Re: [ANN] Reminder about recommended Linaro git access procedure

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Andy Doan wrote: > On 08/29/2014 02:57 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> One more point of concern here. For all the git URLs that I have that >> use http (kernel.org as well as Google's Android urls), its actually >> https they're using. Ma

Re: [ANN] Reminder about recommended Linaro git access procedure

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Andy Doan wrote: > On 08/28/2014 11:30 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Paul Sokolovsky >> wrote: > >>> The case we have with git:// is that small number of users can hog >>> almost all resources of

Re: [ANN] Reminder about recommended Linaro git access procedure

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:28:06 -0700 > John Stultz wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Paul Sokolovsky >> wrote: >> So this is problematic, because there are folks out there in the >> community wh

Re: [ANN] Reminder about recommended Linaro git access procedure

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Recently, we had DoS-like episodes on the main Linaro git server, > http://git.linaro.org , which affected number of Linaro users, > including users of Gerrit system, http://review.linaro.org . > > These episodes were related to unfriendly

Re: embedding html into the wiki

On 09/03/2013 04:33 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> On 4 September 2013 00:09, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I wanted to create a google doc spreadsheet for tracking some team >>> activity and then embed in iframe for t

Re: embedding html into the wiki

On 09/03/2013 02:29 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On 4 September 2013 00:09, Mike Turquette wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I wanted to create a google doc spreadsheet for tracking some team >> activity and then embed in iframe for that spreadsheet into the team >> wiki page. >> >> I tried adding

Re: LSK getting started

On 08/05/2013 05:24 PM, Andy Green wrote: 2) warning-elimination: android: binder This seems to be a problem with a patch already upstream 3) warning-elimination: androidization: mm Problem coming from Androidization patches [snip] 5) warning-elimination: ion: use size_t-specific format In

Re: Organizing Config Fragments

On 08/01/2013 01:30 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote: Historically, the main reason for us creating the frags was because of the platforms (eg, Ubuntu) adding lots of config options that weren't in the defconfig. The vexpress defconfig has always been broken. But over-riding the defconfig with Ubuntu/Andr

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Support for per policy instance of Interactive governor

On 05/16/2013 09:18 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 16 May 2013 22:58, John Stultz wrote: Do you have a git branch with the queue you just sent Todd available? It probably would be easiest to just merge that in. Yes I do have it. It is android-experimental-3.9 based. Can we merge that simply with

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Support for per policy instance of Interactive governor

On 05/16/2013 02:47 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 16 May 2013 14:58, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi Todd and others, If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct policy (per package), currently we can't have multiple instances of same governor. i.e. We can't have multiple

Re: Mali-ization

On 04/13/2013 03:22 AM, Andy Green wrote: On 13/04/13 09:07, the mail apparently from Andy Green included: I'm hoping someone else will write the patches ^^ but if not I'll try to sort something out. The attached series gets it building cleanly against current llct with ION. Cool. Althoug

Re: Mali-ization

On 04/12/2013 05:34 PM, Andy Green wrote: Hi - At the moment the Mali T624 OOT module sources I have do not build against 3.9-rcX / linux-linaro-core-tracking. A colleague checked it and it does build against 3.4. The problems I saw are around ION compatibility but they didn't look tremendo

Re: [Linaro-QA-Service] [linux-next] Snowball build broken

On 04/11/2013 11:28 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: Hi All, Greetings from Linaro QA services. We have setup the process of validating Linux on ARM Kernel builds. One of those ARM targets is Snowball. Snowball build broken log can be found here Build Error: 04:48:08 CC drivers/mfd/ab8500-debu

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

On 04/04/2013 07:53 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 5 April 2013 07:58, John Stultz wrote: On 04/04/2013 06:34 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run O=../ ? Hmm.. when we compile kernel we can give O=../output-folder as an parameter and so

