True, but mine is how you might speak it.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 4:59 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
> Right .. the brain is faster than the fingers
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
Right .. the brain is faster than the fingers..
HHO ?
My configuration reflects the structure of the molecule.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:01 PM
To: LINUX-39
The whole CBU licensing thing likely takes care of those
complications...
But then again, I try to stay far far from that fun.
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not u
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Chase, John wrote:
> Background: Our warm-site machine is a z/890 in CBU configuration,
> currently "maxed out" with GP engines; hence we cannot now add an IFL to
> it.
>
> A proposed z/VM / Linux POC is being delayed because an "IBM rep"
> apparently told one of our decision-
Absolutely wrong. The licensing is more complex for z/VM on standard
engines, but there is no technical restrictions. Both run without problems
on IFL or standard engines.
On 12/4/08 3:10 PM, "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Background: Our warm-site machine is a z/890 in CBU configur
+1
Marcy Cortes wrote:
We run all of our z9 in CBU with GP engines only.
Makes no difference whatsoever to VM or Linux.
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use,
Sounds like a seriously misinformed person ;)
Patrick Carroll | Enterprise Architect
L.L.Bean, Inc.(r) | Double L St. | Freeport ME 04033
http://www.llbean.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 207.552.2426
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ch
We run our zLinux images on a GP, sub-GP at that. We have experienced no
technical issues.
Michael
From: "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 3:10:33 PM
Subject: z/VM and Linux on GP engines
Background
Very clean! I know what you would like to say!
> So, regarding "Linux can't run on a GP engine", would one or more of
you
> please affirm or refute that statement? Expound as you deem
> appropriate, but "keep it clean". :-)
Linux runs just fine on standard CPs as well as IFLs. We need to fin
We run all of our z9 in CBU with GP engines only.
Makes no difference whatsoever to VM or Linux.
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take a
>>> On 12/4/2008 at 3:10 PM, "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> So, regarding "Linux can't run on a GP engine", would one or more of you
> please affirm or refute that statement? Expound as you deem
> appropriate, but "keep it clean". :-)
Linux runs just fine on standard CPs as
Background: Our warm-site machine is a z/890 in CBU configuration,
currently "maxed out" with GP engines; hence we cannot now add an IFL to
it.
A proposed z/VM / Linux POC is being delayed because an "IBM rep"
apparently told one of our decision-makers that Linux "can't run on a GP
engine", and w
Couple it with a bastion guest that provides ssh access to a command line,
and there's your console server. Should shut up much whining from Unix
admins -- just as discussed here months ago...8-).
I should probably borrow some code from Zebra and make it look just like a
Cisco terminal server, whi
It looks like we'll soon have another tool in our kit for fixing network
problems with our
Linux guests when they have difficulty connecting to the net; thanks to the
developers at
IBM Germany. No more sed or rpl invocations from the 3270 console.
Original Message
Subject:
Am Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:59:30 -0500
schrieb Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I can represent IBM with respect to z/VM: IBM is not getting rid of z/VM
> in favor of KVM.
>
> IBM is fully aware of KVM and it's potential intersection with z/VM should
> a System z version ever emerge. It does not in
Right .. the brain is faster than the fingers..
HHO ?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:01 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
> Are the rep's initials HOO? as i
On Wednesday, 12/03/2008 at 02:01 EST, Shawn Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Come on now, haven't you heard the Mainframe is dead? ;)
>
> While I certainly can't speak for entire companies, I'm aware not aware
> of any such efforts.
I can represent IBM with respect to z/VM: IBM is not getting
17 matches
Mail list logo