Many would argue that a Cyrix was equivalent to a 386. ;)
On 01/30/03 20:21, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
Unfortunately, not "lesser" enough to install on my Cyrix 6x86 P166+ or
120+... Authentic Pentium and above.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:51:13 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are y
Dude, you have got to cut back on the caffeine... Or start smoking
again... or something.
What the @#$% did Chang do to chap your a55 so bad? The guy is looking to
use Linux as a server, so let him! The fact that it is great as a desktop
doesn't mean everyone is ready to make that jump. He has
Unfortunately, not "lesser" enough to install on my Cyrix 6x86 P166+ or
120+... Authentic Pentium and above.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:51:13 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure that you have a compatible CPU? The Caldera server
> installations require a Pentium II or bett
m.w.chang wrote:
what does it do? remote admin or just for downloading?
Im running rpm 3.0.6 and I sure don't have rpm --port.. I do have rpm
--ftpport, and rpm --httpport
Where do you see this --port option?
-j
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EM
The only experiences I've had at one company I worked at was that the mail
admin set a max size for the mail that could be stored on the server. This
was an MS Exchange server. If you exceded that you got a message and
couldn't save anything else. If it got too bad the admin deleted big
piec
what does it do? remote admin or just for downloading?
--
.~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
/ v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.20
^ ^10:52am up 7 days, 3:57, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 0.99, 1.00
___
Linux-us
Feigning erudition, Andrew Mathews wrote:
% I've been searching for a reference to any specifications concerning
% maximum message sizes for email. I've googled a fair amount but not
% found anything specific other than RFC 1870 which doesn't give a
% commonly accepted maximum size, just a 64k m
I've never encountered any hard upper limit anywhere. ALthough i
completely agree that email wasn't designed to be a file transfer mechanism.
On 01/30/03 18:17, Andrew Mathews wrote:
I've been searching for a reference to any specifications concerning
maximum message sizes for email. I've googl
I've been searching for a reference to any specifications concerning
maximum message sizes for email. I've googled a fair amount but not
found anything specific other than RFC 1870 which doesn't give a
commonly accepted maximum size, just a 64k minimum capability. I'm
trying to provide some val
Hiii,
Im trying to get my Bind Server to work. I followed the tutorial by Doug Hunley from here : http://www.linux-sxs.org/bind9.html . Im a newbie soo sorry if my questions seem kind of off :) Here is what i im trying to set it up on (Redhat 7.3-2.3.20, BIND-9.2.2rc1)
I followed each step exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
abulma sultan spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> _
> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
methinks the new MSN8 spam protection works so well that it del
On Thursday 30 January 2003 09:07 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > > I'm not sure. It's hard for me to see SCSI ID assignments if I
> > > don't boot an OS so I can then run fdisk.
> >
> > Next time it happens, I'll boot from a floppy and see if I can get
> > fdis
abulma sultan wrote:
_
Same to you.
--
Andrew Mathews
-
1:55pm up 1 day, 13:55, 6 users, load average: 2.27, 1.40, 1.25
-
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http:/
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc ->
Or even Netscape/Mozilla mail.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> This is a common anti-spammer tactic. If the previous caller's
> smarthost suggestion doesn't work you'll either need an MX record (sort
> of a pain with a dynamic address) or you'll have to find out how to use
> comcast'
This is a common anti-spammer tactic. If the previous caller's
smarthost suggestion doesn't work you'll either need an MX record (sort
of a pain with a dynamic address) or you'll have to find out how to use
comcast's SMTP server directly. Unless they're contracting with MSN
this shouldn't be too
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > I'm not sure. It's hard for me to see SCSI ID assignments if I don't
> > boot an OS so I can then run fdisk.
>
> Next time it happens, I'll boot from a floppy and see if I can get fdisk
> running that way.
fdisk really has no part in this process. This
On Thursday 30 January 2003 08:45 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
.
> > The bios diagnostic screen on boot-up does not show SCSI ID
> > numbers, just info about sectors, model number, etc.
>
> It doesn't? Every SCSI controller i've ever used displays the IDs of
> t
On Thursday 30 January 2003 08:28 am, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:39 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> >
> > What kind of controller,
>
> The canonical Symbios 53C875 Ultra SCSI chipset
>
> > and what kind of disks?
>
> Two 9 GB Seagates and an 18 GB Seagate.
