Hi,
I have to send a lot of letters and E-mails to announce my
impending change of address and phone number.
Usually I am using mutt, and I have no problem, when the
recipients are linux users, or when the messges are in English.
This time, the message has to be in Hebrew and some, if not most
of t
So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious ---
there were buttons for right, left, and center positioning. Where is
something equivalent in Thunderbird?
--
Stan Goodman
Qiryat Tiv'on
Israel
__
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:41:23PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi,
> I have to send a lot of letters and E-mails to announce my
> impending change of address and phone number.
> Usually I am using mutt, and I have no problem, when the
> recipients are linux users, or when the messges are in E
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:07:33PM -0400, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:41:23PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
>
> Besides, you should send UTF-8 and not ISO-8859-8-i .
>
> > Besides, this is
> > a statistcs of one. Other ms-windows set-ups might behave
> > differently.
The following is NOT an efficient or recommended solution, but since you seem
to be looking for a 1-time solution for clueless recipients, you could try
this:
1 - create your Hebrew message using whatever you usually use
2 - run Ksnapshot (my Mandriva box is set up to run it in responce to PrtSc
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:51:46PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:07:33PM -0400, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:41:23PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> > Besides, you should send UTF-8 and not ISO-8859-8-i .
> >
> > > Besides, this is
>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 09:19:00PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> The following is NOT an efficient or recommended solution, but since you seem
> to be looking for a 1-time solution for clueless recipients, you could try
> this:
>
> --
> Shlomo Solomon
> http://the-solomons.net
> Sent by KM
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 06:39:57PM -0400, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:51:46PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:07:33PM -0400, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:41:23PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> > >
> >
> > My (def
Hi,
Does anyone know how do i edit the qmail MAILER-DAEMON texts (the texts
that appear in the messages from the mailer-daemon to the users)?
Bareket
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscrib
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
> So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
> beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious
> --- there were buttons for right, left, and center positioning.
> Where is something equivalen
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
> So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
> beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious ---
> there were buttons for right, left, and center positioning. Where is
> something equivalent in Thun
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:23:22PM +0300, shimi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Stan Goodman
> wrote:
>
> > So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
> > beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious ---
> > there were buttons for right, l
On 08/04/2011 03:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
>> So far, I have not found a way to write a Hebrew message with lines
>> beginning at the right side of the window. With Kmail it was obvious
>> --- there were buttons for right, left
On 08/04/2011 04:36 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
On
08/04/2011 03:58 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:23 PM, Yedidyah
Bar-David wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM
+0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 04/08/2011 16:27, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/04/2011 04:36 PM, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:58 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/04/2011 03:23 PM, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 03:17:36PM +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
So far, I have not found a way to write a He
On 08/04/2011 07:01 PM, Moish wrote:
Open the xpi file and change the max version in the rdf file.
I've opened the xpi and rdf files. The relevant part of the latter is:
*
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6}
2.0
5.*
*
TB is v5.0. BiDi seems t
On 04/08/2011 18:52, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 07:01 PM, Moish wrote:
Open the xpi file and change the max version in the rdf file.
I've opened the xpi and rdf files. The relevant part of the latter is:
*
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6}
2.0
5.*
*
TB is v5.0. BiDi
On 08/04/2011 08:58 PM, Moish wrote:
On 04/08/2011 18:52, Stan Goodman wrote:
On 08/04/2011 07:01 PM, Moish wrote:
Open the xpi file and change the max version in the rdf file.
I've opened the xpi and rdf files. The relevant part of the latter is:
*
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfd
Hi,
I'm CCing the addon maintainer, maybe he have some good answers for you all.
In case Eyal is not subscribed to the list, his comments might be held for
moderation. (Eyal - You can read the full discussion here:
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/2011-August/thread.html)
Anyway, n
2011/8/4 Tomer Cohen :
> And if you want to see the RTL composition feature embedded to Thunderbird
> in the future, please comment on the following two bugs and mention how
> important is this feature to you:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464436
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show
With all the respect to Thuderbird, I moved to Gmail and Google Apps years
ago. I recommend using Gmail or Google Apps for email. Then you can use any
computer to read and write mail, not just at home or your laptop.
Uri Even-Chen
Mobile Phone: +972-50-9007559
E-mail: u...@speedy.net
Website: http
Hi Uri,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:58:40 +0300
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> With all the respect to Thuderbird, I moved to Gmail and Google Apps years
> ago. I recommend using Gmail or Google Apps for email. Then you can use any
> computer to read and write mail, not just at home or your laptop.
