler-qt5 as described above to solve the issue. But with 17.10 Frescobaldi works again out of the box on my computer. Until now I’ve stuck to my resolve to not open that can of potential problems coming with less stable Ubuntu versions. How much

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

Hi Andrew, my comments below are based on a very vague understanding of the issue, but maybe they are of help anyway (but please don't let them confuse you). Am 08.12.2017 um 23:52 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi Ben and All, I have to run F 3 on Mint because I can't get the dependencies all

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

17.04 I had to install an older python3-poppler-qt5 as described above to solve the issue. But with 17.10 Frescobaldi works again out of the box on my computer. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mail

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

On 12/8/2017 5:52 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Ben and All, I have to run F 3 on Mint because I can't get the dependencies all lined up for Ubuntu 16.04. It's incredibly difficult, to the point that I had given up and I run a Mint VM just for F 3. Now that others are also having problems,

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

Cross reference in this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-12/msg00187.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

Possibly related, I've noticed that the 16.04 repository version of Frescobaldi has been holding back python3-pyqt4 and python3-sip from upgrading for several months. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben and All, > > I have to

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

Hi Ben and All, I have to run F 3 on Mint because I can't get the dependencies all lined up for Ubuntu 16.04. It's incredibly difficult, to the point that I had given up and I run a Mint VM just for F 3. Now that others are also having problems, perhaps I will look into this again. As to what

Re: Frescobaldi CRASHES

There's not much information in your mail but fwiw: I had the problem of Frescobaldi crashing right away when I opened it (on a Mac). Solved it by completely trashing the preferences. > On 8 Dec 2017, at 19:53, Son_V <vincenzo.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm no more able to op

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

On 12/8/2017 4:59 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hi Vincenzo, I haven’t been able to get any version of Frescobaldi working under Ubuntu 16.04, sadly. I made several attempts at fixing it, and there’s some information here: <https://github.com/wbsoft/python-poppler-qt5/issues/14> Unfortu

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

On 08.12.2017 20:04, Son_V wrote: It's the second message on the same subject I post, but I don't see the first, in case excuse me... Both arrived, so please check in the online archives (they update about every half hour) before reposting your e-mail. Best, Simon

Re: Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

Hi Vincenzo, I haven’t been able to get any version of Frescobaldi working under Ubuntu 16.04, sadly. I made several attempts at fixing it, and there’s some information here: <https://github.com/wbsoft/python-poppler-qt5/issues/14> Unfortunately, the dependencies seem to be te

Frescobaldi 3,.0 CRAHES

It's the second message on the same subject I post, but I don't see the first, in case excuse me... If I try to open a .ly file in Frescobaldi 3.0 (installed blindly as an update) it (Frescobaldi) crashes in a breath. What can I do? Thanks. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com

Frescobaldi CRASHES

I'm no more able to open any .ly file in UbuntuStudio, Frescobaldi crashes in a breath, what can I do? Thanks. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org

Re: Frescobaldi

On 06.12.2017 21:45, Ben wrote: One more thing, if you want (and are on Windows), you could also just use the wicked handy cheat sheet numpad shortcuts :) That's an option as well. I have done that in the past.  Alt + 0203 = *Ë, *for example. In my experience, that’s such a hassle that it’s a

Re: Frescobaldi

On 6 Dec 2017 at 14:49, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > > Tim, > > From Frescobaldi menu: Tools | Special Characters -- my install has all three > of the characters > you mention (highlighted in the screen shot). This is the default view shown > me when I select this &g

Re: Frescobaldi

On 6 Dec 2017 at 14:49, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > > Tim, > > From Frescobaldi menu: Tools | Special Characters -- my install has all three > of the characters > you mention (highlighted in the screen shot). This is the default view shown > me when I select this > Tool.

