Hi,
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:02:05 -0500, Michael Hipp wrote:
>I have 2 servers (both Red Hat 9) separated by the Internet. There are
>Win users on both sides enjoying Samba. I need to share a folder on
>ServerB with the users on ServerA ...
>
>
>PC - ServerA -- ServerB - PC
>
Hi there,
i am facing a strange problem , i have a remote server where i
ssh and store files as backup. But recently when i try to create a
directory by issuing a mkdir command it returns back with segmentation
fault message. But amazingly when i ncftp to that same server with the
same use
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:10:42PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
>[ snips ]
>
>On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 20:21:04 -0400
>dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
>>
>> Microsoft's Web site was made inaccessible for an hour and 40 minutes
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:12:51 -0400
Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A very good read. I'm not sure I buy his politics, but he nails a lot
> of points dead on.
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6989
>
Boy, I think I'll wait for the Readers' Digest Condensed Book versi
A very good read. I'm not sure I buy his politics, but he nails a lot of points dead
on.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6989
--
Matthew Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eisgr.com/
Enterprise Information Systems
*Network Consulting, Integration & Supp
It could be worse... No offense to any Germans, but this could have been the German
legal system... IIRC, the German government presses the charges without any plaintiff
needing to be involved... I'm referring to the KOffice KIllustrator/Adobe debacle a
couple years ago.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003
I wondered what pressing that big Red button would do! :p
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 20:35:15 -0400
Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoth dep:
> > http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
> >
> > Microsoft's Web site was made inaccessible for an hour and 40 minu
--- Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would NFS be a good way to make the shared folder
> available to ServerA
> and then share it with Samba? Can NFS and Samba work
> with the same
> directory and not collide?
>
NFS works just fine with Samba. You can use an NFS
mount and make it a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
| Actually, Kurt, you were the one loaning me some asbestos
undergarments, protecting me from the
(so I thought at that time) evil Andrew Mathews...
I can tell you've been talking to my ex-wives.
- --
Andrew Mathews
- -
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:14:50 -0700
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Brain overload.
>
> Ya, its confusing. You might be able to get away with doing something like
> stunnel, which is alot easier to impliment than a full strength encrypted
> VPN. Whatever you do, don't open NFS/SMB
Glad to help, Alma.
I'm not sure what you're referring to about restarting the services before they
actually work... Once you edit the config or after a reboot?
/etc/init.d/smb restart
/etc/init.d/nmb restart
Most systems don't even RUN IPX anymore. I haven't run IPX since the NCPFS utilities
List
All have said a lot about ed, but when I was fairly new then I tried 4 or 5
distros, they all had some problem to get them up and going. ED, put in the cd
make a few slections & in about 45 minutes to an hour you were syrfing the net.
No muss, no fuss. Easy to learn, easier to maintain. and
Nope, they just made Yast2 a little less HEAVY-HANDED. It still doesn't read in
hand-edited values (they're probably too wimpy to write their tools to deal with all
the values in a config)
Yast2 just looks for self-edited configs and won't overwrite them by default.
use the command "dig pcisys.
Actually, this address is not listed as a nameserver for the domain...
;; ANSWER SECTION:
pcisys.net. 86400 IN A 216.229.32.173
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
pcisys.net. 86400 IN NS ns1.pcisys.net.
pcisys.net. 86400 IN NS ns2.pcisys.
Sorry, but I believe some of your problem is that Bill lives on MY network!
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 10:18:46 -0600
bof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
> 192.168.1.1 bill.mynet.net bill
--
Matthew Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, Kurt, you were the one loaning me some asbestos undergarments, protecting me
from the (so I thought at that time) evil Andrew Mathews... Still, watching you still
humbled me. It reminded me of the Mudding days of old, when I was a newbie and some
uberMudder allowed me to join him on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
| That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a lot of
| showing respect and being humble, especially on an email list.
|
Mine came from David Bandel back in '98 or '99 when I posted to the
Caldera list a fo
Collins Richey wrote:
[ snips ]
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 20:21:04 -0400
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
I just love it. The DoHS is issuing advisory warnings to consumers and
businesses, but they just signed a big contract to b
[ snips ]
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 20:21:04 -0400
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
>
> Microsoft's Web site was made inaccessible for an hour and 40 minutes
> Friday afternoon when a denial-of-service attack overwhelmed the sit
Quoth Michael Hipp:
> Net Llama! wrote:
>
> >Whatever you do, don't open NFS/SMB to the internet.