>
the p
On Friday 12 August 2011 18:58:40 you wrote:
> With all the respect to Thuderbird, I moved to Gmail and Google Apps
> years ago. I recommend using Gmail or Google Apps for email. Then
> you can use any computer to read and write mail, not just at home or
> your laptop.
>
> Uri Even-Chen
> Mobile P
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 23:01, Stan Goodman wrote:
> I tried Thunderbird for about a month and concluded that I don't like
> it. De gustibus non est disputandum. I'm back to Kmail now, with
> enhanced respect for it.
>
טעם וריח.
(I had to google it)
> As for problems of text orientation, includ
One tangential note to Dotan's article regarding inserting
non-printing characters:
In OpenOffice, you can use "Insert->Formatting Mark", which gives
you a handy submenu of such characters. This is more convenient than
using "Insert->Special Character", which requir
Please forgive the top-posting. I think anything else would be cruel in
this case.
The quoted message is entirely in HTML formatting. I don't know why
anybody uses HTML in email, but it is altogether out of place in list
traffic. It is worse in this case, because the message contains no
plain-
2011/8/13 Alan Yaniger :
> One tangential note to Dotan's article regarding inserting non-printing
> characters:
>
> In OpenOffice, you can use "Insert->Formatting Mark", which gives you a
> handy submenu of such characters. This is more convenient than using
> "Insert->Special Character", which re
On 08/13/2011 08:42 PM, Alan Yaniger wrote:
> One tangential note to Dotan's article regarding inserting non-printing
> characters:
>
> In OpenOffice, you can use "Insert->Formatting Mark", which gives you a
> handy submenu of such characters. This is more convenient than using
> "Insert->Special
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 07:53, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I should point out that the document is somewhat out of date, as we are
> quickly approaching a keyboard layout that:
>
> 1. Will be standard
> and
> 2. Will have all of the keys that lyx has.
>
How does an upcoming standard make the page so
On 08/14/2011 08:05 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> At least the LRM and RLM are there. There are some issues with the new
> keyboard layout:
> 1) The lack of LRE/RLE/PDF. What is violent about the change of
> appearance? Like any other tool, if one understands how to use it then
> it works. If not then
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 22:19, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I suggest that you tap the existing resources, that clearly document the
> reasons behind both decisions, rather than assume (incorrectly, I might
> add) stuff about it, and then fling it around like it was a curse-word.
>
I meant to be hars
On 08/15/2011 11:54 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 22:19, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> I suggest that you tap the existing resources, that clearly document the
>> reasons behind both decisions, rather than assume (incorrectly, I might
>> add) stuff about it, and then fling it around
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:12, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I
>> didn't assume anything, all the facts that I mention are referred to
>> here (your site):
>> http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.html
>>
>
> As for the actual criticism, when you've shown that you understood WHY
> the decisions wer
On Thursday 18 August 2011 21:06:40 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> [1] How to say דווקא in English?
The word is obviously related to e,g, דייק, and that's the clue. How to
translate it depends on the sentence, but I usually find that it fits
with "precisely", or "specifically", or something similar. This
On 08/18/2011 09:06 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:12, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I
didn't assume anything, all the facts that I mention are referred to
here (your site):
http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.
Shachar, your mailing in mungling quoted replies. The past three
levels of quotes all came out as single gr's. I fixed them manually
below to preserve context.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 21:57, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> Your previous post explaining why RLM and LRM
>> were not included was very cle
On 08/18/2011 10:53 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Shachar, your mailing in mungling quoted replies. The past three
> levels of quotes all came out as single gr's. I fixed them manually
> below to preserve context.
for some reason, latest thunderbirds (hurrah, we came back on topic!)
refuses to default
2011/8/18 Shachar Shemesh :
> Since there is no way to embed
> paragraph direction (and other changes) in text only,
>
Yes there is, just put this non-printing character at the
beginning of your RTL emails: - -
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
On 08/19/2011 12:52 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2011/8/18 Shachar Shemesh :
>> Since there is no way to embed
>> paragraph direction (and other changes) in text only,
>>
> Yes there is, just put this non-printing character at the
> beginning of your RTL emails: - -
>
Doesn't do the same thing, neith
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:04, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 12:52 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> 2011/8/18 Shachar Shemesh :
>>> Since there is no way to embed
>>> paragraph direction (and other changes) in text only,
>>>
>> Yes there is, just put this non-printing character at the
>> begin
On 08/19/2011 08:13 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Really? Was is the effect of embedding paragraph direction in HTML?
> What is the effect of the character that I posted? How do they differ?
