At 07:33 AM 1/23/2004 +0100, pa3gcu wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2004 05:04, Beolach wrote:
> chuck wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > OBTW, when I
> >
> > ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
> > ping: bad interface address 'eth0'
> >
> > is what I get. I do have an eth0 device. :-|
>
> The -I option doesn't tak
Hi, Beolach:
I tried the same thing that Devesh quoted.
I was not stating that the command line was
'configured correctly'. ;-)
Chuck
Beolach wrote:
>
> chuck wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > OBTW, when I
> >
> > ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
> > ping: bad interface address 'eth0'
> >
> > is what I get.
On Friday 23 January 2004 05:04, Beolach wrote:
> chuck wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > OBTW, when I
> >
> > ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
> > ping: bad interface address 'eth0'
> >
> > is what I get. I do have an eth0 device. :-|
>
> The -I option doesn't take an interface name (ie eth0), but rather t
chuck wrote:
[snip]
OBTW, when I
ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
ping: bad interface address 'eth0'
is what I get. I do have an eth0 device. :-|
The -I option doesn't take an interface name (ie eth0), but rather the
IP address (ie 192.168.0.1) assigned to the interface.
Conway S. Smith
-
To
Hi, Devesh:
I think 'destination host unreachable' is a routing problem.
I think that then no packets are transmitted.
If true, ping would not run and there is no ping failure.
I think we are done with your original problem of 'ping' failure.
I am guessing, because you never reported the outpu
]
Subject: Re: 2 NIC cards not talking
Hi, Beolach:
Thanks.
I asked, but Chadha never reported his (exact) 'ping' usage, nor the (exact)
error message. :-| Chuck
Beolach wrote:
>
> ping has a -I option that allows you to specify the source interface.
> I haven't used t
Hi, Beolach:
Thanks.
I asked, but Chadha never reported his (exact) 'ping' usage,
nor the (exact) error message.
:-|
Chuck
Beolach wrote:
>
> ping has a -I option that allows you to specify the source interface. I
> haven't used this option myself, but I would guess Chadha used some
> thing like
]
Subject: Re: 2 NIC cards not talking
Oops. I just tried it, and it doesn't take an interface name (eth0),
but rather, the IP address for the interface. So instead of
ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
it would be
ping -I xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 192.168.1.1
Where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP address of eth0.
Be
From what you wrote, I'd guess that you have not set up iptables to NAT
the LAN hosts. I'm afraid that what you posted did not answer this
definitively, but that was my fault; I asked for incomplete information
about iptables. NAT'ing is done not in the default (filter) table that
"iptables -nv
ping has a -I option that allows you to specify the source interface. I
haven't used this option myself, but I would guess Chadha used some
thing like this: 'ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1'.
Conway S. Smith
chuck wrote:
Dear Chadha:
In (4.) & (5.)...
I know how to ping from a host with an 'eth0' o
Oops. I just tried it, and it doesn't take an interface name (eth0),
but rather, the IP address for the interface. So instead of
ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
it would be
ping -I xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 192.168.1.1
Where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP address of eth0.
Beolach wrote:
ping has a -I option that
Dear Chadha:
In (4.) & (5.)...
I know how to ping from a host with an 'eth0' or 'eth1' device.
I do not know how to ping from 'eth0' or from 'eth1'.
Sorry, I cannot help.
Chuck
"Chadha, Devesh" wrote:
> 4.Pinging 192.168.1.1 from eth0 gave destnation host unreachable and pinging
> xxx.xxx.x
It looks to me like you're iptables haven't been setup to NAT. I have
attached the output of 'iptables -nvL' on my NATing gateway. Just for
the heck of it I obscured my public address too. I used a slightly
modified version of the rc.firewall-stronger startup script from the
IP-Masquerade HO
esday, January 21, 2004 8:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2 NIC cards not talking
At 07:32 PM 1/21/2004 -0500, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
>Well my reason for not giving is that it is a public IP and does not have
>any firewalls in place. This exposes my server much more to unauthori
need to see the
output of
iptables -nvL
-Original Message-
From: Ray Olszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2 NIC cards not talking
At 04:52 PM 1/21/2004 -0500, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
>[...]
>Ray:
>I have sta
Hi, Chadha:
Originally, you said:
> I have a linux box with 2 NIC cards, both are properly configured.
> Both are on the same subnet, but still don't ping to one another!!
You do not show how you attempt the 'ping',
nor the error message.
Please show exact ping command a
that eth0, eth1 and lo are correctly configured.
ip_forward gives a "1"
What do the gurus say???
-Original Message-
From: Ray Olszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2 NIC cards not talking
At 04:52 PM 1/2
At 04:52 PM 1/21/2004 -0500, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
[...]
Ray:
I have static IP and therefore I cannot give the actual IP address.
I don't understand why, unless for some reason you think that your IP
address is a secret. Once you start using the address for any purpose, it
will be known to everyo
0
ppp0
In the above case, ppp0 was a ppp-over-ethernet association with eth1.
You should mask out your real IP address for security (if static).
HTH, Chuck
p.s. I have never understood the signature threat! ? ! ?
Perhaps a separate email identity for public messages?
"Chadha, Dev
onvenience.