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

On 04/04/2013 06:34 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 5 April 2013 00:18, John Stultz wrote: Yea, I'll push it upstream and send it to Andrey for Linux Linaro. Thanks for the testing. There are more problems than this i believe... Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i ha

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

On 04/03/2013 09:27 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 3 April 2013 22:53, John Stultz wrote: Huh. I'm totally unfamiliar with this. Looks like when adding support for the -O option, if its not used, we end up passing -O=. to make, which generates the unnecessary source softlink. Does the att

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

On 04/03/2013 10:01 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 3 April 2013 21:41, John Stultz wrote: On 04/02/2013 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi John, I have been struggling since some time "who creates source directory in my kernel tree"? And i thought to clean up the mess today and fou

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

On 04/02/2013 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi John, I have been struggling since some time "who creates source directory in my kernel tree"? And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running merge_config.sh creates it.. And it isn't cleaned up even by running make mrproper... PS: I am

Re: arm 0-day kernel builders?

On 01/20/2013 06:57 AM, Rob Clark wrote: Btw, not sure if any of you have seen the 0-day kbuild setup that intel has.. https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild runs various builds for different archs on every commit with different configs, randconfig, etc. And various checks with sparse,

Re: When do we plan to move to Linux 3.8?

On 01/07/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: I get this compilation error: arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c: In function 'l2x0_init': arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c:376:3: error: 'cache_id' undeclared (first use in this function) arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c:376:3: note: each undeclared identifier is repor

Re: When do we plan to move to Linux 3.8?

On 01/07/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 14:06 -0800, John Stultz wrote: Instead of doing the full re-base, I just merged the 3.8-rc2+ tree into the linaro-android-3.7-anton-rebase branch, and the collisions were seemingly manageable. I've only compile test

Re: When do we plan to move to Linux 3.8?

On 01/04/2013 12:19 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 01/04/2013 06:33 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 01/04/2013 02:28 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 15:14 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 4 January 2013 15:09, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: For my part I have prepared a 3.8 branch

Re: When do we plan to move to Linux 3.8?

On 01/04/2013 06:33 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 01/04/2013 02:28 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 15:14 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 4 January 2013 15:09, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: For my part I have prepared a 3.8 branch for vexpress [1] which doesn't yet contain An

Re: [GIT PULL] cpufreq-interactive-gov-master-v1

On 12/19/2012 06:05 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 5 December 2012 09:55, John Stultz wrote: So while I can try to update the linaro-android tree more frequently, maintaining that tree is more of a background task. So when my other commitments consume my attention, sometimes that update frequency

Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 12.12

On 12/13/2012 03:53 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: * Android kernel doesn't compile because of some change in gpu/ion. Even after adding fixes for compilation errors there is crash during booting, so didn't push those fixes. Hey Tushar, After looking at the issues you pointed out, I've got some a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 12.12

On 12/13/2012 03:53 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: * Android kernel doesn't compile because of some change in gpu/ion. Even after adding fixes for compilation errors there is crash during booting, so didn't push those fixes. Tushar: Sorry about this. I'll try to take a look at the compilation is

Re: [GIT PULL] cpufreq-interactive-gov-master-v1

On 12/04/2012 08:10 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 5 December 2012 06:32, John Stultz wrote: Ok, so I've taken the 3.7 rebase tree Anton did while I was on leave and cherry-picked a number of newer changes from the AOSP/android-3.4 branch. This should contain the latest AOSP cpufreq-intera

Re: [GIT PULL] cpufreq-interactive-gov-master-v1

On 12/04/2012 10:47 AM, John Stultz wrote: On 12/04/2012 02:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: Any conclusion to this discussion? I'd really like the latest version of interactive governor to be carried in all Linaro releases (Android and Ubuntu). The one from the Android tree isn't

Re: [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: xt_quota2: Remove extra parameter from netlink_kernel_create

