I had good success using 2.0.36 with a DPT2564 card using the drivers
from the DPT website and following their installation instructions. Been
working as a server for over a year with no problems. Don't know that
much about the PM3224 cards though.
Mark...
David Livingstone wrote:
>
I had an unexpected resync at one stage when I changed the system clock.
Mark...
Kirk Patton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We have a linux box running 2.2.12-20 in a raid level 5 configuration.
>
> Today we had problems accessing the server. When I checked, the load
> was up t
mentions about changing the devices types to
fd but I'm not totally sure on how to do this.
Thanks
Mark
automatically ?
Thanks for the help
Mark
Kevin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey there guys, got a question for you. I just received one of
> these cards and it is basically a dual channel raid system. The problem
> I am having is that RH6.1 recognizes the first drive and only the first
> drive. Here is the config.
We fixed
any of these problems affect other, non-journaled filesystems
> > too? Yes, 1) can: throughout the kernel there are places where buffers
> > are modified before the dirty bits are set. In such places we will
> > always mark the buffers dirty soon, so the window in which an incorre
It is possible that the problem is a result of the raid code not beeing PPC
friendly when concerning byte boundries.
Open up linux/include/linux/raid/md_p.h
At line 161 you should have something ressembling the following
__u32 sb_csum; /* 6 checksum of the whole superblock
*/
Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 02:16:57PM -0600, Mark Ferrell wrote:
> > You also have to remember that in most LVM implementations adding a device to the
> > LVM does not add it to the raid.
> [snip]
> > "Oh look .. the 90G raid5 array is gett
gt; :.....: putrid forms of man:
> : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
> :OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
> :.:{Konkhra}...:
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972) 685-7868 : Desk
(972) 685-4210 : Lab
(972) 879-4326 : Pager
es for being short. I provide support myself so I certainly
recognize the necessisity for brevity.
Mark
ore posting.
2) Use my swap partition as one of the RAID drives. This seemed to be
working, but I was afraid it would think I had a teeny-tiny RAID.
3) Commenting out one of the raid-disk entries (of course mkraid wouldn't
run at all).
Anyway, I'd greatly app
e allocation..
Is there
> one?
Reiserfs does, doesn't it?
--Stephen
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972) 685-7868 : Desk
(972) 685-4210 : Lab
(972) 879-4326 : Pager
|
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
http://www.wirthuell.de
|
Fax.: +49 89 66617-48603
|
Fak. fuer Physik +49 761 203-5896 |
Administration CIP-Pool: 203-7682 |
__
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972) 685-7868 : Desk
(972) 685-4210 : Lab
(972) 879-4326 : Pager
r not, but I happen to
> have exactly (4) 4.3gb SCSI drives on an aic78xxx ( the Ultra Wide
> version) too, on an SMP box (2.2.12). however, I boot on an IDE
> drive, and uses no RAID.
>
> This one config is working fine.
>
> I'd say, it's the raid thingy, then ...
>
> Viet
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972) 685-7868 : Desk
(972) 685-4210 : Lab
(972) 879-4326 : Pager
No, I havn't had lockups at all that I remember, regardless of how hard
I beat on the machine. The system is a Dell PowerEdge2300 using
AIC-7880 controlers for the drives, and using the AIC-7860(?) for the
dat drive and cd-rom.
I run the same patches on a Dell OptiPlex GX1 using an AIC-7880
cont
: : constantly dumping system information?
> : :
> : : Any information or clues would be more then appreciated. Replies
> : : directly to the list are more then fine; I subscribe to both.
> : :
> : : Thanks.
> : :
> : : ::: Jason A. Diegmueller
> : : ::: Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer
> : : ::: 513/542-1500 WORK // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : : ::: Systems Administrator, Bertke Systems Innovations
> : :
> : :
> : : --------------------------
> : : ------
> : : to unsubscribe email "unsubscribe linux-admin" to
> : : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : : See the linux-admin FAQ: http://www.kalug.lug.net/linux-admin-FAQ/
> : :
> :
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(972) 685-7868 : Desk
(972) 685-4210 : Lab
(972) 879-4326 : Pager
Maybe you two could work together and make a RaidRoot-HOWTO that covers both lilo
and grub??
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Poling wrote:
> On 23 Aug 1999, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote:
> > James Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > How come I
be more
descriptive but I am at work now and don't have any of my logs ..
Will get home and do a make mrproper and try again and see if it still has
issues .. will drop you a log if all is not well.
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ferrell, Mark (EXCHANGE:RICH2:2K25)" wr
Was playing w/ 2.2.12-final last night in alan's 2.2.12pre releases and it
appears to fully support the newer raid source.
--
Mark Ferrell : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the latest (ie. 19990724) RAID stuff in 2.2.11-ac3 ?
>
> If not, what version of the RAID
l
is patched
to auto-detect the raid arrayz then all should be fine.
Corse .. like I said .. I could be off my rocker and there might be a
limitation that I am not
aware of.
