Re: [wiki] Please clarify how to check whether barriers are properly implemented in hardware

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:07:01PM +, Hugo Mills wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Fedja Beader wrote: > > Is there some testing utility for this? Is there a way to extract this/tell > > with a high enough certainty from datasheets/other material before purchase? > >

Re: [wiki] Please clarify how to check whether barriers are properly implemented in hardware

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Fedja Beader wrote: > Is there some testing utility for this? Is there a way to extract this/tell > with a high enough certainty from datasheets/other material before purchase? Given that not implementing barriers is basically a bug in the hardware

[wiki] Please clarify how to check whether barriers are properly implemented in hardware

Is there some testing utility for this? Is there a way to extract this/tell with a high enough certainty from datasheets/other material before purchase? https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#How_does_this_happen.3F -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"

Wiki updates

Hi, I've updated the Status page and synced the manual pages from btrfs-progs git. The status of various features is split to one more column, Performance. There's a section for each 'mostly OK' status below the table and linked from the note. This will hopefully be more understandable than just

Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:19:14AM +, Alberto Bursi wrote: > Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too. > > The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why > it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs. Regarding dead li

Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:33:21PM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote: > 2017-09-12 12:19 GMT+03:00 Alberto Bursi <alberto.bu...@outlook.it>: > > Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too. > > > > The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead l

Re: dead links in wiki about why not using lz4

2017-09-12 12:19 GMT+03:00 Alberto Bursi <alberto.bu...@outlook.it>: > Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too. > > The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why > it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs. > >

dead links in wiki about why not using lz4

Since zstd was added in btrfs there are people wondering why not lz4 too. The wiki paragraph [1] cites a couple dead links as explanations on why it's not a good idea to have lz4 in btrfs. I think it would be nice if someone can write that information back in the wiki, or for the very least

Re: Btrfs wiki account

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:46:17PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 07:35:24PM +0800, chou Dai wrote: > > Hi,I wanted to add some content and edit some content to wiki,but I > > made a registration two week ago(Account Name:Dai chou) . Now, I still > > can

Re: Btrfs wiki account

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 07:35:24PM +0800, chou Dai wrote: > Hi,I wanted to add some content and edit some content to wiki,but I > made a registration two week ago(Account Name:Dai chou) . Now, I still > cannot register, through registration request expired already. And > Btrfs wiki sa

Btrfs wiki account

Hi,I wanted to add some content and edit some content to wiki,but I made a registration two week ago(Account Name:Dai chou) . Now, I still cannot register, through registration request expired already. And Btrfs wiki says"Just drop a mail on linux kernel btrfs mailing list with an approp

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:38:36PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > >>I'm not sure if the brfsck is really all that helpful to user as much > >>as it is for developers to better learn about the failure vectors of > >>the file system. > > > >ReiserFS had no working fsck for all of the 8 years I

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-19 14:27, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: ReiserFS had no working fsck for all of the 8 years I used it (and still didn't last year when I tried to use it on an old disk). "Not working" here means "much less

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: >> ReiserFS had no working fsck for all of the 8 years I used it (and still >> didn't last year when I tried to use it on an old disk). "Not working" >> here means "much less data is readable from the filesystem

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-19 00:08, Zygo Blaxell wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Right, well I'm vaguely curious why ZFS, as different as it is, basically take the position that if the hardware went so batshit that they can't unwind it on a normal mount, then an fsck

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:32:14AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2016-09-18 23:47, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:56:03PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > >>4. File Range Cloning and Out-of-band Dedupe: Similarly, work fine if the FS > >>is healthy. > > > >I've

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:08:55AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > > At the end of the day I'm not sure fsck really matters. If the filesystem > is getting corrupted enough that both copies of metadata are broken, > there's something fundamentally wrong with that setup (hardware bugs, > software

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-18 22:57, Zygo Blaxell wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:00:44AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: To be entirely honest, both zero-log and super-recover could probably be pretty easily integrated into btrfs check such that it detects when they need to be run and does so. zero-log

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-18 23:47, Zygo Blaxell wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:56:03PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: 4. File Range Cloning and Out-of-band Dedupe: Similarly, work fine if the FS is healthy. I've found issues with OOB dedup (clone/extent-same): 1. Don't dedup data that has not been

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Right, well I'm vaguely curious why ZFS, as different as it is, > basically take the position that if the hardware went so batshit that > they can't unwind it on a normal mount, then an fsck probably can't > help either... they still

