Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Rainer Mager
Hi all, I'm trying to do 2 things with SCSI/RAID both of which are having problems. Any help would be greatly appreciated. My system is 2.2.14 with the 5.1.22 Adaptec AIC-7xxx drivers. First, I'm trying to get 4 SCSI drives working. Forget RAID, forget anything complex, I just want

MPL-licensed LAND-5 donated s/w raid code

2000-02-01 Thread James Manning
It's bound to get brought up here, so we might as well do it now. The release certainly seems to indicate a feeling that the current s/w raid is lacking (I think most if not all of us would dsagree at least to a large extent), so perhaps the best question(s) are: 1) Is the MPL a problem given

Re: Compaq smartSCSI doesn't recognise 2nd drive

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel Bidwell
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 06:33:37PM +0100, Sjoerd Tromp wrote: I've encounterd this problem ones. In almost the same situation a proliant 2500 with 192MB memory and a Compaq smartarray controller.. the problem was he couldn't format one of my logical drives because a memory problem. Now

RE: Compaq smartSCSI doesn't recognise 2nd drive

2000-02-01 Thread Newman Chakerian
Thanks Bill for your comments I actually had the entries in fstab right when I tried it. (Sorry for the manual typos) I was wondering .. The Compaq Proliant has an internal SCSI Controller (NCRXX ??). The RedHat install picks this up no problem. AM I better off using the internal controller

Re: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread James Manning
[ Monday, January 31, 2000 ] Rainer Mager wrote: Feb 1 02:48:01 dual kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 10920, scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Read (6) 00 06 df 60 00 Feb 1 02:48:03 dual kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 10921, scsi1, channel 0, id 1, lun

Re: MPL-licensed LAND-5 donated s/w raid code

2000-02-01 Thread Andy Poling
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, James Manning wrote: It's bound to get brought up here, so we might as well do it now. The release certainly seems to indicate a feeling that the current s/w raid is lacking (I think most if not all of us would dsagree at least to a large extent) Not at all. Despite

Re: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Rainer Mager
(Please pardon the excessive logs) Very good question, sorry I forget it to start out with... On 1 chanel (the internal one, if it matters), I have just 1 UWSCSI2 drive. On the other channel I have 6 devices, the 3 other drives, a CD-RW drive, a ZIP drive, and a Conner tape drive. So, your

Re: Raid over Network

2000-02-01 Thread Murat Koc
For what are the 40 PCs used normally ? Thomas Thanks a lot. I' ll check nbd and pvfs. In our system there are 350 users 40 PCs+10PCs(servers for various jobs). One server is NFS and NIS server and the other 40PCs are NIS and NFS clients. They have 4.3Gb hd but just 2.3GB enough(SuSE), so

puzzling RAID message

2000-02-01 Thread Benjamin de los Angeles Jr .
Hello, I'm puzzled by this message during bootup: autodetecting RAID array could not import /dev/hda2! could not import /dev/hdc4! could not import /dev/hda4! could not import /dev/hdc4! autorun... ... autorun DONE the arrays are detected and working properly, how can I do away with "could not

Re: MPL-licensed LAND-5 donated s/w raid code

2000-02-01 Thread Illtud Daniel
Neil Brown said: (and Andy Poling said similar) Maybe I missed something, but all I found on their download site is a bunch of perl CGI scripts that turns your web browser into a GUI interface to RAID 0.90. The README said things like "this code is buggy, insecure, and incomplete, but maybe

RAID1 on RED HAT 6.0

2000-02-01 Thread kbashir
Hi, I have redhat linux 6 with two scsi hard disk A B. Each have three partitions.I want to implement software raid 1.The partitions are of same size on both hard disk. HARDDISK A was running for the last 1 year. HARDDISK B is just added. Now how will i mirror the two so that my data dont

Re: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Peter Pregler
Hi, I had similar problems (actually your messages could be a cut-and-paste of my old logs) with my box at the beginning. The actual problems was that the scsi-bus did not fullfill the specifications. Replacing some hardware (hot-swap boxes) solved it. BTW, all worked well under DOS in the

Re: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Stephen Waters
or you could just configure the transfer rate to be one notch lower than your current level. had to do that with my 4 U2W drives in a hotswap box w/ a tekram dc390u2b (symbios chipset). -s Peter Pregler wrote: Hi, I had similar problems (actually your messages could be a cut-and-paste of

Turning non-raid system into raid.

