/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
--
Squabsy
Using Opera, The Bat, K-meleon, or Becky.
Trying to use Linux
Right Now Using Fastmail when I should be working
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://mail.linux-sxs.org/mailman
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 06:52, Squabsy wrote:
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
I've used Suse 8.2 and find it to be a good distro, especially if you
like
on the realative
| advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
knoppix is great as a bootable cd distribution, which is how many people
use it. if you're running a distribution you like and you're running it
for production purposes as opposed to fooling around, why consider
switching?
still, if you d/l
to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire
religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry combined with what i feel is completely
stupid packaging give
of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire
on reasonably
ok with it.
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd
would care to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
Knoppix is a great recovery system and a good linux demo. It can easily
be installed to your hard drive. The hardware detection is very good.
It's on one cd. It has access to debian archives, which contain huge
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire
religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry combined with what i feel is completely
stupid packaging give me a bad taste in my
problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably
ok with it.
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
Knoppix is a great recovery system and a good linux
Net Llama! wrote:
Gotta ask. What is so stupid about what I consider the best
packaging/updating scheme out there. (sorry, haven't tried gentoo) You
can keep debian updated using only a couple of commands once in a while.
(apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade)
Not if you want to compile from
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Gotta ask. What is so stupid about what I consider the best
packaging/updating scheme out there. (sorry, haven't tried gentoo) You
can keep debian updated using only a couple of commands once in a while.
(apt-get update apt-get
Net Llama! wrote:
unpack it, then:
./configure
make
checkinstall -D
This makes a .deb file for easy uninstalling later.
Sure, but if you're going to go that route, then you're not really getting
the 'advantage' of debian any longer. its just as simple to do that on a
redhat box to give me
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire
religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry
Collins Richey wrote:
Debian zealot griping - How dare Knoppix call itself a Debian distro when
Knoppix packages some closed software packages with its distro!
I don't usually reply to these things, but I felt much better after registering
for the service and letting the Debian guy know where he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Moffat wrote:
| Collins Richey wrote:
|
| Debian zealot griping - How dare Knoppix call itself a Debian distro
| when
| Knoppix packages some closed software packages with its distro!
|
| I don't usually reply to these things, but I felt much
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:03:06 -0600
Andrew Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Moffat wrote:
| Collins Richey wrote:
|
| Debian zealot griping - How dare Knoppix call itself a Debian distro
| when
| Knoppix packages some closed software
Quoth Collins Richey:
Hey, if you agree with me 50% of the time, you should definitely seek treatment
soonest grin. All kidding aside, I have difficulty playing with those who
have rigid opinions.
So, I'm guessing this means you don't play with yourself? ;-)
Kurt
--
An Englishman never
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:15:33 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Collins Richey:
Hey, if you agree with me 50% of the time, you should definitely seek
treatment soonest grin. All kidding aside, I have difficulty playing with
those who have rigid opinions.
So, I'm guessing
18 matches
Mail list logo