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:56:03PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > 4. File Range Cloning and Out-of-band Dedupe: Similarly, work fine if the FS > is healthy. I've found issues with OOB dedup (clone/extent-same): 1. Don't dedup data that has not been committed--either call fsync() on it, or

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:00:44AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > To be entirely honest, both zero-log and super-recover could probably be > pretty easily integrated into btrfs check such that it detects when they > need to be run and does so. zero-log has a very well defined situation in >

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-15 17:23, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 14:20 -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: 3. Fsck should be needed only for un-mountable filesystems. Ideally, we should be handling things like Windows does. Preform slightly better checking when reading data, and if

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-15 16:26, Chris Murphy wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Hugo Mills wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: 2. We're developing new features

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 14:20 -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > 3. Fsck should be needed only for un-mountable filesystems.  Ideally, > we  > should be handling things like Windows does.  Preform slightly > better  > checking when reading data, and if we see an error, flag the > filesystem  > for

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Hugo Mills wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn >> wrote: >> >> > 2. We're developing new features without making sure that check

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:02:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn > wrote: > > > 2. We're developing new features without making sure that check can fix > > issues in any associated metadata. Part of merging a new

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > 2. We're developing new features without making sure that check can fix > issues in any associated metadata. Part of merging a new feature needs to > be proving that fsck can handle fixing any issues in the

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-15 14:01, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2016-09-12 16:08, Chris Murphy wrote: - btrfsck status e.g. btrfs-progs 4.7.2 still warns against using --repair, and lists it under dangerous options also; while

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2016-09-12 16:08, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> - btrfsck status >> e.g. btrfs-progs 4.7.2 still warns against using --repair, and lists >> it under dangerous options also; while that's true, Btrfs can't be >>

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 02:44:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Just to cut yourself some slack, you could skip 3.14 because it's EOL > now, and just go from 4.4. Don't the btrfs-tools used to create the filesystem also play a huge role in this game? Greetings Marc --

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

Am Dienstag, 13. September 2016, 07:28:38 CEST schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn: > On 2016-09-12 16:44, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > >> Am Montag, 12. September 2016, 23:21:09 CEST schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen: > >>> On Mon, Sep

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-12 16:08, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: Things listed as TBD status: 1. Seeding: Seems to work fine the couple of times I've tested it, however I've only done very light testing, and the whole feature is

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

16, 18:27:47 CEST schrieb David Sterba: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:27:14PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: I therefore would like to propose that some sort of feature / stability matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably somewhere where it is easy to find. It would be nice to archi

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-13 04:38, Timofey Titovets wrote: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status I suggest to mark RAID1/10 as 'mostly ok' as on btrfs RAID1/10 is safe to data, but not for application that uses it. i.e. it not hide I/O error even if it's can be masked.

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status I suggest to mark RAID1/10 as 'mostly ok' as on btrfs RAID1/10 is safe to data, but not for application that uses it. i.e. it not hide I/O error even if it's can be masked. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg56739.html /* Retest it with

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:57:17PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Great. I made to minor adaption. I added a link to the Status page to my warning in before the kernel log by feature page. And I also mentioned that at the time the page was last updated the latest

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

EST schrieb David Sterba: >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:27:14PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> > > > > I therefore would like to propose that some sort of feature / >> > > > > stability >> > > > > matrix for the latest kernel is added

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

wrote: > > > > > I therefore would like to propose that some sort of feature / > > > > > stability > > > > > matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably > > > > > somewhere > > > > > where it is easy to find. It wou

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

bility > > > > matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably somewhere > > > > where it is easy to find. It would be nice to archive old matrix'es as > > > > well in case someone runs on a bit older kernel (we who use Debian tend > > > >

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > > Things listed as TBD status: > 1. Seeding: Seems to work fine the couple of times I've tested it, however > I've only done very light testing, and the whole feature is pretty much > undocumented. Mostly OK.

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

Am Montag, 12. September 2016, 18:27:47 CEST schrieb David Sterba: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:27:14PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > > > I therefore would like to propose that some sort of feature / stability > > > matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

eature / stability matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably somewhere where it is easy to find. It would be nice to archive old matrix'es as well in case someone runs on a bit older kernel (we who use Debian tend to like older kernels). In my opinion it would make things bit

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

some sort of feature / stability >>>> matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably somewhere >>>> where it is easy to find. It would be nice to archive old matrix'es as >>>> well in case someone runs on a bit older kernel (we who use Debian tend >>&g

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On 2016-09-12 12:27, David Sterba wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:27:14PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: I therefore would like to propose that some sort of feature / stability matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably somewhere where it is easy to find. It would be nice