On 11/15/2012 01:17 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Required as per commit 9f00d9776bc5 ("netlink: hide struct module parameter in netlink_kernel_create"). Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera Thanks! Merged into linaro-android-3.7-anton-rebase. -john ___ lina

Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: android: Fix build error because of removal of usb_gadget_controller_number

On 11/15/2012 01:17 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Required as per commit ed9cbda ("usb: gadget: remove usb_gadget_controller_number()"). Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera Thanks! Merged into linaro-android-3.7-anton-rebase. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list

Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: android: Fix build error because of change in composite driver framework

On 11/15/2012 01:17 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- Thanks! Merged into linaro-android-3.7-anton-rebase. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH] gpu: ion: Use RB_CLEAR_NODE instead of rb_init_node

On 11/15/2012 02:02 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: rb_init_node() has been removed from the kernel, use alternate macro. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- This patch also needs to go into android-3.7 tree. Thanks for this. Sorry it took me so long, but I've just now merged this into the linaro-an

Re: [GIT PULL] cpufreq-interactive-gov-master-v1

On 12/04/2012 02:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:30:03PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: [...] How do you suggest to solve these issues? That you, Andrey and the 'the guy maintaining the Android topic' Deepak, is th

Re: [PATCH] merge_config.sh: Add option to specify output dir

On 12/02/2012 11:36 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: Provide a -O option to specify dir to put generated .config Then merge_config.sh does not need to be copied to target dir, for easy re-usage in other script Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao Tested-by: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) Acked-by: John Stultz thanks

Re: [PATCH] merge_config.sh: Add option to specify output dir

On 11/29/2012 06:04 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: Provide a -O option to specify dir to put generated .config This looks ok to me, although you might want to add some extra details in the commit log as to why this is useful. And one minor nit below. thanks -john @@ -100,7 +112,7 @@ for MERGE_FI

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

On 09/10/2012 11:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Would you mind testing the following patch? It seems to resolve the issue, but I've not yet run it through my test suite to make sure it didn't break anything else. No problem, I will try it this evening. Is this problem related to all 32bits arch ?

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Android fixes w.r.t. 3.6 kernel

On 09/10/2012 10:22 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: Ping !!! On 08/31/2012 09:57 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Required for android-3.6 tree. Tushar Behera (2): netfilter: xt_quota2: Move away from NLMSG_PUT() netfilter: xt_quota2: Update parameter list in netlink_kernel_create net/netfilter/xt_q

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

On 09/10/2012 12:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/10/2012 07:14 PM, John Stultz wrote: In the meantime, I'll try to reproduce on my T61. If you could send me your .config, I'd appreciate it. http://pastebin.com/qSxqfdDK The header of the config file shows for a v3.5-rc7 because

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

On 09/07/2012 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/07/2012 07:22 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

appears between v3.5 and v3.6-rc1. It is not easy to reproduce but after taking some time to dig, it seems to appear with this commit: 1e75fa8be9fb61e1af46b5b3b176347a4c958ca1 is the first bad commit commit 1e75fa8be9fb61e1af46b5b3b176347a4c958ca1 Author: John Stultz Date: Fri Jul 13 01:21:53 2012

Re: Call for topic updates and new topics for linux-linaro-core-tracking tree

On 08/10/2012 11:57 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, The linux-linaro-core-tracking tree (llct, see http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=summary for some more details) is planned to be moved to v3.6-rc1 (or v3.6-rc2 if it is out) early next week. There wil

Mumble server having issues?

So I've been having trouble with the mumble server and the behavior is odd enough that I don't think its a problem just on my end. I'm seeing cases where: * Only one of two members in a room can hear me talk * One member could hear both parties talking * I can't hear either of them talk As well

Re: android-3.4 ... / Audit of OOT android code

On 06/10/2012 02:53 AM, Andy Green wrote: On 05/24/2012 11:06 PM, the mail apparently from Andy Green included: Putting it another way if Linaro isn't going to take even a modest amount of care about the OOT Android content making problems in vanilla case, we probably aren't ready to add this l

Re: Git repo for kernel config fragments created

On 06/11/2012 06:14 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: I have created an git repo for the kernel config fragments we produced a while ago, this is at git://git.linaro.org/kernel/configs.git The config-core-tracking branch in this repo is intended to be added to the linux-linaro-core-tracking branch

Re: Are we going to start using config fragments?