Re: Frescobaldi

Windows Vista!!!  The ALT-Keypad sequence should remain viable for you. You can also create some snippets in Frescobaldi for those you use most freqently and assign a key-sequence for them, e.g., create a snippet for an ellipse … using Alt-0133 and assign, say, Ctrl-Alt-. as its key sequence

Re: Frescobaldi

Tim, >From Frescobaldi menu: Tools | Special Characters -- my install has all three of the characters you mention (highlighted in the screen shot). This is the default view shown me when I select this Tool. Depending on our OS you may find alternatives more useful. If you have a Windows compu

Re: Frescobaldi

On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:36:42 -0500, Tim Slattery wrote: > I've been setting vocal pieces with German lyrics, and trying to use > Tools| Special Characters to find things like a and u with Umlauts, > and the double-s character that looks like a Beta. I would strongly advise

Re: Frescobaldi

On 12/6/2017 3:36 PM, Tim Slattery wrote: I've been enjoying using Frescobaldi for creating Lilypond scores, it makes many things much easier. I've been setting vocal pieces with German lyrics, and trying to use Tools| Special Characters to find things like a and u with Umlauts, and the double

Re: Frescobaldi

On 12/6/2017 3:36 PM, Tim Slattery wrote: I've been enjoying using Frescobaldi for creating Lilypond scores, it makes many things much easier. I've been setting vocal pieces with German lyrics, and trying to use Tools| Special Characters to find things like a and u with Umlauts, and the double

Frescobaldi

I've been enjoying using Frescobaldi for creating Lilypond scores, it makes many things much easier. I've been setting vocal pieces with German lyrics, and trying to use Tools| Special Characters to find things like a and u with Umlauts, and the double-s character that looks like a Beta. I find

Re: Frescobaldi Qt5

On 2017-11-22 08:54 PM, Brett M. Gilio wrote: I know the Frescobaldi developers have been planning for a transition to PyQt5/Qt5. I am quite versed with python and qt5, does anybody know how far along they have gone in this? I'm running it in the following environment, with no particular

Re: Frescobaldi Qt5

Hi Brett, Am 23.11.2017 um 04:54 schrieb Brett M. Gilio: I know the Frescobaldi developers have been planning for a transition to PyQt5/Qt5. I am quite versed with python and qt5, does anybody know how far along they have gone in this? As can be seen from https://github.com/wbsoft

Frescobaldi Qt5

I know the Frescobaldi developers have been planning for a transition to PyQt5/Qt5. I am quite versed with python and qt5, does anybody know how far along they have gone in this? -- Brett M. Gilio B.S. Biological Sciences B.M. Music Composition http://www.brettgilio.com/ "Sometimes the ob

Git functionality testing in Frescobaldi

most of the remaining open issues on the tracker (https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/labels/gsoc-2017-git) should not block that branch from being merged. So please, anyone who is using Frescobaldi from the Git repository or can do so is invited to check out the rewrite-vcs branch and test

Re: Frescobaldi on a Mac - Preference Files

Dear Davide, Thanks! I'll check that asap and hope to be able to use Frescobaldi again ... I'll let you know! Best, Robert > On 11 Oct 2017, at 15:09, Davide Liessi <davide.lie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Robert, > > I overlooked your messages to the Frescobaldi list,

Re: Frescobaldi on a Mac - Preference Files

Dear Robert, I overlooked your messages to the Frescobaldi list, I'm sorry. 2017-10-11 14:23 GMT+02:00 Robert Schmaus <robert.schm...@web.de>: > I'm looking for the place where Frescobaldi would store its preference > files, namely the session informations etc. The preference

Frescobaldi on a Mac - Preference Files

Dear List, This doesn't belong here, strictly speaking, but I don't get any answers from the Frescobaldi list. I'm looking for the place where Frescobaldi would store its preference files, namely the session informations etc. The reason for this is that I can't open Frescobaldi anymore

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

Indeed it is an Ubuntu package. This one worked for me: https://answers.launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/python3.6-as-default/+files/python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb The one I installed through apt did not work out. Thanks to everyone! best, J On

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

On Sat 23 Sep 2017 at 13:11:14 (+0200), Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > I used python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb, I think from debian > despite I have a Ubuntu installation. python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb looks like an Ubuntu package.