Mark F.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nortel Networks
Christopher A. Gantz wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> First I
I installed the raid 0.90 tools and installed and patch the 2.2.6
kernel. Though I did it from source .. don't know if that matters.
Corse .. getting Yast to believe it's root fs was /dev/md0 is a
completely different storry.
Schackel, Fa. Integrata, ZRZ DA wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm us
Guys,
Thanks for your help. I now have a working system after I downgraded my
kernel.
Its a shame the software RAID HOWTO does not point out the Alpha sub
directory.
Im shocked that I have lost 12GB off my raid 0 set before I have even
started!
Mark Beck
cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities
Guys,
Ive downloaded 2.2.6 kernel, and now trying to patch
"raid0145-19990421-2.2.6".
[root@lisc0002 src]# ls -l
total 394
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Jun 11 16:18 linux -> linux-2.2.6/
drwxr-xr-x 15 1046 1046 1024 Jun 11 16:25 linux-2.2.6
drwxr-xr-x 14 1046 1046
Could someone tell me what the latest version of Kernel supports raiding
that works. Also where do I get the patches from?
And why do I need to patch?
Mark Beck
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
ock at 24988992kB
mkraid: aborted
No information can be found in the System logs.
mkraid version 0.90.0
Linux lisc0002.rrds.co.uk 2.2.9 #5 Wed Jun 9 15:48:15 BST 1999 i686 unknown
Any help appreciated.
Mark Beck
to the other disks after running lilo.
This would mean if the first disk (bios boot disk) failed it could be
removed and the next disk would be ready to be booted from.
Any thoughts?
Mark
____
|- Mark Anthony Lisher
r problem. The mail from Charles is here:
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~happy/megaraid.smp.txt
Sorry I haven't made it more usable but I've been busy :)
--
Mark Plaksinhttp://www.arches.uga.edu/~happy/
2) Try the patch we got from AMI to solve our SMP+MegaRAID problems. I
*think* that it comes with a different megaraid.c and megaraid.h than
what you'll find elsewhere though I haven't diff'd them yet.
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~happy/megaraid.smp.txt
--
Mark Plaksin
Eugene Blanchard wrote:
>
> I am running raid0 over raid1. Two striped pairs mirrored. Two internal
...
> I would think that if a drive failed running a mirrored raid that the
> system would realize this, shut down the bad mirrored half, send an
...
Isn't that why people usually run raid1 over r
Michael Shields wrote:
..
> I have a Celeron 333, which should not be dramatically slower. Are
> you sure these numbers are right -- 85 MB/s? How much RAM is in that
ooops. Yeah, ignore the 85MB values.
Here it is again, using "bonnie -s 256" on my 128MB P2-400 w/raid0 (2 IDE):
Seeker 1...Se
Michael Shields wrote:
>
> Here is a bonnie (tested with -s of 3x physical RAM) on my new home
> system:
>
> ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> MachineMB K/sec %CP
Dave Wreski wrote:
>
...# ./mkraid --configfile /etc/raidtab /dev/md0
> handling MD device /dev/md0
> analyzing super-block
> disk 0: /dev/hdc1, 425218kB, raid superblock at 425152kB
> disk 1: /dev/hdd1, 425218kB, raid superblock at 425152kB
> mkraid: aborted
I traced that "aborted" down to a fa
Since the stock md/raid0 is now horribly broken in 2.1.12[89],
I decided today to try the latest raid1 stuff:
raid0145-19981110-2.1.127 -- kernel patch
raidtools-19981105-0.90.tar.gz -- raid utilities
After patching the kernel and rebooting, I created /etc/raidtab:
Me Too! Me Too! Same Ooops, same place,
but with Fast! IDE drives instead of SCSI.
I thought for a moment that it might be a hard-to-find
IDE driver bug, but I see that Andreas managed to get it
to happen on a SCSI-only RAID0.
I first noticed this problem with .128/.129/.129+flufix
but that do
> > AMD K6-233
64M
> [...]
> > 2 x fast/wide/ultra 9.1gig 7200rpm disks (/export) ---> /dev/md0
> [...]
> > ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> > MachineMB K/sec
stats are missing
above and the drive as Oracle8 on it and runs *TONS* of data through.
Thanks
Mark
the most part,
prior to these problems, it has been a no-brainer. But, where I am now
is not good and is endangering the desired outcome of the project and I
have to do something soon. So I make my case to all of you and I thank
you for listening.
Mark
-
was having in the
Archive. But this one has stumped me and no one has posted a similar
question that I have seen. I am pretty new to system administration
under Linux. ;)
Also which would be a better way to go for a news server under Linux,
Raid 0 or a linear stripe?
--
Sincerely,
Mark Atkin
Hi,
Has anybody got DPT's RAID management software for SCO running under Linux?
I can get the binaries to run but dptmgr always says it can't talk to the
device. dptelog says it can't open the device file I created for it.
Any help will be appreciated!
-
39 matches
Mail list logo