>
> Are you saying don't open them directly to the Internet or don't attempt
> to send them via a secure tunnel/VPN to another network? If the latter,
> then I'm entirely barking up the wrong tree.
Net Llama! wrote:
Whatever you do, don't open NFS/SMB to the internet.
Are you saying don't open them directly to the Internet or don't attempt
to send them via a secure tunnel/VPN to another network? If the latter,
then I'm entirely barking up the wrong tree.
Michael
_
--- Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> SCO Agrees IBM Owns AIX, JFS, NUMA, RCU Copyrights
>
>
http://mozillaquest.com/Linux03/ScoSource-24-Copyrights_Story01.html
>
>
> Andrew Mathews
Too bad really for IBM; If SCO was a Canadian com
On 08/01/03 18:08, Michael Hipp wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
You really need to use a secure VPN, such as FreeSwan. Opening up SMB
or NFS on the internet is just asking to be 0wn3d.
Yes. Is FreeSwan the best way to do this?
maybe, maybe not. I'm admittedly not anything close to an expert on SMB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SCO Agrees IBM Owns AIX, JFS, NUMA, RCU Copyrights
http://mozillaquest.com/Linux03/ScoSource-24-Copyrights_Story01.html
- --
Andrew Mathews
- -
~ 7:10pm up 19 days, 23:29, 9 users,
2.5.x & 2.6.x kernels require swap version 1. What I can't figure out is
what's the difference between swap0 & swap1? I've googled a bit, and there
are tons of instructions talking about how this version or that version are
needed with kernel f00, but still no one explains why version 1 is an
Net Llama! wrote:
You really need to use a secure VPN, such as FreeSwan. Opening up SMB
or NFS on the internet is just asking to be 0wn3d.
Yes. Is FreeSwan the best way to do this?
I've also been reading a bit about CIPE which seems to be included in
RH. Know anything about it?
http://sites.in
On 08/01/03 17:35, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth dep:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
Microsoft's Web site was made inaccessible for an hour and 40 minutes
Friday afternoon when a denial-of-service attack overwhelmed the site
with traffic, making it impossibl
On 08/01/03 17:02, Michael Hipp wrote:
I have 2 servers (both Red Hat 9) separated by the Internet. There are
Win users on both sides enjoying Samba. I need to share a folder on
ServerB with the users on ServerA ...
PC - ServerA -- ServerB - PC
SMB Internet Folder
Quoth dep:
> http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
>
> Microsoft's Web site was made inaccessible for an hour and 40 minutes
> Friday afternoon when a denial-of-service attack overwhelmed the site
> with traffic, making it impossible for legitimate page reques
Quoth Geoff:
[...]
> I run LFS 3.3, which I installed last year (gcc 2.95.3 / glibc 2.2.5). My
> system is very nicely sorted and up-to-date, except for the fact that gcc
> and glibc have obviously moved on.
Yup.
> Whenever I have looked into this topic in the past I have become lost and
> dep
Kurt Wall wrote:
How about:
search pcisys.net local
Kurt
Yes, that was changed, but the problem still exists. I now believe that
it is in my gateway machine, so I will have to take a look at it when
the spirit inspires me.
Thanx to all for your help.
BOF
___
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12808118
Microsoft's Web site was made inaccessible for an hour and 40 minutes
Friday afternoon when a denial-of-service attack overwhelmed the site
with traffic, making it impossible for legitimate page requests to get
through.
Quoth Bill Campbell:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:59:10PM -0400, Kurt Wall wrote:
> >Quoth Matthew Carpenter:
> >> That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a lot of
> >> showing respect and being humble, especially on an email list.
> >
> >Hmm. I think this is a compliment, b
Quoth bof:
> I am trying to set up a Suse 8.2 desktop box, (Bob, address
> 192.168.1.33) but am having trouble connecting to the Internet. I am
> not running a firewall on it.
>
> I can ping an Internet address by IP address without problem. When I
> try to ping by hostname I receive the error
I have 2 servers (both Red Hat 9) separated by the Internet. There are
Win users on both sides enjoying Samba. I need to share a folder on
ServerB with the users on ServerA ...
PC - ServerA -- ServerB - PC
SMB Internet Folder SMB
ServerB will have a folder to be
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:59:10PM -0400, Kurt Wall wrote:
>Quoth Matthew Carpenter:
>> That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a lot of
>> showing respect and being humble, especially on an email list.