On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: I have attached a couple of patches for the config fragments (3.5 removed the PERF_COUNTERS config). Thanks, I'll create a new branch for 3.5 and merge your changes, so they don't get lost

Re: Are we going to start using config fragments?

On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago? (Or did we not reach consensus on that?) I wouldn't say there was a strong consensus. But I think we should push to make it available at an infrastructure level so those w

Re: Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

On 06/01/2012 06:18 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote: If it helps, I am forwarding Tomi's pull request to Florian for 3.5 merge window. I haven't checked very closely, but looks like the fixes are in that pull request. Thanks so much! -john ___ linaro-dev m

Re: Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

On 05/25/2012 07:24 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 19:49 +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, Rob, So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now trying to sort out the following HD

Re: Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

On 05/25/2012 07:24 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 19:49 +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, Rob, So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now trying to sort out the following HD

Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

Hey Arnd, Rob, So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now trying to sort out the following HDMI failure I'm seeing w/ the current 3.5-rc with my Panda Board. [2.973693] omapdss error: HPD IRQ request failed [2.978759] omapdss HDMI error: failed to power o

Re: Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

On 05/24/2012 06:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 24 May 2012, John Stultz wrote: On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot

Re: Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot fails after not finding the root device. Looking at the boot log I'm seeing: omap_hs

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/23/2012 05:25 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 24/05/12 06:42, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Am I right in thinking the issue you're running into here is that your customer has direct expectations for the tree you're maintaining, which makes adding unexpected instability on a vanilla

Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot fails after not finding the root device. Looking at the boot log I'm seeing: omap_hsmmc: probe of omap_hsmmc.0 failed with error -22 With

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/21/2012 09:21 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 22/05/12 01:58, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33:47AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: like Andy, I am a bit concerned that we merge the android stuff into the linaro-core and that we get android candies in 'va

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/17/2012 09:00 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 18/05/12 09:49, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree re-adds some items like earlysuspend

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/21/2012 03:27 AM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andy Green > wrote: So I just wanted to check first with folks to make sure there are no objections to merging in the -compat changes, and that the

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/18/2012 06:57 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: On 17 May 2012 22:09, Zach Pfeffer wrote: On 17 May 2012 20:49, John Stultz wrote: Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tr

android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree re-adds some items like earlysuspend and classic wakelocks in order to provide better compatibility with old (and by old, I really mean

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On 05/07/2012 02:09 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: 07.05.2012 09:05, Andy Green написал: Since it's still there in today's llct and making me see double, I tracked it down to this from Androidization series 109a3af ARM: Make low-level printk work Author: Tony Lindgren Date: Mon May 9 14:10:26

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

On 05/03/2012 09:31 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Sorry for the delay. I've updated the linux-linaro-core-tracking, but it curr

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

On 05/03/2012 09:16 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 05/03/2012 08:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: So Andrey mailed me that there was a conflict between Linus' v3.4-rc5 and the Android tree, but when I went to updated the tree sort it out, v.3.4-rc5 merged in without any issues. I suspec

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

merge conflicts; guess later today. Is the resolution simple enough? Otherwise, feels that the better scalable approach is that the topic owner (e.g. John Stultz for the time being) gets notified and asked to fix the merge conflict on his side. Your daily merge scripts would then pick it up automati

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On 04/24/2012 08:24 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 04/25/2012 11:12 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: We're still undergoing uplevel on tilt-tracking and didn't get back to tilt-3.3 functionality yet (OMAP4 boot is busted, although hopefully we have a fix for that today), so I put off th