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:27:14PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > > I therefore would like to propose that some sort of feature / stability > > matrix for the latest kernel is added to the wiki preferably somewhere > > where it is easy to find. It would be nice to arc

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:06:47AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On 25 April 2016 at 07:36, David Sterba wrote: > > The conversion looks relatively ok, indentation could be 2 spaces and > > all bullet lists with '*'. Thanks. > > Done. I also added one line before each new

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

On 25 April 2016 at 07:36, David Sterba wrote: > The conversion looks relatively ok, indentation could be 2 spaces and > all bullet lists with '*'. Thanks. Done. I also added one line before each new version. I've attached it, since it's just one file; however, if you prefer I

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

rfs-progs > >> changelog is located > > > > At the moment it's the release announcement in this mailinglist, that > > gets copied to the wiki with some formatting adjustments. I'm willing to > > copy the announcement text to a file in git (and will do for the next

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

oops, that gzip -9 shouldn't be there :-/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

ncement in this mailinglist, that > gets copied to the wiki with some formatting adjustments. I'm willing to > copy the announcement text to a file in git (and will do for the next > release). But at the moment I won't add all the past changelogs so if > anybody wants to do that I'l appr

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:41:36PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > I'm just wondering where the primary location of the btrfs-progs > changelog is located, because I'd like to include upstream changes in > the Debian package. Is it really the wiki? If so, it would seem my

Re: primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

Nicholas D Steeves posted on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:41:36 -0400 as excerpted: > I'm just wondering where the primary location of the btrfs-progs > changelog is located, because I'd like to include upstream changes in > the Debian package. Is it really the wiki? If so, it would seem my

primary location of btrfs-progs changelog: The wiki?

Hi, I'm just wondering where the primary location of the btrfs-progs changelog is located, because I'd like to include upstream changes in the Debian package. Is it really the wiki? If so, it would seem my options are copying+pasting with every release, or writing a script to download the page

Re: Btrfs wiki account

one more tool for incremental backups to wiki, but accidentally had typo in email at registration. Now, more than one month after I still can't register, though registration request should expire already. Does anyone have access to fix that? Can't find any contacts of person who supports wiki

Re: Btrfs wiki account

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 03:21:53AM +0200, Nazar Mokrynskyi wrote: I wanted to add one more tool for incremental backups to wiki, but accidentally had typo in email at registration. Now, more than one month after I still can't register, though registration request should expire already. Does

Btrfs wiki account

I wanted to add one more tool for incremental backups to wiki, but accidentally had typo in email at registration. Now, more than one month after I still can't register, though registration request should expire already. Does anyone have access to fix that? Can't find any contacts of person who

Btrfs wiki account

I wanted to add one more tool for incremental backups to wiki, but accidentally had typo in email at registration. Now, more than one month after I still can't register, though registration request should expire already. Does anyone have access to fix that? Can't find any contacts of person who

Re: ext4 convert bugs, wiki warning?

On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 02:48:41PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote: On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 11:29:40AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about btrfs-convert problems? I

ext4 convert bugs, wiki warning?

Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about btrfs-convert problems? I don't think it needs to be a lengthy write up since the scope of the problem is not clear yet. But since there's definitely reproduced problems that have been going on for some time now maybe it'd

Re: ext4 convert bugs, wiki warning?

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote: On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 11:29:40AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about btrfs-convert problems? I don't think it needs to be a lengthy write up since the scope

Re: ext4 convert bugs, wiki warning?

On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 11:29:40AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about btrfs-convert problems? I don't think it needs to be a lengthy write up since the scope of the problem is not clear yet. But since there's definitely reproduced

Re: Wiki suggestions

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 07:33:13PM +0200, Marc Joliet wrote: Am Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:21:54 +0200 schrieb Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de: OK, I'll make the changes then (sans kernel log). Just a heads up: I accepted the terms of service, but the link goes to a non-existent wiki page. I have

Re: Wiki suggestions

Am Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:56:17 + (UTC) schrieb Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net: Marc Joliet posted on Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:26:04 +0200 as excerpted: I hope it's not out of place, but I have a few suggestions for the Wiki: Just in case it wasn't obvious... The wiki is open to user editing

Re: Wiki suggestions

Am Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:21:54 +0200 schrieb Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de: OK, I'll make the changes then (sans kernel log). Just a heads up: I accepted the terms of service, but the link goes to a non-existent wiki page. -- Marc Joliet -- People who think they know everything really annoy those