>
>Hmm. I think this is a compliment, but I'm not sure. I've certainly
>
Thanks Matt,
I have that setup and it looks like it should work, but I need to stop
and restart both processes before it actually works. (SuSE also doesn't
seem to pickup netbios over IPX like Caldera did so that is causing some
changes...) It bothers me but I won't be digging into it until a
This sounds very similar to my setup. I am running SuSE 8.2 pro with a
SMC NAT router. The router is the DHCP server and also holds the DNS
pointer.
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
#
192.168.2.7 awetzker.weg.org awetzker
192.168.2.1 hub router
192.168.2.10 crunch.weg.org crunch
192.168.2.4 alma
On 08/01/03 13:51, Geoff wrote:
Whenever I have looked into this topic in the past I have become lost and
depressed in a mass of postings in other places warning about binary
incompatibilities, the need to recompile most or all of my libraries, the
danger of hosing my system entirely .. etc. In sh
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
>
> > Quoth Matthew Carpenter:
> > > That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a
> > > lot of showing respect and being humble, especially on an email
> > >
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Quoth Matthew Carpenter:
> > That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a lot of
> > showing respect and being humble, especially on an email list.
>
> Hmm. I think this is a compliment, but I'm not sure. I've certainly
> been know to en
Quoth Matthew Carpenter:
> That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a lot of
> showing respect and being humble, especially on an email list.
Hmm. I think this is a compliment, but I'm not sure. I've certainly
been know to enter a fray with a double-barreled flamethrower, bu
ronnie gauthier wrote:
Just curious
xxx.xxx.32.xxx
xxx.xxx.33.xxx
is there a typo or just a coincidence?
Coincidence.
After further investigation, it would appear that the problems that I
have been having may be in the machine that I am using as a NAT gateway.
Which is just wonderful, as it wa
--- Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These are useful, but...
>
> >whois.rfc-ignorant.org -- Sites that do not have
> >proper WHOIS information
>
> This one can be totally bogus as it depends on the
> maintainers of the whois
> databases, not on the ISPs themselves.
>
I'm not sure
That's ok. Let's just say that between you and Kurt, I learned a lot of
showing respect and being humble, especially on an email list.
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 08:43:23 -0600
Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Carpenter wrote:
>
Hello,
In spite of 5 years in linux, I am new to sxs and to this ng. I found you
because I was Googling for information on upgrading gcc and glibc, and I
found the excellent guidance at http://www.opq.se/sxs/index2.html. I have
also just found a couple of posts on the topic here.
I run LFS 3.3,
Just curious
xxx.xxx.32.xxx
xxx.xxx.33.xxx
is there a typo or just a coincidence?
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:50:40 -0600 - bof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following
Re: Re: Unknown host error message when trying to ping Internet
>pcisys.net uses 216.229.32.173 as their mail server. Their DNS serve
Apparently they have changed their systems, for 216.229.33.250 was their
DNS server for some time and I did not look it up.
At any rate, I plugged in your values into /etc/resolv.conf and still
get the same unknown host message.
BTW, I was under the impression that Suse had changed Yast so that
Ok I tried again and this what I got when a performed an nslookup on for pcisys.net on
216.229.33.250
pcisys.net A 216.229.32.173
pcisys.net MX 10 mail.pcisys.net
pcisys.net MX 20 smtp1.pcisys.net
pcisys.net MX 20 smtp2.pcisys.net
pcisys.net NS ns1.pcisys.net
pcisys.net NS ns2.pcisys.net
pc
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 14:50, bof wrote:
> pcisys.net uses 216.229.32.173 as their mail server. Their DNS server is
> 216.229.33.250.
>
> If I try to dig or nslookup "pcisys.net" I get a "connection timed out.
> no servers could be reached" message.
Here are the results of my dig. Looks like yo
pcisys.net uses 216.229.32.173 as their mail server. Their DNS server is
216.229.33.250.
If I try to dig or nslookup "pcisys.net" I get a "connection timed out.
no servers could be reached" message.
Wil McGilvery wrote:
I performed an nslookup and this is what I got.
pcisys.net. A 216.229.32.
here is what I get.
How do you have 216.229.32.250 set for a DNS server when it is not listed?
ns2.pcisys.net - 216.29.32.166
ns1.pcisys.net - 216.229.32.170
banya.pcisys.net - 216.229.32.250
jerry.pcisys.net - 207.76.102.251
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 11:51:04 -0600 - bof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
the
I performed an nslookup and this is what I got.
pcisys.net. A 216.229.32.173
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager
Lynch Digital Media Inc
416-744-7949
416-716-3964 (cell)
1-866-314-4678
416-744-0406 FAX
www.LynchDigital.com
-Original Message-
From: Net Llama! [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
You sure that's the right IP for the nameserver? What happens if you try
to dig or nsloopkup?