On the theoretical level, an RLE at the beginning of the paragraph means
to embed an RTL run inside the paragra
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:28, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On the practical level, many implementations (Windows' edit control
> included) do line breaks and only then BiDi. As a result, all state is
> lost at the end of the line, and the RLE only covers the first line of
> the paragraph. Since most
The result leaves a bit to be desired:
1) The promised two buttons for determining the justification
direction are nowhere to be seen (yes, I have checked that box for
displaying them).
Customize the toolbars (for the main 3-pane window and for the
composition window) and you ca
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:08, Shai Berger wrote:
> Hi Dotan,
>
> Sorry about the delay in getting back to you -- I just returned from a
> vacation.
>
> There's a little too little context here for me to understand what the
> discussion is about, or how I can help; I sincerely hope I can. Please n
Sorry to bother people with this, but I seem to be receiving 2 copies of
most messages sent to linux-il. Checking the header shows both are sent
via [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I guess I am not listed twice. Any ideas?
=
To unsubscribe, s
Hi, I'm looking for a good mailer for linux.
It should be graphical, should support threads (mainly for reading
linux-il :) and should deal the same way with folders as "pine" does,
since I still wan to be able to use pine, when connected by remote).
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Dmitry Fink (aka FINiK) wrote:
> It should be graphical, should support threads (mainly for reading
> linux-il :) and should deal the same way with folders as "pine" does,
> since I still wan to be able to use pine, when connected by remote).
from past discussions of this s
x27;t know if such beast exists. But there is mutt, which is a
really-nice text-mode mailer. Much better than pine, but then,
pine is really awful, so it's not a big compliment. Anyway, mutt
is probably the best mailer I've ever seen.
Vadik.
--
If there was anything that depressed him
an to be able to use pine, when connected by remote).
>
> I don't know if such beast exists. But there is mutt, which is a
> really-nice text-mode mailer. Much better than pine, but then,
> pine is really awful, so it's not a big compliment. Anyway, mutt
pine rocks big t
OMS>> > I don't know if such beast exists. But there is mutt, which is a
OMS>> > really-nice text-mode mailer. Much better than pine, but then,
OMS>> > pine is really awful, so it's not a big compliment. Anyway, mutt
OMS>>
OMS>> pine rocks big
> from past discussions of this subject here, no such thing exists for
> linux. thus, you'l have to settle with lesser mail clients.
>
Just thought ...
You can use IMAP with pine as well as any other IMAP client.
I think - you'll not have any problem with IMAP folders if
you're working this way.
Quoth Ohad M. Somjen on Thu, Oct 28, 1999:
> pine rocks big time !!!
Nah. It's inconsistent, and it does things behind your back.
> you can give exmh a try. it's based on mh and from what
> little experience i had with it's a pretty good mailer.
The problem is tha
I cannot view E. Tromers mail using mozilla's mailer (blank page)
(this is mozilla 1.0.0 client pulling from an IMAP server)
does anyone else have this problem (so I'll report a mozilla bug) or
should I
investigate my
Works for me - Mozilla on Windows.
I pulled it via POP3, though.
Guy Baruch wrote:
> I cannot view E. Tromers mail using mozilla's mailer (blank page)
> (this is mozilla 1.0.0 client pulling from an IMAP server)
>
> does anyone else have this problem (so I'll report a moz
thanks to all that responded, and specific thanks for Eran which
dilligently located the problem.
it is not a Mozilla bug but a bug in weizmann's firewall.
>
--
-- regards
+---
+ Guy Baruch , Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Insti
The title says it all pretty much. I personally don't use the emacs
mailer, but I know a lecturer who does.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
Shlomi Fish[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:59:36 +0300 (IDT),
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The title says it all pretty much. I personally don't use the emacs
> mailer, but I know a lecturer who does.
Emacs19 is really old. It also have several mailers all of them support
MIME in r
"Yair Friedman (Jerusalem)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:59:36 +0300 (IDT),
> Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The title says it all pretty much. I personally don't use the emacs
> > mailer, but I know a lec
There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
--- Omer
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 21:38 +0300, Stan Goodman wrote:
> On Thursday 18 August 2011 21:06:40 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > [1] How to say דווקא in English?
>
> The word is obviously related to
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 22:08, Omer Zak wrote:
> There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
> http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
>
> --- Omer
>
Nice, thanks.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
___
L
On Thursday 18 August 2011 22:08:29 Omer Zak wrote:
> There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
> http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
It's not harder to translate than any other word. It's only necessary to
think what one wants to say, which not everyone does. As I said ear
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 22:08, Omer Zak wrote:
> There is a special blog article devoted to this subject:
> http://elephant.org.il/translate/davka.html
>
> --- Omer
>
I think that I've finally found the word in English: poetic. See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetic_justice
Also, in the m
62 matches
Mail list logo