Re: Fix for Ubuntu networking [Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree]

On 04/19/2012 04:03 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:17 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:22 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 00:22 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, I updated (overwrote) the current linux-linaro t

Re: Linaro 12.04 3.4-rc1 based androidization branch is available

On 04/13/2012 03:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Hi John When using the linaro-android-3.4 branch the mouse buttons don't seem to work. I've tracked the problem down to something you fixed in linaro-android-3.4-jstultz-rebase, namely: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/android.git;a

3.4 based config-fragment tree for 12.04

Hey Andrey, I rebased the config-fragment tree to 3.4-rc2, and you can find it here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-configs-3.4 Let me know if you run into any issues. thanks -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@

Re: Linaro 12.04 3.4-rc1 based androidization branch is available

On 04/09/2012 03:18 PM, John Stultz wrote: I went ahead and forward ported the AOSP-3.3 tree to 3.4-rc1. You can grab it here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-android-3.4-jstultz-rebase Sigh. Looks like the Google devs are following close behind and released their own

Linaro 12.04 3.4-rc1 based androidization branch is available

I went ahead and forward ported the AOSP-3.3 tree to 3.4-rc1. You can grab it here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-android-3.4-jstultz-rebase thanks -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists

qemu & hardware gfx acceleration

So the Google Android team just posted this: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/hsDu/~3/OCt1AQzfyWI/faster-emulator-with-better-hardware.html Which shows their device emulator running w/ hardware acceleration. Since I know they started with qemu, I was curious if there was any details as

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 04/02/2012 11:58 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:18 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 04/02/2012 10:29 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:37 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: We almost certainly need board

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 04/02/2012 06:58 AM, Andy Green wrote: On 04/02/2012 09:40 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 21:10 +0800, Andy Green wrote: If you want to do it with this complex directory scheme, please don't so anything to the definitive sources that makes it mandatory.

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 04/02/2012 10:29 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:37 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: We almost certainly need board specific android and ubuntu fragments as well, so I'll add vexpress-android.conf and vexpress-ubuntu

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:15 -0700, John Stultz wrote: In that case, just go ahead and push the full config to the config tree. If we need to do have fullly-enabled vs upstream builds we can deal with the warnings in the latter case (or maybe

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/30/2012 12:00 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Right, some of the config options should better move to the feature branches. I have cleaned up origen.conf so that we can now boot linux-linaro-tracking kernel till the console. Code dropped at [1]. With the help of a couple of patches[2], I was abl

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 03/30/2012 10:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:33 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/30/2012 01:19 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: To do that the vexpress config fragment will need to be a topic branch on the ARM Landing Teams git, and every topic which changes a

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express [ was: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel]

On 03/30/2012 01:19 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:00 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/29/2012 02:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: John, I've attached a config fragment for Versatile Express. Great! I've merged that in! There's a few warnings though:

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/29/2012 09:57 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: The new log messages are because of this config entry. CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y But the information is useful, hence better it stays that way. Yea. The lockdep output is super useful for catching really hard to trigger bugs. Take those warnings seri

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 09:37 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/28/2012 10:17 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: I have not validated the changes in android.conf, but by merging linaro-base.conf and origen.conf, I was able to boot my kernel the way I would have expected

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express [ was: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel]

On 03/29/2012 02:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose me

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 09:37 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/28/2012 10:17 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pa

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 06:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Sorry, there's a bug in the ubuntu config, CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR should be 32768, not 0. Thanks! I'll make sure that gets fixed. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 01:48 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote: Hi John, On 26 March 2012 20:20, John Stultz <mailto:john.stu...@linaro.org>> wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 06:40 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote: I suspect we'll need an ubuntu specific fragment as well as all the other board fragments. The Ubuntu packaging scripts check that various config options are set, using these I have cr

[RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, and doing so early so we can make sure that all the desired config options are present in