Regards,
Devesh
-Original Message-
From: chuck gelm net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 4:45 PM
To: Chadha, Devesh
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: 2 NIC cards not talking
Hello, Chadha:
You do not show how you attempt the &
is
baloney nonetheless, and you and your employer need to understand that it
is made meaningless by the act of you sending the message to a mailing list.
-Original Message-
From: Juan Facundo Suárez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:13 AM
To: linux-newbie list
S
your solution after I reach home and get back to you tomorrow.
Regards,
Devesh
-Original Message-
From: pa3gcu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:38 AM
To: Chadha, Devesh; linux-newbie list
Subject: Re: 2 NIC cards not talking
On Wednesday 21 January 2004
7;Juan Facundo Suárez'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "linux-newbie
list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: 2 NIC cards not talking
| Juan,
|
| Eth0 has the external assigned IP by my ISP. Eth1 has a 192.168.x.x ip
| address. Eth1 ac
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 16:23, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
> Juan,
>
> Eth0 has the external assigned IP by my ISP. Eth1 has a 192.168.x.x ip
> address. Eth1 acts as the DHCP server for my LAN. My LAN is working fine. I
> can connect machines to the LAN and even connect one machine to another.
>
> B
internet nor connect to any internal machine from outside!!
Do I need to bridge the 2 NICs ???
Regards,
Devesh
-Original Message-
From: Juan Facundo Suárez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:13 AM
To: linux-newbie list
Subject: Re: 2 NIC cards not talking
er: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Chadha, Devesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:25 AM
Subject: 2 NIC cards not talking
| Hi,
|
| I have a linux box with 2 NIC cards, both are properly
Hi,
I have a linux box with 2 NIC cards, both are properly configured. Both are
on the same subnet, but still don't ping to one another!!
I need to setup the box as the firewall/router that has eth0 set as external
and eth1 as internal serving as DHCP server to other computers on the
ne
At 08:12 AM 8/12/02 -0500, Majid Tahir wrote:
>hello all
>i have just installed redhat 7.2 on a machine that needs to have 2 nic
>cards...however neither of the two nic cards have been "found". How would
>i configure it so that the two cards are properly installed..also
On Monday 12 August 2002 13:12, Majid Tahir wrote:
> hello all
> i have just installed redhat 7.2 on a machine that needs to have 2 nic
> cards...however neither of the two nic cards have been "found". How would
> i configure it so that the two cards are properly ins
Majid,
I've suffered from the multiple NIC problem, and so stalted way the
following notes. But keep in mind I've no expertise myself.
It is especially tricky to configure more than one network of the same
type, such as getting two NICS to co-exist. Sometimes the machine
determines which NIC is
I'd suggest that you open the machine up and look at the cards.
---Original Message---
>From: Majid Tahir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Date: 8/12/2002 5:18:00 AM
>Subject: NIC cards
>
hello all
i have just installed redhat 7.2 on a machine that needs to have 2 nic cards...however
neither of the two nic cards have been "found". How would i configure it so that the
two cards are properly installed..also one other problem is that i dont know the name
of one of the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard Adams wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yes, it is like apache, except it is my own web server but when an
> > incomming request comes in on 192.168.2.1:80, my program does not pick up
> > the connect request.
> >
> > My program is listening
redirecting and
forwarding outside your box (port forwarding), but it would help to check
it over.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Lee Chin wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a system with 3 NIC cards, each on a seperate subnet, with IP
> addresses 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1.
>
> I have a program li
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:53:59 -0500 (EST), Lee Chin wrote:
>Hi,
>I have a system with 3 NIC cards, each on a seperate subnet, with IP
>addresses 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1.
>
>I have a program listening for socket connections on 192.168.1.1, port 80.
>
>What
Lee Chin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Yes, it is like apache, except it is my own web server but when an
> incomming request comes in on 192.168.2.1:80, my program does not pick up
> the connect request.
>
> My program is listening on port 80 on 192.168.1.1
>
> I think I need to set up some ipchains ru
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> Hi,
> Yes, it is like apache, except it is my own web server but when an
> incomming request comes in on 192.168.2.1:80, my program does not pick up
> the connect request.
>
> My program is listening on port 80 on 192.168.1.1
Without knowing which program it
On 28-Mar-2001 Lee Chin wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a system with 3 NIC cards, each on a seperate subnet, with IP
> addresses 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1.
>
> I have a program listening for socket connections on 192.168.1.1, port 80.
>
> What I want to do is have
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Lee Chin wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a system with 3 NIC cards, each on a seperate subnet, with IP
> addresses 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1.
>
> I have a program listening for socket connections on 192.168.1.1, port 80.
>
> What I want to
how
Thanks
Lee
--Original Message--
From: Richard Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Lee Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 28, 2001 9:23:25 PM GMT
Subject: Re: 3 NIC cards problem
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Lee Chin wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a system with 3 NIC cards, each on a sep
Hi,
I have a system with 3 NIC cards, each on a seperate subnet, with IP
addresses 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1.
I have a program listening for socket connections on 192.168.1.1, port 80.
What I want to do is have incomming connection requets for IP 192.168.2.1
and 192.168.3.1 on
41 matches
Mail list logo
