On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 13:07, shimi wrote:
>
>
> 2011/2/22 ik
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to configure openvpn to be a host to host like configuration.
>> The reason is simple, because I want to have access to the machine that is
>> the "serv
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 13:16, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:59:13PM +0200, ik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to configure openvpn to be a host to host like configuration.
> > The reason is simple, because I want to have access to the m
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:59:13PM +0200, ik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to configure openvpn to be a host to host like configuration.
> The reason is simple, because I want to have access to the machine that is
> the "server".
> The problem is, that I have ma
2011/2/22 ik
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to configure openvpn to be a host to host like configuration.
> The reason is simple, because I want to have access to the machine that is
> the "server".
> The problem is, that I have many "clients" that need to
Hello,
I'm trying to configure openvpn to be a host to host like configuration.
The reason is simple, because I want to have access to the machine that is
the "server".
The problem is, that I have many "clients" that need to be like that.
How can I have a host to ho
On Feb 6, 2010, at 10:24 PM, Gadi Cohen wrote:
Some more on this for those interested... it looks like NV just have
some special rules that go into effect during times of peak
traffic. My speeds and email are fine most of the time, but in the
evenings this weekend suddenly my slightly less
Eventually
replaced it with a (physically) real rented server, since it was for
production use. The VPS I'm using now is on VMware, which apparently
has a good track record.
> This host is a 20$/month account, and is certainly not the cheapest. It
> also doubles as my OpenVPN server
Of course being local, speeds to the box are
> excellent. I then installed an openvpn server and enabled IP forwarding
> with NAT.
Congratulations.
Not relevant for me (I'm not in Israel) but have you checked the
connectivity of this box to the rest of the net? If it's throug
>
> This host is a 20$/month account, and is certainly not the cheapest. It
> also doubles as my OpenVPN server.
"This" == ??
>
--
> Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
> http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
> tzaf...@cohens
ccount, and is certainly not the cheapest. It
also doubles as my OpenVPN server.
--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
tzaf...@cohens.org.il || best
ICQ# 16849754 || friend
_
Hi Gadi,
I don't know from which company you took the VPS, but you really want to
make sure it's not sitting under something like OpenVZ which could make your
VPS sometimes unusable if your "neighbor" in that machine is hitting his VPS
with huge CPU load.
Thanks,
Hetz
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:01
I should also add that since the box isn't used for much else, and
encrypted routing is hardly resource intensive, its actually very
feasible for a whole bunch of us to share something like this. The
$29/mo on the package I found comes with 500GB/mo. And it's not
difficult to give out static IPs
rtual private server, i.e. your own linux system
running as a virtual machine, with root access) in Israel. I found one
for $29/mo, but I didn't look around too much since this is a 1 month
experiment for me. Of course being local, speeds to the box are
excellent. I then installed an openvpn se
formation - google is your friend.
> about restricting the openvpn traffic, I think that you tag with iptables
> all of the vpn traffic and limit the bandwidth with tc.
>
> Ohad
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Noam Rathaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
why not using normal ip shaping ?
as far as it goes for normal shaping, I'm sure you could find a lot of
information - google is your friend.
about restricting the openvpn traffic, I think that you tag with iptables
all of the vpn traffic and limit the bandwidth with tc.
Ohad
On Tue, J
Hi,
Anyone experienced with traffic shaping general, and with OpenVPN
specifically?
I want to limit the upstream traffic sent from our VPN server to our VPN
clients.
I can't use 'shaper' (the OpenVPN command line parameter).
So any suggestion would be welcome.
--
Noam Rat
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:55, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the response, the issue is that windows doesn't support TUN
> devices, so your configuration for them MUST be different, can you post it
> here? (the server.conf and client.conf - remove any secret thin
Hi,
Thanks for the response, the issue is that windows doesn't support TUN
devices, so your configuration for them MUST be different, can you post it
here? (the server.conf and client.conf - remove any secret things :) )
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:53:22 Micha Silver wrote:
> Noam Rathaus wrote
Noam Rathaus wrote:
Hi,
I am having difficulties getting both my UNIX VPN clients and my Windows VPN
clients to use the same server.conf file, is this even possible or do I need
two separate VPN servers one using TAP while the other uses TUN?
We use a single server.conf file with the d
Hi,
I am having difficulties getting both my UNIX VPN clients and my Windows VPN
clients to use the same server.conf file, is this even possible or do I need
two separate VPN servers one using TAP while the other uses TUN?
