]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Another distribution question
Not entirely we think:
LSB does help in the the layout for scripts, like /usr/local/xxx for
sendmail and /etc/init.d etc, but the two main distros we
certify Rh adv
srv and SuSE SLES both seemingly will have differences in the
near future
in respects to libs, SLES will be taking an
All,
I'm about ready to put up our first linux lpar, and have another question
or two.
This question is causing alot of confusion for us. We are getting ready
to
put up SuSe linux, and also want to put up a couple of relevent
applications
to actually do a pilot test. When an vendor
There are lots of examples of customers using DB2 on Linux for S/390. Feel
free to contact me for more information.
One of the largest motivating factors involved in getting vendors to port
their code to Linux for S/390 is customers. Jim Elliott can certainly tell
you if and when, but if it
/Corporate/Spartan)
Subject:Re: Another distribution question
There are lots of examples of customers using DB2 on Linux for S/390. Feel
free to contact me for more information.
One of the largest motivating factors involved in getting vendors to port
their code to Linux for S/390
Java aside, applications written to run on Linux are source code compatible, not
binary compatible. In the case of most commercial programs, where source code is
generally not available to customers, you depend on the source code owner to compile
and test their code for each new Linux platform.
Or is this another black-eye for the mainframe(like Unix
System Services was from a pure UNIX perspective) where
it's not quite ready for prime-time, and is just different enough that
there
are not enough apps available yet.
I think Linux is progressing much faster than USS did in its infancy.
I wouldn't take that for granted. If it doesn't specifically mention Linux
for S/390, ask the vendor (or see if Jim responds).
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 08:26 am, you wrote:
Rich,
Thanks for the response. You didn't answer my question however.
The question was, if a vendor app says it is
:
|
| Subject: Re: Another distribution question
|
--|
Rich,
Thanks
]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Another distribution question
All,
I'm about ready to put up our first linux lpar, and have another question
or two.
This question is causing alot of confusion for us. We are getting ready
to
put up SuSe linux
This question is causing alot of confusion for us. We are
getting ready
to
put up SuSe linux, and also want to put up a couple of relevent
applications
to actually do a pilot test. When an vendor application says it is
certified
to run on SuSe(or Redhat) distribution, does that mean it
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dave Jousma wrote:
Rich,
Thanks for the response. You didn't answer my question however.
The question was, if a vendor app says it is certified to run on SuSe
linux, can it run on SuSe linux on any of the supported SuSe
Linux platforms? For example, for INFORMIX,
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dave Jousma wrote:
Thanks all for the responses. For us, this is a chicken and egg thing.
We are just testing the waters, so to speak, so we are not ready to
call any vendor(s) to see if they will play in the 390 environment.
You have answered my question, though. The
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another distribution question
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dave Jousma wrote:
Thanks all for the responses
-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another distribution question
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dave Jousma wrote:
Thanks all for the responses. For us
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Gregg C Levine wrote:
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Something else we need to consider here. Why would each distributor
actually distribute the freely available version of say, sendmail, and
not insist on certification for it? John, if it wasn't certified then,
it sure as
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another distribution question
We do certifiy through normal QA process SuSE SLES, RH Adv Srv for
example
on Intel systems, and SuSE SLES on zSeries, this is the commercial
products, and I mention this because the thread started about Oracle
from
what I read
dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another distribution question
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Jon R. Doyle wrote:
We do certifiy through normal QA process SuSE SLES, RH Adv Srv for example
on Intel systems, and SuSE SLES on zSeries, this is the commercial
products, and I mention this because the thread started about Oracle from
what I read. Oracle has several
Not entirely we think:
LSB does help in the the layout for scripts, like /usr/local/xxx for
sendmail and /etc/init.d etc, but the two main distros we certify Rh adv
srv and SuSE SLES both seemingly will have differences in the near future
in respects to libs, SLES will be taking an approach with
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 23:16, David Boyes wrote:
Does the introduction of the LSB and the informal certification scripts
for LSB 1.x compliance address this at all? I'm thinking that if the
application is written to be LSB x.y compliant, then it should work and
be supportable on other LSB x.y
21 matches
Mail list logo