Re: Call for topics for the 12.03 release of linux-linaro kernel

On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 00:07 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > I've pushed the baseline for the 12.03 linux-linaro kernel tree to > git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro branch. > > Currently this is v3.3-rc6 plus: > - 4 topics from the ARM LT > - few c

Re: Initial Linaro+Android kernel for 12.02 is available

On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:19 -0600, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Paul, > > Would you get Andrey setup to push to android.git.linaro.org? > > We should name it > > kernel/kwg.git > > Sound good with everyone? Why not reuse the existing kernel/linaro-android.git ? thanks -john __

Re: Initial Linaro+Android kernel for 12.02 is available

On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 00:16 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > The tree is here: > git://git.linaro.org/people/ynk/linux-linaro-tracking.git > branch: linaro-android > tag: linux-linaro-3.3-rc3-2012.02-1-android-0 Zach, now that Andrey is running the kernel show, you might need to ge

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 04:32 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > Ah, very interesting. > > dmesg | grep clock > [0.00] OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER1 at 32768 Hz > [0.00] sched_clock: 32 bits at 32kHz, resolution > 30517ns, wraps every 131071999ms Hr

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 04:32 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > Ah, very interesting. > > dmesg | grep clock > [0.00] OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER1 at 32768 Hz > [0.00] sched_clock: 32 bits at 32kHz, resolution > 30517ns, wraps every 131071999ms Hr

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 21:21 -0800, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > BTW, I have no ideas why clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME,...) returns {0, 1} > regardless of underlying clock source. I expect {0, 30517} for 32K timer > and {0, 26} for MPU timer. Yea. I had proposed to export the underlying clocksource's res

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:21 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Stultz wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > > Hrm. No, that shouldn't be the case. CLOCK_MONOTONIC and > > CLOCK_REALTIME > > are driv

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > On 02/07/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'm experiencing what appears to be a minimum clock resolution issue in > > using clock_gettime() on a PandaBoard ES running ubuntu. > > > > *> uname -r* > >

Re: [PATCH] hrtimers, timers: eliminate some jiffies-backed code

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 19:40 +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > This patch provides an attempt to get away from jiffies in msleep() > and msleep_interruptible() to hrtimers-backed usleep_range() and > usleep_range_interruptible(). Both of the latter now returns an amount > of microseconds really spent i

Re: Problems with timers with linux-next on snowball

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:06 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > > [Me] > >>> It is easy to reproduce with 'time sleep 1' where the timer expires 1, 2 > >>> or 3 seconds later. > >>> > >>> It seems that does not happen with linux-linaro-3.1 but I

Initial Linaro+Android kernel for 11.12 is available

Zach reminded me that this month is compressed, so a linaro+android kernel would be needed immediately for 11.12. As Andrey is just ramping up in taking over for the Linaro Android kernel maintenance, I wanted to just get a kernel out, using the older kernel workflow, so that we had someth

Linaro Android Kernel Release for Nov 2011

Just following the release of the linux-linaro-3.1-20011.11-0 tag being made, I've updated the Linaro+Android tree. I've tagged it as: linux-linaro-3.1-2011.11-0-android-1 >From the branch: git://android.git.linaro.org/kernel/linaro-android.git linaro-android-3.1-agreen-rebase thanks -john

Initial linaro-android-3.1 kernel for 11.11

Just wanted to announce that the initial Linaro+Android-3.1 kernel for 11.11 is available. I've tagged it as: linux-linaro-3.1-2011.11-0-android-0 >From the branch: git://android.git.linaro.org/kernel/linaro-android.git linaro-android-3.1-agreen-rebase Please remember Nico is freezing the 11.11

Re: Linaro Kernel October 2011 Release

On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 03:11 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the > availability our October 2011 development snapshot: > > linux-linaro-3.1-2011.10-1 > > As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels > and have not

  1   2   >