On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:10:08AM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Agreed. I'd like an easy way of getting pre-built binaries of all the
>> stable enough Linaro outputs. On the toolchain side this would
>> include the latest monthly releases
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:10:08AM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> > To my mind the important constraint is that there should be some
> > relatively easy thing
> > that we can say to someone 'and this is how you get a stable Linaro';
> > and by that I mean the whole
> > thing - a set of tools that bui
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:30:35PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
> today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs. I'll
> start with some history and proposals:
> We created a fairly ad hoc PPA layout for the 10
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Joerg Hohensohn
wrote:
> Hello Jesse (et al)
>
> Thanks for your answer, some confusion remains, see below.
> I'm fine with proprietary drivers, this just has to work.
>
>> The availability of graphics drivers is obviously quite a hot topic at the
>> moment.
>> Fo
Hello Jesse (et al)
Thanks for your answer, some confusion remains, see below.
I'm fine with proprietary drivers, this just has to work.
> The availability of graphics drivers is obviously quite a hot topic at the
> moment.
> For your OMAP3 board, you are probably better off sticking with the ub
Thanks Joey. We had a late breaking bug yesterday that made me switch
branches in the document. The fix has now been merged and the Wiki has
been updated to point you to the correctLinaro Image Tools:
bzr branch lp:linaro-image-tools
On 01/20/2011 01:10 PM, Joey Stanford wrote:
> Followed this
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:44 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 20 January 2011 18:30, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
>> today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs. I'll
>> start with some history and pr
Followed this quickly today.
My build line was different due to the way the branch executed:
joey@warthog:~$ overo-kernel-suffix/linaro-hwpack-create --local-deb
./u-boot-linaro-omap3-overo_2010.12-0ubuntu1_armel.deb --local-deb
./x-loader-omap3-overo_1.4.4+git20101223+6f3a261-1ubuntu1_armel.deb
Hi Jorg,
The availability of graphics drivers is obviously quite a hot topic at the
moment. For your OMAP3 board, you are probably better off sticking with the
ubuntu packages (you'll need to add multiverse in order to find the various
'*-sgx-omap3' packages) as that will get you up and running f
On 20 January 2011 18:30, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey
>
> As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
> today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs. I'll
> start with some history and proposals:
To my mind the important constraint is that there sh
This thread received relatively negative feedback on the use of hwpacks
along Android/ChromeOS images. I think we should defer this part, at
least we have more experience with said images.
I do agree with the overall approach of doing things in the upsteam
way. I'm less clear on how end-use
Hey
As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs. I'll
start with some history and proposals:
We created a fairly ad hoc PPA layout for the 10.11 cycle, with
ppa:linaro-maintainers/tools
ppa
Hello,
This is my first post, I'm a complete noop to Linaro, discovered it
yesterday. Needing to run OpenGL ES applications and media playback, I
was excited to find e.g. this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhglD0mJiLk
(under Linaro, GStreamer playing a video by DSP in fullscreen)
and t
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011, Alexander Sack wrote:
> What's the plan for staging/QA before pushing this backport into the
> tools ppa?
Good question; do we have a process for this? I realize we don't have
a -proposed/-updates etc. setup for stuff which we only provide in
PPAs.
--
Loïc Minier
_
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> Once this gets out of NEW and enters natty, I should prepare lucid and
> maverick backports into the Tools PPA (ppa:linaro-maintainers/tools,
> https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/tools/+packages)
> in the mean time, it's i
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> How does l-m-c know about the boot partition convention?
I've just added to the wiki page; this came up yesterday on IRC when we
started taking imx51 into account.
We would have a partition_layout field which commands which partition
layout type we wa
Andy,
thanks, and I've just added wiki.linaro.org/Boards as a top level index
and a page that I've been using for the Efika mx smartbook...
Dave
On 20 Jan 2011, at 06:50, Andy Doan wrote:
> FYI:
>
> I've just created a page describing how to get a Linaro image running on
> the Overo Gum
On 20 January 2011 05:15, Scott Bambrough wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:02 -0600, James Westby wrote:
>
> > An illustration of what I mean: if we add linux_image and ignore it, and
> > then use it within Android hwpacks, someone with the old code will try
> > and use one of those new hwpacks,
18 matches
Mail list logo