On Tuesday May 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some recovery problems with RAID1.
> (raidtools 0.90)
> I use Red Hat Linux 6.1 and I have two partitions mirrored (hda8 and hdc8).
> If I loose the second part of the mirror I don't have any problems.
> I can recreate the RAID1 with
Hi,
I have a 3-disk raid 5 system and would like to add a spare:
Kernel: 2.2.15
Patch: raid-2.2.15-A0
Patch: ide.2.2.15.2509.patch
Boot disk is not part of any array.
Mobo is: Oceanic 440BX whic doc sez only supports UDMA 33
PCI IDE cards (2): Magic IDE 66 - these are Promise cards
hi,
I am newbie in RAID.
I want to know how could I set up multiple MD devices for
RAID1.
do I just configure MD1 in the same /etc/raidtab file which
contains the configuration of MD0.
I would really appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks-a million.
Regards,
Kartik
System Administration wrote:
>
> Juri Haberland writes:
> > System Administration wrote:
> > > Whoops! You're saying that SuSE's 2.2.14 *kernel* still needs
> > > patching (as opposed to just having raidtools-0.90 in the system)? Of
> > > course I enabled LVM and MD options along with linea
Juri Haberland writes:
> System Administration wrote:
> > Whoops! You're saying that SuSE's 2.2.14 *kernel* still needs
> > patching (as opposed to just having raidtools-0.90 in the system)? Of
> > course I enabled LVM and MD options along with linear, raid0, and
> > raid1 personalities whe
This may be a FAQ, but is there any design document
for the linux-raid subsystem that explains what the API
is for designing a new RAID personality? I'm going over
it myself, and trying to build such a document, but if
anyone already has one laying around, I would greatly
appreciate a poin
Two places, one posted just a little while ago.
http://www.progressive-comp.com/Lists/
http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-raid/
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Brinker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 4:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: A
System Administration wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Whoops! You're saying that SuSE's 2.2.14 *kernel* still needs
> patching (as opposed to just having raidtools-0.90 in the system)? Of
> course I enabled LVM and MD options along with linear, raid0, and
> raid1 personalities when I built the kernel use
Juri Haberland writes:
> System Administration wrote:
> >
> > A clarification and a correction: 1) I'm using raidtools-0.90
> > (19990824) and 2) RAID0 was started with older mdtools and *not*
> > mkraid.
> >
> > System Administration writes:
> > > I'm almost certain this a FAQ (or soon
Hi
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Piete Brooks wrote:
> > When running LILO only /dev/hdb is updated.
>
> How come ?
Wish I knew It all happened after I was testing to see what would
happen under various failure conditions. I had three identical drives that
I was experimenting with by removing and r
Does anyone know if an archive of this mailing list exists, and what the
URL is if it does?
Thanks,
Ron
I would suspect lilo is not writing boot info to both disks.
Try "/sbin/lilo -v -v -v " to see what lilo is actually
writing to which disk. This may shed some light on the problem.
I upgraded lilo to the RH6.2 version (lilo-21.15). The RPM includes
the raid-1 patch. It works for me (RH6.0) bo
Hi,
Am Die, 23 Mai 2000 schrieben Sie:
> Hi
>
> I have a similar problem.
>
> /dev/md1 consists of /dev/hda5 and /dev/hdb5
>
> When running LILO only /dev/hdb is updated.
>
> Should /dev/hdb fail, I cannot boot from /dev/hda and get a message that
> no valid boot disk was found.
>
> I hav
Hi
I have a similar problem.
/dev/md1 consists of /dev/hda5 and /dev/hdb5
When running LILO only /dev/hdb is updated.
Should /dev/hdb fail, I cannot boot from /dev/hda and get a message that
no valid boot disk was found.
I have tried installing a new /dev/hda, fdisk'd and raidhotadd'd the
Hello,
I have some recovery problems with RAID1.
(raidtools 0.90)
I use Red Hat Linux 6.1 and I have two partitions mirrored (hda8 and hdc8).
If I loose the second part of the mirror I don't have any problems.
I can recreate the RAID1 with raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/hdc8.
But if I loose the first m
System Administration wrote:
>
> A clarification and a correction: 1) I'm using raidtools-0.90
> (19990824) and 2) RAID0 was started with older mdtools and *not*
> mkraid.
>
> System Administration writes:
> > I'm almost certain this a FAQ (or soon will be) but I can't find the
> > answer. Su
Hi Neil
> This is also fixed for 2.3.99pre8+.
>
> The event counter is incremented at raidstart and at raidstop, and a
> difference of 1 does not cause a disc to appear old, you need a
> difference of 2.
Would still have caused failure in the mentioned case:
May 18 16:38:27 backup kernel: autor
17 matches
Mail list logo