>
> > When its missing
>
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 07:54:58 -0800
James Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Its written by:
> Berny Goodheart & James Cox
> ISBN: 013 207556 3
>
> There is one copy on amazon for an astounding $332... Heck I'd sell you
> my copy for 300$ =)
>
Thanks for the (generous) offer Jim :-0
but th
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > When its missing
> > some disks, is it reassigning the SCSI IDs accordingly to the disks
> > that it does see, or does it remember that the 'missing' ones exist,
> > and keep the ID assignments the same?
>
> I'm not sure. It's hard for me to see SCSI ID
On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:39 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > Hi list.
> >
> > A not very linux-like question so please forgive me if it's
> > off-topic. My box has developed a worrisome problem. When I reboot
> > (to switch back and forth to the Evil OS) my
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:18 pm, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder
wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:13 pm, someone claiming to be Matt Nelson
>
> wrote:
> > Have you gotten any help with this? I'd like to set it up too but would
> > like to know of any pitfalls before hand
>
>
>
>
Sam Morgan wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 06:53:19 -0800
James Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An _excellent_
book is "The Secret Garden Explained" no longer in print, but you can
find it..
Got an authors name?
I can't find anything under that title?
God Bless,
Sam Morgan
--
"linux --
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 06:53:19 -0800
James Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An _excellent_
> book is "The Secret Garden Explained" no longer in print, but you can
> find it..
Got an authors name?
I can't find anything under that title?
God Bless,
Sam Morgan
--
"linux -- the lifetime learning e
m.w.chang wrote:
AH.. FORGOT ABOUT MINIX! I did read about Mr. Trovald's story and
forgot about that piece. lost marks in linux history... :(
and how did the guy crated minix? where is that very core bootdisk?
shouldn't linuxfromscratch begin from that very first bootdisk? :)
I think he meant
My ip is dynamic. It doesn't change much, but it can change.
Joel
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:15:22AM -0500, John Voigt wrote:
> On 01/30/2003 01:35 AM, ronnie gauthier wrote:
>
> > If comcast allows what you are doing it may be as simple as asking them to put
> > you into their reverse lookup tabl
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> A not very linux-like question so please forgive me if it's off-topic.
> My box has developed a worrisome problem. When I reboot (to switch back
> and forth to the Evil OS) my disk controller does not see all of my
> hard drives. My box is SC
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, tom wrote:
> Greets Net Llama;
>
> "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Since when is a P4 the same as IA64??
>
> Isn't it? I've seen the progression of the hardware over the
> years as this;
>
> 386-486 => 16 bit OS platforms/ 32 bit architecture
> 586-686-P3 => 3
Hi list.
A not very linux-like question so please forgive me if it's off-topic.
My box has developed a worrisome problem. When I reboot (to switch back
and forth to the Evil OS) my disk controller does not see all of my
hard drives. My box is SCSI and the disk controller is on the Intel
mothe
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
> % On 01/29/03 19:42, Kurt Wall wrote:
> % >Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
> % >%
> % >% Redhat-7.0 had a seriously broken gcc implimentation. 8.0 has a beta
> % >% release of glibc. All the intermediate release
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:49:06 -0800
> "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've never had a single problem installing Redhat 7.1, 7.2 or 7.3.
> >
> > On 01/29/03 19:31, Joel Hammer wrote:
> > > This reminds me of the problems I had with RH 7.2 or
On 1/30/2003 6:33 AM, someone claiming to be Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 01/29/03 19:42, Kurt Wall wrote:
% >Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% >%
% >% Redhat-7.0 had a seriously broken gcc implimentation. 8.0 has a beta
% >% release of glibc. All the inter
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:49:06 -0800
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never had a single problem installing Redhat 7.1, 7.2 or 7.3.
>
> On 01/29/03 19:31, Joel Hammer wrote:
> > This reminds me of the problems I had with RH 7.2 or whatever. I
> > think redhat was not using the partiti
On 01/30/2003 01:35 AM, ronnie gauthier wrote:
If comcast allows what you are doing it may be as simple as asking them to put
you into their reverse lookup table.
This is one option, but if it is a typical cable ISP, it's not likely to
happen.
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail to direct
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 01/29/03 19:42, Kurt Wall wrote:
% >Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% >%
% >% Redhat-7.0 had a seriously broken gcc implimentation. 8.0 has a beta
% >% release of glibc. All the intermediate releases had no such problems,
% >% and use standards
37 matches
Mail list logo