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

Hi, I used python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb, I think from debian despite I have a Ubuntu installation. So this is probably not a sane advice but it worked for me. The version in the package repository did not work for me. Cheers, Joram ___

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

Jaime Oliver La Rosa wrote > Hi all, > > I am encountering this problem when trying to engrave any score in > Frescobaldi. The score compiles fine, but I can't see the preview, and I > get the error below as described in this post: > > https://github.com/wbsoft/f

Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

Hi all, I am encountering this problem when trying to engrave any score in Frescobaldi. The score compiles fine, but I can't see the preview, and I get the error below as described in this post: https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/838 Is there a known solution for this? I am using

Re: frescobaldi print

Ok, I solved the problem. I reinstalled Frescobaldi. An interesting fact is that I had to reinstall it twice. After the first reinstallation Frescobaldi did not run anymore. When I clicked on the application nothing happen (no error dialog box, etc; simply nothing). Maybe because I didn't

Re: frescobaldi print

> > Hi G, > > PRINT is found in the File menu, where you can print the source / music, > as you choose. > Printing is usually quite easy from Frescobaldi. > > 1) What printer are you using, a "PDF" printer, network, etc? > it's a network printer nothing

Re: frescobaldi print

On 18 September 2017 at 14:59, Knute Snortum <ksnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is also a printer icon on the toolbar that does the same thing as > File > Print Music. (Ctrl-P worked for me on Windows 10.) > The printer icon does absolutely nothing when clicked. On my fresco

Re: frescobaldi print

ianmaria Lari: >> >>> Sorry to ask this that probably is a very trivial question, but I have >>> not >>> able to find a solution online. >>> >>> Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly >>> from >>> Fre

Re: frescobaldi print

o print the pdf file generated by lilypond > directly from > Frescobaldi? > > > File → Print music … or Ctrl+P as in most applications. > Hi G, PRINT is found in the File menu, where you can print the source / music, as you choose. Printing is usually quite easy from Fre

Re: frescobaldi print

that probably is a very trivial question, but I have not >> able to find a solution online. >> >> Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly from >> Frescobaldi? >> > > File → Print music … or Ctrl+P as in most applications. > > _

Re: frescobaldi print

Am 14.09.2017 um 12:49 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: Sorry to ask this that probably is a very trivial question, but I have not able to find a solution online. Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly from Frescobaldi? File → Print music … or Ctrl+P as in most

frescobaldi print

Sorry to ask this that probably is a very trivial question, but I have not able to find a solution online. Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly from Frescobaldi? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond

Frescobaldi/Git - important question

Hi all, Wen Xin, one of this year's GSoC students, has created an issue tracker item (https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/996) with an important question about how partial staging should be implemented, opening up our previous discussion to the "public". As opening a tr

Re: Fwd: [Frescobaldi] GSoC Project "Add Support for Git Workflows to Frescobaldi" introduction (Urs Liska)

Am 25.05.2017 um 14:04 schrieb Leszek Wroński: > > Guys, > > apologies if I've missed something obvious, but what is the intended > place for discussing the very welcome 'Add Git support to Frescobaldi' > project? Here? The Frescobaldi forum? The wiki (but where?)? Well, t

Re: Fwd: [Frescobaldi] GSoC Project "Add Support for Git Workflows to Frescobaldi" introduction (Urs Liska)

Guys, apologies if I've missed something obvious, but what is the intended place for discussing the very welcome 'Add Git support to Frescobaldi' project? Here? The Frescobaldi forum? The wiki (but where?)? (I just have a minor requst: it would be convenient if we could create and change

Re: SVG icons for use in Frescobaldi

if there isn't a specific one. I've faked this in the screenshot by simply picking two random existing icons from the Frescobaldi code. As I'm really not good at it I'd be happy if someone could create a nice default icon (SVG) that can be used as a "generic openLilyLib package" icon. (If t

Re: Fwd: [Frescobaldi] GSoC Project "Add Support for Git Workflows to Frescobaldi" introduction

Il giorno lun 22 mag 2017 alle 17:36, Urs Liska ha scritto: This design is mainly discussed by me and Urs. We want to hear more voices from the community to help make this design become better and more practical. Please comment below if you have related ideas, thank you!