Re: Wiki suggestions

: I hope it's not out of place, but I have a few suggestions for the Wiki: Just in case it wasn't obvious... The wiki is open to user editing. You can, if you like, get an account and make the changes yourself. =:^) Of course, it's understandable if your reaction to web and wiki

Re: Wiki suggestions

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:18:27PM +0200, Marc Joliet wrote: Am Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:56:17 + (UTC) schrieb Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net: Marc Joliet posted on Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:26:04 +0200 as excerpted: I hope it's not out of place, but I have a few suggestions for the Wiki

Re: Wiki suggestions

Marc Joliet posted on Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:26:04 +0200 as excerpted: I hope it's not out of place, but I have a few suggestions for the Wiki: Just in case it wasn't obvious... The wiki is open to user editing. You can, if you like, get an account and make the changes yourself. =:^) Of course

Wiki suggestions

Hi, I hope it's not out of place, but I have a few suggestions for the Wiki: - The presentation NYLUG Presents: Chris Mason on Btrfs (May 14th 2015) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3QRWUfBua8 would make a nice addition to the Articles, presentations, podcasts section. - The same goes

Compression: effect of chattr: wiki is contradictory

On the wiki, it first speaks about forcing compression by adding the c attribute, but later states that the c attribute enables, not forces compression. Which is it? =from wiki: Can I force compression on a file without using the compress mount option

Re: the wiki?

Hi Dave, you should forward your question directly to kernel.org webmaster webmas...@kernel.org. They are using mediawiki in a multisite environment for all kernel.org related wikis. regards, André On 03/31/2015 04:00 AM, Dave Stevens wrote: I've been reading the wiki to help sort out an issue

Re: the wiki?

Stevens wrote: I've been reading the wiki to help sort out an issue and learn more about RAID. I wanted to download it to my local drive to read offlibe and that facility sseems to not be there. I checked the mediawiki version in the source and it is an LTS version for which support ends in two

the wiki?

I've been reading the wiki to help sort out an issue and learn more about RAID. I wanted to download it to my local drive to read offlibe and that facility sseems to not be there. I checked the mediawiki version in the source and it is an LTS version for which support ends in two months

BTRFS wiki: page about recovery (was: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Allow btrfsck to reset csum of all tree blocks, AKA dangerous mode.)

users know the correct timing using it. I wonder about making a wiki page about recovery options with two parts: 1) Diagnosis. First find out what might be wrong. 2) Cure. Then decide which steps to try to recover. This seems really useful. But I'm a little afraid

Wiki bug re. metadata_ratio mount option

The wiki page https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Mount_options has outdated information regarding the metadata-ratio option. It says: metadata_ratio=number Sets the number of data chunks that need to be allocated to force a metadata chunk allocation. By default this is set to 8

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

documentation on the wiki. * Play with your filesystems, work out how the FS behaves -- *in detail*. Read the FS features on the wiki and try at least some of them out. Use this to understand how it should behave. In particular, the semantics of snapshots, and the difference between

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

Hi Hugo, Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 11:05:03 schrieb Hugo Mills: I am not asking to hold my hand You are, though. Something like using grep to find code that (might be) related to the thing you're trying to work with is _fundamental_. You should expect to be reading the code -- several

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

Hi Hugo, Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 11:05:03 schrieb Hugo Mills: I am not asking to hold my hand You are, though. Something like using grep to find code that (might be) related to the thing you're trying to work with is _fundamental_. You should expect to be reading the code --

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Wang Shilong wangshilong1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hugo, Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 11:05:03 schrieb Hugo Mills: I am not asking to hold my hand You are, though. Something like using grep to find code that (might be) related to the thing you're trying to

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

On Jul 26, 2014, at 7:43 PM, Nick Krause xerofo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Wang Shilong wangshilong1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hugo, Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 11:05:03 schrieb Hugo Mills: I am not asking to hold my hand You are, though. Something like using

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Jul 26, 2014, at 7:43 PM, Nick Krause xerofo...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Wang Shilong wangshilong1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hugo, Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 11:05:03 schrieb Hugo

Re: Help with Project on brtfs wiki

On 7/26/14, 8:43 PM, Nick Krause wrote: ... Fine then I guess I need to read the documentation and other things on my own. Seems everyone here wants me to figure out everything on my own. Hugo bent over backwards, twice, to give you very good advice. So did Steven Rostedt on LKML. You

Help with Project on brtfs wiki

Hey brtfs devolopers. I am new so I think this project,Implement new FALLOC_FL_* modes needs more information for me to write if for you guys. I am wondering what is fallocate and how you want me to write this, define statements or as functions in a certain file? I am not asking to hold my hand

