I just came back from Share and we would like to try to bring up Linux
on an lpar on our z9. I was told to remove all of the dasd except what
Linux would be using. What else should or should not be included in this
IOCDS? Anything else that might prove helpful?
We plan to try this with CentOS-5.
On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
I just came back from Share and we would like to try to bring up Linux
on an lpar on our z9. I was told to remove all of the dasd except what
Linux would be using. What else should or should not be included in
this
IOCDS? Anything e
Hi,
You will also need your OSA cards and maybe some tape addresses. Are you going
to be using native Lpar or zVM?
Regards,
-Jose
-Original Message-
From: Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 1:14 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: IO
For now, native with hopes of selling VM.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Message-
From: José L. Ramírez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 1:21 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.ED
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adam Thornton
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: IOCDS for Redhat
>
>
> On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
>
> > I just
> For now, native with hopes of selling VM.
IBM will loan you VM for a "trial", generally for free if you ask
nicely. You'll waste a lot of time and effort getting Linux working in
LPAR for no gain, and you lose a lot of the cool factor by only being
able to create one Linux system.
Talk to your
> No offense to the OP, but this is likely
> to be especially true of a shop which is trying out CentOS instead of
> SUSE or RHEL.
Since both Novell and RH offer downloadable trial versions, it doesn't
make a lot of sense to mess with CentOS if you're seriously considering
production use. Just do
To directly answer your question:
1. Remove anything you don't want to give to the Linux test system. After
all, if you don't know what you are doing (that is what a test system is for),
then the Linux image, may be told to take and use devices that the production
system(s) want.
2. Remove
*) I've been trying to that VM "trial" for several weeks. IBM has not
been helpful. If I ever get it, I'll have to learn VM but that's OK with
me.
*) I was not able to find a RHEL trial, I'll go look again.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD
> *) I've been trying to that VM "trial" for several weeks. IBM has not
> been helpful. If I ever get it, I'll have to learn VM but that's OK
with
> me.
I've forwarded your note to a couple IBMers who should be able to crack
something loose for you. If not, they'll find out why.
Also, there's pr
Don't forget to come along to the HILLGANG meetings where you'll find
other people doing or have done what you're doing.
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, David Boyes wrote:
> Also, there's probably some one around DC who'll spare you a morning
> to
> get you started on your VM install and ops. I
zVM is definitively the way to go, our experience in zVM was none and still we
were able to install/configure zVM without major problems. If your are still
going to use CentOS instead of RedHat or SUSE you may want to take a look at
the following RedBook, it's oriented to RedHat so it should als
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 1:33 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bauer, Bobby
(NIH/CIT) [E]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *) I've been trying to that VM "trial" for several weeks. IBM has not
> been helpful. If I ever get it, I'll have to learn VM but that's OK with
> me.
I can get that fix
I've no problem with the but our Linux guys use Red Hat on the
other servers. Since it's an uphill swim already, I've gotta go with the
path of least resistance.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Messa
I have a default VSWITCH defined and connected to my OSA express card. z/VM 5.2.
The following userids are coupled to the VSWITCH. Q vswitch detail output at
end of note.
TCPIP (142.214.154.50)
LINUX02 (142.214.154.42) (SLES10)
SLES10 (142.214.154.51) (SLES10)
LINUX04 (142.214.154.44) (SELS10)
LI
Ok finally got it.
The default in SLES10 is "sftp" i.e. encrypted FTP.
I tested it for a whileI think I will figure out how to go back to ftp.
FTP from my PC to Linux with my 100 Mb card in the PC, use to take 90% of the
card and perhaps 5% cpu utilization of my IFL.
SFTP from my PC to Li
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 3:26 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: I'm starting to tailor SLES10 with SP1.
>
>
> Ok finally got it.
>
> The default in SLES10 is "sftp"
Hi,
In the past I had a similar problem but don't really remember if I was still on
zVM 4.4 or zVM 5.2. The problem was fixed after applying the latest maintenance
to zVM.
Regards,
-Jose
-Original Message-
From: Hans Rempel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:13
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 4:34 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "McKown,
John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> From what I recall, OpenSSH does
> not use the built in crypto engines on a System z, which is why it takes
> so much CPU. I think that ftps can use the crypto engines, if you h
The link to the Red Hat trial is:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/details/eval/
Shoot me a note after you fill out that form and I'll get the request
expedited.
-Brad
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 14:14 -0400, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
> I've no problem with the but our Linux guys use Red Hat on th
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 4:12 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hans Rempel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a default VSWITCH defined and connected to my OSA express card. z/VM
> 5.2.
>
> The following userids are coupled to the VSWITCH. Q vswitch detail output at
> end of note.
>
> T
> OpenSSH will if you configure OpenSSL to use libica from IBM.
Are you SURE? After I got OpenSSL using libica correctly, I spent about
three months trying to make it work with OpenSSH and never got anywhere.
Do you have a recipe?
ok
r.
-
Thought I'd ask if any of you have done this?
Although it looks like it works correctly and the logs have no complaints
registered, the directory in
/opt/IBM/WebSphere/AppServer/properties/version/ does not contain a
sdk.FP6109.ptf file as expected. Java -verion returns the correct results.
PMR
... Sorry - trying again without stupid digital signature stuff
Thought I'd ask if any of you have done this?
Although it looks like it works correctly and the logs have no
complaints
registered, the directory in
/opt/IBM/WebSphere/AppServer/properties/version/ does not contain a
sdk.FP6109.
Afternoon,
I was running out of space on '/', so I followed the procedure to move part of
a file system to another volume. I successfully moved /usr to a new volume.
It mounted successfully, so I updated /etc/fstab following the procedure. All
was good. So I shut down and rebooted. Dur
Afternoon again,
During a reboot this afternoon, I received a message stating that it had been
143 days since /dev/dasd?1 had been checked. Check forced.
This occurred for all the physical /dev/dasd?1 drives, the two small LVM
groups, and some of the special directories.
Is this normal
This is normal for EXT2 filesystems. I don't know if this also happens on EXT3.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Stuart
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:26 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Forced Disk Check During Boot
Afternoon
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 7:26 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-snip-
> During a reboot this afternoon, I received a message stating that it had
> been 143 days since /dev/dasd?1 had been checked. Check forced.
-snip-
> Is this normal? I don't re
Thanks Alan and Mark,
I think I'll leave things as they are for now. But now I know they're
considered normal.
Thanks,
Dave
Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Mark Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/20/2007 4:34 PM >>>
>>>
The first batch of Linux and z/VM presentations from SHARE 109 in San Diego are
now up on the linuxvm.org web site. Thanks to all the speakers who went to
SHARE and contributed their presentations to the community.
You can view them at http://linuxvm.org/present/#share109
SessPresenter
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 5:20 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Stricklin, Raymond J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OpenSSH will if you configure OpenSSL to use libica from IBM.
>
> Are you SURE? After I got OpenSSL using libica correctly, I spent about
> three months trying to make it w
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 7:19 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-snip-
> I was running out of space on '/', so I followed the procedure to move part
> of a file system to another volume. I successfully moved /usr to a new
> volume. It mounted succe
I do this to provide OSA failover for the TCP/IP stack. It's easier
than configuring VIPA.
Mark Post wrote:
I'm going to keep looking at your note, but I'm a little concerned that you
have the TCPIP userid coupled to the VSWITCH. It may be confusing things. Was
there a particular reason yo
33 matches
Mail list logo