2000-02-01 Thread Chris Cogdon
Hey all... this probably isnt a 100% raid question, but I'm hoping that someone here has had a similar experience that might be able to help me. I'm trying to turn a non-raid system (RedHat-6.1: no flames please, I've heard them all already :) into a root-raid system. If raid wasnt involved,

OT on SWAP not on RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Craig Zody
Hello all, Although I have RAID set up on a few systems that I help out with, this is not really a SWAP on RAID question, but since everyone here seems to know so much about it, I figured that I would ask here first before annoying the entire Linux-Kernel mailing list. I have a box with 4 IDE

RE: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Rainer Mager
Multiple responses to responses in 1 message, I hope no one gets confused... First off, I did some testing with normal SCSI (no RAID) (yes, I do know this is a RAID mailing list, but everyone is being so helpful I hope I'm forgiven ;-). I wrote simultaneously to each of my 4 SCSI drives as fast

RE: RAID1 on RED HAT 6.0

2000-02-01 Thread Gregory Leblanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You might need to update a few other packages, like the kernel packages (I don't know whats going break if I do that), and the package that contains fdisk (rpm -qf /sbin/fdisk?). You might need to leave the "old" RH6.0 kernel packages, and get the

Re: How to start swap on raid correctly?

2000-02-01 Thread David Holl
In an extreme case, a drive could fail and a new one hot added while the machine is live. Then reconstruction could occur while the swap area is active. You might also like a cron job if you _REALLY_ want? On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Holger Kiehl wrote: -Hello - -Since swapping on a software raid is

RE: OT on SWAP not on RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Gregory Leblanc
-Original Message- From: Craig Zody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 7:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT on SWAP not on RAID Hello all, Although I have RAID set up on a few systems that I help out with, this is not really a SWAP on RAID

RE: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Gregory Leblanc
Woohoo! Somebody who knows how to reply to a thread! grin -Original Message- From: Rainer Mager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 7:58 AM To: Linux-RAID Subject: RE: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID Multiple responses to responses in 1 message,

RE: Argh, more problems with SCSI and RAID

2000-02-01 Thread Peter Pregler
On 01-Feb-2000 Rainer Mager wrote: From: Peter Pregler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I had similar problems (actually your messages could be a cut-and-paste of my old logs) with my box at the beginning. The actual problems was that the scsi-bus did not fullfill the specifications. Replacing

Re: Raid over Network

2000-02-01 Thread Thomas Waldmann
That means, that you can "export" a block device on each of your 40 PCs (you´ld export your 2GB partition). Then import these nbds on your server. But do not mount them RW and write to them. There is no locking inbetween machines, and you can get a whole lot of interesting results if you

Re: some recommendations for IDE raid (using 37GB drives)

2000-02-01 Thread Zach Coombes, AMD, Austin, TX
A fix(?) is found... First, sorry for the horrendous English on the first post. Never try to write a technical email right before a meeting. You may become a poster child for the deterioration of our schooling system (a quote from the day I sent this: "Jeez, and they actually graduated

Re: some recommendations for IDE raid (using 37GB drives)

2000-02-01 Thread Brian D. Haymore
A fix, possibly, is to look at using grub instead of lilo. Since it doesn't write the kernel params into the MBR the way lilo does it may vary well allow for longer strings passed to the kernel. -- Brian D. Haymore University of Utah Center for High Performance Computing 155 South 1452 East RM