Re: Fwd: btrfs Wiki account request

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:19:08PM +0200, Sjon Hortensius wrote: I wrote a simple alternative for a script that is currently on the btrfs wiki (for showing quotas) in bash instead of Python. I have attempted to add this to the page but after entering the captcha 15 times my account

Fwd: btrfs Wiki account request

I wrote a simple alternative for a script that is currently on the btrfs wiki (for showing quotas) in bash instead of Python. I have attempted to add this to the page but after entering the captcha 15 times my account was rejected because of a missing bio. Maybe someone can add this to https

Re: Error in btrfs wiki - How much space will I get with my multi-device configuration?

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Astro Xe wrote: The content of the FAQ How much space will I get with my multi-device configuration? (https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#How_much_space_will_I_get_with_my_multi-device_configuration.3F) is currently wrong. The usable space

[PATCH 3/4] btrfs-progs: Add btrfs wiki reference to man pages.

Add btrfs wiki page reference to btrfs-check/btrfsck, btrfs-restore and btrfs-device as supplement. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com --- Documentation/btrfs-check.txt | 5 + Documentation/btrfs-device.txt | 10 -- Documentation/btrfs-restore.txt | 4

Re: [PATCH 3/4] btrfs-progs: Add btrfs wiki reference to man pages.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: Add btrfs wiki page reference to btrfs-check/btrfsck, btrfs-restore and btrfs-device as supplement. I'd rather avoid any references to 'btrfsck', it's been deprecated and 'btrfs check' should be used, thouth I'm sure there are enough

Re: wiki vs man pages

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: Generally, would you agree to putting more links to the wiki in man pages since man pages are not forever but sure take a long time to update on the installed based and the wiki can be up to date for everyone right away? (I'm

Re: wiki vs man pages

Original Message Subject: Re: wiki vs man pages From: Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com Date: 2014年04月14日 09:45 On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: Generally, would you agree to putting more links to the wiki in man

Re: updating the wiki

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 07:17:31PM +0200, George Eleftheriou wrote: Thank you too for the enlightenment. Not just now but so many times in the past (just the compilation of your list interventions is a wiki in its own right). Me too, I've been meaning to create a wiki account for quite some

Hint to kernel source tree clone usage in Btrfs wiki

Hi together, I'm new to the list and hope to be at the right place for the following issue: The wiki page https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories#btrfs_kernel_module_git_repository talks about integrating an existing local kernel clone (instance) by adding it as a git

Re: swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki

Thanks to all, who* answer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki

swapon $swapfile i just adding this to rc.local and this work good. May be, add it to btrfs Wiki as temporary solution to using swap file? I always thought Btrfs does not allow swap files on purpose, because it is not deadlock-proof when used in the swapping context. It's more

Re: swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki

karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com posted on Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:30:18 +0100 as excerpted: Is the swap over NFS code upstream ? ?esrever ni txet referp uoy od ;tsop-pot t'nod esaelP (Please don't top-post; do you prefer text in reverse?) Quote the context you need so your question makes sense and

Re: swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki

#create 8G sparse swap file losetup $swapfile /swap #mount file to loop mkswap $swapfile swapon $swapfile i just adding this to rc.local and this work good. May be, add it to btrfs Wiki as temporary solution to using swap file? Timofey Hi, Yes, Timofey, it does work. I tested the same over

Re: swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki

loop device truncate -s 8G /swap #create 8G sparse swap file losetup $swapfile /swap #mount file to loop mkswap $swapfile swapon $swapfile i just adding this to rc.local and this work good. May be, add it to btrfs Wiki as temporary solution to using swap file? I always thought Btrfs

Re: swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki

#mount file to loop mkswap $swapfile swapon $swapfile i just adding this to rc.local and this work good. May be, add it to btrfs Wiki as temporary solution to using swap file? Timofey 2013/10/21 Тимофей Титовец nefelim...@gmail.com: Hello list, i know what btrfs don't support swap files. I

Re: minor wiki bug, check_int mount options description

On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: I think the wiki has descriptions for check_int and check_int_data reversed: I've fixed it in the wiki. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org

minor wiki bug, check_int mount options description

I think the wiki has descriptions for check_int and check_int_data reversed: check_int (since 3.3) Switch on integrity checker for data and metadata (if compiled in) check_int_data (since 3.3) Switch on integrity checker for data (if compiled in) https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php

  1   2   >