SVG icons for use in Frescobaldi

Hi all, I'm working on adding openLilyLib support for Frescobaldi. Right now I have a problem adding an icon file, and I don't have any clue what the problem is. Take the attached SVG files. Both can conveniently be opened in an image viewer or browser or whatever. But when loaded as an icon

Fwd: [Frescobaldi] GSoC Project "Add Support for Git Workflows to Frescobaldi" introduction

Hi LilyPond users, below is a message by Wen Xin, a student who will work on adding Git support to Frescobaldi over the summer as his GSoC project. Please have a look at the introduction and also the Wiki page that is linked, we would like to have more discussion before going into actual

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

as musicxml and convert musicxml2ly. 4. Edit converted music with frescobaldi. Adding header, paper, staff, transpositions and whatever is needed. *Nesmotren govori kao da mačem probada, a jezik je mudrih iscjeljenje. Izreke 12:18* On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Bernhard Kleine <bernhard.

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

Am 29.04.2017 um 18:47 schrieb Knute Snortum: > Can I ask a dumb question? Are you just trying to play the music you > just entered in LilyPond? Have you tried double-clicking on the .mid > file from a File Explorer window? Often the default MIDI player will > execute. Or, in

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

My favorite software for generating MIDI files for rehearsals is SpeedyMIDI: https://sourceforge.net/projects/speedymidi/ That program allows entering pitches and durations as a MIDI file. Then Frescobaldi, or the LilyPond midi2ly tool it uses, can generate a LY file from it. Bernhard Kleine

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

Can I ask a dumb question? Are you just trying to play the music you just entered in LilyPond? Have you tried double-clicking on the .mid file from a File Explorer window? Often the default MIDI player will execute. Or, in Frescobaldi, there is a MIDI Player window which you can open via

Your email address, was Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

If you don't want to receive emails at the address you post from, please try setting a Reply-To: header on your emails like the one in this email's header. Mail-Followup-To: should work too. On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:18:39 (+0200), zs.has...@gmx.de wrote: > Hallo, > [...] ist meine Emailadresse für

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

On Fri 28 Apr 2017 at 10:32:14 (+0100), Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: <u...@openlilylib.org> > To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:19 AM > Subject: Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows > > > >Am 2017-0

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

usescore, capella, Sibelius). The problem > is always the same. > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Jacques Menu Muzhic [mailto:imj-muz...@bluewin.ch] >> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. April 2017 11:01 >> An: zs.has...@gmx.de >> Cc: Jacques Menu Muzhic <imj-muz...@bluewin.ch&

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

>'encodingsoftware' then it should compile fine, if it's a general >problem it should choke on the next invalid characters. Result: Starte lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.59 [La-valse-opaline-ende-1.ly]... Processing `c:/users/stephan/appdata/local/temp/frescobaldi-ldi

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

>> I know this problem science 2.19.4? > >2.19.4 of LilyPond or Frescobaldi? The last working Lilypondversion I know is 2.19.41. I detected the first time with 2.19.45 and 49. The problem exist with Frescobaldi 2.18/19 and 3. Win7 and win 10. The report in F

Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

- Original Message - From: <u...@openlilylib.org> To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:19 AM Subject: Re: XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows Am 2017-04-28 10:33, schrieb zs.has...@gmx.de: I know this problem science 2.19.4? Can you det

XML-Import into Frescobaldi Windows

I know this problem science 2.19.4? After someone asks today on the german forum about this problem, I want to tell the list about that problem. It is not possible after importing the xml-File into Frescobaldi to work with the import result. But the import looks normal. Opening the result

Re:Midiimport f?r Lilypond/Frescobaldi

; > Subject: Midiimport f?r Lilypond/Frescobaldi > Message-ID: <5086c85f-1546-f32a-927e-9d49633c1...@gmx.net > <mailto:5086c85f-1546-f32a-927e-9d49633c1...@gmx.net>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I saw the thread in this group four years ago. I

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

Bernhard Kleine wrote: With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi/Lilypond on win 7. I have seen that VLC mediaplayer has to be supplied with softfonts e.g. fluid-softfonts. The installation proposal, however, does not state how to supply this softfonts to the actual VLC. I

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 10:08 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > Hi Carl, > > this has been most helpful and I will organize a keyboard for input. How > to record the tunes and to save them will take some time to learn. > > With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi

Re: Midiimport für Lilypond/Frescobaldi

Hi Carl, this has been most helpful and I will organize a keyboard for input. How to record the tunes and to save them will take some time to learn. With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi/Lilypond on win 7. I have seen that VLC mediaplayer has to be supplied with softfonts

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >