Why can't the mailing list server put itself in the Reply-To: field? It's annoying!
-Original Message-
From: Yedidyah Bar-David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[snip]
In practice, it happened to me quite many times that a used FAT
partition was mke2fsed, used (as ext2), and then mounted
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:09:36AM +0200, Arik Baratz wrote:
Why can't the mailing list server put itself in the Reply-To: field? It's annoying!
-Original Message-
From: Yedidyah Bar-David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[snip]
In practice, it happened to me quite many times that
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003, Uri Itscowits wrote about Re: Guessing filesystem while
unmounted:
First I want to thank everybody for the time effort,
( although some responses show,
some guys did NOT spend enough time reading my problem all the way {: )
:)
I hope my response wasn't one
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:09:36AM +0200, Arik Baratz wrote:
Why can't the mailing list server put itself in the Reply-To: field?
It's annoying!
Why can't people learn to use procmail? it's annoying!
ObLinux: Alan Cox has decreed that 2.5 is approaching usability. (My
words, not his).
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:41:01PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't people learn to use procmail? it's annoying!
Because part of supporting open standards is that you don't
have to use
specific software in order to enjoy a forum properly. I
can't use procmail
because
Dear Amos,
When I replied privately to you in the message you quote, I did it
for a reason. By replying to the list, you are making tje unforgivable
sin of making private a public correspondence. With every additional
message you send, you take another gigantic leap towards my
killfile. Please
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:57:52PM +0200, Uri Itscowits wrote:
Hi there,
I need to guess which is the root filesystem ( on GNU/Linux OC),
while all partitions are still unmounted.
You can do it the same way the kernel does it in the early boot stages
- by getting the information from
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Guessing filesystem while
unmounted:
You can do it the same way the kernel does it in the early boot stages
- by getting the information from lilo, via the boot record. You'll
need to read and parse the boot record, though. Mounting each
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:48:07PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Note, by the way, that newer distributions (such as Redhat 8) use Grub,
not LILO, so anything relying on the structure of a lilo boot record
isn't foolproof either.
I never investigated this, so take it with a grain of salt, but I
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Guessing filesystem while
unmounted:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:48:07PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Note, by the way, that newer distributions (such as Redhat 8) use Grub,
not LILO, so anything relying on the structure of a lilo boot
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003, Orna Agmon wrote about Re: Guessing filesystem while unmounted:
Well, as far as I know Grub does not know where your root filesystem (/)
lives, until it first finds the boot filesystem, finds the grub/grub.conf
file in it (grub understands the ext2 filesystem), reads
doing :
awk '{if ($2==/)print $1}' /etc/fstab
will print either the root partition (e.g. /dev/hda2 ) or the root
label ( e.g. LABEL=/ )
the first is trevial,
the second, can be found by running e2label on all partitions and seeing
wich has the right label
erez.
Uri Itscowits wrote:
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Uri Itscowits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi there,
I need to guess which is the root filesystem ( on GNU/Linux OC),
while all partitions are still unmounted.
I could of course mount each in turn, and look for /etc/fstab or so,
but I am looking
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:02:59PM +0200, Uri Itscowits wrote:
Hi there,
I need to guess which is the root filesystem ( on GNU/Linux OC),
while all partitions are still unmounted.
I could of course mount each in turn, and look for /etc/fstab or so,
but I am looking for a way which
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:48:07PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Note, by the way, that newer distributions (such as Redhat 8) use Grub,
not LILO, so anything relying on the structure of a lilo boot record
isn't foolproof
Hi all,
First I want to thank everybody for the time effort,
( although some responses show,
some guys did NOT spend enough time reading my problem all the way {: )
Since no one gave me a good answer,
(except for Muli's, which was my idea to begin with)
I tried to look for the way
16 matches
Mail list logo