--
Noam Rathaus
CTO
1616 Anderson Rd.
McLean, VA 22102
Tel: 7
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:01:50PM +0200, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> Hi Erez,
> Since OpenVPN is uses OpenSSL for crypto functions, it's security in terms
> of man-in-the-middle attacks should be no less than OpenSSL - which is
> pretty good.
Actually it should be:
Sinc
As in most cases, it depends.
I suggest you to read review of VPN for Linux solutions in Linux Journal:
www.linuxjournal.com/article/7881.
Rgds,
Vitaly
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in
Hi Erez,
Since OpenVPN is uses OpenSSL for crypto functions, it's security in terms
of man-in-the-middle attacks should be no less than OpenSSL - which is
pretty good.
On the other hand, OpenVPN could in theory have local end-point exploits
that reduce it's security in terms of local
hi
is openvpn considured secured ?
cheers,
erez.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noam Rathaus wrote:
Hi,
Well why doesn't Check Point be the better "man" and support other products?
They do. L2TP with IPSec. There is a builtin client in Windows XP for
it. I'm not sure I would like to trust it with anything that has the
name "security" on it, but it does the basic stuff (en
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Tal, Shachar; 'Eli Marmor'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenVPN, from the 1st of October supports Win32
On Thursday 09 October 2003 15:26, Tal, Shachar wrote:
> &g
On Thursday 09 October 2003 16:15, Tal, Shachar wrote:
> > > Which brings us to the important question: will it also (by default,
> > with no easy way to turn it off)
> > > auto-run viral-attachments,load 1x1-authenticating-gifs, perform
> > > fill-in-your-favorite-nightmare, on other OSes as well?
On Thursday 09 October 2003 15:26, Tal, Shachar wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Eli Marmor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > It's called "Outlook Web Access" (although it's a part of Exchange; It
> > is just a web-emulation of Outlook).
> >
> > As far as I remember, it supports SSL.
> >
-Original Message-
From: Eli Marmor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenVPN, from the 1st of October supports Win32
> Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
> > Exchange have a web interface so maybe ssh will suffice
Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> Exchange have a web interface so maybe ssh will suffice for all your activities.
> in addition its less intrusive since its already installed and would take for
> you time to set up the openVPN. i know how office regs can be some times.
It's called "
Exchange have a web interface so maybe ssh will suffice for all your activities.
in addition its less intrusive since its already installed and would take for
you time to set up the openVPN. i know how office regs can be some times.
* - * - *
Tzahi Fadida
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:32:48AM +0200, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I use both SSH tunnel and OpenVPN, have seen an advantage until now
> to SSH, as all platforms have it, however, SINCE you have to before hand
> decide what you want to tunnel (port, IP, etc) it bares
Hi,
As I use both SSH tunnel and OpenVPN, have seen an advantage until now
to SSH, as all platforms have it, however, SINCE you have to before hand
decide what you want to tunnel (port, IP, etc) it bares an in-convince.
Unlike OpenVPN, which tunnels everything (a downside if you are upstream
Hi,
Well why doesn't Check Point be the better "man" and support other products? Anyhow as
I said before, OpenVPN isn't an IPSec or IKE implementation.
As to protocols that can be tunneled, I saw everything being tunneled :) examples:
1) SMTP traffic (da...)
2) IMP pings
On Thursday 09 October 2003 09:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oded Arbel wrote:
> > I'm using OpenVPN to create a tunnel from my workstation to my home
> > computer so I can get in the office network from home (because I couldn't
> > get the RH only linux SecureRe
Oded Arbel wrote:
I'm using OpenVPN to create a tunnel from my workstation to my home computer
so I can get in the office network from home (because I couldn't get the RH
only linux SecureRemote client to work, and that's what my company uses), and
Hmm, that's exactly the
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 21:23, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >Anyhow long story short... http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/ and get the
> > BETA (if you need Windows support).
>
> As it is SSL - will it support UDP?
OpenVPN is UDP based. its uses SSL over UDP, and as such has the
Noam Rathaus wrote:
believe it or not, some implementations of VPN, non commercial of course, do not support strong encryption)
Since when are l2tp and pptp non-commercial?
Does it works with SecureClient, Cisco's VPN ... I don't know :)
OpenVPN uses SSL/TLS rather than IPSec. As suc
Hi,
I know this is the Linux-IL mailing list, but I am not sure how many of you out there
know:
OpenVPN (an excellent project for VPN support) now has a very stable (Just don't
Ctrl-C the Console Window :] ) Windows port of their VPN client (and server).
What it basically means:
1) You ca
39 matches
Mail list logo