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, bof wrote:
> Yes. I can ping 216.229.33.250 and get a reply. But if I try and ping
> "pcisys.net" (216.229.33.250 is the nameserver for pcisys.net), I get
> the "unknown host pcisys.
Yes. I can ping 216.229.33.250 and get a reply. But if I try and ping
"pcisys.net" (216.229.33.250 is the nameserver for pcisys.net), I get
the "unknown host pcisys.net" error message.
So how do I correct this?
BOF
Net Llama! wrote:
Can you ping the IPs in resolv.conf from the SuSE-8.2 box?
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:45:13 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm attempting 'make xconfig' on 2.6.0-test2, and it just occured to
> me that there is no key on whether the dot or the check represents a
> module. Anyone have a clue to lend me?
If you read my page this question is
--- Gerry Doris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I use MailScanner and have installed both
> F-Prot and ClamAV.
> F-Prot is free for non-commercial users.
> MailScanner installs seamlessly
> requiring no changes to sendmail (also works with
> Postfix and Exim).
> MailScanner calls the ins
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:19:24AM -0700, Gary Wilson wrote:
...
>I would add the bl servers at rfc-ignornant.org, which
>includes :
>postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org -- Sites that do not have
>postmaster@ addresses
>abuse.rfc-ignorant.org -- Sites that do not have
>abuse@ addresses
>dsn.rfc-ignorant.
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 12:18, bof wrote:
> I am trying to set up a Suse 8.2 desktop box, (Bob, address
> 192.168.1.33) but am having trouble connecting to the Internet. I am
> not running a firewall on it.
>
> I can ping an Internet address by IP address without problem. When I
> try to ping by
Can you ping the IPs in resolv.conf from the SuSE-8.2 box? If not, then
that's your problem.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, bof wrote:
> I am trying to set up a Suse 8.2 desktop box, (Bob, address
> 192.168.1.33) but am having trouble connecting to the Internet. I am
> not running a firewall on it.
>
> I c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net Llama! shocked and awed us all by speaking:
> No offense, but what's with the critique of answers? I didn't realize that
> this had do be an essay with well thought out replies.
just trying to get to the 'meat-and-potatos' part of it all. hard to
I am trying to set up a Suse 8.2 desktop box, (Bob, address
192.168.1.33) but am having trouble connecting to the Internet. I am
not running a firewall on it.
I can ping an Internet address by IP address without problem. When I
try to ping by hostname I receive the error message "unknown host."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Wilson shocked and awed us all by speaking:
> While we are discussing email and spam, I was
> wondering if anyone had any experience with CLAM
> anti-virus, found at http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ ?
>
> I'm looking at anti-virus solutions for a Lin
I'm attempting 'make xconfig' on 2.6.0-test2, and it just occured to me
that there is no key on whether the dot or the check represents a module.
Anyone have a clue to lend me?
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Wilson wrote:
| While we are discussing email and spam, I was
| wondering if anyone had any experience with CLAM
| anti-virus, found at http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ ?
|
| I'm looking at anti-virus solutions for a Linux
| mailserver now that Micros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
| :) Glad to know we can still joke around. I still remember the first time
you and I spoke... it was not necessarily pleasant, in fact I believe Kurt had
to step in :)
| Great to still be seeing you, mate! Time does odd thin
> While we are discussing email and spam, I was
> wondering if anyone had any experience with CLAM
> anti-virus, found at http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ ?
>
> I'm looking at anti-virus solutions for a Linux
> mailserver now that Microsoft has bought RAV and is in
> the process of shutting it down.
>
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:05:47 +1000
Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:29 am, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
> > Lots of people wrote too much to quote.
> >
> > Between reminiscing about eDesk 2.4 and favorite brews, this is
> > becoming another eDesk 2.4 wake.
> > Not that t
While we are discussing email and spam, I was
wondering if anyone had any experience with CLAM
anti-virus, found at http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ ?
I'm looking at anti-virus solutions for a Linux
mailserver now that Microsoft has bought RAV and is in
the process of shutting it down.
Gary
___
--- Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> If email doesn't go through because of a well-chosen
> blacklist (this includes
> RBL's which actually block SPAM servers, which I
> left out of my early post),
> the problem is theirs to fix, not yours. The reason
> you choose RBL's
> CAREFU
70 matches
Mail list logo
